Across the crypto market, a strange pattern has captured traders’ attention. Filecoin (FIL), Storj, Arweave (AR), and Internet Computer (ICP) have been pumping in near lockstep, defying the expectation that decentralized infrastructure adoption occurs independently. On closer inspection, this isn’t organic growth. It appears to be a calculated rotation of capital, an orchestrated liquidity cycle posing as momentum. Over the past week, ICP rallied by 240% in just 6 days, while FIL nearly tripled. To the untrained eye, this might signal new adoption or institutional interest. But under the surface, it looks more like a synchronized exit. Smart money often enters these narratives early, fuels social chatter, and then quietly distributes to latecomers chasing “the next breakout.” As one chart cools off, another lights up, creating the illusion of continuous sector-wide strength. In reality, the same capital simply flows from one token to another. These infrastructure tokens share a common narrative: decentralized storage and computation as the backbone for AI and Web3. Retail traders are drawn to the idea of “AI infrastructure on blockchain,” but the price behavior suggests coordinated movements rather than varied market confidence. When one starts dumping, they all follow, a telltale sign of rotational liquidity rather than fundamental expansion. The current phase looks like the distribution stage. Early buyers have secured massive returns, and now attention is being redirected toward slower-moving assets under the same “old coin squeeze” storyline. This is classic market playbook behavior: create momentum, draw in volume, exit into strength, and leave traders holding consolidation bags. If the rotation pattern continues, the next phase will likely see profits from ICP and FIL channeled into smaller-cap extensions of the same narrative. Traders chasing late entries risk being caught on the wrong side of an infrastructure hype cycle that has already been fully priced in by institutional actors weeks ago. Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this storyAcross the crypto market, a strange pattern has captured traders’ attention. Filecoin (FIL), Storj, Arweave (AR), and Internet Computer (ICP) have been pumping in near lockstep, defying the expectation that decentralized infrastructure adoption occurs independently. On closer inspection, this isn’t organic growth. It appears to be a calculated rotation of capital, an orchestrated liquidity cycle posing as momentum. Over the past week, ICP rallied by 240% in just 6 days, while FIL nearly tripled. To the untrained eye, this might signal new adoption or institutional interest. But under the surface, it looks more like a synchronized exit. Smart money often enters these narratives early, fuels social chatter, and then quietly distributes to latecomers chasing “the next breakout.” As one chart cools off, another lights up, creating the illusion of continuous sector-wide strength. In reality, the same capital simply flows from one token to another. These infrastructure tokens share a common narrative: decentralized storage and computation as the backbone for AI and Web3. Retail traders are drawn to the idea of “AI infrastructure on blockchain,” but the price behavior suggests coordinated movements rather than varied market confidence. When one starts dumping, they all follow, a telltale sign of rotational liquidity rather than fundamental expansion. The current phase looks like the distribution stage. Early buyers have secured massive returns, and now attention is being redirected toward slower-moving assets under the same “old coin squeeze” storyline. This is classic market playbook behavior: create momentum, draw in volume, exit into strength, and leave traders holding consolidation bags. If the rotation pattern continues, the next phase will likely see profits from ICP and FIL channeled into smaller-cap extensions of the same narrative. Traders chasing late entries risk being caught on the wrong side of an infrastructure hype cycle that has already been fully priced in by institutional actors weeks ago. Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story

Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem

2025/11/14 19:06

Across the crypto market, a strange pattern has captured traders’ attention. Filecoin (FIL), Storj, Arweave (AR), and Internet Computer (ICP) have been pumping in near lockstep, defying the expectation that decentralized infrastructure adoption occurs independently. On closer inspection, this isn’t organic growth. It appears to be a calculated rotation of capital, an orchestrated liquidity cycle posing as momentum.

