Author: FinTax Frequent industry fluctuations: How crypto mining companies cope with challenges The crypto mining industry in 2025 seems to be completely different from before. In 2021, mainland China completely banned crypto mining activities, forcing a large number of mining machines to relocate, and the global computing power landscape suddenly changed; In 2022, Ethereum completed its transition from PoW to PoS, marking the end of the traditional mining model for one of the largest public chains; In 2024, Bitcoin will be halved, mining profitability will be tightened, and profit margins will be compressed year-on-year. Faced with multiple challenges from policies, technology, and the market, crypto mining companies are forced to accelerate their transformation and seek new paths to survival and growth. To this end, crypto mining companies have made various external attempts: upgrading ASIC hardware to pursue higher computing efficiency; rebranding and expanding their business, transforming their identity from "miners" to "digital infrastructure providers" to enter the AI and high-performance computing markets; accessing capital markets and issuing computing power derivatives to enhance financing capabilities and stabilize returns; and signing long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) and introducing cooling and operations optimization technologies to cope with energy pressures. Meanwhile, mining pools are continuously innovating in computing power allocation mechanisms, settlement transparency, and derivatives services to maintain their user base and cope with increasingly fierce competition. While these transformations have undoubtedly effectively mitigated the impact of external risks, they cannot change the fact that the external environment remains fraught with uncertainty. Policies can change overnight, and energy and cryptocurrency prices are subject to constant fluctuations. At this time, it may be helpful to shift some of the focus from external factors to internal factors, exploring internal growth potential. In particular, by optimizing internal financial and accounting management capabilities and strengthening compliance and transparency, mining companies and mining pools can build their own defenses amidst the fierce external competition, solidify their current operations, and lay a solid foundation for earning the long-term trust of the capital market. Overview of the pain points of financial accounting management for mining companies and mining pools In reality, most crypto mining companies and mining pools face several thorny issues in their internal accounting management, such as: Distorted profit accounting: While computing power output is distributed across multiple mining pools and accounts, costs such as electricity, depreciation, and site operations and maintenance are spread across different entities, making it difficult to match each transaction. The result is that while profits appear to be growing, the true gross and net profit margins are unclear, leaving companies with a lack of basis for decision-making. Cross-border financial fragmentation: As computing power migrates to North America, Central Asia, the Middle East, and other regions, accounting standards vary across jurisdictions, leaving accounts scattered across various subsidiaries. Consolidating financial statements is time-consuming and labor-intensive, and prone to inconsistent reporting. This makes it difficult for management to present a unified and credible financial report when facing external financing or regulatory scrutiny. Disconnect between business and finance: In mining pools, operational systems are responsible for recording hashrate allocation and user settlements, but financial systems often rely on manual import or Excel processing. Data delays and information asymmetry often lead to a disconnect between actual on-chain revenue and reported financial figures, impacting both internal management and external trust. Compliance and audit pressures: With stricter tax compliance, companies are required to provide a complete and traceable chain of evidence for transactions. However, in reality, crypto mining companies often lack audit-friendly accounting systems, making it difficult to quickly prove asset ownership and cost bases. This can easily challenge a company's credibility and financing capabilities when dealing with regulators or the capital market. A disconnect between management and strategy: Crypto mining companies tend to focus on expanding computing power and negotiating energy prices, while internal value management is often relegated to a "back-office situation." This leads to finance teams constantly struggling with reconciliations and reporting, preventing them from aligning their strategies and establishing long-term transparency and credibility in the capital markets. Building a compliance moat by optimizing internal financial and accounting management Faced with volatile external environments, crypto mining companies and mining pools will struggle to truly seize the initiative if they rely solely on computing power expansion or business transformation. To navigate these cycles, crypto mining companies and mining pools should consider establishing a more compliant and sustainable accounting management system. The core of this system is to ensure the authenticity, timeliness, and comprehensiveness of accounting data, ensuring that it truly reflects operational results, mitigating compliance risks while providing management with a reliable basis for decision-making. First, profits need to be visible. Through automated data collection and reconciliation, companies can track computing power output and revenue on a transaction-by-transaction basis, accurately matching these with costs such as electricity, depreciation, and operations and maintenance. This results in verifiable gross and net profit margins, no longer based on rough estimates, providing a solid foundation for strategic decision-making. Without comprehensive accounting across different jurisdictions, entities, and currencies, a complete financial picture is difficult to form, hindering management's ability to respond promptly and accurately to financing, audit, and regulatory requirements. At the same time, the integration of business and finance is also key to improving management efficiency. Mining pool operations, such as hashrate allocation, user settlements, and fund flows, often lag and are prone to distortion if they rely entirely on manual processing. Linking these events with financial data in real time will significantly reduce reconciliation costs, improve information transparency, and help earn the trust of partners and the capital market. Furthermore, increasing compliance and audit requirements necessitate that companies be able to provide a traceable chain of evidence. Any missing link, from original transactions to complete reporting, presents potential risks. Audit-friendly accounting systems, however, can better prepare companies for financial disclosures, tax audits, and capital market due diligence. Ultimately, through automation and systematization, finance teams can be freed from tedious tasks like reconciliation and reporting, allowing them to focus on matters that create higher value for the company, thereby transforming the finance function from a "record-keeper" to a "growth enabler."Author: