PANews reported on November 23 that Port3 Network released an incident report on its X platform regarding a hacking attack. Port3 Network stated that it used NEXA Network's cross-chain token solution, CATERC20. However, CATERC20 has a boundary condition verification vulnerability. After token ownership was relinquished, the function returned a value of 0, which happens to match the ownership verification condition. Therefore, the ownership check failed, making unauthorized access possible. This issue was not mentioned in the CATERC20 audit report. Because Port3 tokens had previously relinquished ownership to achieve greater decentralization, they were in this vulnerable state.PANews reported on November 23 that Port3 Network released an incident report on its X platform regarding a hacking attack. Port3 Network stated that it used NEXA Network's cross-chain token solution, CATERC20. However, CATERC20 has a boundary condition verification vulnerability. After token ownership was relinquished, the function returned a value of 0, which happens to match the ownership verification condition. Therefore, the ownership check failed, making unauthorized access possible. This issue was not mentioned in the CATERC20 audit report. Because Port3 tokens had previously relinquished ownership to achieve greater decentralization, they were in this vulnerable state.

Port3 Network: Attacked due to a boundary condition verification vulnerability in its cross-chain token solution CATERC20.

2025/11/23 14:02

PANews reported on November 23 that Port3 Network released an incident report on its X platform regarding a hacking attack. Port3 Network stated that it used NEXA Network's cross-chain token solution, CATERC20. However, CATERC20 has a boundary condition verification vulnerability. After token ownership was relinquished, the function returned a value of 0, which happens to match the ownership verification condition. Therefore, the ownership check failed, making unauthorized access possible. This issue was not mentioned in the CATERC20 audit report. Because Port3 tokens had previously relinquished ownership to achieve greater decentralization, they were in this vulnerable state.

Market Opportunity
CROSS Logo
CROSS Price(CROSS)
$0.12544
$0.12544$0.12544
-0.46%
USD
CROSS (CROSS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record

‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record

The post ‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline “Sinners” shattered a 75-year-old record
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:34
‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years

‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years

The post ‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Return to Silent Hil Return to Silent Hil
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:19