The post No, Cardano Hydra Head Might Not Be 100% Secure, Here’s the Reason appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Renowned Cardano (ADA) advocate Armor Tesar, also known as YODA on X, has issued an important caution on Hydra. The warning is important to help users and operators understand the security setup of the layer-2 scaling solution for Cardano. Hydra operators hold authority over locked ADA funds According to YODA, while Hydra allows for faster and cheaper transactions, there are critical details that users need to be aware of. Notably, only Hydra operators are fully in charge of their ADA. It implies, therefore, that any user not running their own node is at the mercy of the Hydra operator. This is because any user who locks their ADA into a Hydra head automatically gives up control. For clarity, once locked, the user’s private key can no longer directly access the funds, as they are controlled by the Hydra head smart contract, not the user’s wallet. If you want to use Hydra, you trust the operators of Hydra Head. You are only in control of your funds if you are one of the Hydra Head operators. When you lock ADA into a Hydra Head, you sign a transaction with your private key. The transaction sends ADA into an on-chain… pic.twitter.com/hbh78guPLY — Cardano YOD₳ (@JaromirTesar) December 4, 2025 It means that even without having a user’s private keys, the operators can still control what happens to the funds. The operators have this power because, inside the Hydra system, every update requires signatures from all operators, not users. Thus, operators can agree on any state, even a malicious one. Based on the design of the Hydra system, once the on-chain Hydra smart contract accepts the operator’s signatures, that becomes the “truth” when the Hydra head closes. YODA is warning that this poses a major security risk, as operators could collude to sign a fake snapshot and… The post No, Cardano Hydra Head Might Not Be 100% Secure, Here’s the Reason appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Renowned Cardano (ADA) advocate Armor Tesar, also known as YODA on X, has issued an important caution on Hydra. The warning is important to help users and operators understand the security setup of the layer-2 scaling solution for Cardano. Hydra operators hold authority over locked ADA funds According to YODA, while Hydra allows for faster and cheaper transactions, there are critical details that users need to be aware of. Notably, only Hydra operators are fully in charge of their ADA. It implies, therefore, that any user not running their own node is at the mercy of the Hydra operator. This is because any user who locks their ADA into a Hydra head automatically gives up control. For clarity, once locked, the user’s private key can no longer directly access the funds, as they are controlled by the Hydra head smart contract, not the user’s wallet. If you want to use Hydra, you trust the operators of Hydra Head. You are only in control of your funds if you are one of the Hydra Head operators. When you lock ADA into a Hydra Head, you sign a transaction with your private key. The transaction sends ADA into an on-chain… pic.twitter.com/hbh78guPLY — Cardano YOD₳ (@JaromirTesar) December 4, 2025 It means that even without having a user’s private keys, the operators can still control what happens to the funds. The operators have this power because, inside the Hydra system, every update requires signatures from all operators, not users. Thus, operators can agree on any state, even a malicious one. Based on the design of the Hydra system, once the on-chain Hydra smart contract accepts the operator’s signatures, that becomes the “truth” when the Hydra head closes. YODA is warning that this poses a major security risk, as operators could collude to sign a fake snapshot and…

No, Cardano Hydra Head Might Not Be 100% Secure, Here’s the Reason

2025/12/05 06:13

Renowned Cardano (ADA) advocate Armor Tesar, also known as YODA on X, has issued an important caution on Hydra. The warning is important to help users and operators understand the security setup of the layer-2 scaling solution for Cardano.

Hydra operators hold authority over locked ADA funds

According to YODA, while Hydra allows for faster and cheaper transactions, there are critical details that users need to be aware of. Notably, only Hydra operators are fully in charge of their ADA. It implies, therefore, that any user not running their own node is at the mercy of the Hydra operator.

This is because any user who locks their ADA into a Hydra head automatically gives up control. For clarity, once locked, the user’s private key can no longer directly access the funds, as they are controlled by the Hydra head smart contract, not the user’s wallet.

It means that even without having a user’s private keys, the operators can still control what happens to the funds. The operators have this power because, inside the Hydra system, every update requires signatures from all operators, not users. Thus, operators can agree on any state, even a malicious one.

Based on the design of the Hydra system, once the on-chain Hydra smart contract accepts the operator’s signatures, that becomes the “truth” when the Hydra head closes.

