PANews reported on September 20th that Curve ecosystem contributor haowi.eth posted on the X platform: "Recently, Onekey and its founder Wang Lei (also known as yishi) issued a joint statement accusing them of making false statements about me regarding the so-called Resupply vulnerability incident. This incident triggered a series of personal attacks and false accusations. This matter has nothing to do with any DeFi project or industry risk. I deny the joint statement issued publicly by Onekey and Wang Lei and their subsequent remarks. There is no point in making statements without basis or evidence. I have not been subject to legal sanctions in any country. Any statement should be based on irrefutable facts. I reserve all rights and will act according to my judgment. As a member and investor of the Curve community, I have expressed my views and facts to defend the legitimate rights and interests of myself and other investors. I will actively pursue legal means to protect my rights and will not tolerate any malicious defamation or personal attacks." haowi.eth stated that Yishi and 3D had previously tweeted that Curve was to blame for the losses in Resupply’s insurance pool, and had made many irresponsible remarks. He refuted the relevant remarks one by one, and then received a lawyer’s letter two days ago.PANews reported on September 20th that Curve ecosystem contributor haowi.eth posted on the X platform: "Recently, Onekey and its founder Wang Lei (also known as yishi) issued a joint statement accusing them of making false statements about me regarding the so-called Resupply vulnerability incident. This incident triggered a series of personal attacks and false accusations. This matter has nothing to do with any DeFi project or industry risk. I deny the joint statement issued publicly by Onekey and Wang Lei and their subsequent remarks. There is no point in making statements without basis or evidence. I have not been subject to legal sanctions in any country. Any statement should be based on irrefutable facts. I reserve all rights and will act according to my judgment. As a member and investor of the Curve community, I have expressed my views and facts to defend the legitimate rights and interests of myself and other investors. I will actively pursue legal means to protect my rights and will not tolerate any malicious defamation or personal attacks." haowi.eth stated that Yishi and 3D had previously tweeted that Curve was to blame for the losses in Resupply’s insurance pool, and had made many irresponsible remarks. He refuted the relevant remarks one by one, and then received a lawyer’s letter two days ago.
Curve ecosystem contributor haowi.eth claims to have received a lawyer's letter and denies the joint statement publicly released by Onekey and Wang Lei.
PANews reported on September 20th that Curve ecosystem contributor haowi.eth posted on the X platform: "Recently, Onekey and its founder Wang Lei (also known as yishi) issued a joint statement accusing them of making false statements about me regarding the so-called Resupply vulnerability incident. This incident triggered a series of personal attacks and false accusations. This matter has nothing to do with any DeFi project or industry risk. I deny the joint statement issued publicly by Onekey and Wang Lei and their subsequent remarks. There is no point in making statements without basis or evidence. I have not been subject to legal sanctions in any country. Any statement should be based on irrefutable facts. I reserve all rights and will act according to my judgment. As a member and investor of the Curve community, I have expressed my views and facts to defend the legitimate rights and interests of myself and other investors. I will actively pursue legal means to protect my rights and will not tolerate any malicious defamation or personal attacks."
haowi.eth stated that Yishi and 3D had previously tweeted that Curve was to blame for the losses in Resupply’s insurance pool, and had made many irresponsible remarks. He refuted the relevant remarks one by one, and then received a lawyer’s letter two days ago.
Market Opportunity
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000457
$0.000457$0.000457
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For
The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush. Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs. Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record
The post ‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline “Sinners” shattered a 75-year-old record
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:34
‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years
The post ‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Return to Silent Hil Return to Silent Hil
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:19