The post Malicious worm compromises crypto domains in supply-chain attack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Nov. 24, security firm Aikido detected a second wave of the Shai-Hulud self-replicating npm worm, compromising 492 packages with a combined 132 million monthly downloads. The attack struck major ecosystems, including AsyncAPI, PostHog, Postman, Zapier, and ENS, exploiting the final weeks before npm’s Dec. 9 deadline to revoke legacy authentication tokens. Aikido’s triage queue flagged the intrusion around 3:16 AM UTC, as malicious versions of AsyncAPI’s go-template and 36 related packages began spreading across the registry. The attacker labeled stolen-credential repositories with the description “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming,” maintaining theatrical branding from the September campaign. The worm installs the Bun runtime during package setup, then executes malicious code that searches developer environments for exposed secrets using TruffleHog. Compromised API keys, GitHub tokens, and npm credentials are published to randomly named public repositories, and the malware attempts to propagate by pushing new infected versions to up to 100 additional packages, five times the scale of the September attack. Technical evolution and destructive payload The November iteration introduces several modifications from the September attack.The malware now creates repositories with randomly generated names for stolen data rather than using hardcoded names, complicating takedown efforts. Setup code installs Bun via setup_bun.js before executing the primary payload in bun_environment.js, which contains the worm logic and credential-exfiltration routines. The most destructive addition: if the malware cannot authenticate with GitHub or npm using stolen credentials, it wipes all files in the user’s home directory. Aikido’s analysis revealed execution errors that limited the attack’s spread. The bundling code that copies the full worm into new packages sometimes fails to include bun_environment.js, leaving only the Bun installation script without the malicious payload. Despite these failures, the initial compromises hit high-value targets with massive downstream exposure. AsyncAPI packages dominated the first wave, with 36 compromised releases including @asyncapi/cli, @asyncapi/parser,… The post Malicious worm compromises crypto domains in supply-chain attack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Nov. 24, security firm Aikido detected a second wave of the Shai-Hulud self-replicating npm worm, compromising 492 packages with a combined 132 million monthly downloads. The attack struck major ecosystems, including AsyncAPI, PostHog, Postman, Zapier, and ENS, exploiting the final weeks before npm’s Dec. 9 deadline to revoke legacy authentication tokens. Aikido’s triage queue flagged the intrusion around 3:16 AM UTC, as malicious versions of AsyncAPI’s go-template and 36 related packages began spreading across the registry. The attacker labeled stolen-credential repositories with the description “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming,” maintaining theatrical branding from the September campaign. The worm installs the Bun runtime during package setup, then executes malicious code that searches developer environments for exposed secrets using TruffleHog. Compromised API keys, GitHub tokens, and npm credentials are published to randomly named public repositories, and the malware attempts to propagate by pushing new infected versions to up to 100 additional packages, five times the scale of the September attack. Technical evolution and destructive payload The November iteration introduces several modifications from the September attack.The malware now creates repositories with randomly generated names for stolen data rather than using hardcoded names, complicating takedown efforts. Setup code installs Bun via setup_bun.js before executing the primary payload in bun_environment.js, which contains the worm logic and credential-exfiltration routines. The most destructive addition: if the malware cannot authenticate with GitHub or npm using stolen credentials, it wipes all files in the user’s home directory. Aikido’s analysis revealed execution errors that limited the attack’s spread. The bundling code that copies the full worm into new packages sometimes fails to include bun_environment.js, leaving only the Bun installation script without the malicious payload. Despite these failures, the initial compromises hit high-value targets with massive downstream exposure. AsyncAPI packages dominated the first wave, with 36 compromised releases including @asyncapi/cli, @asyncapi/parser,…

Malicious worm compromises crypto domains in supply-chain attack

2025/11/25 20:29

On Nov. 24, security firm Aikido detected a second wave of the Shai-Hulud self-replicating npm worm, compromising 492 packages with a combined 132 million monthly downloads.

