The post ‘Nothing burger’ – David Sacks blasts NYT’s ‘conflict of interest’ report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. David Sacks, the U.S. AI and crypto czar, has distanced himself from a recent New York Times (NYT) report alleging widespread conflicts of interest.   The report claimed that Sacks leveraged his influential White House role to push policy directions that benefited himself and his tech and crypto cronies. However, Sacks denied the allegations and slammed the report as a ‘bungled mess,’ a “nothing burger,” and sued the publisher for defamation.  Source: X Sacks’ crypto portfolio under scrutiny The report stated that Sacks retained 20 crypto investments, contradicting the previous statement by the White House that he had sold over $200 million in crypto positions to minimize conflict of interest.  “What is clear is that Mr. Sacks, directly or through Craft, has retained 20 crypto and 449 A.I.-related investments, according to The Times analysis.” In particular, the NYT alleged that Sacks pushed the stablecoin bill, the GENIUS Act, to advance his interest in BitGo. It added,  “In September, BitGo filed for an initial public offering. Craft owns 7.8 percent of the company, according to financial filings, which would be worth more than $130 million at BitGo’s 2023 valuation.” BitGo is a custody and a ‘stablecoin-as-a-service’ provider that built the infrastructure behind USD1, the stablecoin issued by Trump-backed World Liberty Financial (WLFI). However, the firm denied any benefit from the passage of the GENIUS Act. Sacks’ crypto policy push Sacks began Craft Ventures in 2017, targeting tech start-ups. However, he reportedly divested some of his investments in Bitcoin, Solana, and others to minimize a conflict of interest, according to a White House statement earlier in the year.  As a top policy figure shaping the White House’s role in crypto, Sacks secured some notable wins, including the passage of the stablecoin law and pushing back against some crypto-related debanking.  Still, the strategic BTC… The post ‘Nothing burger’ – David Sacks blasts NYT’s ‘conflict of interest’ report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. David Sacks, the U.S. AI and crypto czar, has distanced himself from a recent New York Times (NYT) report alleging widespread conflicts of interest.   The report claimed that Sacks leveraged his influential White House role to push policy directions that benefited himself and his tech and crypto cronies. However, Sacks denied the allegations and slammed the report as a ‘bungled mess,’ a “nothing burger,” and sued the publisher for defamation.  Source: X Sacks’ crypto portfolio under scrutiny The report stated that Sacks retained 20 crypto investments, contradicting the previous statement by the White House that he had sold over $200 million in crypto positions to minimize conflict of interest.  “What is clear is that Mr. Sacks, directly or through Craft, has retained 20 crypto and 449 A.I.-related investments, according to The Times analysis.” In particular, the NYT alleged that Sacks pushed the stablecoin bill, the GENIUS Act, to advance his interest in BitGo. It added,  “In September, BitGo filed for an initial public offering. Craft owns 7.8 percent of the company, according to financial filings, which would be worth more than $130 million at BitGo’s 2023 valuation.” BitGo is a custody and a ‘stablecoin-as-a-service’ provider that built the infrastructure behind USD1, the stablecoin issued by Trump-backed World Liberty Financial (WLFI). However, the firm denied any benefit from the passage of the GENIUS Act. Sacks’ crypto policy push Sacks began Craft Ventures in 2017, targeting tech start-ups. However, he reportedly divested some of his investments in Bitcoin, Solana, and others to minimize a conflict of interest, according to a White House statement earlier in the year.  As a top policy figure shaping the White House’s role in crypto, Sacks secured some notable wins, including the passage of the stablecoin law and pushing back against some crypto-related debanking.  Still, the strategic BTC…

‘Nothing burger’ – David Sacks blasts NYT’s ‘conflict of interest’ report

2025/12/01 19:33

David Sacks, the U.S. AI and crypto czar, has distanced himself from a recent New York Times (NYT) report alleging widespread conflicts of interest.  

The report claimed that Sacks leveraged his influential White House role to push policy directions that benefited himself and his tech and crypto cronies.

