The post The U.S. Can Win Its 2026 World Cup Group, But It Won’t Be Easy appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. United States head coach Mauricio Pochettino coaches winger Max Arfsten during the international friendly match against Paraguay in November in Chester, Pa. Icon Sportswire via Getty Images In the aftermath of the 2026 FIFA World Cup Draw held on Friday afternoon in Washington, there has been an almost universal agreement among American media that the U.S. men’s national team received a favorable draw. The Americans will face Australia, Paraguay and the winner of UEFA Playoff C (Turkiye, Slovakia, Romania or Kosovo) in their Group D round robin. The top two finishers will advance automatically to the 32-team knockout stage. And eight third-place finishers out of 12 groups will also progress. And as a host nation and the highest ranked Group D side in the FIFA World Rankings, the Americans will be favorites not only to advance from their group but also win it, something they haven’t accomplished since 2010. But it may not be as straightforward as the early projections suggest, for a few reasons. Group Balance The Americans eluded a couple of the obvious worst-case scenarios by avoiding Croatia, Morocco or one of the South American teams in Pot 2. But in failing to draw a European team before Pot 4, they also ensured that they would avoid one of the true minnows of the competition, because tournament regulations would force them to be paired with one of the European playoff pathways. Group D Teams (FIFA World Rankings) United States (14)Australia (26)Paraguay (39)*Turkiye (25)*Slovakia (45)*Romania (47)*Kosovo (80) *Potential European playoff winner And if Turkiye wins its playoff, it would create a group where all four teams are inside FIFA’s current Top 40. The only other place that’s possible is Group F, depending on which European team joins the Netherlands, Japan and Tunisia. To think of it another way, while… The post The U.S. Can Win Its 2026 World Cup Group, But It Won’t Be Easy appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. United States head coach Mauricio Pochettino coaches winger Max Arfsten during the international friendly match against Paraguay in November in Chester, Pa. Icon Sportswire via Getty Images In the aftermath of the 2026 FIFA World Cup Draw held on Friday afternoon in Washington, there has been an almost universal agreement among American media that the U.S. men’s national team received a favorable draw. The Americans will face Australia, Paraguay and the winner of UEFA Playoff C (Turkiye, Slovakia, Romania or Kosovo) in their Group D round robin. The top two finishers will advance automatically to the 32-team knockout stage. And eight third-place finishers out of 12 groups will also progress. And as a host nation and the highest ranked Group D side in the FIFA World Rankings, the Americans will be favorites not only to advance from their group but also win it, something they haven’t accomplished since 2010. But it may not be as straightforward as the early projections suggest, for a few reasons. Group Balance The Americans eluded a couple of the obvious worst-case scenarios by avoiding Croatia, Morocco or one of the South American teams in Pot 2. But in failing to draw a European team before Pot 4, they also ensured that they would avoid one of the true minnows of the competition, because tournament regulations would force them to be paired with one of the European playoff pathways. Group D Teams (FIFA World Rankings) United States (14)Australia (26)Paraguay (39)*Turkiye (25)*Slovakia (45)*Romania (47)*Kosovo (80) *Potential European playoff winner And if Turkiye wins its playoff, it would create a group where all four teams are inside FIFA’s current Top 40. The only other place that’s possible is Group F, depending on which European team joins the Netherlands, Japan and Tunisia. To think of it another way, while…

The U.S. Can Win Its 2026 World Cup Group, But It Won’t Be Easy

2025/12/06 08:52

United States head coach Mauricio Pochettino coaches winger Max Arfsten during the international friendly match against Paraguay in November in Chester, Pa.

Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

In the aftermath of the 2026 FIFA World Cup Draw held on Friday afternoon in Washington, there has been an almost universal agreement among American media that the U.S. men’s national team received a favorable draw.

The Americans will face Australia, Paraguay and the winner of UEFA Playoff C (Turkiye, Slovakia, Romania or Kosovo) in their Group D round robin. The top two finishers will advance automatically to the 32-team knockout stage. And eight third-place finishers out of 12 groups will also progress.

And as a host nation and the highest ranked Group D side in the FIFA World Rankings, the Americans will be favorites not only to advance from their group but also win it, something they haven’t accomplished since 2010.

But it may not be as straightforward as the early projections suggest, for a few reasons.

Group Balance

The Americans eluded a couple of the obvious worst-case scenarios by avoiding Croatia, Morocco or one of the South American teams in Pot 2. But in failing to draw a European team before Pot 4, they also ensured that they would avoid one of the true minnows of the competition, because tournament regulations would force them to be paired with one of the European playoff pathways.


Group D Teams (FIFA World Rankings)

United States (14)
Australia (26)
Paraguay (39)
*Turkiye (25)
*Slovakia (45)
*Romania (47)
*Kosovo (80)

*Potential European playoff winner


And if Turkiye wins its playoff, it would create a group where all four teams are inside FIFA’s current Top 40. The only other place that’s possible is Group F, depending on which European team joins the Netherlands, Japan and Tunisia.

To think of it another way, while every game in the Americans’ group should be realistically winnable, every game could also be realistically losable. That isn’t the case in some other groups.