The attack struck major ecosystems, including AsyncAPI, PostHog, Postman, Zapier, and ENS, exploiting the final weeks before npm’s Dec. 9 deadline to revoke legacy authentication tokens.

Aikido’s triage queue flagged the intrusion around 3:16 AM UTC, as malicious versions of AsyncAPI’s go-template and 36 related packages began spreading across the registry.

The attacker labeled stolen-credential repositories with the description “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming,” maintaining theatrical branding from the September campaign.

The worm installs the Bun runtime during package setup, then executes malicious code that searches developer environments for exposed secrets using TruffleHog.

Compromised API keys, GitHub tokens, and npm credentials are published to randomly named public repositories, and the malware attempts to propagate by pushing new infected versions to up to 100 additional packages, five times the scale of the September attack.

Technical evolution and destructive payload

The November iteration introduces several modifications from the September attack.
The malware now creates repositories with randomly generated names for stolen data rather than using hardcoded names, complicating takedown efforts.

Setup code installs Bun via setup_bun.js before executing the primary payload in bun_environment.js, which contains the worm logic and credential-exfiltration routines.

The most destructive addition: if the malware cannot authenticate with GitHub or npm using stolen credentials, it wipes all files in the user’s home directory.

Aikido’s analysis revealed execution errors that limited the attack’s spread. The bundling code that copies the full worm into new packages sometimes fails to include bun_environment.js, leaving only the Bun installation script without the malicious payload.

Despite these failures, the initial compromises hit high-value targets with massive downstream exposure.

AsyncAPI packages dominated the first wave, with 36 compromised releases including @asyncapi/cli, @asyncapi/parser, and @asyncapi/generator.

PostHog followed at 4:11 AM UTC, with infected versions of posthog-js, posthog-node, and dozens of plugins. Postman packages arrived at 5:09 AM UTC.

The Zapier compromise affected @zapier/zapier-sdk, zapier-platform-cli, and zapier-platform-core, while the ENS compromise affected @ensdomains/ensjs, @ensdomains/ens-contracts, and ethereum-ens.

GitHub branch creation suggests repository-level access

The AsyncAPI team discovered a malicious branch in their CLI repository created immediately before the compromised packages appeared on npm.

The branch contained a deployed version of the Shai-Hulud malware, indicating the attacker gained write access to the repository itself rather than simply hijacking npm tokens.

This escalation mirrors the technique used in the original Nx compromise, in which attackers modified source repositories to inject malicious code into legitimate build pipelines.

Aikido estimates that 26,300 GitHub repositories now contain stolen credentials marked with the “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming” description.

The repositories contain secrets exposed by developer environments that ran the compromised packages, including cloud service credentials, CI/CD tokens, and authentication keys for third-party APIs.

The public nature of the leaks amplifies the damage: any attacker monitoring the repositories can harvest credentials in real time and launch secondary attacks.

Attack timing and mitigation

The timing coincides with npm’s Nov. 15 announcement that it will revoke classic authentication tokens on Dec. 9.

The attacker’s choice to launch a final large-scale campaign before the deadline suggests they recognized the window for token-based compromises was closing. Aikido’s timeline shows the first Shai-Hulud wave began Sept. 16.

The Nov. 24 “Second Coming” represents the attacker’s last opportunity to exploit legacy tokens before npm’s migration cuts off that access.

Aikido recommends that security teams audit all dependencies from affected ecosystems, particularly the Zapier, ENS, AsyncAPI, PostHog, and Postman packages installed or updated after Nov. 24.

Organizations should rotate all GitHub, npm, cloud, and CI/CD secrets used in environments where these packages were present, and search GitHub for repositories with the “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming” description to determine if internal credentials were exposed.

Disabling npm postinstall scripts in CI pipelines prevents future install-time execution, and pinning package versions with lock files limits exposure to newly compromised releases.

