MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade. In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric […]MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade. In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric […]

Meat importers seek expansion of pork MAV to allow new entrants

2025/12/07 20:01

MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade.

In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric tons (MT) limits opportunities for new entrants and fails to reflect current market needs.

According to MITA, pre-MAV, pork production in 1994 was roughly 1 million MT (MMT) and peaked at 1.9 MMT in 2019. Following the African Swine Fever (ASF) outbreak, production reverted to 1994 levels despite an almost doubling of the Philippine population.

MITA said the hog industry’s recovery will take years and that the proposed reallocation, particularly the portion earmarked for state-owned enterprises, which already import duty-free, will not increase total supply.

The MAV is a commitment to the World Trade Organization to allow certain quantities of goods for import. Shipments within the MAV quota are charged a most favored nation tariff, while volumes beyond that pay higher rates.

Pork shipments within the MAV quota are subject to a 15% tariff, while volumes exceeding the MAV are charged the regular 25% rate.

Agriculture Secretary Francisco Tiu Laurel, Jr. has said that the department will review MAV rules after finding that only a handful of importers cornered a significant portion of the quota. MITA said the DA’s proposed rules would allocate 50% of import quotas to processors, 30% to state-owned enterprises, and 20% to other sectors. 

MITA noted that the problem lies not with the existing allocation scheme but with the overall MAV available for importers.

“Those without quota often argue that the system is unfair to them… The challenge arises when new entrants seek to participate but available volumes are insufficient,” MITA President Emeritus Jesus C. Cham said in the letter.

The DA said it intends to maintain the total MAV under the new scheme as increased volumes would hurt the already-low farmgate prices of hog.

“Right now, we can’t raise the MAV because of the low farmgate price. It’s not the right time,” Mr. Tiu Laurel has told reporters.

In November, the DA froze applications for MAV quotas while the new policy was being worked out. MITA said the DA told it that the allocations will be finalized in January.

“The abruptness of this announcement caught licensees entirely by surprise. Orders have already been placed and buying decisions finalized. These sudden shifts have created substantial uncertainty, as imports may now fall under out-quota rates, significantly affecting landed cost and contractual commitments,” Mr. Cham said.

Earlier this year, MITA said it recommended increasing the pork MAV by 500,000 MT to offset the 900,000-MT production lost due to the ASF outbreak. The MAV Advisory Council later proposed an initial MAV Plus of 250,000 MT until 2028. Neither recommendation has been implemented.

MITA urged the government to retain the current MAV Guidelines and activate the MAV Plus mechanism for both pork and poultry, prioritizing existing licensees while designating part of the volume for first-come-first-served allocation.

The group also recommended referring the matter to the MAV Advisory Council, which they said has historically represented all stakeholders. — Vonn Andrei E. Villamiel

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token

Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token

The post Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Largest Bank in Spain Launches Crypto Service: Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token Sign Up for Our Newsletter! For updates and exclusive offers enter your email. Leah is a British journalist with a BA in Journalism, Media, and Communications and nearly a decade of content writing experience. Over the last four years, her focus has primarily been on Web3 technologies, driven by her genuine enthusiasm for decentralization and the latest technological advancements. She has contributed to leading crypto and NFT publications – Cointelegraph, Coinbound, Crypto News, NFT Plazas, Bitcolumnist, Techreport, and NFT Lately – which has elevated her to a senior role in crypto journalism. Whether crafting breaking news or in-depth reviews, she strives to engage her readers with the latest insights and information. Her articles often span the hottest cryptos, exchanges, and evolving regulations. As part of her ploy to attract crypto newbies into Web3, she explains even the most complex topics in an easily understandable and engaging way. Further underscoring her dynamic journalism background, she has written for various sectors, including software testing (TEST Magazine), travel (Travel Off Path), and music (Mixmag). When she’s not deep into a crypto rabbit hole, she’s probably island-hopping (with the Galapagos and Hainan being her go-to’s). Or perhaps sketching chalk pencil drawings while listening to the Pixies, her all-time favorite band. This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Center or Cookie Policy. I Agree Source: https://bitcoinist.com/banco-santander-and-snorter-token-crypto-services/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:45
How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

The post How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 13: Participants hold signs in support of TikTok outside the U.S. Capitol Building on March 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) Getty Images From President Trump’s first ban attempt to a near-blackout earlier this year, TikTok’s five-year roller coaster ride looks like it’s finally slowing down now that Trump has unveiled a deal framework to keep the ByteDance app alive in the U.S. A look back at the saga around TikTok starting in 2020, however, shows just how close the app came to being shut out of the US – how it narrowly averted a ban and forced sale that found rare bipartisan backing in Washington. Recapping TikTok’s dramatic five-year battle When I interviewed Brendan Carr back in 2022, for example, the future FCC chairman was already certain at that point that TikTok’s days were numbered. For a litany of perceived sins — everything from the too-cozy relationship of the app’s parent company with China’s ruling regime to the app’s repeated floating of user privacy — Carr was already convinced, at least during his conversation with me, that: “The tide is going out on TikTok.” It was, in fact, one of the few issues that Washington lawmakers seemed to agree on. Even then-President Biden was on board, having resurrected Trump’s aborted TikTok ban from his first term and signed it into law. “It feels different now than it did two years ago at the end of the Trump administration, when concerns were first raised,” Carr told me then, in August of 2022. “I think, like a lot of things in the Trump era, people sort of picked sides on the issue based on the fact that it was Trump.” One thing led to another, though, and it looked like Carr was probably…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:29