Paradex, a decentralized perpetual futures exchange, is back in the headlines after it announced that one of its integrations, the Mithril trading bot, was involvedParadex, a decentralized perpetual futures exchange, is back in the headlines after it announced that one of its integrations, the Mithril trading bot, was involved

Paradex integration hacked as Mithril trading bot subkeys compromised

Paradex, a decentralized perpetual futures exchange, is back in the headlines after it announced that one of its integrations, the Mithril trading bot, was involved in a security compromise. 

The latest news comes days after it initiated a major chain rollback prompted by a serious technical glitch. 

The previous incident was not caused by an exploit, but this most recent one, which was announced on January 21, has been linked to a hacker.  

What happened to the Mithril trading bot?

According to the official post from the Paradex team, an attacker gained access to Mithril’s internal systems, which led to approximately 57 user subkeys getting compromised. 

Subkeys are known as limited-permission keys that take trades on behalf of a user; however, they don’t have the ability to withdraw funds from your account and are commonly used by third-party applications and bots.

The team has acted promptly in response to the compromise. They have paused all XP transfers and promised to re-enable them shortly, and have also revoked all subkeys linked with Mithril trading accounts. 

Only users who had their accounts connected to the trading bots were potentially affected by this exploit, the team has claimed. 

The team ended the post by pointing out that anyone who grants a subkey to any third-party bot, app, or platform is effectively trusting their security practices to protect their respective accounts. 

“Paradex cannot control or audit how external services store and secure your keys. Before connecting to any third-party service, consider the risks and only grant permissions to platforms you trust,” the team wrote on X. 

Those are carefully chosen words and could be seen as the team shifting responsibility to users and the third-party provider rather than fully owning any potential partnership shortcomings. 

Technical glitch forced Paradex to initiate a chain rollback 

A couple of days before this attack, on January 19, 2026, Paradex suffered a serious technical glitch during what was described as a scheduled maintenance. The glitch was caused by a faulty database migration, which caused the platform to erroneously price assets at $0, shocking many of the traders, especially those who had open positions. 

It triggered through an automated liquidation engine, resulting in mass forced closures of leveraged positions across the Perps exchange. The error went beyond mere UI display issues, as several other services were reported down before the team intervened. 

To fix the problem, the team proposed a chain rollback, and even though there was some resistance, they went ahead with it, rolling the blockchain back to an earlier verified state. This effectively reversed the problematic transactions and halted trading for some hours. 

On X, the team reassured community members and users that funds were mostly safe and the platform was able to return to normal after the recovery. One day later, the team announced that it had completed a review of accounts impacted by the incident and had refunded all users who were incorrectly liquidated (primarily related to PAXG). 

In total, $650,000 was reportedly distributed across 200 accounts, and since then, Gigavault deposits and withdrawals have resumed. 

“Tickets related to these refunds will be closed automatically. All other tickets will be reviewed and addressed over the next few days,” the team wrote on X, thanking users for their patience.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Market Opportunity
Hyperbot Logo
Hyperbot Price(BOT)
$0.003437
$0.003437$0.003437
-8.17%
USD
Hyperbot (BOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
ZKP Crypto Presale Auction: 8,000x Returns Slipping Away with Each Burned Coin

ZKP Crypto Presale Auction: 8,000x Returns Slipping Away with Each Burned Coin

Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) operates a 450-day crypto ICO, burning unsold coins each day. Supply drops through phases, plus a strong deflationary design might create
Share
coinlineup2026/01/23 01:00