Near Protocol has spent the past year expanding its sharding network, turning performance into its main calling card. Developer milestones released through 2025 show activity rising across Nightshade shards as new tools bring external assets into the Near environment. Cross-chain integration has become the sector’s defining race, and every major project is now looking for […]Near Protocol has spent the past year expanding its sharding network, turning performance into its main calling card. Developer milestones released through 2025 show activity rising across Nightshade shards as new tools bring external assets into the Near environment. Cross-chain integration has become the sector’s defining race, and every major project is now looking for […]

Near Protocol Neighbors XRP Tundra’s Cross-Chain Arctic Ecosystem

2025/10/15 20:00

Near Protocol has spent the past year expanding its sharding network, turning performance into its main calling card. Developer milestones released through 2025 show activity rising across Nightshade shards as new tools bring external assets into the Near environment. Cross-chain integration has become the sector’s defining race, and every major project is now looking for the most efficient way to move liquidity between networks.

XRP Tundra approaches the same challenge from another direction. Instead of scaling a single chain through shards, it links two existing ecosystems—the XRP Ledger and Solana—through an audited framework designed for interoperability. Where Near widens its base layer, Tundra builds bridges between ledgers already proven at scale.

Near’s Sharded Expansion Gains Ground

Near’s Nightshade design splits transaction processing across multiple shards, allowing the network to run operations in parallel. Each shard acts as a lightweight blockchain, coordinated by a single validator set. The upgrade to Phase 2 allowed automatic resharding, meaning active areas of the network can divide further as demand rises without halting operations.

NEAR’s performance milestones are public record: the core team reported 600 ms block times and roughly 1.2 s finalityin May 2025, and confirmed nine shards live on mainnet in August. These updates restored Near to the center of scalability discussions among Layer-1 developers.

The project’s focus now extends beyond speed — it aims to serve as an access layer for assets from Ethereum, Solana, and other chains through its Rainbow Bridge. The strategy works within Near’s own environment. The limitation is that every asset crossing through its bridge must eventually conform to Near’s contract standards. That design still centralizes finality within one chain, even as execution becomes more distributed.

XRP Tundra’s GlacierChain: Linking Ledgers, Not Shards

XRP Tundra is taking the opposite route. Instead of expanding one blockchain, it connects two with complementary strengths. Solana processes transactions at scale, averaging over 50 000 per second in live conditions. The XRP Ledger delivers near-instant settlement with deterministic finality and transparent state verification.

The next stage, GlacierChain, will function as a Layer-2 bridge between them. It will allow users to move liquidity across networks without wrapping tokens or leaving the audited perimeter of either ledger. The system is being developed to handle both governance signals and transaction data, using XRPL’s validator consensus to anchor results.

This design treats interoperability as infrastructure rather than feature. Each layer retains its native advantages — Solana’s speed and XRPL’s settlement assurance — while the bridge manages confirmation logic in real time. The architecture avoids the bottlenecks that come with scaling a single network under heavy load.

Dual-Token Structure Keeps Functions Clear

The two-token model is central to how Tundra handles cross-chain coordination. TUNDRA-S, operating on Solana, is the utility and yield token powering liquidity pools, staking rewards, and transaction flow. TUNDRA-X, on the XRP Ledger, governs protocol parameters, reserves, and future Layer-2 proposals.

By separating these roles, Tundra removes a major pain point visible in other ecosystems. Governance votes, staking returns, and market liquidity no longer compete for the same token supply. It’s a model designed for composability: one token builds, the other decides.

This structure also reduces exposure to congestion. When Solana traffic spikes, governance remains unaffected on XRPL. When governance proposals activate on the XRPL side, execution speed on Solana continues uninterrupted. The result is an operational division that favors continuity over theoretical maximum throughput.

Verified Infrastructure for Interoperable Finance

Audits remain the foundation of that continuity. XRP Tundra’s codebase has been reviewed by Cyberscope, Solidproof, and FreshCoins. Team identity verification was completed through Vital Block, confirming the transparency standard that underpins every phase of the project.

Independent coverage on Crypto Volt’s channel described Tundra’s architecture as cross-chain done from the ledger level, emphasizing how the audits allow verifiable performance across different networks. In an industry still recovering from bridge exploits and unaudited interoperability experiments, that level of disclosure has become a competitive advantage.

The audit process extends to token economics as well. Each presale round is reviewed before the next begins, creating a timestamped record of contract integrity. This practice gives investors a way to track compliance across every component of the ecosystem.

Presale Growth Reflects Structural Confidence

The numbers behind that framework have continued to grow. XRP Tundra’s Phase 6 presale has raised more than $1.2 million from 11,600+ participants. TUNDRA-S sells at $0.1 with a 14% bonus, while TUNDRA-X carries a reference price of $0.05. Listing values are fixed at $2.5 and $1.25 respectively, giving the project a measurable, pre-audited upside.

Because presale mechanics and audits are synchronized, later buyers enter under the same verified structure as early ones. That consistency stands in contrast to networks where token distribution adjusts on demand or liquidity events trigger price resets.

Tundra’s cross-chain model isn’t trying to replicate Near’s sharding. It’s addressing the same performance challenge with different tools — linking independent ledgers under an auditable framework rather than splitting one chain into fragments.

Follow Tundra’s bridge build-out as XRPL and Solana converge:

Website: https://www.xrptundra.com/
Medium: https://medium.com/@xrptundra
Telegram: https://t.me/xrptundra
X: https://x.com/Xrptundra

Contact: Tim Fénix — contact@xrptundra.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Canada Canadian Portfolio Investment in Foreign Securities rose from previous $9.04B to $17.41B in July

Canada Canadian Portfolio Investment in Foreign Securities rose from previous $9.04B to $17.41B in July

The post Canada Canadian Portfolio Investment in Foreign Securities rose from previous $9.04B to $17.41B in July appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:38
Why BONK’s weekly trend remains deeply bearish despite price rise

Why BONK’s weekly trend remains deeply bearish despite price rise

The post Why BONK’s weekly trend remains deeply bearish despite price rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bonk saw a 5.55% rally in the past 24 hours, but CoinMarketCap data showed that its daily trading volume has fallen by nearly 10% at the time of writing. These gains could be driven partly due to the Solana [SOL] launchpad Bonk.fun news that 51% of the fees would be used to buy back BONK, up from the existing 10%. BONK sinks below long-term support Source: BONK/USDT on TradingView Bonk’s [BONK] weekly chart showed a strong downtrend in progress. The $0.0000096 support, which stretched back to early 2024, was being retested as resistance. Two weeks ago, a weekly trading session closed below this support. The OBV was also in a downtrend with the price, and the RSI’s reading of 36 showed strong bearish momentum. Overall, it was a place where the bulls needed to make a last stand. As things stand, the buyers lack the conviction to reverse the trend. Source: BONK/USDT on TradingView On the 4-hour chart, there seemed to be a bit of hope for BONK bulls. A range formation (purple) between $0.00000846 and $0.0000105 has halted the downtrend over the past three weeks. At the same time, the OBV trended higher, while the RSI oscillated between bullish and bearish momentum. It was a sign that there was buying pressure in recent days. Despite this hopeful development, it would be extremely difficult for the bulls to overturn the long-term downtrend. The loss of $0.0000096 as support, just below the psychological $0.00001 level, was a big blow to bullish sentiment. The bullish BONK case The rising OBV hinted at a potential, albeit unlikely, BONK trend reversal. A breakout past $0.0000105 and a retest of the range high as support would be a buy signal. To the north, the next target would be $0.0000135. Traders call to action — Respect…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 05:02