FinTax Frequent industry fluctuations: How crypto mining companies cope with challenges The crypto mining industry in 2025 seems to be completely different from before. In 2021, mainland China completely banned crypto mining activities, forcing a large number of mining machines to relocate, and the global computing power landscape suddenly changed; In 2022, Ethereum completed its transition from PoW to PoS, marking the end of the traditional mining model for one of the largest public chains; In 2024, Bitcoin will be halved, mining profitability will be tightened, and profit margins will be compressed year-on-year. Faced with multiple challenges from policies, technology, and the market, crypto mining companies are forced to accelerate their transformation and seek new paths to survival and growth. To this end, crypto mining companies have made various external attempts: upgrading ASIC hardware to pursue higher computing efficiency; rebranding and expanding their business, transforming their identity from "miners" to "digital infrastructure providers" to enter the AI and high-performance computing markets; accessing capital markets and issuing computing power derivatives to enhance financing capabilities and stabilize returns; and signing long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) and introducing cooling and operations optimization technologies to cope with energy pressures. Meanwhile, mining pools are continuously innovating in computing power allocation mechanisms, settlement transparency, and derivatives services to maintain their user base and cope with increasingly fierce competition. While these transformations have undoubtedly effectively mitigated the impact of external risks, they cannot change the fact that the external environment remains fraught with uncertainty. Policies can change overnight, and energy and cryptocurrency prices are subject to constant fluctuations. At this time, it may be helpful to shift some of the focus from external factors to internal factors, exploring internal growth potential. In particular, by optimizing internal financial and accounting management capabilities and strengthening compliance and transparency, mining companies and mining pools can build their own defenses amidst the fierce external competition, solidify their current operations, and lay a solid foundation for earning the long-term trust of the capital market. Overview of the pain points of financial accounting management for mining companies and mining pools In reality, most crypto mining companies and mining pools face several thorny issues in their internal accounting management, such as: Distorted profit accounting: While computing power output is distributed across multiple mining pools and accounts, costs such as electricity, depreciation, and site operations and maintenance are spread across different entities, making it difficult to match each transaction. The result is that while profits appear to be growing, the true gross and net profit margins are unclear, leaving companies with a lack of basis for decision-making. Cross-border financial fragmentation: As computing power migrates to North America, Central Asia, the Middle East, and other regions, accounting standards vary across jurisdictions, leaving accounts scattered across various subsidiaries. Consolidating financial statements is time-consuming and labor-intensive, and prone to inconsistent reporting. This makes it difficult for management to present a unified and credible financial report when facing external financing or regulatory scrutiny. Disconnect between business and finance: In mining pools, operational systems are responsible for recording hashrate allocation and user settlements, but financial systems often rely on manual import or Excel processing. Data delays and information asymmetry often lead to a disconnect between actual on-chain revenue and reported financial figures, impacting both internal management and external trust. Compliance and audit pressures: With stricter tax compliance, companies are required to provide a complete and traceable chain of evidence for transactions. However, in reality, crypto mining companies often lack audit-friendly accounting systems, making it difficult to quickly prove asset ownership and cost bases. This can easily challenge a company's credibility and financing capabilities when dealing with regulators or the capital market. A disconnect between management and strategy: Crypto mining companies tend to focus on expanding computing power and negotiating energy prices, while internal value management is often relegated to a "back-office situation." This leads to finance teams constantly struggling with reconciliations and reporting, preventing them from aligning their strategies and establishing long-term transparency and credibility in the capital markets. Building a compliance moat by optimizing internal financial and accounting management Faced with volatile external environments, crypto mining companies and mining pools will struggle to truly seize the initiative if they rely solely on computing power expansion or business transformation. To navigate these cycles, crypto mining companies and mining pools should consider establishing a more compliant and sustainable accounting management system. The core of this system is to ensure the authenticity, timeliness, and comprehensiveness of accounting data, ensuring that it truly reflects operational results, mitigating compliance risks while providing management with a reliable basis for decision-making. First, profits need to be visible. Through automated data collection and reconciliation, companies can track computing power output and revenue on a transaction-by-transaction basis, accurately matching these with costs such as electricity, depreciation, and operations and maintenance. This results in verifiable gross and net profit margins, no longer based on rough estimates, providing a solid foundation for strategic decision-making. Without comprehensive accounting across different jurisdictions, entities, and currencies, a complete financial picture is difficult to form, hindering management's ability to respond promptly and accurately to financing, audit, and regulatory requirements. At the same time, the integration of business and finance is also key to improving management efficiency. Mining pool operations, such as hashrate allocation, user settlements, and fund flows, often lag and are prone to distortion if they rely entirely on manual processing. Linking these events with financial data in real time will significantly reduce reconciliation costs, improve information transparency, and help earn the trust of partners and the capital market. Furthermore, increasing compliance and audit requirements necessitate that companies be able to provide a traceable chain of evidence. Any missing link, from original transactions to complete reporting, presents potential risks. Audit-friendly accounting systems, however, can better prepare companies for financial disclosures, tax audits, and capital market due diligence. Ultimately, through automation and systematization, finance teams can be freed from tedious tasks like reconciliation and reporting, allowing them to focus on matters that create higher value for the company, thereby transforming the finance function from a "record-keeper" to a "growth enabler."

