The post Korea Signals Strict New Era for Crypto Firms: Mandatory Compensation, Bigger Fines appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Regulations South Korea’s regulators are signaling a dramatic shift in how digital-asset platforms will be treated under the law. Instead of viewing crypto exchanges as technology companies operating in a gray zone, policymakers are now pushing to classify them under rules normally reserved for banks and major payment institutions — and that includes full responsibility for user losses even when the platform itself is not to blame. Key Takeaways South Korea is preparing bank-style “no-fault” liability rules for crypto exchanges. A surge of outages and the Upbit incident pushed lawmakers toward stronger consumer protections. Proposed penalties may reach 3% of annual revenue — far higher than today’s fixed fines. A separate stablecoin bill faces a December 10 deadline amid political pressure.  Recurring Exchange Failures Force Regulators to Rethink the Rules The turning point has not been a single incident but an accumulation of failures. According to data delivered to lawmakers, Korea’s biggest exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax — collectively suffered 20 service disruptions since last year. More than 900 users were affected, and losses exceeded 5 billion won.For regulators, the pattern indicates that system fragility, not isolated mistakes, is the problem. The Financial Services Commission (FSC) and Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) have concluded that voluntary safeguards are no longer sufficient, and exchanges must now meet standards closer to those that govern the banking sector. The Upbit Breach Becomes the Catalyst — but Not for the Reason Most Expect Although the late-November Upbit breach drew widespread attention, the fallout had more to do with the exchange’s response than the hack itself. More than 104 billion won worth of Solana-based tokens left Upbit wallets in under an hour. The technical failure was serious — but lawmakers were equally focused on the lag in reporting. Nearly six hours passed before… The post Korea Signals Strict New Era for Crypto Firms: Mandatory Compensation, Bigger Fines appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Regulations South Korea’s regulators are signaling a dramatic shift in how digital-asset platforms will be treated under the law. Instead of viewing crypto exchanges as technology companies operating in a gray zone, policymakers are now pushing to classify them under rules normally reserved for banks and major payment institutions — and that includes full responsibility for user losses even when the platform itself is not to blame. Key Takeaways South Korea is preparing bank-style “no-fault” liability rules for crypto exchanges. A surge of outages and the Upbit incident pushed lawmakers toward stronger consumer protections. Proposed penalties may reach 3% of annual revenue — far higher than today’s fixed fines. A separate stablecoin bill faces a December 10 deadline amid political pressure.  Recurring Exchange Failures Force Regulators to Rethink the Rules The turning point has not been a single incident but an accumulation of failures. According to data delivered to lawmakers, Korea’s biggest exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax — collectively suffered 20 service disruptions since last year. More than 900 users were affected, and losses exceeded 5 billion won.For regulators, the pattern indicates that system fragility, not isolated mistakes, is the problem. The Financial Services Commission (FSC) and Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) have concluded that voluntary safeguards are no longer sufficient, and exchanges must now meet standards closer to those that govern the banking sector. The Upbit Breach Becomes the Catalyst — but Not for the Reason Most Expect Although the late-November Upbit breach drew widespread attention, the fallout had more to do with the exchange’s response than the hack itself. More than 104 billion won worth of Solana-based tokens left Upbit wallets in under an hour. The technical failure was serious — but lawmakers were equally focused on the lag in reporting. Nearly six hours passed before…

Korea Signals Strict New Era for Crypto Firms: Mandatory Compensation, Bigger Fines

2025/12/08 03:22
Regulations

South Korea’s regulators are signaling a dramatic shift in how digital-asset platforms will be treated under the law.

Instead of viewing crypto exchanges as technology companies operating in a gray zone, policymakers are now pushing to classify them under rules normally reserved for banks and major payment institutions — and that includes full responsibility for user losses even when the platform itself is not to blame.

Key Takeaways
  • South Korea is preparing bank-style “no-fault” liability rules for crypto exchanges.
  • A surge of outages and the Upbit incident pushed lawmakers toward stronger consumer protections.
  • Proposed penalties may reach 3% of annual revenue — far higher than today’s fixed fines.
  • A separate stablecoin bill faces a December 10 deadline amid political pressure. 

Recurring Exchange Failures Force Regulators to Rethink the Rules

The turning point has not been a single incident but an accumulation of failures.

According to data delivered to lawmakers, Korea’s biggest exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax — collectively suffered 20 service disruptions since last year. More than 900 users were affected, and losses exceeded 5 billion won.
For regulators, the pattern indicates that system fragility, not isolated mistakes, is the problem.

The Financial Services Commission (FSC) and Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) have concluded that voluntary safeguards are no longer sufficient, and exchanges must now meet standards closer to those that govern the banking sector.

The Upbit Breach Becomes the Catalyst — but Not for the Reason Most Expect

Although the late-November Upbit breach drew widespread attention, the fallout had more to do with the exchange’s response than the hack itself.

More than 104 billion won worth of Solana-based tokens left Upbit wallets in under an hour. The technical failure was serious — but lawmakers were equally focused on the lag in reporting.

Nearly six hours passed before the incident was disclosed to the FSS, a delay that sparked political criticism, especially because it followed minutes after Dunamu finalized a merger with Naver Financial.

