TLDR MegaETH will refund all deposits from its USDm Pre-Deposit Bridge after operational failures during launch A misconfigured multisig transaction allowed early reopening, causing deposits to exceed $400 million unintentionally Technical issues included incorrect contract parameters, KYC provider rate limits, and timing control failures The $250 million cap was filled within minutes, locking out users [...] The post MegaETH’s $400 Million Stablecoin Launch Goes Wrong, All Funds Refunded appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR MegaETH will refund all deposits from its USDm Pre-Deposit Bridge after operational failures during launch A misconfigured multisig transaction allowed early reopening, causing deposits to exceed $400 million unintentionally Technical issues included incorrect contract parameters, KYC provider rate limits, and timing control failures The $250 million cap was filled within minutes, locking out users [...] The post MegaETH’s $400 Million Stablecoin Launch Goes Wrong, All Funds Refunded appeared first on CoinCentral.

MegaETH’s $400 Million Stablecoin Launch Goes Wrong, All Funds Refunded

2025/11/28 16:59

TLDR

  • MegaETH will refund all deposits from its USDm Pre-Deposit Bridge after operational failures during launch
  • A misconfigured multisig transaction allowed early reopening, causing deposits to exceed $400 million unintentionally
  • Technical issues included incorrect contract parameters, KYC provider rate limits, and timing control failures
  • The $250 million cap was filled within minutes, locking out users who relied on official communications
  • Refunds are pending smart contract audit, with a new USDC-USDm bridge planned before mainnet beta launch

MegaETH will return all funds deposited into its Pre-Deposit Bridge following a series of technical failures that disrupted the launch of its native stablecoin, USDm. The Ethereum Layer-2 project announced the decision Thursday on X, acknowledging what it called “sloppy execution” during the rollout.

The pre-deposit campaign opened Tuesday with a $250 million limit. Users immediately encountered problems when the deposit contract contained an incorrect SaleUUID parameter. This required an emergency multisig update to fix.

At the same time, Sonar, the KYC provider handling identity verification, applied strict rate limits that blocked many users from accessing the platform. The team needed more than 20 minutes to identify and resolve the issue.

Once the system came back online, deposits resumed at a randomized time. Users who were actively refreshing the page filled the entire $250 million cap within minutes. Those waiting for official announcements found themselves locked out completely.

MegaETH then decided to raise the deposit cap to $1 billion. This is where the most serious problem occurred.

During the process of increasing the cap, a multisignature transaction controlling the contract parameters was misconfigured. The transaction was set to require all four signatures instead of three out of four. Once the required signatures were collected, the transaction became executable by anyone.

An external party executed the queued transaction roughly 30 minutes before the bridge was scheduled to reopen. Deposits resumed earlier than planned and quickly surpassed $400 million.

The team attempted to contain the situation by reducing the cap to $400 million. Transaction speeds meant this effort failed as deposits continued flowing in. A second attempt to set the cap at $500 million also failed to stop the uncontrolled inflow.

MegaETH eventually suspended the entire process. The team scrapped plans to expand the limit to $1 billion and halted further deposits, citing unresolved bugs in the KYC system.

Technical Details Behind the Failure

The misconfigured multisig transaction created a critical vulnerability in the launch process. Safe multisig transactions become executable by any party once the required number of signatures is reached. MegaETH lost control over the timing of the cap increase as a result.

The team emphasized that no user funds were ever at risk during these events. All deposits remained secure in the smart contract throughout the process.

The KYC provider issues added to the chaos. Sonar’s rate limiting prevented legitimate users from completing deposits during the initial window. This created an unfair advantage for users who managed to bypass or avoid these restrictions.

What Happens Next

MegaETH will process refunds through a new smart contract currently under audit. The team did not provide a specific timeline for when refunds will begin, stating only that repayments will start shortly after the audit completes.

