The most powerful methane-fueled rocket engine ever built was not made by a century-old aerospace giant. It came from a private company that nearly went bankrupt in 2008 and now carries a $1.77 trillion valuation — SpaceX. Its name is Raptor 3, it produces approximately 280 tonnes-force (tf) of thrust at sea level, and it is one of the most thermodynamically efficient rocket engines ever to fly. It is also the core reason Starship and the Super Heavy booster can turn "fully reusable" from science fiction into engineering reality.
For aerospace enthusiasts, the Raptor engine represents the most significant propulsion breakthrough of the past decade. For investors preparing for SpaceX's Nasdaq debut on June 12, 2026, under ticker SPCX, Raptor is the hard-tech moat underpinning the company's $1.77 trillion valuation.
When Elon Musk first revealed Raptor 3's engineering data in August 2024, the entire aerospace industry recalibrated its understanding of what a methane engine could do. At approximately 280 tf of sea-level thrust, Raptor 3 stands alone at the top of the methalox category — ahead of every flying or in-development methane engine in the world.
But the raw thrust number is only the surface story. What truly defines Raptor 3 is how it produces that thrust:
Full-Flow Staged Combustion (FFSC). Historically, only three engines have ever flown with this architecture, and Raptor is the only one in active service today. FFSC pre-burns both fuel-rich and oxidizer-rich mixtures separately, then injects both hot gas streams together into the main combustion chamber, extracting nearly all the chemical energy in the propellants and converting it into thrust.
Approximately 350 bar of chamber pressure. That is roughly 50% higher than the Space Shuttle Main Engine (RS-25) at 207 bar — and the RS-25 has been considered the industrial benchmark for staged combustion for the past four decades.
Aggressive subtractive design. Raptor 3 eliminates the external secondary heat shielding, removes most of the external plumbing, and integrates lines and sensors directly into the engine body. According to public statements from Musk, Raptor 3 contains roughly half the parts of Raptor 2, has a lower dry mass, yet produces more thrust.
This is not iterative improvement. This is a ground-up redesign targeting "thousands of engines per year" production cadence — exactly the manufacturing throughput required to build a multiplanetary transportation network.
To understand why Raptor matters, you have to start with where SpaceX began. The SpaceX engine evolution is a deliberate trajectory: from a kerosene engine fighting for survival in 2006 to a full-flow staged combustion engine that defines an industry two decades later.
The Merlin engine was born of practical constraints. When SpaceX was founded in 2002, the company had limited capital and needed a propellant combination that was proven, manageable, and rapidly iterable. Kerosene (RP-1) plus liquid oxygen (LOX) was the obvious answer — easy to handle, backed by decades of Soviet-American engineering data, and storable at ambient temperatures.
The Merlin engine SpaceX story began with Merlin 1A, which first flew on Falcon 1 in 2006 with approximately 35 tf of thrust. The current operational variant, Merlin 1D, produces approximately 85 tf at sea level and powers the Falcon 9 first stage in a nine-engine "octaweb" configuration. SpaceX engineers have refined Merlin across more than a dozen sub-revisions, and its thrust-to-weight ratio remains among the highest of any operational rocket engine.
The SpaceX Merlin engine uses a gas generator cycle — simpler than staged combustion, less efficient, but reliable enough, cheap enough, and mass-producible enough to give SpaceX dominant share of the global commercial launch market. By 2025, Merlin had logged more successful orbital launches than any other operational rocket engine family.
There are no oil refineries on Mars. But the Martian atmosphere is rich in CO₂, and water ice exists beneath the surface — exactly the two ingredients needed to synthesize methane locally via the Sabatier reaction. For SpaceX's mission to make humanity multiplanetary, propellant choice was not preference — it was forced by the engineering reality of Mars: a rocket designed to refuel on Mars had to burn methane.
That single design constraint shaped Raptor's entire development. Beyond "Martian manufacturability," methane offers two additional advantages over kerosene: it burns cleaner, leaving almost no carbon residue and allowing engines to be reused rapidly without deep refurbishment; and it offers higher specific impulse, increasing payload capacity per launch.
The clearest way to understand the SpaceX engine evolution is to put both generations side by side. The differences are not subtle — they represent two fundamentally different eras of rocket engineering.
| Specification | Merlin 1D (Falcon 9) | Raptor 2 (Starship) | Raptor 3 (Latest) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Propellant | RP-1 (kerosene) + LOX | Liquid methane (CH₄) + LOX | Liquid methane (CH₄) + LOX |