The golden age of computing power has arrived. What is the moat of crypto mining companies?

2025/09/18 12:00

Author: FinTax

Frequent industry fluctuations: How crypto mining companies cope with challenges

The crypto mining industry in 2025 seems to be completely different from before.

In 2021, mainland China completely banned crypto mining activities, forcing a large number of mining machines to relocate, and the global computing power landscape suddenly changed;

In 2022, Ethereum completed its transition from PoW to PoS, marking the end of the traditional mining model for one of the largest public chains;

In 2024, Bitcoin will be halved, mining profitability will be tightened, and profit margins will be compressed year-on-year.

Faced with multiple challenges from policies, technology, and the market, crypto mining companies are forced to accelerate their transformation and seek new paths to survival and growth. To this end, crypto mining companies have made various external attempts: upgrading ASIC hardware to pursue higher computing efficiency; rebranding and expanding their business, transforming their identity from "miners" to "digital infrastructure providers" to enter the AI and high-performance computing markets; accessing capital markets and issuing computing power derivatives to enhance financing capabilities and stabilize returns; and signing long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) and introducing cooling and operations optimization technologies to cope with energy pressures. Meanwhile, mining pools are continuously innovating in computing power allocation mechanisms, settlement transparency, and derivatives services to maintain their user base and cope with increasingly fierce competition.

While these transformations have undoubtedly effectively mitigated the impact of external risks, they cannot change the fact that the external environment remains fraught with uncertainty. Policies can change overnight, and energy and cryptocurrency prices are subject to constant fluctuations. At this time, it may be helpful to shift some of the focus from external factors to internal factors, exploring internal growth potential. In particular, by optimizing internal financial and accounting management capabilities and strengthening compliance and transparency, mining companies and mining pools can build their own defenses amidst the fierce external competition, solidify their current operations, and lay a solid foundation for earning the long-term trust of the capital market.

Overview of the pain points of financial accounting management for mining companies and mining pools

In reality, most crypto mining companies and mining pools face several thorny issues in their internal accounting management, such as:

Distorted profit accounting: While computing power output is distributed across multiple mining pools and accounts, costs such as electricity, depreciation, and site operations and maintenance are spread across different entities, making it difficult to match each transaction. The result is that while profits appear to be growing, the true gross and net profit margins are unclear, leaving companies with a lack of basis for decision-making.