Over the past week, ICP rallied by 240% in just 6 days, while FIL nearly tripled. To the untrained eye, this might signal new adoption or institutional interest. But under the surface, it looks more like a synchronized exit. Smart money often enters these narratives early, fuels social chatter, and then quietly distributes to latecomers chasing “the next breakout.” As one chart cools off, another lights up, creating the illusion of continuous sector-wide strength. In reality, the same capital simply flows from one token to another.

These infrastructure tokens share a common narrative: decentralized storage and computation as the backbone for AI and Web3. Retail traders are drawn to the idea of “AI infrastructure on blockchain,” but the price behavior suggests coordinated movements rather than varied market confidence. When one starts dumping, they all follow, a telltale sign of rotational liquidity rather than fundamental expansion.

The current phase looks like the distribution stage. Early buyers have secured massive returns, and now attention is being redirected toward slower-moving assets under the same “old coin squeeze” storyline. This is classic market playbook behavior: create momentum, draw in volume, exit into strength, and leave traders holding consolidation bags.

If the rotation pattern continues, the next phase will likely see profits from ICP and FIL channeled into smaller-cap extensions of the same narrative. Traders chasing late entries risk being caught on the wrong side of an infrastructure hype cycle that has already been fully priced in by institutional actors weeks ago.


Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token

Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token

The post Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Largest Bank in Spain Launches Crypto Service: Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token Sign Up for Our Newsletter! For updates and exclusive offers enter your email. Leah is a British journalist with a BA in Journalism, Media, and Communications and nearly a decade of content writing experience. Over the last four years, her focus has primarily been on Web3 technologies, driven by her genuine enthusiasm for decentralization and the latest technological advancements. She has contributed to leading crypto and NFT publications – Cointelegraph, Coinbound, Crypto News, NFT Plazas, Bitcolumnist, Techreport, and NFT Lately – which has elevated her to a senior role in crypto journalism. Whether crafting breaking news or in-depth reviews, she strives to engage her readers with the latest insights and information. Her articles often span the hottest cryptos, exchanges, and evolving regulations. As part of her ploy to attract crypto newbies into Web3, she explains even the most complex topics in an easily understandable and engaging way. Further underscoring her dynamic journalism background, she has written for various sectors, including software testing (TEST Magazine), travel (Travel Off Path), and music (Mixmag). When she’s not deep into a crypto rabbit hole, she’s probably island-hopping (with the Galapagos and Hainan being her go-to’s). Or perhaps sketching chalk pencil drawings while listening to the Pixies, her all-time favorite band. This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Center or Cookie Policy. I Agree Source: https://bitcoinist.com/banco-santander-and-snorter-token-crypto-services/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:45
How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

The post How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 13: Participants hold signs in support of TikTok outside the U.S. Capitol Building on March 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) Getty Images From President Trump’s first ban attempt to a near-blackout earlier this year, TikTok’s five-year roller coaster ride looks like it’s finally slowing down now that Trump has unveiled a deal framework to keep the ByteDance app alive in the U.S. A look back at the saga around TikTok starting in 2020, however, shows just how close the app came to being shut out of the US – how it narrowly averted a ban and forced sale that found rare bipartisan backing in Washington. Recapping TikTok’s dramatic five-year battle When I interviewed Brendan Carr back in 2022, for example, the future FCC chairman was already certain at that point that TikTok’s days were numbered. For a litany of perceived sins — everything from the too-cozy relationship of the app’s parent company with China’s ruling regime to the app’s repeated floating of user privacy — Carr was already convinced, at least during his conversation with me, that: “The tide is going out on TikTok.” It was, in fact, one of the few issues that Washington lawmakers seemed to agree on. Even then-President Biden was on board, having resurrected Trump’s aborted TikTok ban from his first term and signed it into law. “It feels different now than it did two years ago at the end of the Trump administration, when concerns were first raised,” Carr told me then, in August of 2022. “I think, like a lot of things in the Trump era, people sort of picked sides on the issue based on the fact that it was Trump.” One thing led to another, though, and it looked like Carr was probably…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:29