| Power Cycle | Gas generator (open cycle) | Full-flow staged combustion (FFSC) | Full-flow staged combustion (FFSC) |
| Sea-Level Thrust | ~85 tf (845 kN) | ~230 tf (2,256 kN) | ~280 tf (2,746 kN) |
| Vacuum Thrust | ~95 tf (Merlin 1D Vac) | ~258 tf | ~306 tf |
| Specific Impulse (Sea Level) | ~282 s | ~327 s | ~350 s (target) |
| Chamber Pressure | ~97 bar | ~300 bar | ~350 bar |
| Dry Mass | ~470 kg | ~1,630 kg | ~1,525 kg (lighter) |
| Thrust-to-Weight Ratio | ~180:1 | ~143:1 | ~183:1 |
| First Flight | 2010 (Falcon 9 v1.0) | 2023 (Starship IFT-1) | 2025 (integrated flight) |
| Reusability Target | 10–20+ flights | Rapid reuse within hours | Rapid reuse within hours |
| Platform | Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy | Starship, Super Heavy | Starship, Super Heavy |
| Unit Cost (estimated) | ~$1M | <$1M | ~$250K target |
The jump in chamber pressure from Merlin's 97 bar to Raptor 3's 350 bar represents the single largest generational increase in operational rocket engine history. Higher chamber pressure means more thrust per kilogram of engine mass — and that single metric sits at the heart of the entire fully-reusable rocket design philosophy.
The SpaceX Super Heavy booster is the first stage of the Starship system, and it is the most powerful rocket stage ever built. At its base, it clusters 33 Raptor engines — 13 fixed inner engines surrounded by 20 outer engines, with three of those outer engines gimbaled for vectored thrust steering during ascent.
At liftoff, those 33 engines collectively produce approximately 7,590 tf of thrust — about 74.4 million newtons. For comparison:
The SpaceX Starship booster is not just the most powerful rocket stage in history — it is nearly twice as powerful as anything that came before it. More importantly, it is designed to fly back to the launch site, be caught mid-air by the mechanical arms of the "Mechazilla" launch tower, and be reloaded with propellant in hours rather than months.
That reusability rewrites the economics of orbit in a way traditional aerospace simply cannot match. The fully expendable Saturn V cost approximately $1.4 billion per launch in 2024 dollars — and was used once. Super Heavy is designed to fly hundreds of times. Once full reusability becomes routine, the gap in per-launch cost will be measured in orders of magnitude — which is exactly why SpaceX is simultaneously building moats across commercial launch, the Starlink constellation, and government defense contracts.
SpaceX's S-1 filing with the SEC, submitted on May 20, 2026, discloses approximately $3 billion in Starship-related R&D spending for 2025 alone — including investment in Raptor 3 development and manufacturing scale-up. That outlay is the largest single contributor to SpaceX's consolidated $4.9 billion net loss for 2025.
The bull case. Raptor 3's manufacturing efficiency, combined with Starship's full reusability, will ultimately drive per-kilogram cost-to-orbit below anything any competitor can match. This allows SpaceX not only to further compress the commercial launch market it has already captured through Falcon 9, but also to open markets that do not yet exist — orbital data centers, point-to-point Earth transit, lunar logistics, and ultimately Mars infrastructure. The Raptor engine is the enabling technology underneath all of it.
The bear case. Morningstar's discounted cash flow analysis puts SpaceX's fair value closer to $780 billion, well below the $1.75 trillion IPO target. Starship R&D is viewed as a significant drag on near-term profitability. Until Raptor 3 reaches its production targets and Starship achieves consistent commercial cargo cadence, the engine-level economics remain a forward-looking bet rather than a proven business case.
June 12, 2026 — when SPCX begins trading on Nasdaq — will be the first time public markets get to price this tradeoff in real time.
For traders looking to position ahead of SPCX's official Nasdaq listing — or to actively trade the volatility before and after launch — MEXC offers the SPCXSTOCK_USDT perpetual contract.
This is a perpetual futures contract that uses USDT stablecoin as margin and tracks SpaceX's enterprise valuation, with leveraged long and short exposure available. Unlike traditional stock markets, it trades 24/7 and is fully settled in USDT.
A few critical points every trader needs to understand before opening a position:
The SPCXSTOCK_USDT perpetual contract is not the same as owning SPCX stock. It does not confer equity ownership, voting rights, or dividend entitlements. It is a derivative instrument linked to SpaceX's valuation, designed for traders seeking directional exposure and leveraged positions — not a substitute for long-term equity holdings.
Risk factors include leverage liquidation, funding rate volatility, and the general high volatility characteristic of pre-listing derivative products. This contract is best suited for short-term traders, event-driven traders, and active derivatives users.
