RippleX is developing ZKP integration to enable privacy, scalability, and safer interoperability to the XRPL without disrupting speed. ZKP will facilitate programmableRippleX is developing ZKP integration to enable privacy, scalability, and safer interoperability to the XRPL without disrupting speed. ZKP will facilitate programmable

Ripple Advances Zero-Knowledge Proofs on XRPL to Unlock Privacy and Scalability

  • RippleX is developing ZKP integration to enable privacy, scalability, and safer interoperability to the XRPL without disrupting speed.
  • ZKP will facilitate programmable privacy, minimize cross-chain interoperability, and scale to Layer-2, creating new opportunities to developers and institutions.

Ripple is proceeding with its intention to deploy zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) technology to the XRP Ledger, and the research is now in the prototyping stage. This is part of an effort by Ripple, through its developer-facing team, RippleX, to make XRPL more private, scalable, and interoperable without altering its underlying design as a fast, efficient settlement layer.

Aanchal Malhotra, the Head of Research at RippleX, confirmed in a recent episode of the Onchain Economy video series that facilitating zero-knowledge proofs is a high-priority goal. The team is developing a hybrid architecture to bring together ZK features specific to the architecture of XRPL, which was developed in advance of the emergence of modern ZK systems.

Zero-knowledge proofs allow users to prove that something is true without the source data. This allows selective disclosure; that is, the user can release only the information that they need, such as proving that they are over 18, without stating their specific age. 

RippleX is designing a custom approach instead of using off-the-shelf ZK solutions, as XRPL, which, as we reported, has already seen an upgrade to 3.0.0, was created before ZKP technology was widely available.

Ripple’s Plan: Selective Privacy, Trustless Bridges, and Layer-2 Scaling

RippleX is taking a hybrid route, combining native ZK functions for performance with a programmable layer for developer flexibility. This lets builders choose the best proving systems for their needs. According to Malhotra, the goal is not complete but programmable privacy, where users or institutions can selectively reveal details for compliance while keeping other information private.

Trust-minimized interoperability is another benefit. Most cross-chain bridges today depend on trusted third parties. This trust becomes substitutable with cryptographic proofs with the help of ZKPs, and the operations of bridges become safer and more verifiable. RippleX considers this to be the key to scaling multi-chain activity without compromising security.

Off-chain computation, with zero-knowledge proofs, is also supported, which allows XRPL to scale with Layer-2 systems. The developer can execute complicated calculations on these secondary layers and transfer tiny and verifiable proofs to XRPL. This decreases the workload on the main chain and leaves it with its core business of settlement and verification.

In a post on X, one XRP user has praised Aanchal Malhotra and her work on ZKPs, and the importance of this technology to the future of the XRP Ledger. He stated:

Meanwhile, Malhotra has described scalability as a multidimensional challenge. In her view, ZKPs solve this by allowing Layer-2s to execute heavy workloads while Layer-1 simply verifies proofs. This design brings higher throughput without overburdening XRPL’s base layer.

As detailed by CNF, Ripple recently demonstrated XRPL institutional-grade infrastructure at Davos 2026 as a further development of its global financial adoption. In the meantime, XRP has seen a dip in the last 7 days, falling by over 7%. At press time, XRP price was trading at $1.92, a 2.8% decline in the past day.

]]>
Market Opportunity
zkPass Logo
zkPass Price(ZKP)
$0.1172
$0.1172$0.1172
-0.76%
USD
zkPass (ZKP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UNI Technical Analysis Jan 22

UNI Technical Analysis Jan 22

The post UNI Technical Analysis Jan 22 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. UNI is trading at the $4.82 level with a %3.92 drop intraday. While the primary downtrend
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 06:45
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Pi Coin Price Prediction: Critical Support Level is Being Tested – Long-Term Setup Could Surprise Everyone

Pi Coin Price Prediction: Critical Support Level is Being Tested – Long-Term Setup Could Surprise Everyone

The Pi Coin price prediction has become much more bullish today, after the alt bounced strongly off a key support level.
Share
Coinstats2026/01/23 06:44