In 2024, several countries were so hard up economically that their GDP growth was really low, like Italy’s 0.7%, Japan’s 0.1% and Germany’s -0.2%, which was an In 2024, several countries were so hard up economically that their GDP growth was really low, like Italy’s 0.7%, Japan’s 0.1% and Germany’s -0.2%, which was an

Emotion, not reason, behind plunder raps vs Recto in PhilHealth fund transfer

In 2024, several countries were so hard up economically that their GDP growth was really low, like Italy’s 0.7%, Japan’s 0.1% and Germany’s -0.2%, which was an economic contraction. Other Asian countries were growing at below 5%, like Singapore’s 4.4%, Taiwan’s 4.3%, Thailand and Hong Kong’s 2.5%, and South Korea’s 2%.

But the Philippines grew by 5.7%, the third highest growth among the world’s top 50 large economies by GDP size, trailing only Vietnam and India.

Our inflation rate also fell, from 6% in 2023 to only 3.2% in 2024, and further down to only 1.6% in 2025 (see the table).

The outstanding performance of the Philippines was led by the economic team including former Finance Secretary Ralph G. Recto. President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. saw Mr. Recto’s hard work at the Department of Finance (DoF) so he promoted him to be his Executive Secretary last November.

Then out came the brickbats. See these reports in BusinessWorld: “Plunder, other raps filed vs Recto, Ledesma over PhilHealth fund transfer” (Dec. 22, 2025), “Fresh plunder complaint filed against Recto, Ledesma over PhilHealth fund transfer” (Jan. 15).

I think these cases can be considered “emotional misconduct” by the petitioners, who used the Supreme Court ruling on the Philippine Health Insurance Corp. (PhilHealth) fund transfer but did not read the arguments of the Justices who said that there was no plunder, no malversation of funds, no misconduct on the part of Mr. Recto. As per Justice Raul B. Villanueva:

“As previously discussed, and further explained herein, Special Provision 1(d) and DoF Circular No. 003-2024 are not unconstitutional….

“Crucially as well, the requisite elements, among others, for both technical malversation or plunder are not present. For plunder, the core element of amassing or acquiring ill-gotten wealth is completely negated as the PhilHealth fund balance was actually remitted to the National Treasury, and to no one else, particularly not even to the Office of the President or the DoF. As to technical malversation, a key element is that the questioned funds was placed ‘under (the offender’s) administration,’ which is not what happened in the case of the PhilHealth fund balance since what was transferred to the National Treasury was not directly handled by the President or the DoF Secretary….

“Secretary Recto cannot be held liable for issuing DoF Circular No. 003-2024… The DoF was directed to issue DoF Circular No. 003-2024 as required in Special Provision 1(d). In doing so, it precisely obeyed a special provision in the 2024 GAA. Clearly, the DoF did not act solely on its own or issued the subject circular without any basis or authority at all. The language of Special Provision 1(d) is unequivocal; the DoF has the duty to issue the guidelines to implement the said provision within 15 days from the effectivity of the 2024 GAA. For its obedience, no fault can or should be attributed to the DoF…

“To hold Secretary Recto liable in any way whatsoever is like punishing him for simply doing his job. If he did not comply with the valid dictates of Special Provision 1(d), then he may possibly become culpable of violating the law, which would have made his situation even worse.”

Justice Raul Villanueva was my contemporary at the University of the Philippines (UP) School of Economics undergrad in the mid-1980s. We belong to the same organization, UP Economics Towards Consciousness (UP-ETC), along with Justice Marvic Leonen, though they are respectively younger and older than me by one year. Justice Villanueva was an intelligent economics student, then proceeded to UP Law. His arguments in the excerpt above are consistent with his high academic achievements and objective assessment.

The petitioners used emotion and not reason, and intellectual dishonesty when they filed their plunder case against Mr. Recto. The man has worked hard to improve the Philippines’ economy. Let him do more hard work for the country and not be harassed by emotional litigation.

Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr. is the president of Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr. Research Consultancy Services, and Minimal Government Thinkers. He is an international fellow of the Tholos Foundation.

minimalgovernment@gmail.com

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.02196
$0.02196$0.02196
+0.36%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

MAXI DOGE Holders Diversify into $GGs for Fast-Growth 2025 Crypto Presale Opportunities

MAXI DOGE Holders Diversify into $GGs for Fast-Growth 2025 Crypto Presale Opportunities

Presale crypto tokens have become some of the most active areas in Web3, offering early access to projects that blend culture, finance, and technology. Investors are constantly searching for the best crypto presale to buy right now, comparing new token presales across different niches. MAXI DOGE has gained attention for its meme-driven energy, but early [...] The post MAXI DOGE Holders Diversify into $GGs for Fast-Growth 2025 Crypto Presale Opportunities appeared first on Blockonomi.
Share
Blockonomi2025/09/18 00:00
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52
Bank of Canada cuts rate to 2.5% as tariffs and weak hiring hit economy

Bank of Canada cuts rate to 2.5% as tariffs and weak hiring hit economy

The Bank of Canada lowered its overnight rate to 2.5% on Wednesday, responding to mounting economic damage from US tariffs and a slowdown in hiring. The quarter-point cut was the first since March and met predictions from markets and economists. Governor Tiff Macklem, speaking in Ottawa, said the decision was unanimous. “With a weaker economy […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/17 23:09