The episode convinced legislators that crypto exchanges must be held to the same rapid-reporting and consumer-compensation standards that banks face.

“No-Fault” Liability: Banks Already Live With It — Crypto May Be Next

Under Korea’s Electronic Financial Transactions Act, banks and payment firms are required to reimburse customers for losses caused by system failures, even when internal wrongdoing cannot be proven.

This “no-fault” rule ensures that consumers are protected first, and investigations come after.

Regulators are now exploring whether this same rule should apply to exchanges — meaning a hacked or malfunctioning platform would be required to pay back customers regardless of whether negligence is established.

This would represent the most aggressive consumer-protection mandate ever imposed on Korea’s crypto sector.

Stricter Fines, Higher Operational Standards and Mandatory Security Upgrades

In addition to liability expansion, lawmakers are considering new enforcement tools.

One proposal would authorize fines of up to 3% of annual revenue for major incidents — matching penalties already used for banks. Today, even severe failures by crypto exchanges carry a maximum fine of only about $3.4 million, a figure many lawmakers say is outdated and too small to deter misconduct.

The broader package is expected to include tougher IT requirements, enhanced auditing, and mandatory reporting windows measured in minutes, not hours.

Regulation Expands Beyond Hacks — Stablecoins Now Under Deadline Pressure

The push for exchange liability coincides with mounting political demands for a comprehensive stablecoin law.

Parliament has given regulators until December 10 to deliver a draft bill.

If they miss the deadline, senior lawmakers have warned they will advance legislation without the government’s input during the National Assembly’s extraordinary session in early 2026.

This suggests Korea intends to modernize its crypto framework across multiple fronts at once: exchanges, payments, stablecoins and anti–money laundering controls.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Author

Kosta joined the team in 2021 and quickly established himself with his thirst for knowledge, incredible dedication, and analytical thinking. He not only covers a wide range of current topics, but also writes excellent reviews, PR articles, and educational materials. His articles are also quoted by other news agencies.

Related stories

Next article

Source: https://coindoo.com/korea-signals-strict-new-era-for-crypto-firms-mandatory-compensation-bigger-fines/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

The post Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor and a group of crypto executives met in Washington, D.C. yesterday to push for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (the BITCOIN Act), which would see the U.S. acquire up to 1M $BTC over five years. With Bitcoin being positioned yet again as a cornerstone of national monetary policy, many investors are turning their eyes to projects that lean into this narrative – altcoins, meme coins, and presales that could ride on the same wave. Read on for three of the best crypto projects that seem especially well‐suited to benefit from this macro shift:  Bitcoin Hyper, Best Wallet Token, and Remittix. These projects stand out for having a strong use case and high adoption potential, especially given the push for a U.S. Bitcoin reserve.   Why the Bitcoin Reserve Bill Matters for Crypto Markets The strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill could mark a turning point for the U.S. approach to digital assets. The proposal would see America build a long-term Bitcoin reserve by acquiring up to one million $BTC over five years. To make this happen, lawmakers are exploring creative funding methods such as revaluing old gold certificates. The plan also leans on confiscated Bitcoin already held by the government, worth an estimated $15–20B. This isn’t just a headline for policy wonks. It signals that Bitcoin is moving from the margins into the core of financial strategy. Industry figures like Michael Saylor, Senator Cynthia Lummis, and Marathon Digital’s Fred Thiel are all backing the bill. They see Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a hedge against systemic risks. For the wider crypto market, this opens the door for projects tied to Bitcoin and the infrastructure that supports it. 1. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) – Turning Bitcoin Into More Than Just Digital Gold The U.S. may soon treat Bitcoin as…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:27
The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The post The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. From encrypted chats to decentralized messaging Encrypted messengers are having a second wave. Apps like WhatsApp, iMessage and Signal made end-to-end encryption (E2EE) a default expectation. But most still hinge on phone numbers, centralized servers and a lot of metadata, such as who you talk to, when, from which IP and on which device. That is what Vitalik Buterin is aiming at in his recent X post and donation. He argues the next steps for secure messaging are permissionless account creation with no phone numbers or Know Your Customer (KYC) and much stronger metadata privacy. In that context he highlighted Session and SimpleX and sent 128 Ether (ETH) to each to keep pushing in that direction. Session is a good case study because it tries to combine E2E encryption with decentralization. There is no central message server, traffic is routed through onion paths, and user IDs are keys instead of phone numbers. Did you know? Forty-three percent of people who use public WiFi report experiencing a data breach, with man-in-the-middle attacks and packet sniffing against unencrypted traffic among the most common causes. How Session stores your messages Session is built around public key identities. When you sign up, the app generates a keypair locally and derives a Session ID from it with no phone number or email required. Messages travel through a network of service nodes using onion routing so that no single node can see both the sender and the recipient. (You can see your message’s node path in the settings.) For asynchronous delivery when you are offline, messages are stored in small groups of nodes called “swarms.” Each Session ID is mapped to a specific swarm, and your messages are stored there encrypted until your client fetches them. Historically, messages had a default time-to-live of about two weeks…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 14:40