The post Solana Ecosystem Questions Jupiter Lend’s Isolation Claims Amid Rehypothecation Warnings appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Challenge on Jupiter Lend vault independence over rehypothecation risks. Public criticism arises, claiming interconnected risks. Solana community urges clarity on risk separation claims. The independence of Jupiter Lend’s vaults has been challenged by Solana ecosystem figures, including Fluid and Kamino co-founders, due to concerns over asset rehypothecation and risk exposure. This controversy highlights critical transparency issues in DeFi, potentially affecting Jupiter Lend’s credibility and user trust, amid concerns of risk disclosure discrepancies within Solana’s ecosystem. Rehypothecation Risks and Call for Transparency Intensify The independence of vaults at Jupiter Lend, part of the Solana ecosystem, is under scrutiny. Fluid’s co-founder Samyak Jain said rehypothecation was used for capital efficiency, meaning collateral isn’t completely isolated across vaults. Kamino co-founder Marius also joined the dialogue, signaling that the migration tool to Jupiter Lend was blocked due to misleading design claims and risk underestimations, prompting concerns over user exposure to recursive strategies. Potential shifts in capital allocation are seen as community players reassess their positions in light of these revelations. Kamino and Fluid have pointed to misrepresentations in Jupiter’s messaging, calling the supposed risk separation and vault independence claims misleading. The public critique encompasses how recursive borrowing—such as using SOL—exposes lenders to unintended risks linked with rehypothecating collateral into other assets. “Vaults use rehypothecation for capital efficiency and are therefore not fully isolated in practice.” The Solana community, amid these allegations, echoes a desire for a definitive response from Jupiter. While Jupiter has emphasized 95% LTV and supposed innovation, critics argue that this masks underlying asset correlation risks. As of yet, Jupiter hasn’t provided a formal rebuttal to these cross-asset exposure concerns. Historical Context, Price Data, and Expert Insights Did you know? Controversy around Jupiter Lend’s vaults signals a recurring concern in DeFi over transparency and risk communication. From CoinMarketCap data, Solana’s… The post Solana Ecosystem Questions Jupiter Lend’s Isolation Claims Amid Rehypothecation Warnings appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Challenge on Jupiter Lend vault independence over rehypothecation risks. Public criticism arises, claiming interconnected risks. Solana community urges clarity on risk separation claims. The independence of Jupiter Lend’s vaults has been challenged by Solana ecosystem figures, including Fluid and Kamino co-founders, due to concerns over asset rehypothecation and risk exposure. This controversy highlights critical transparency issues in DeFi, potentially affecting Jupiter Lend’s credibility and user trust, amid concerns of risk disclosure discrepancies within Solana’s ecosystem. Rehypothecation Risks and Call for Transparency Intensify The independence of vaults at Jupiter Lend, part of the Solana ecosystem, is under scrutiny. Fluid’s co-founder Samyak Jain said rehypothecation was used for capital efficiency, meaning collateral isn’t completely isolated across vaults. Kamino co-founder Marius also joined the dialogue, signaling that the migration tool to Jupiter Lend was blocked due to misleading design claims and risk underestimations, prompting concerns over user exposure to recursive strategies. Potential shifts in capital allocation are seen as community players reassess their positions in light of these revelations. Kamino and Fluid have pointed to misrepresentations in Jupiter’s messaging, calling the supposed risk separation and vault independence claims misleading. The public critique encompasses how recursive borrowing—such as using SOL—exposes lenders to unintended risks linked with rehypothecating collateral into other assets. “Vaults use rehypothecation for capital efficiency and are therefore not fully isolated in practice.” The Solana community, amid these allegations, echoes a desire for a definitive response from Jupiter. While Jupiter has emphasized 95% LTV and supposed innovation, critics argue that this masks underlying asset correlation risks. As of yet, Jupiter hasn’t provided a formal rebuttal to these cross-asset exposure concerns. Historical Context, Price Data, and Expert Insights Did you know? Controversy around Jupiter Lend’s vaults signals a recurring concern in DeFi over transparency and risk communication. From CoinMarketCap data, Solana’s…

                                                                               Crypto venture funding was weak in November, with only a few major raises driving totals, as overall deal activity reached one of its lowest points this year.                     Venture capital funding in the cryptocurrency sector remained muted in November, continuing a broader slowdown that has persisted through late 2025. Deal activity was once again concentrated in a small number of large raises by established companies.As Cointelegraph previously reported, the third quarter saw a similar pattern: total funding climbed to $4.65 billion, according to Galaxy Digital, but deal counts lagged as capital flowed primarily to bigger, more mature firms.November reflected the same divergence. Figures from RootData showed only 57 disclosed crypto funding rounds during the month — one of the weakest tallies of the year — despite headline-grabbing raises such as Revolut’s $1 billion round and Kraken’s $800 million raise ahead of its anticipated initial public offering.Read more