WLFI Rolls Out Phased Unlock and Burn Plan Amid Growing Scrutiny

The Trump-family-backed project proposes locking 62 billion tokens under new vesting terms and burning 4.5 billion days after using its own tokens as collateral for a $75 million loan triggered investor fury.

The proposal

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the DeFi project backed by the Trump family, has put a sweeping governance proposal to its community. 

It targets 62.28 billion currently locked WLFI tokens and introduces multi-year vesting schedules across two stakeholder groups.

Early backers who purchased WLFI at $0.015 or $0.05 in presale hold roughly 17 billion locked tokens. 

Under the proposal, they would move to a two-year cliff followed by two years of linear vesting. No burn would apply to this group. 

Unlocks would not begin until at least early 2028, extending past January 2029, when Donald Trump’s second presidential term ends.

Founders, team members, advisers, and partners hold a combined 45.24 billion tokens. Their terms are stricter. 

Opting in requires accepting an immediate 10% burn of their allocation of roughly 4.52 billion tokens destroyed on-chain followed by a two-year cliff and three-year linear vest on the remainder. 

Any insider who declines remains locked indefinitely but keeps governance rights.

“This is the least favorable unlock term in this proposal and is subject to a mandatory burn upon opt-in.” — World Liberty Financial, official X post

Why now

The timing is hard to separate from recent controversy. 

Just days before the proposal was published, CoinDesk reported that WLFI had used 5 billion of its own tokens as collateral on Dolomite, a lending protocol co-founded by WLFI’s own CTO to borrow $75 million in stablecoins. 

The tokens dropped 12% to a record low the following day.

Critics drew comparisons to past DeFi failures involving self-collateralization by founders. 

WLFI dismissed concerns, saying its lending position was not at risk of liquidation and that it would post more collateral if the token’s price fell further. 

The project acknowledged that WLFI is now central to how it funds itself and manages community expectations.

Adding to the pressure, the project acknowledged a governance participation problem. 

Across six previous votes, between 2.7 billion and 11.1 billion tokens cast ballots, leaving the majority of locked supply inactive. 

The new proposal forces a choice: accept long vesting or remain locked with no liquidity path.

The Justin Sun feud

The most explosive dimension of the controversy involves Tron founder Justin Sun, once WLFI’s largest external backer after a $30 million investment in late 2024. 

In a detailed post on X on April 13, Sun accused WLFI of embedding a hidden backdoor blacklisting function in its token smart contract, one that can freeze, restrict, or effectively seize any holder’s assets without community consent.

Sun described himself as “the first and single largest victim,” pointing to his wallet, which has been frozen since September 2025 reportedly after he transferred around $9 million in WLFI tokens. 

His holdings, estimated at 545 million tokens, have lost over $80 million in value since the freeze, tracking WLFI’s broader decline.

Reports indicate the original token contract launched in September 2024 had no blacklisting feature. 

A blacklist function was added in August 2025, almost a year after Sun’s initial investment, just before trading began. 

A second upgrade in November introduced a “batch reallocation” mechanism, which WLFI framed as a tool for recovering stolen or compromised funds.

“This isn’t voting; it’s coercion… the outcome was decided before the vote even started.” — Justin Sun, post on X, April 15, 2026

WLFI responded by calling Sun’s claims “baseless allegations” and accused him of “playing the victim” to cover misconduct. 

It argued the blacklist is a “Regulatory Compliance Module” required under the 2025 CLARITY Act to block sanctioned entities. The project’s legal team threatened a defamation lawsuit, responding publicly: “See you in court.” 

Sun replied by demanding the anonymous team members identify themselves publicly.

Regarding the new unlock proposal specifically, Sun called it “one of the most absurd governance scams” he had seen, labelling the project “World Tyranny.” 

He alleged that holders who vote against the proposal risk being locked indefinitely, making the vote structurally coercive. 

He also alleged that his holdings, representing roughly 4% of voting power, had been frozen ahead of the vote.

Governance concentration concerns

Data cited in coverage of previous votes shows signs of extreme concentration. 

A March 2026 staking vote passed with 99.12% approval, but over 76% of participating tokens came from just 10 wallets. 

WLFI requires a 180-day stake to participate in governance, a rule that critics say entrenches insiders and early whales.

The new proposal requires a quorum of 1 billion WLFI with a simple majority to pass. Voting runs for seven days. 

The team framed the proposal as an effort to “align long-term incentives and address concerns about supply overhang.”

Market reaction

WLFI’s token climbed around 7% to roughly $0.084 in the hours after the proposal was published, a pattern consistent with past rallies around burn announcements in other tokens. 

The token remains more than 75% below its all-time high of approximately $0.33, reached shortly after trading launched in September 2025.

Current market data puts WLFI’s circulating supply at around 32 billion tokens and its market capitalisation near $2.6 billion. 

The project had spent $65.6 million on open-market buybacks over six months prior to the proposal, acquiring tokens at an average well above current prices.