The post JST Technical Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction Volume Profile and MarketThe post JST Technical Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction Volume Profile and Market

JST Technical Analysis Jan 21

Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction

Volume Profile and Market Participation

JST’s 24-hour volume was realized at the 4.48 million dollar level. This volume indicates moderate participation during a period when the price recorded a 3.95% increase. When evaluating market participants’ conviction (determination), examining the volume profile is critically important. The volume profile shows how much trading occurred at specific price levels, revealing elements such as value area and point of control (POC – control point).

In the daily timeframe, JST’s volume profile shows a value area concentrated around $0.04. The POC level sits around approximately $0.0407, which overlaps with one of the recent supports (71/100 score). Compared to average volume (assuming the last 7-14 day average is in the 3-5M$ range), the current volume is slightly above but not explosive. This may not be sufficient for a healthy uptrend; as strong rises expect volume to be 50-100% higher. Market participation appears retail-heavy – large block trades are limited. If volume increase remains weak as price rises, it signals unsustainable momentum. Conversely, low volume during declines is a supportive sign.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

The accumulation phase is when big players (smart money) quietly buy, providing hidden clues in volume. The following signals support accumulation in JST: Price holding above EMA20 ($0.04) with low-volume consolidations observed. Particularly around the $0.0419 support (80/100), holding without volume increase is a classic accumulation pattern. RSI at 58.49 is neutral, no overbought – this suggests an environment where big players are building positions. In MTF context (1D/3D/1W), there are 12 strong levels and supports dominate in lower timeframes (1D: 3S/2R). Price rising without upward volume spikes increases the likelihood of stealth accumulation. In healthy accumulation, volume gradually increases on upticks and dries up on downticks – JST partially matches this.

Distribution Risks

Distribution, on the other hand, is the phase where big players sell to retail, evident through high volume participation + price resistance. Risks in JST are as follows: Supertrend bearish and $0.05 resistance strong. Volume does not sufficiently support the 3.95% rise – like a trap rally before healthy distribution. In higher timeframes, resistances dominate (3D:1S/3R, 1W:3S/5R), volume increase below POC could signal distribution. If $0.0434 (81/100) is not broken and volume divergence forms (price up, volume down), selling pressure may come. Attention: Resistance tests without sudden spikes above average volume raise fakeout risk.

Price-Volume Alignment

Does volume confirm price action? JST is in an uptrend (+3.95%) but volume is moderate – no full alignment. In a healthy rise, volume on up candles should be 1.5-2 times that of up candles; here it’s balanced. MACD histogram neutral at zero, RSI at 58 – no volume divergence but confirmation weak. Low volume in declines is bullish, high is bearish. In recent data, volume dried up on $0.0407 support tests – bullish confirmation. However, if volume increases at $0.0434 resistance, rejection expected. Unhealthy volume: Price up, volume down (momentum loss); JST shows a slight tendency. Educational note: Volume exposes price’s “lies” – rallies without spikes usually end in correction.

Big Player Activity

Big player (institutional) activities are detected through abnormal volume blocks and profile shapes. In JST, clear block trades are limited, but thick volume layers in the $0.04 value area – potential institutional rest. POC defense strong, a level smart money watches. No selling traces in upper tails (high-volume wicks) for distribution. Healthy pattern: Volume increase in low timeframe up moves, stability in higher TF. In JST, 1W resistances (5R) dominant, big players may be accumulating short positions – not definitive, pattern-based only. No retail frenzy (RSI neutral), implying institutional dominance. Watch: Sudden 2-3x volume spikes as reversal signals.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at $88,959 with -4.09% drop bearish (Supertrend bearish), dominance rising – caution for altcoins. JST shows relative strength against BTC (+3.95 vs BTC down), decoupling in early stage. If BTC cannot break $88,531 resistance ($88,259 support), selling wave may hit JST. Key BTC levels: Support break at $88,259/$86,637 leads to alt dump; above $90,873 resistance gives JST breathing room. Assuming correlation ~0.7-0.8, BTC downtrend limits JST uptrend – volume may weaken with BTC divergence. Details in JST Spot Analysis and JST Futures Analysis.

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume-based outlook: Short-term bullish bias ($0.0419-$0.0434 range), accumulation signals dominate but wait for confirmation. Bull target $0.0539 (low score, requires volume spike); bear $0.0306 if volume increases at resistance. Strategy: Long if holds above $0.0407 POC, short on volume down divergence. Overall: Stay cautious until volume confirms price – healthy uptrend needs 6-7M$+ volume. This analysis emphasizes what volume tells beyond price: Participation determines conviction.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/jst-volume-analysis-january-21-2026-accumulation-or-distribution

Market Opportunity
JUST Logo
JUST Price(JST)
$0.04488
$0.04488$0.04488
-0.44%
USD
JUST (JST) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump ally drops bombshell claim GOP 'deliberately' sabotaging him with impeachment plot

Trump ally drops bombshell claim GOP 'deliberately' sabotaging him with impeachment plot

Right-wing conspiracy theorist and activist Laura Loomer unleashed a bombshell claim Friday night that members of the Republican Party are intentionally tanking
Share
Rawstory2026/01/24 09:35
IBM Qiskit v2.3 Adds C API Expansion for Quantum-HPC Integration

IBM Qiskit v2.3 Adds C API Expansion for Quantum-HPC Integration

The post IBM Qiskit v2.3 Adds C API Expansion for Quantum-HPC Integration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Joerg Hiller Jan 23, 2026 18:06 IBM releases
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/24 09:31
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40