Aleo insists that institutions will never be fully secure on-chain until they turn to private settlement rails.Aleo insists that institutions will never be fully secure on-chain until they turn to private settlement rails.

Why Stablecoin Privacy Matters for Institutional On-chain Security, According to Aleo

2025/11/17 02:05

As the institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies, particularly the stablecoin sector, expands, the need for privacy settlement is becoming increasingly important. A Privacy Gap Report from the layer-1 zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) privacy blockchain Aleo has highlighted the challenges that could stem from the persistent lack of privacy.

According to the report, the lack of privacy in institutional stablecoin transactions has created a major disconnect in today’s blockchain economy. Aleo explained that such a development exposes institutions to competitors, third parties, and bad actors.

The Stablecoin Privacy Gap

Aleo believes that privacy is the missing piece of stablecoin adoption. Stablecoin activity has climbed to new highs, recording nearly $1.25 trillion in transaction volume by last month.

On a year-over-year basis, custodian transactions have recorded a 256% growth, with Copper and Ceffu controlling 75.7% of the flows. Each firm is responsible for $107.85 billion and $106.47 billion, respectively. Labeled market-making entities, such as Wintermute, have averaged $50.8 billion in monthly volume over the last 24 months. Last month, labeled institutional flows hit $68.94 billion, with Wintermute alone accounting for 67.2% of labeled fund flows and 73,000 daily transactions.

Even government transfers are visible. Aleo tracked a U.S. enforcement-related transaction of $225.5 million in June 2025, as well as at least $320 million in transfers in that month.

As stablecoin usage goes mainstream, the adoption of privacy infrastructure is barely beginning. Only 0.0013% (approximately $624.4 million) of $1.25 trillion institutional flows used any form of privacy settlement last month. This indicates that institutions are executing high-value transfers on fully transparent chains. They are exposing their movement patterns and trading strategies in real time.

The Threat and Solution

Currently, institutional behaviour and counterparties are visible to external observers. These transparent rails allow competitors and third parties to map flows, liquidity patterns, and relationships.

Market makers can be surveilled for inventory levels, tracking client flows, and checking rebalancing schedules. This affects at least nine million unique USD Coin (USDC) addresses. Most stablecoin custodian flows occur on Ethereum, and Aleo says observation is easiest on this network. This exposes client strategies.

Additionally, transactions executed by over-the-counter desks reveal price discovery information that should be confidential. Bad actors exploit this data to front-run trades and manipulate markets.

The team behind the ZKPs privacy network believes that institutions need to embrace privacy infrastructure to remain safe on-chain. With compliant privacy-preserving rails already emerging, the industry could witness a 2-5% (representing $1 billion-$2.5 billion) shift into private settlement soon.

The post Why Stablecoin Privacy Matters for Institutional On-chain Security, According to Aleo appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

The post Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is making another attempt to break the downtrend that has kept the crypto king capped since late October. Price is hovering near $91,000 as investors watch a rare shift in market structure unfold.  For the first time in more than two and a half years, short-term holders have surpassed long-term holders in realized profits, creating both opportunities and risks for BTC. Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin Sees Some Shift The MVRV Long/Short Difference highlights a notable change in Bitcoin’s profit distribution. A positive reading usually signals long-term holders hold more unrealized gains, while a negative value indicates short-term holders are ahead. In Bitcoin’s case, the difference has dipped into negative territory for the first time since March 2023. This marks 30 months since short-term holders last led in profits. Such dominance raises concerns because short-term holders tend to sell aggressively when volatility increases. Their profit-taking behavior could add pressure on BTC’s price if the broader market weakens, especially during attempts to break the downtrend. Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. Bitcoin MVRV Long/Short Difference. Source: Santiment Sponsored Sponsored Despite this shift, Bitcoin’s broader momentum shows encouraging signs. Exchange net position change data confirms rising outflows across major platforms, signaling a shift in investor accumulation. BTC leaving exchanges is often treated as a bullish indicator, reflecting confidence in long-term appreciation. This trend suggests that many traders view the $90,000 range as a reasonable bottom zone and are preparing for a potential recovery. Sustained outflows support price stability and strengthen the probability of BTC breaking above immediate resistance levels. Bitcoin Exchange Net Position Change. Source: Glassnode BTC Price Is Trying Its Best Bitcoin is trading at $91,330 at the time of writing, positioned just below the $91,521 resistance. Reclaiming this level and flipping it into support…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 05:57
OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

The post OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The successful stock market debut of Moore Threads, a company that’s being touted as China’s answer to Nvidia, has been overshadowed by resurfaced allegations that link one of its co-founders to an unpaid cryptocurrency debt that has been lingering for roughly a decade. Shares in the GPU maker skyrocketed to as much as 470% on Thursday following its initial public offering (IPO) on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, valuing the company at around RMB 282 billion ($39.9 billion). However, as the success was being celebrated online, a social media post revived claims that Moore Threads’ co-founder Li Feng borrowed 1,500 Bitcoins from Mingxing “Star” Xu, founder and CEO of cryptocurrency exchange OKX, and never repaid the loan. Crypto past with OKX founder resurfaces In an X post, AB Kuai.Dong referenced Feng’s involvement in a 2017 initial coin offering that raised 5,000 ETH alongside controversial angel investor Xue Manzi. Feng allegedly dismissed the Bitcoin loan, stating, “It was just that Xu Mingxing’s investment in me had failed.” Xu responded to the post with a conciliatory message, writing, “People cannot always remain in the shadow of negative history. Face the future and contribute more positive energy.” He added, “Let the legal system handle the debt issue,” and offered blessings to every entrepreneur. Feng reportedly partnered with Xue Manzi and Li Xiaolai in 2017 to launch Malego Coin, which was later renamed Alpaca Coin MGD. The project reportedly raised approximately 5,000 ETH, but it was around this period that China banned ICOs, allowing regulators to crack down on what they viewed as speculative excess and potential fraud in the cryptocurrency sector. The Bitcoin loan dispute appears separate from the ICO controversy. According to sources familiar with the matter, the original loan agreement was dated December 17, 2014, with an expiry of December 16, 2016.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 06:13