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/malicious-worm-compromises-crypto-domains-in-supply-chain-attack/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
OSL Hong Kong Lists XRP for Professional Investors Amid Signs of Sustained Market Interest

OSL Hong Kong Lists XRP for Professional Investors Amid Signs of Sustained Market Interest

The post OSL Hong Kong Lists XRP for Professional Investors Amid Signs of Sustained Market Interest appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OSL Hong Kong has listed XRP for professional investors, enabling deposits, withdrawals, and trading through pairs like XRP/HKD, XRP/USD, and XRP/USDT. This move supports Hong Kong’s regulated framework and reflects growing institutional interest in XRP amid ETF inflows exceeding $897 million. OSL Hong Kong launches XRP trading for professional investors under local licensing rules, expanding access to regulated digital asset services. XRP pairs including XRP/HKD, XRP/USD, and XRP/USDT are now available via Flash Trade, OTC channels, and the XRP Ledger. Market data from Santiment and SoSo indicates sustained accumulation by large holders, with $897.35 million in XRP ETF inflows despite a 32% market cap drop over two months. Discover how OSL Hong Kong’s XRP listing boosts professional trading options amid rising ETF interest. Explore key details, market insights, and implications for investors in this regulated expansion. What is the Significance of OSL Hong Kong Listing XRP? OSL Hong Kong’s listing of XRP marks a key expansion in regulated cryptocurrency trading for professional investors in the region. The exchange, licensed under Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission, now supports XRP deposits, withdrawals, and trading through established pairs, enhancing accessibility via the XRP Ledger. This development aligns with broader institutional adoption trends, providing secure channels for cross-border transaction capabilities inherent to XRP. How Does OSL Hong Kong Facilitate XRP Trading? OSL Hong Kong enables XRP trading exclusively for professional investors, adhering to local regulatory standards that define eligibility based on financial expertise and net worth criteria. Trading pairs such as XRP/HKD, XRP/USD, and XRP/USDT became available this week, with operations routed through the platform’s Flash Trade for spot trading and OTC desk for larger transactions. Deposits and withdrawals integrate directly with the XRP Ledger, ensuring efficient settlement times of just a few seconds, as per blockchain specifications. The exchange’s official announcement emphasized…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 23:12
XRP Dips 6% Yet Spot ETFs Draw Steady Inflows Amid Potential Consolidation

XRP Dips 6% Yet Spot ETFs Draw Steady Inflows Amid Potential Consolidation

The post XRP Dips 6% Yet Spot ETFs Draw Steady Inflows Amid Potential Consolidation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP experienced a 6% price slip last week, yet spot ETF inflows exceeded $10 million, signaling robust investor confidence. This resilience stems from steady open interest and positive funding rates, indicating long-term holders are undeterred by short-term volatility in the XRP market. XRP spot ETF inflows reached $10.23 million daily, pushing total net assets to $861.32 million despite price dips. XRP traded near $2.02, with consistent buying even on quieter market days. Momentum indicators like RSI and CMF show weak but stable demand, with capital flow remaining slightly positive at 0.04. Discover why XRP’s 6% dip didn’t deter investors, with strong ETF inflows and steady open interest. Explore the latest XRP price action and market signals for informed decisions. What Are the Latest XRP ETF Inflows and Their Impact? XRP ETF inflows demonstrated impressive resilience last week, totaling over $10.23 million in daily net additions despite the token’s 6% price decline. This surge, highlighted by a peak of more than $240 million earlier in the period, underscores sustained institutional interest in XRP. Total net assets under management climbed to $861.32 million, reflecting a broader trend of accumulation amid market fluctuations. How Has XRP’s Price Action Evolved Amid Recent Volatility? XRP’s price action has shown a pattern of consolidation around the $2.05 level, retreating from recent highs as resistance at $2.10 consistently capped upward moves. Technical indicators reveal a cooling but controlled environment: the Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicated subdued momentum without entering oversold territory, while the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) hovered near 0.04, suggesting modest positive capital inflows. Data from TradingView illustrates this stability, with XRP positioned below the 20-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) at $2.29, yet avoiding panic selling. According to market analysts at SoSoValue, such indicators point to a healthy pause rather than a bearish reversal. This phase…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 23:30