YODA is warning that this poses a major security risk, as operators could collude to sign a fake snapshot and direct the funds to themselves. He is emphasizing that the only way to have full control of one’s fund is to be a Hydra operator.

If, however, a user delegates their funds and uses Hydra through an operator, they have to “rely” on the operator not to cheat. This requires a high level of trust in the Hydra operators.

You Might Also Like

Cardano community urged to prioritize trust 

YODA’s message to Cardano users is that Hydra is only truly trustless for people who run a node themselves. 

Every other user is effectively using it the same way as a custodial service. In essence, before one decides to use a Hydra-based DeFi app, they must do their own research.

It is important to know who the operators are and whether they are trustworthy enough not to team up with malicious actors to redirect users’ funds.

Hydra has been so dogged with speculation that even Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson had to wade in in 2024 to address concerns about it.

Source: https://u.today/no-cardano-hydra-head-might-not-be-100-secure-heres-the-reason

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

The post Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is making another attempt to break the downtrend that has kept the crypto king capped since late October. Price is hovering near $91,000 as investors watch a rare shift in market structure unfold.  For the first time in more than two and a half years, short-term holders have surpassed long-term holders in realized profits, creating both opportunities and risks for BTC. Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin Sees Some Shift The MVRV Long/Short Difference highlights a notable change in Bitcoin’s profit distribution. A positive reading usually signals long-term holders hold more unrealized gains, while a negative value indicates short-term holders are ahead. In Bitcoin’s case, the difference has dipped into negative territory for the first time since March 2023. This marks 30 months since short-term holders last led in profits. Such dominance raises concerns because short-term holders tend to sell aggressively when volatility increases. Their profit-taking behavior could add pressure on BTC’s price if the broader market weakens, especially during attempts to break the downtrend. Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. Bitcoin MVRV Long/Short Difference. Source: Santiment Sponsored Sponsored Despite this shift, Bitcoin’s broader momentum shows encouraging signs. Exchange net position change data confirms rising outflows across major platforms, signaling a shift in investor accumulation. BTC leaving exchanges is often treated as a bullish indicator, reflecting confidence in long-term appreciation. This trend suggests that many traders view the $90,000 range as a reasonable bottom zone and are preparing for a potential recovery. Sustained outflows support price stability and strengthen the probability of BTC breaking above immediate resistance levels. Bitcoin Exchange Net Position Change. Source: Glassnode BTC Price Is Trying Its Best Bitcoin is trading at $91,330 at the time of writing, positioned just below the $91,521 resistance. Reclaiming this level and flipping it into support…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 05:57
OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

The post OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The successful stock market debut of Moore Threads, a company that’s being touted as China’s answer to Nvidia, has been overshadowed by resurfaced allegations that link one of its co-founders to an unpaid cryptocurrency debt that has been lingering for roughly a decade. Shares in the GPU maker skyrocketed to as much as 470% on Thursday following its initial public offering (IPO) on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, valuing the company at around RMB 282 billion ($39.9 billion). However, as the success was being celebrated online, a social media post revived claims that Moore Threads’ co-founder Li Feng borrowed 1,500 Bitcoins from Mingxing “Star” Xu, founder and CEO of cryptocurrency exchange OKX, and never repaid the loan. Crypto past with OKX founder resurfaces In an X post, AB Kuai.Dong referenced Feng’s involvement in a 2017 initial coin offering that raised 5,000 ETH alongside controversial angel investor Xue Manzi. Feng allegedly dismissed the Bitcoin loan, stating, “It was just that Xu Mingxing’s investment in me had failed.” Xu responded to the post with a conciliatory message, writing, “People cannot always remain in the shadow of negative history. Face the future and contribute more positive energy.” He added, “Let the legal system handle the debt issue,” and offered blessings to every entrepreneur. Feng reportedly partnered with Xue Manzi and Li Xiaolai in 2017 to launch Malego Coin, which was later renamed Alpaca Coin MGD. The project reportedly raised approximately 5,000 ETH, but it was around this period that China banned ICOs, allowing regulators to crack down on what they viewed as speculative excess and potential fraud in the cryptocurrency sector. The Bitcoin loan dispute appears separate from the ICO controversy. According to sources familiar with the matter, the original loan agreement was dated December 17, 2014, with an expiry of December 16, 2016.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 06:13