Unfamiliar Role

There’s also the reality that entering the World Cup as a group favorite will be an unfamiliar feeling. It’s never happened for the Americans in the program’s modern history, not even in 1994 when they previously hosted and were drawn into a group with Colombia, Romania and Switzerland.


Odds To Win Group D

United States +125
UEFA Path D winner +250
Paraguay +300
Australia +650

Odds via Bet365


Taking on that role can be a difficult adjustment for teams, in part because it’s likely to influence the tactical posture of opponents. The Americans have typically thrived on the world stage when they’re able to play on the counterattack and in transition. But as a host nation and a moderate group favorite (+125 odds via Bet365), the USMNT may encounter opponents more likely to adopt a more conservative posture and challenge the Americans to be protagonists.

It’s a role the Americans have only regularly occupied when playing in Concacaf against Central American or Carribean nations. And those opponents aren’t nearly as dangerous as countering sides as those with the talent level of Paraguay, Australia or Turkiye.

Familiarity, not Fear

Lastly, there’s the potential for the Americans to be approaching a group stage that includes two teams they’ve played friendlies against in the previous year.

The USMNT suffered a 2-1 loss to Turkey in the June buildup to the 2025 Concacaf Gold Cup. Then last month they earned a 2-1 victory over Paraguay. Both games were played on American soil, and both games were clearly winnable for either side.


USMNT recent friendlies vs. potential Group D opponents

USA 1, Turkiye 2
June 7, 2025 | Hartford, Conn.
USA: McGlynn 1’; TUR: Güler (24’), Aktürkoglu (27’)

USA 2, Paraguay 1
Nov 15, 2025 | Chester, Pa.
USA: Reyna (4’), Balogun (71’); PAR: Arce (10’)


It’s impossible to say exactly what impact that could have. But in high leverage matches, typically more familiarity makes the margins between winning and losing smaller. And that often benefits the underdogs, who for once won’t be the United States.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianquillen/2025/12/05/the-us-can-win-its-2026-world-cup-group-but-it-wont-be-easy/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

The post Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is making another attempt to break the downtrend that has kept the crypto king capped since late October. Price is hovering near $91,000 as investors watch a rare shift in market structure unfold.  For the first time in more than two and a half years, short-term holders have surpassed long-term holders in realized profits, creating both opportunities and risks for BTC. Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin Sees Some Shift The MVRV Long/Short Difference highlights a notable change in Bitcoin’s profit distribution. A positive reading usually signals long-term holders hold more unrealized gains, while a negative value indicates short-term holders are ahead. In Bitcoin’s case, the difference has dipped into negative territory for the first time since March 2023. This marks 30 months since short-term holders last led in profits. Such dominance raises concerns because short-term holders tend to sell aggressively when volatility increases. Their profit-taking behavior could add pressure on BTC’s price if the broader market weakens, especially during attempts to break the downtrend. Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. Bitcoin MVRV Long/Short Difference. Source: Santiment Sponsored Sponsored Despite this shift, Bitcoin’s broader momentum shows encouraging signs. Exchange net position change data confirms rising outflows across major platforms, signaling a shift in investor accumulation. BTC leaving exchanges is often treated as a bullish indicator, reflecting confidence in long-term appreciation. This trend suggests that many traders view the $90,000 range as a reasonable bottom zone and are preparing for a potential recovery. Sustained outflows support price stability and strengthen the probability of BTC breaking above immediate resistance levels. Bitcoin Exchange Net Position Change. Source: Glassnode BTC Price Is Trying Its Best Bitcoin is trading at $91,330 at the time of writing, positioned just below the $91,521 resistance. Reclaiming this level and flipping it into support…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 05:57
OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

The post OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The successful stock market debut of Moore Threads, a company that’s being touted as China’s answer to Nvidia, has been overshadowed by resurfaced allegations that link one of its co-founders to an unpaid cryptocurrency debt that has been lingering for roughly a decade. Shares in the GPU maker skyrocketed to as much as 470% on Thursday following its initial public offering (IPO) on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, valuing the company at around RMB 282 billion ($39.9 billion). However, as the success was being celebrated online, a social media post revived claims that Moore Threads’ co-founder Li Feng borrowed 1,500 Bitcoins from Mingxing “Star” Xu, founder and CEO of cryptocurrency exchange OKX, and never repaid the loan. Crypto past with OKX founder resurfaces In an X post, AB Kuai.Dong referenced Feng’s involvement in a 2017 initial coin offering that raised 5,000 ETH alongside controversial angel investor Xue Manzi. Feng allegedly dismissed the Bitcoin loan, stating, “It was just that Xu Mingxing’s investment in me had failed.” Xu responded to the post with a conciliatory message, writing, “People cannot always remain in the shadow of negative history. Face the future and contribute more positive energy.” He added, “Let the legal system handle the debt issue,” and offered blessings to every entrepreneur. Feng reportedly partnered with Xue Manzi and Li Xiaolai in 2017 to launch Malego Coin, which was later renamed Alpaca Coin MGD. The project reportedly raised approximately 5,000 ETH, but it was around this period that China banned ICOs, allowing regulators to crack down on what they viewed as speculative excess and potential fraud in the cryptocurrency sector. The Bitcoin loan dispute appears separate from the ICO controversy. According to sources familiar with the matter, the original loan agreement was dated December 17, 2014, with an expiry of December 16, 2016.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 06:13