The post MARA’s ‘Discount’ Is a Myth Once Debt Is Included, VanEck’s Sigel Warns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The two largest publicly traded companies holding bitcoin, Strategy (MSTR) and MARA Holdings (MARA), have each fallen roughly 40% over the past six weeks. CoinDesk Research has extensively covered the MSTR correction, but MARA, which is down 55% year over year, is also attracting attention as some investors view it as inexpensive at current levels. Matthew Sigel, head of digital assets research at VanEck, argues that the perception of MARA as cheap is not supported by the data. Sigel argues that the company is actually trading at a premium to it’s bitcoin holdings and not a discount. Sigel highlights MARA’s $3.3 billion in outstanding convertible debt relative to its $4.9 billion in bitcoin holdings. Adjusting for the convertible debt leaves just $1.6 billion of net bitcoin value before accounting for any additional liabilities that the mining business incurs. That compares with a $4.7 billion equity market cap, which Sigel implies that MARA is in fact trading at a premium once debt is included, rather than at a discount to its bitcoin holdings. Sigel also addresses MARA’s high short interest, which currently stands at 27%. After adjusting for delta hedging related to the company’s convertible notes, Sigel estimates that true short interest falls to about 15%, a reduction of 44%. Sigel contrasts this with MSTR, which has more than $8 billion of convertible debt, compared to a $53 billion market cap. Once hedge related shorts are removed, MSTR’s short interest declines by only 31%, or by roughly 9 million shares. Sigel characterizes MARA’s short interest as more structural, compared with MSTR’s which he frames as more fundamentals driven. Sigel argues that over half of MARA’s equity volatility stems from its capital structure and financing dynamics rather than from pure bitcoin beta. He concludes that MSTR offers a much cleaner bitcoin duration… The post MARA’s ‘Discount’ Is a Myth Once Debt Is Included, VanEck’s Sigel Warns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The two largest publicly traded companies holding bitcoin, Strategy (MSTR) and MARA Holdings (MARA), have each fallen roughly 40% over the past six weeks. CoinDesk Research has extensively covered the MSTR correction, but MARA, which is down 55% year over year, is also attracting attention as some investors view it as inexpensive at current levels. Matthew Sigel, head of digital assets research at VanEck, argues that the perception of MARA as cheap is not supported by the data. Sigel argues that the company is actually trading at a premium to it’s bitcoin holdings and not a discount. Sigel highlights MARA’s $3.3 billion in outstanding convertible debt relative to its $4.9 billion in bitcoin holdings. Adjusting for the convertible debt leaves just $1.6 billion of net bitcoin value before accounting for any additional liabilities that the mining business incurs. That compares with a $4.7 billion equity market cap, which Sigel implies that MARA is in fact trading at a premium once debt is included, rather than at a discount to its bitcoin holdings. Sigel also addresses MARA’s high short interest, which currently stands at 27%. After adjusting for delta hedging related to the company’s convertible notes, Sigel estimates that true short interest falls to about 15%, a reduction of 44%. Sigel contrasts this with MSTR, which has more than $8 billion of convertible debt, compared to a $53 billion market cap. Once hedge related shorts are removed, MSTR’s short interest declines by only 31%, or by roughly 9 million shares. Sigel characterizes MARA’s short interest as more structural, compared with MSTR’s which he frames as more fundamentals driven. Sigel argues that over half of MARA’s equity volatility stems from its capital structure and financing dynamics rather than from pure bitcoin beta. He concludes that MSTR offers a much cleaner bitcoin duration…

MARA’s ‘Discount’ Is a Myth Once Debt Is Included, VanEck’s Sigel Warns

2025/12/06 14:47

The two largest publicly traded companies holding bitcoin, Strategy (MSTR) and MARA Holdings (MARA), have each fallen roughly 40% over the past six weeks.

CoinDesk Research has extensively covered the MSTR correction, but MARA, which is down 55% year over year, is also attracting attention as some investors view it as inexpensive at current levels.

Matthew Sigel, head of digital assets research at VanEck, argues that the perception of MARA as cheap is not supported by the data. Sigel argues that the company is actually trading at a premium to it’s bitcoin holdings and not a discount.

Sigel highlights MARA’s $3.3 billion in outstanding convertible debt relative to its $4.9 billion in bitcoin holdings. Adjusting for the convertible debt leaves just $1.6 billion of net bitcoin value before accounting for any additional liabilities that the mining business incurs.

That compares with a $4.7 billion equity market cap, which Sigel implies that MARA is in fact trading at a premium once debt is included, rather than at a discount to its bitcoin holdings.

Sigel also addresses MARA’s high short interest, which currently stands at 27%. After adjusting for delta hedging related to the company’s convertible notes, Sigel estimates that true short interest falls to about 15%, a reduction of 44%.
Sigel contrasts this with MSTR, which has more than $8 billion of convertible debt, compared to a $53 billion market cap.

Once hedge related shorts are removed, MSTR’s short interest declines by only 31%, or by roughly 9 million shares. Sigel characterizes MARA’s short interest as more structural, compared with MSTR’s which he frames as more fundamentals driven.

Sigel argues that over half of MARA’s equity volatility stems from its capital structure and financing dynamics rather than from pure bitcoin beta. He concludes that MSTR offers a much cleaner bitcoin duration exposure, while MARA’s mining equity performance is dominated by what he describes as a problematic capital structure.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/12/05/mara-trades-at-a-premium-factoring-in-its-debt-not-a-discount-vaneck-s-sigel

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05