A new investigation by prominent on-chain analyst ZachXBT has exposed what could be one of the most serious insider-related crypto security breaches involving UA new investigation by prominent on-chain analyst ZachXBT has exposed what could be one of the most serious insider-related crypto security breaches involving U

ZachXBT Alleges $40 Million Crypto Theft From U.S. Government Wallets

2026/01/26 00:57

A new investigation by prominent on-chain analyst ZachXBT has exposed what could be one of the most serious insider-related crypto security breaches involving U.S. government-controlled wallets.

According to the findings, an individual identified as John Daghita is accused of siphoning over $40 million in various cryptocurrencies from digital wallets managed on behalf of the U.S. government. These wallets reportedly held seized assets tied to criminal investigations, funds meant to be securely stored under federal custody.

ZachXBT’s on-chain tracing reveals that the assets were not taken in a single transaction but drained gradually over several months, suggesting deliberate planning rather than a technical exploit. The stolen crypto was then routed through decentralized protocols and privacy mixers in anju apparent effort to conceal the money trail.

The full investigation was publicly detailed by ZachXBT in a thread shared here:

The revelations are now fueling serious concerns about how seized digital assets are being managed and protected by government contractors.

Family Connection Raises Insider Access Concerns

What makes the case especially alarming is the alleged family link to the firm responsible for safeguarding the seized funds.

ZachXBT reports that John Daghita is the son of the CEO of Cyber Management & Digital Security Services (CMDSS), a cybersecurity company that recently secured a federal contract involving digital asset custody.

CMDSS is not a peripheral service provider. The firm plays a direct role in managing and securing cryptocurrencies confiscated by U.S. authorities during criminal seizures. This places the company in control of wallets holding millions of dollars across multiple blockchains.

The relationship has sparked widespread concern that the alleged theft may not have resulted from hacking in the traditional sense, but rather from insider access, one of the most difficult security risks to prevent.

While no official confirmation has yet emerged from federal agencies, the connection alone has intensified calls for greater oversight in government crypto custody.

Federal Contract Put CMDSS At The Center Of Asset Custody

CMDSS was awarded a high-profile contract to assist the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) in managing and disposing of seized and forfeited crypto assets.

The responsibilities reportedly include:

• Securing government-controlled wallets

• Managing transfers and liquidations

• Handling custody infrastructure

• Supporting digital asset forfeiture processes

In effect, CMDSS acts as a technical custodian for cryptocurrency confiscated during law enforcement operations.

These wallets may contain assets recovered from major hacks, fraud schemes, darknet marketplaces, and ransomware cases, making them highly sensitive targets.

The scale of funds under custody means even a small breach could lead to massive losses, placing extraordinary trust in the systems and personnel controlling access.

Alleged Systematic Draining And Laundering Operation

According to ZachXBT’s blockchain analysis, the theft unfolded slowly rather than through a sudden exploit.

The funds were allegedly:

• Removed in stages across months

• Moved through decentralized exchanges

• Routed via cross-chain bridges

• Laundered using privacy mixers and protocols

This pattern is consistent with techniques used by sophisticated threat actors to reduce traceability and avoid triggering automated monitoring systems.

ZachXBT claims transaction flows directly connect government seizure wallets to addresses controlled by Daghita, forming a consistent and traceable pattern of unauthorized withdrawals.

The gradual nature of the transfers suggests a calculated operation rather than an accidental exposure of private keys.

Unclear How Access Was Obtained

One of the most critical unanswered questions remains how John Daghita gained control over wallets holding government assets.

What is currently known:

• His father owns CMDSS

• CMDSS holds an active government IT contract in Virginia

• The company assists in managing seized crypto for the USMS

What remains unclear:

• Whether access was granted intentionally

• Whether internal security protocols failed

• Whether credentials were shared or compromised

• Whether proper multi-signature systems were in place

So far, no public explanation has been issued by CMDSS or U.S. authorities.

This lack of clarity has only intensified scrutiny around contractor oversight and internal security practices.

A Wake-Up Call For Government Crypto Security

If confirmed, the incident would represent one of the largest alleged insider crypto thefts tied to government-held funds.

It also highlights a growing challenge as law enforcement agencies accumulate massive crypto reserves through seizures.

Unlike traditional bank assets, cryptocurrencies rely entirely on private key security. Anyone with access can move funds instantly, with no central authority able to reverse transactions.

As governments increasingly outsource custody to private firms, risks expand to include:

• Insider abuse

• Weak access controls

• Poor audit systems

• Lack of real-time monitoring

• Human security failures

The case may push agencies to accelerate adoption of:

• Multi-signature custody wallets

• Segmented access permissions

• Independent security audits

• Continuous on-chain surveillance

For the crypto industry, it reinforces a long-standing reality: custody remains the weakest link in digital finance.

Even the most secure blockchain becomes vulnerable when access control breaks down.

As investigations continue, this case could become a turning point for how seized digital assets are managed worldwide, forcing tighter controls, greater transparency, and stronger accountability across both government agencies and private contractors.

For now, the blockchain evidence uncovered by ZachXBT has already sparked a serious conversation about insider risk in the era of government crypto custody, one likely to shape policy long after the dust settles.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs

Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs

The post Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold surged over the $5,500-per-ounce milestone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/31 01:48
Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40