The project plans to reopen a conversion bridge between USDC and USDm before launching its Frontier mainnet. This beta phase will aim to establish stable liquidity under more controlled conditions. The team stated that depositor contributions will be recognized in the future but did not specify how.

MegaETH is designed as an Ethereum Layer-2 network targeting high-speed transactions. The project claims theoretical capacity of up to 100,000 transactions per second with sub-millisecond latency and fees below $0.01. Ethereum currently processes about 30 transactions per second.

The refund contract is under audit, with all deposits set to be returned to participants.

The post MegaETH’s $400 Million Stablecoin Launch Goes Wrong, All Funds Refunded appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

The post Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is making another attempt to break the downtrend that has kept the crypto king capped since late October. Price is hovering near $91,000 as investors watch a rare shift in market structure unfold.  For the first time in more than two and a half years, short-term holders have surpassed long-term holders in realized profits, creating both opportunities and risks for BTC. Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin Sees Some Shift The MVRV Long/Short Difference highlights a notable change in Bitcoin’s profit distribution. A positive reading usually signals long-term holders hold more unrealized gains, while a negative value indicates short-term holders are ahead. In Bitcoin’s case, the difference has dipped into negative territory for the first time since March 2023. This marks 30 months since short-term holders last led in profits. Such dominance raises concerns because short-term holders tend to sell aggressively when volatility increases. Their profit-taking behavior could add pressure on BTC’s price if the broader market weakens, especially during attempts to break the downtrend. Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. Bitcoin MVRV Long/Short Difference. Source: Santiment Sponsored Sponsored Despite this shift, Bitcoin’s broader momentum shows encouraging signs. Exchange net position change data confirms rising outflows across major platforms, signaling a shift in investor accumulation. BTC leaving exchanges is often treated as a bullish indicator, reflecting confidence in long-term appreciation. This trend suggests that many traders view the $90,000 range as a reasonable bottom zone and are preparing for a potential recovery. Sustained outflows support price stability and strengthen the probability of BTC breaking above immediate resistance levels. Bitcoin Exchange Net Position Change. Source: Glassnode BTC Price Is Trying Its Best Bitcoin is trading at $91,330 at the time of writing, positioned just below the $91,521 resistance. Reclaiming this level and flipping it into support…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 05:57
OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

The post OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The successful stock market debut of Moore Threads, a company that’s being touted as China’s answer to Nvidia, has been overshadowed by resurfaced allegations that link one of its co-founders to an unpaid cryptocurrency debt that has been lingering for roughly a decade. Shares in the GPU maker skyrocketed to as much as 470% on Thursday following its initial public offering (IPO) on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, valuing the company at around RMB 282 billion ($39.9 billion). However, as the success was being celebrated online, a social media post revived claims that Moore Threads’ co-founder Li Feng borrowed 1,500 Bitcoins from Mingxing “Star” Xu, founder and CEO of cryptocurrency exchange OKX, and never repaid the loan. Crypto past with OKX founder resurfaces In an X post, AB Kuai.Dong referenced Feng’s involvement in a 2017 initial coin offering that raised 5,000 ETH alongside controversial angel investor Xue Manzi. Feng allegedly dismissed the Bitcoin loan, stating, “It was just that Xu Mingxing’s investment in me had failed.” Xu responded to the post with a conciliatory message, writing, “People cannot always remain in the shadow of negative history. Face the future and contribute more positive energy.” He added, “Let the legal system handle the debt issue,” and offered blessings to every entrepreneur. Feng reportedly partnered with Xue Manzi and Li Xiaolai in 2017 to launch Malego Coin, which was later renamed Alpaca Coin MGD. The project reportedly raised approximately 5,000 ETH, but it was around this period that China banned ICOs, allowing regulators to crack down on what they viewed as speculative excess and potential fraud in the cryptocurrency sector. The Bitcoin loan dispute appears separate from the ICO controversy. According to sources familiar with the matter, the original loan agreement was dated December 17, 2014, with an expiry of December 16, 2016.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 06:13