Key Takeaways: South Korea plans to apply bank-level, no-fault compensation rules to crypto exchanges after a major breach at Upbit. Regulators want exchanges to reimburse users for losses from hacks The post South Korea to Impose Bank-Level Liability on Crypto Exchanges After Upbit’s $30M Hack appeared first on CryptoNinjas.Key Takeaways: South Korea plans to apply bank-level, no-fault compensation rules to crypto exchanges after a major breach at Upbit. Regulators want exchanges to reimburse users for losses from hacks The post South Korea to Impose Bank-Level Liability on Crypto Exchanges After Upbit’s $30M Hack appeared first on CryptoNinjas.

South Korea to Impose Bank-Level Liability on Crypto Exchanges After Upbit’s $30M Hack

2025/12/08 02:45

Key Takeaways:

  • South Korea plans to apply bank-level, no-fault compensation rules to crypto exchanges after a major breach at Upbit.
  • Regulators want exchanges to reimburse users for losses from hacks or system failures, even if the platform is not at fault.
  • The upcoming overhaul introduces stricter IT requirements, higher penalties, and expanded oversight, signaling the toughest regulatory shift in Korea’s crypto sector to date.

South Korea is preparing one of its most aggressive regulatory responses yet after a high-profile incident at Upbit reignited concerns about weak digital-asset protections. The government now aims to treat crypto exchanges with the same standards as traditional financial institutions, an approach that could redefine operational risk across the entire industry.

Read More: Upbit Hit Again: ₩44.5B Solana Hot-Wallet Hack Slams Korea’s Top Crypto Exchange

Government Moves to Treat Crypto Platforms Like Banks

South Korean regulators have long acknowledged gaps in their digital-asset rulebook, but the latest breach at Upbit strengthened the political urgency to act. Authorities are now pursuing a framework that would require exchanges to compensate users for financial losses regardless of fault, mirroring the liability rules that banks and electronic payment firms must follow.

This marks a significant departure from the current system, in which crypto platforms face far fewer obligations. Under existing laws, regulators cannot compel reimbursement even when an exchange suffers a major security lapse. The Upbit hack exposed this shortcoming in real time.

On November 27, more than 104 billion won worth of Solana-based tokens, roughly $30 million were transferred out of Upbit to external wallets in less than an hour. Despite the scale of the breach, legal constraints left authorities with limited power to enforce compensation or issue meaningful penalties.

For policymakers, this incident was not isolated, it was the latest example of operational fragility within Korea’s crypto sector. As one official noted, user protection standards had become “unacceptably inconsistent” with the size and influence of the industry.

Recurring Failures Highlight the Scale of the Problem

Repeated Outages and Weak Obligations Accelerate the Regulatory Shift

Data submitted to lawmakers by the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) shows that the nation’s five major exchanges: Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax reported 20 system failures from 2023 through September this year. Over 900 users were not spared by these disruptions and an estimated 5 billion won was lost.

Upbit alone registered six incidences, which impacted on more than 600 clients. It is apparent that the trend indicates that technical instability is not a sporadic inconvenience but a structural risk that cannot be ignored anymore by the regulators.

Outages in the system have severely important consequences in Korea, with the volumes of cryptocurrency trading being some of the highest in the region, which is why there can be the logistics of inability to withdraw funds, paralyzing accounts, and breaking of price transactions during unpredictable times. The fact that such failures may cause forced losses by retail traders and erode market confidence in a larger scale.

Regulators are of the opinion that in the absence of tougher accountability guidelines, exchanges will have very little motivation to improve infrastructure or implement bank-style security measures. The new liability model will aim at undoing that imbalance.

Read More: South Korea Warns ETFs: Crypto Exposure Too High – Coinbase & MicroStrategy Under Fire

The post South Korea to Impose Bank-Level Liability on Crypto Exchanges After Upbit’s $30M Hack appeared first on CryptoNinjas.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The post The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. From encrypted chats to decentralized messaging Encrypted messengers are having a second wave. Apps like WhatsApp, iMessage and Signal made end-to-end encryption (E2EE) a default expectation. But most still hinge on phone numbers, centralized servers and a lot of metadata, such as who you talk to, when, from which IP and on which device. That is what Vitalik Buterin is aiming at in his recent X post and donation. He argues the next steps for secure messaging are permissionless account creation with no phone numbers or Know Your Customer (KYC) and much stronger metadata privacy. In that context he highlighted Session and SimpleX and sent 128 Ether (ETH) to each to keep pushing in that direction. Session is a good case study because it tries to combine E2E encryption with decentralization. There is no central message server, traffic is routed through onion paths, and user IDs are keys instead of phone numbers. Did you know? Forty-three percent of people who use public WiFi report experiencing a data breach, with man-in-the-middle attacks and packet sniffing against unencrypted traffic among the most common causes. How Session stores your messages Session is built around public key identities. When you sign up, the app generates a keypair locally and derives a Session ID from it with no phone number or email required. Messages travel through a network of service nodes using onion routing so that no single node can see both the sender and the recipient. (You can see your message’s node path in the settings.) For asynchronous delivery when you are offline, messages are stored in small groups of nodes called “swarms.” Each Session ID is mapped to a specific swarm, and your messages are stored there encrypted until your client fetches them. Historically, messages had a default time-to-live of about two weeks…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 14:40
Grayscale Files Sui Trust as 21Shares Launches First SUI ETF Amid Rising Demand

Grayscale Files Sui Trust as 21Shares Launches First SUI ETF Amid Rising Demand

The post Grayscale Files Sui Trust as 21Shares Launches First SUI ETF Amid Rising Demand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Grayscale Sui Trust filing and 21Shares’ launch of the first SUI ETF highlight surging interest in regulated Sui investments. These products offer investors direct exposure to the SUI token through spot-style structures, simplifying access to the Sui blockchain’s growth without direct custody needs, amid expanding altcoin ETF options. Grayscale’s spot Sui Trust seeks to track SUI price performance for long-term holders. 21Shares’ SUI ETF provides leveraged exposure, targeting traders with 2x daily returns. Early trading data shows over 4,700 shares exchanged, with volumes exceeding $24 per unit in the debut session. Explore Grayscale Sui Trust filing and 21Shares SUI ETF launch: Key developments in regulated Sui investments for 2025. Stay informed on altcoin ETF trends. What is the Grayscale Sui Trust? The Grayscale Sui Trust is a proposed spot-style investment product filed via S-1 registration with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, aimed at providing investors with direct exposure to the SUI token’s price movements. This trust mirrors the performance of SUI, the native cryptocurrency of the Sui blockchain, minus applicable fees, offering a regulated avenue for long-term participation in the network’s ecosystem. By holding SUI assets on behalf of investors, it eliminates the need for individuals to manage token storage or transactions directly. ⚡ LATEST: GRAYSCALE FILES S-1 FOR $SUI TRUSTThe “Grayscale Sui Trust,” is a spot-style ETF designed to provide direct exposure to the $SUI token. Grayscale’s goal is to mirror SUI’s market performance, minus fees, giving long-term investors a regulated, hassle-free way to… pic.twitter.com/mPQMINLrYC — CryptosRus (@CryptosR_Us) December 6, 2025 How does the 21Shares SUI ETF differ from traditional funds? The 21Shares SUI ETF, launched under the ticker TXXS, introduces a leveraged approach with 2x daily exposure to SUI’s price fluctuations, utilizing derivatives for amplified returns rather than direct spot holdings. This structure appeals to short-term…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 14:20