The post Grand Jury Declines Indictment Against Letitia James appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline An indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James was declined by a grand jury Thursday in a mortgage fraud case against her, marking the second Trump administration-led indictment James has avoided within the last two weeks. New York Attorney General Letitia James, speaks outside the United States District Court on Oct. 24 in Norfolk, Virginia. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Key Facts The indictment was declined by a grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia. The Justice Department sought to indict James after its first indictment against James was thrown out in November, as U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who signed the indictment, was not validly appointed. Prosecutors can still seek a third indictment against James, who has denied wrongdoing. What We Don’t Know: If the DOJ will also try to reindict former FBI Director James Comey, whose charges for allegedly lying to Congress were also thrown out due to Halligan’s appointment being invalid. While bringing charges against James was more straightforward, Comey’s case is more complicated, as the statute of limitations for his comments to Congress expired in September. Federal law does allow prosecutors to bring new charges within six months of charges being dismissed despite the statute of limitations—or 60 days after any appeals process ends—but it’s unclear if that applies here. Currie suggested in a footnote to her ruling that since the government’s indictment against Comey was never valid in the first place, since Halligan wasn’t a valid prosecutor, then the six-month rule doesn’t apply, and the charges can’t be brought again. The judge’s comments aren’t binding, however, so the Trump administration could still try to bring charges again and see how it plays out in court. Read More Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/04/new-york-attorney-general-letitia-james-avoids-new-indictment-from-trump-administration/The post Grand Jury Declines Indictment Against Letitia James appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline An indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James was declined by a grand jury Thursday in a mortgage fraud case against her, marking the second Trump administration-led indictment James has avoided within the last two weeks. New York Attorney General Letitia James, speaks outside the United States District Court on Oct. 24 in Norfolk, Virginia. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Key Facts The indictment was declined by a grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia. The Justice Department sought to indict James after its first indictment against James was thrown out in November, as U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who signed the indictment, was not validly appointed. Prosecutors can still seek a third indictment against James, who has denied wrongdoing. What We Don’t Know: If the DOJ will also try to reindict former FBI Director James Comey, whose charges for allegedly lying to Congress were also thrown out due to Halligan’s appointment being invalid. While bringing charges against James was more straightforward, Comey’s case is more complicated, as the statute of limitations for his comments to Congress expired in September. Federal law does allow prosecutors to bring new charges within six months of charges being dismissed despite the statute of limitations—or 60 days after any appeals process ends—but it’s unclear if that applies here. Currie suggested in a footnote to her ruling that since the government’s indictment against Comey was never valid in the first place, since Halligan wasn’t a valid prosecutor, then the six-month rule doesn’t apply, and the charges can’t be brought again. The judge’s comments aren’t binding, however, so the Trump administration could still try to bring charges again and see how it plays out in court. Read More Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/04/new-york-attorney-general-letitia-james-avoids-new-indictment-from-trump-administration/

Grand Jury Declines Indictment Against Letitia James

2025/12/05 07:45

Topline

An indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James was declined by a grand jury Thursday in a mortgage fraud case against her, marking the second Trump administration-led indictment James has avoided within the last two weeks.

New York Attorney General Letitia James, speaks outside the United States District Court on Oct. 24 in Norfolk, Virginia.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Key Facts

The indictment was declined by a grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia.

The Justice Department sought to indict James after its first indictment against James was thrown out in November, as U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who signed the indictment, was not validly appointed.

Prosecutors can still seek a third indictment against James, who has denied wrongdoing.

What We Don’t Know:

If the DOJ will also try to reindict former FBI Director James Comey, whose charges for allegedly lying to Congress were also thrown out due to Halligan’s appointment being invalid. While bringing charges against James was more straightforward, Comey’s case is more complicated, as the statute of limitations for his comments to Congress expired in September. Federal law does allow prosecutors to bring new charges within six months of charges being dismissed despite the statute of limitations—or 60 days after any appeals process ends—but it’s unclear if that applies here. Currie suggested in a footnote to her ruling that since the government’s indictment against Comey was never valid in the first place, since Halligan wasn’t a valid prosecutor, then the six-month rule doesn’t apply, and the charges can’t be brought again. The judge’s comments aren’t binding, however, so the Trump administration could still try to bring charges again and see how it plays out in court.

Read More

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/04/new-york-attorney-general-letitia-james-avoids-new-indictment-from-trump-administration/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Canada Canadian Portfolio Investment in Foreign Securities rose from previous $9.04B to $17.41B in July

Canada Canadian Portfolio Investment in Foreign Securities rose from previous $9.04B to $17.41B in July

The post Canada Canadian Portfolio Investment in Foreign Securities rose from previous $9.04B to $17.41B in July appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:38
Why BONK’s weekly trend remains deeply bearish despite price rise

Why BONK’s weekly trend remains deeply bearish despite price rise

The post Why BONK’s weekly trend remains deeply bearish despite price rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bonk saw a 5.55% rally in the past 24 hours, but CoinMarketCap data showed that its daily trading volume has fallen by nearly 10% at the time of writing. These gains could be driven partly due to the Solana [SOL] launchpad Bonk.fun news that 51% of the fees would be used to buy back BONK, up from the existing 10%. BONK sinks below long-term support Source: BONK/USDT on TradingView Bonk’s [BONK] weekly chart showed a strong downtrend in progress. The $0.0000096 support, which stretched back to early 2024, was being retested as resistance. Two weeks ago, a weekly trading session closed below this support. The OBV was also in a downtrend with the price, and the RSI’s reading of 36 showed strong bearish momentum. Overall, it was a place where the bulls needed to make a last stand. As things stand, the buyers lack the conviction to reverse the trend. Source: BONK/USDT on TradingView On the 4-hour chart, there seemed to be a bit of hope for BONK bulls. A range formation (purple) between $0.00000846 and $0.0000105 has halted the downtrend over the past three weeks. At the same time, the OBV trended higher, while the RSI oscillated between bullish and bearish momentum. It was a sign that there was buying pressure in recent days. Despite this hopeful development, it would be extremely difficult for the bulls to overturn the long-term downtrend. The loss of $0.0000096 as support, just below the psychological $0.00001 level, was a big blow to bullish sentiment. The bullish BONK case The rising OBV hinted at a potential, albeit unlikely, BONK trend reversal. A breakout past $0.0000105 and a retest of the range high as support would be a buy signal. To the north, the next target would be $0.0000135. Traders call to action — Respect…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 05:02