Cross-border financial fragmentation: As computing power migrates to North America, Central Asia, the Middle East, and other regions, accounting standards vary across jurisdictions, leaving accounts scattered across various subsidiaries. Consolidating financial statements is time-consuming and labor-intensive, and prone to inconsistent reporting. This makes it difficult for management to present a unified and credible financial report when facing external financing or regulatory scrutiny.

Disconnect between business and finance: In mining pools, operational systems are responsible for recording hashrate allocation and user settlements, but financial systems often rely on manual import or Excel processing. Data delays and information asymmetry often lead to a disconnect between actual on-chain revenue and reported financial figures, impacting both internal management and external trust.

Compliance and audit pressures: With stricter tax compliance, companies are required to provide a complete and traceable chain of evidence for transactions. However, in reality, crypto mining companies often lack audit-friendly accounting systems, making it difficult to quickly prove asset ownership and cost bases. This can easily challenge a company's credibility and financing capabilities when dealing with regulators or the capital market.

A disconnect between management and strategy: Crypto mining companies tend to focus on expanding computing power and negotiating energy prices, while internal value management is often relegated to a "back-office situation." This leads to finance teams constantly struggling with reconciliations and reporting, preventing them from aligning their strategies and establishing long-term transparency and credibility in the capital markets.

Building a compliance moat by optimizing internal financial and accounting management

Faced with volatile external environments, crypto mining companies and mining pools will struggle to truly seize the initiative if they rely solely on computing power expansion or business transformation. To navigate these cycles, crypto mining companies and mining pools should consider establishing a more compliant and sustainable accounting management system. The core of this system is to ensure the authenticity, timeliness, and comprehensiveness of accounting data, ensuring that it truly reflects operational results, mitigating compliance risks while providing management with a reliable basis for decision-making.

First, profits need to be visible. Through automated data collection and reconciliation, companies can track computing power output and revenue on a transaction-by-transaction basis, accurately matching these with costs such as electricity, depreciation, and operations and maintenance. This results in verifiable gross and net profit margins, no longer based on rough estimates, providing a solid foundation for strategic decision-making. Without comprehensive accounting across different jurisdictions, entities, and currencies, a complete financial picture is difficult to form, hindering management's ability to respond promptly and accurately to financing, audit, and regulatory requirements.

At the same time, the integration of business and finance is also key to improving management efficiency. Mining pool operations, such as hashrate allocation, user settlements, and fund flows, often lag and are prone to distortion if they rely entirely on manual processing. Linking these events with financial data in real time will significantly reduce reconciliation costs, improve information transparency, and help earn the trust of partners and the capital market.

Furthermore, increasing compliance and audit requirements necessitate that companies be able to provide a traceable chain of evidence. Any missing link, from original transactions to complete reporting, presents potential risks. Audit-friendly accounting systems, however, can better prepare companies for financial disclosures, tax audits, and capital market due diligence. Ultimately, through automation and systematization, finance teams can be freed from tedious tasks like reconciliation and reporting, allowing them to focus on matters that create higher value for the company, thereby transforming the finance function from a "record-keeper" to a "growth enabler."

Market Opportunity
RealLink Logo
RealLink Price(REAL)
$0.07334
$0.07334$0.07334
+0.82%
USD
RealLink (REAL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40
transcosmos helping Chinese lingerie brand LING LINGERIE’s full-fledged entry into Japan

transcosmos helping Chinese lingerie brand LING LINGERIE’s full-fledged entry into Japan

Executing strategies to help LING LINGERIE, a Chinese brand meeting Gen Z needs, boost awareness TOKYO, Jan. 23, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — transcosmos today announced
Share
AI Journal2026/01/23 19:30
UBS Crypto Trading: The Bold Move That Could Reshape Private Banking in 2025

UBS Crypto Trading: The Bold Move That Could Reshape Private Banking in 2025

BitcoinWorld UBS Crypto Trading: The Bold Move That Could Reshape Private Banking in 2025 In a landmark development for the financial world, Swiss banking titan
Share
bitcoinworld2026/01/23 19:25