Trade SPCXSTOCK_USDT on MEXC →
What is the SpaceX Raptor engine?
Raptor is SpaceX's in-house developed full-flow staged combustion (FFSC) methane-liquid oxygen rocket engine, used to power both the Starship upper stage and the Super Heavy booster. It is currently the only operational FFSC flight engine in the world, with only three engines in history having ever flown using this cycle architecture.
How powerful is Raptor 3 compared to Merlin?
Raptor 3 produces approximately 280 tf of sea-level thrust versus Merlin 1D's roughly 85 tf — more than three times the per-engine thrust. Raptor 3 also operates at chamber pressures (~350 bar) approximately 3.6 times higher than Merlin (~97 bar), with significantly improved specific impulse, meaning more thrust per kilogram of propellant burned.
How many Raptor engines does the SpaceX Super Heavy booster use?
The SpaceX Super Heavy booster uses 33 Raptor engines — 13 fixed inner engines plus 20 outer engines, three of which are gimbaled for steering. Total liftoff thrust is approximately 7,590 tf, nearly double the Saturn V.
Why did SpaceX switch from kerosene to methane?
Methane can be synthesized on Mars via the Sabatier reaction, using CO₂ from the Martian atmosphere and water ice from the subsurface. Because SpaceX's mission is to make humanity multiplanetary, the engines transporting humans to Mars had to use a propellant that can be manufactured on Mars itself. Additionally, methane burns cleaner than kerosene, leaving almost no carbon residue and supporting rapid reusability.
Is the Merlin engine still in use?
Yes. The Merlin engine powers every Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy mission. According to SpaceX's S-1 filing with the SEC, these vehicles collectively accounted for approximately 90% of global commercial orbital launches in 2025. Merlin remains the core revenue engine for SpaceX today, while Raptor is the technology investment aimed at the future.
When does SPCX begin trading on Nasdaq?
According to SpaceX's amended S-1 filing, the target is to begin trading on Nasdaq under ticker SPCX on June 12, 2026, at a fixed IPO price of $135 per share.
Can I trade SpaceX exposure before June 12?
Yes. MEXC offers the SPCXSTOCK_USDT perpetual contract, which tracks SpaceX's enterprise value and allows traders to take leveraged long or short positions using USDT as margin, ahead of the official Nasdaq listing.
What is the difference between the SPCXSTOCK_USDT perpetual contract and SPCX stock?
The MEXC perpetual contract is a USDT-margined derivative tracking SpaceX's valuation — it does not represent equity ownership, voting rights, or dividend entitlements. SPCX stock, once listed, will represent actual equity in Space Exploration Technologies Corp. The perpetual contract is suited for short-term traders; SPCX stock is suited for long-term equity investors.
SpaceX's dominance in reusable rockets is not, at its core, a marketing story or a government contract story — it is an engine story. Merlin kept SpaceX commercially alive and went on to dominate the orbital launch market. Raptor — and Raptor 3 specifically — is the engine designed to take human civilization off this planet.
At 280 tf of thrust, with full-flow staged combustion and 350 bar of chamber pressure, Raptor 3 is no longer competing with other methane engines — it is defining the category. And when SPCX opens on Nasdaq on June 12, 2026, it will be the first time in 24 years that public market investors can participate in the company building it.
For traders looking to position around that event — or to express a view on SpaceX's valuation right now — the SPCXSTOCK_USDT perpetual contract on MEXC is one of the few liquid instruments offering pre-IPO directional exposure with USDT as margin.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Perpetual contracts involve significant risk, including leverage liquidation and full loss of principal. Conduct your own research before trading.

Key Takeaways Crypto capital gains in Argentina are taxed at a flat 15% rate, while crypto income is taxed at progressive rates of 5%–35%. Holding crypto is not taxed, but selling, trading, or earning

Key Takeaways Flat 15% Tax Rate: Individuals pay a consistent 15% tax only on realized gains (when converting crypto to fiat). No Tax on Swaps: Exchanging one cryptocurrency for another is not a taxab

Key Takeaways SpaceX reusable rockets fundamentally rewrote the economics of commercial spaceflight: On December 21, 2015, Falcon 9's first-stage booster completed the world's first orbital-class rock

The most powerful methane-fueled rocket engine ever built doesn't run on government funding or decades-old aerospace tradition. It runs on iteration speed. SpaceX's Raptor 3 — the third-generation met

Week 1 of June 2026Reporting Period: May 27–June 2, 2026Data Cutoff: June 2, 2026Key NarrativeOver the past week, macroeconomic data and institutional fund flows dominated market direction.On the macr