ZachXBT has sharply criticized major InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps, Galxe, and Layer3 for fueling a rise in AI-driven spam and low-quality content. He claims these platforms, by incentivizing engagement farming, are polluting the ecosystem and undermining genuine discussions. ZachXBT’s critique has sparked a wider debate on the consequences of automated content flooding, with many users calling for reforms to restore authenticity to these platforms.
Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has raised concerns about the growing problem of AI-generated spam in the InfoFi space. In recent social media posts, he targeted several prominent platforms such as Kaito Yaps, Galxe, Layer3, Cookie, and Wallchain. According to ZachXBT, these platforms encourage AI bots to flood feeds with low-value interactions, resulting in what he describes as “ecosystem pollution.”
He pointed out that many of these platforms incentivize users to engage in repetitive, low-quality activity to earn rewards. This, he argues, leads to a flood of AI-generated content that undermines meaningful discussion and harms the credibility of the ecosystem. “All the meta has done is boost AI slop and low-quality content while pretending it brought sticky users to the project,” he wrote in a response to a promotion for Kaito Yaps in July.
InfoFi platforms, such as Kaito Yaps and Galxe, have faced scrutiny for their use of AI models to incentivize user engagement. These platforms reward users with tokens for activities like market commentary, predictions, and social media posts. However, critics argue that these reward structures have encouraged the rise of automated bots designed to produce high volumes of low-quality content.
The issue is exacerbated by the engagement-driven systems that prioritize quantity over the quality of user contributions. ZachXBT criticized these platforms for promoting a “game the system” mentality, where bots and coordinated groups flood feeds to maximize rewards. He believes this undermines genuine user interactions and weakens the integrity of discussions.
To bring attention to the issue, ZachXBT has initiated a bounty program. He is offering cash rewards for individuals who can successfully scrape user data from the platforms in question. The aim is to gather data that can expose the scale of AI-driven activity across platforms like Kaito Yaps, Wallchain, Galxe, and Layer3.
On his Telegram channel, ZachXBT posted a bounty of $5,000 for the first person who could compile data sets from the specified platforms. He urged people to collect any available information, including usernames, user IDs, and on-chain addresses. His efforts highlight the growing frustration within the crypto community with the increasing prevalence of automated, low-value content.
The growing criticism of InfoFi platforms is not limited to ZachXBT. Many users within the crypto community have voiced their frustration with the engagement farming tactics seen on platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe. Some argue that the incentive structures reward users for posting content that adds little value to the discussion.
“Instead of experts, we have an army of mercenaries. Instead of discussions, we have ‘Reply Guys’ on steroids,” said Azel, a community commentator. Many users feel that these platforms have shifted their focus from genuine conversation to artificial metrics that prioritize engagement over substance.
In response to these concerns, some platforms have begun exploring ways to improve the quality of content by reducing the influence of AI bots. Despite these efforts, the ongoing challenge of balancing user engagement with content quality remains a significant issue for the InfoFi space.
The post ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content appeared first on CoinCentral.