However, Sacks denied the allegations and slammed the report as a ‘bungled mess,’ a “nothing burger,” and sued the publisher for defamation. 

Source: X

Sacks’ crypto portfolio under scrutiny

The report stated that Sacks retained 20 crypto investments, contradicting the previous statement by the White House that he had sold over $200 million in crypto positions to minimize conflict of interest. 

In particular, the NYT alleged that Sacks pushed the stablecoin bill, the GENIUS Act, to advance his interest in BitGo. It added, 

BitGo is a custody and a ‘stablecoin-as-a-service’ provider that built the infrastructure behind USD1, the stablecoin issued by Trump-backed World Liberty Financial (WLFI).

However, the firm denied any benefit from the passage of the GENIUS Act.

Sacks’ crypto policy push

Sacks began Craft Ventures in 2017, targeting tech start-ups.

However, he reportedly divested some of his investments in Bitcoin, Solana, and others to minimize a conflict of interest, according to a White House statement earlier in the year. 

As a top policy figure shaping the White House’s role in crypto, Sacks secured some notable wins, including the passage of the stablecoin law and pushing back against some crypto-related debanking. 

Still, the strategic BTC reserve and market structure bill has not yet crossed the finishing line. 

As such, top crypto leaders threw their support behind him, led by Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino. The world’s largest stablecoin issuer chief said Sacks has done a good job in supporting U.S. crypto and added

Perianne Boring, a partner at Off the Chain Capital, echoed a similar stance, calling it a coordinated attack on crypto. 

Source: X


Final Thoughts

  • Sacks has denied any conflict of interest, and the NYT claims that he pushed crypto policies to benefit his firm, Craft Ventures. 
  • The crypto industry, led by Tether CEO, defended Sacks and condemned the report as a coordinated attack against the sector. 
Next: AAVE: $160 support in danger? THIS signals a deeper downside ahead

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/nothing-burger-david-sacks-blasts-nyts-conflict-of-interest-report/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Canada Canadian Portfolio Investment in Foreign Securities rose from previous $9.04B to $17.41B in July

Canada Canadian Portfolio Investment in Foreign Securities rose from previous $9.04B to $17.41B in July

The post Canada Canadian Portfolio Investment in Foreign Securities rose from previous $9.04B to $17.41B in July appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:38
Why BONK’s weekly trend remains deeply bearish despite price rise

Why BONK’s weekly trend remains deeply bearish despite price rise

The post Why BONK’s weekly trend remains deeply bearish despite price rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bonk saw a 5.55% rally in the past 24 hours, but CoinMarketCap data showed that its daily trading volume has fallen by nearly 10% at the time of writing. These gains could be driven partly due to the Solana [SOL] launchpad Bonk.fun news that 51% of the fees would be used to buy back BONK, up from the existing 10%. BONK sinks below long-term support Source: BONK/USDT on TradingView Bonk’s [BONK] weekly chart showed a strong downtrend in progress. The $0.0000096 support, which stretched back to early 2024, was being retested as resistance. Two weeks ago, a weekly trading session closed below this support. The OBV was also in a downtrend with the price, and the RSI’s reading of 36 showed strong bearish momentum. Overall, it was a place where the bulls needed to make a last stand. As things stand, the buyers lack the conviction to reverse the trend. Source: BONK/USDT on TradingView On the 4-hour chart, there seemed to be a bit of hope for BONK bulls. A range formation (purple) between $0.00000846 and $0.0000105 has halted the downtrend over the past three weeks. At the same time, the OBV trended higher, while the RSI oscillated between bullish and bearish momentum. It was a sign that there was buying pressure in recent days. Despite this hopeful development, it would be extremely difficult for the bulls to overturn the long-term downtrend. The loss of $0.0000096 as support, just below the psychological $0.00001 level, was a big blow to bullish sentiment. The bullish BONK case The rising OBV hinted at a potential, albeit unlikely, BONK trend reversal. A breakout past $0.0000105 and a retest of the range high as support would be a buy signal. To the north, the next target would be $0.0000135. Traders call to action — Respect…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 05:02