The first TAO halving is projected for mid-December 2025, though exact timing remains fluid due to Bittensor’s unique mechanics. Unlike Bitcoin’s straightforward halving, TAO operates on a multi-layered system where subnet tokens, liquidity pools, alpha burns, root proportions, and flow-based emissions interact in ways that affect every participant differently. Expert Andy notes that these complexities […]The first TAO halving is projected for mid-December 2025, though exact timing remains fluid due to Bittensor’s unique mechanics. Unlike Bitcoin’s straightforward halving, TAO operates on a multi-layered system where subnet tokens, liquidity pools, alpha burns, root proportions, and flow-based emissions interact in ways that affect every participant differently. Expert Andy notes that these complexities […]

TAO Halving Impact: Alpha Tokens, Liquidity, and Subnet Survival Strategies

2025/11/30 14:30
  1. TAO halving reduces block emissions from 1 to 0.5 TAO, tightening an already deflationary system.
  2. Subnet alpha tokens face structural pressure as liquidity drops, creating winners and losers before price changes appear.
  3. Post-halving, survival depends on strong fundamentals, sustained flows, and strategic staking choices.

The first TAO halving is projected for mid-December 2025, though exact timing remains fluid due to Bittensor’s unique mechanics. Unlike Bitcoin’s straightforward halving, TAO operates on a multi-layered system where subnet tokens, liquidity pools, alpha burns, root proportions, and flow-based emissions interact in ways that affect every participant differently.

Expert Andy notes that these complexities mean traditional supply shock narratives only tell part of the story. The halving triggers when total issued the token reaches 10.5 million, not circulating supply, accounting for recycled tokens from subnet registrations, miner and validator activity, and other on-chain actions.

With current block emissions at 1 TAO per 12-second block, roughly 7,200 TAO enter circulation daily. After the halving, this falls to 3,600 TAO per day, cutting annual issuance from around 2.6 million to 1.3 million.

Subnets Introduce Individual Alpha Tokens and AMM Swaps

Alpha tokens are assigned now to every subnet. In the case when the TAO is staked into a subnet, it is replaced with alpha by an automated market maker. The alpha distribution is divided into alpha out and alpha in, which represent rewards to the participants and liquidity to the pool, respectively. The alpha_ in is cut by half, and the alpha out does not change.

This structural change increases volatility: miners who must sell alpha to make ends meet now are exposed to less liquidity, and it puts pressure on the alpha prices downwards. Small pool subnets are the most susceptible to attack, whereas early, well-financed subnets become permanently advantaged.

Alpha token trajectories are also influenced by the halving, shifting one subnet halving towards the future. Subnets with alpha building up until halving have the advantage of experiencing a quicker early supply growth, and subnets with halving after have a worse liquidity situation.

Performance Depends on TAO Flows, Coverage, and Alpha Burns

The downsizing doubles the competitive nature of the network. Subnets should be able to attract sticky capital and create real utility to exist. Weak subnets will be at risk of deregistration as slots will be occupied, and miners and validators will migrate to better subnets. Root staking offers a safer option, which conserves TAO but yields diminish with time.

Expert Andy stresses that it is now survival and profit based on observation of net TAO flows, coverage percentages, and alpha burn rates, as opposed to price. Subnets with better coverage and stable alpha burns will perform better, and those that are not able to sustain liquidity will experience a higher rate of decomposition.

Also Read: Bittensor Price Pullback Could Ignite Explosive Bullish Wave Toward $748 Zone

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05