According to a postmortem report, a math error in the Truebit Protocol purchase contract was responsible for the $26 million theft Hackers minted millions in tokensAccording to a postmortem report, a math error in the Truebit Protocol purchase contract was responsible for the $26 million theft Hackers minted millions in tokens

This Is What Really Happened In The $26M Truebit Hack

  • According to a postmortem report, a math error in the Truebit Protocol purchase contract was responsible for the $26 million theft
  • Hackers minted millions in tokens for nearly zero cost by bypassing overflow checks.
  • The TRU token price crashed by 100% following the $26 million drain.

The cryptocurrency space was hit hard on January 12, when the Truebit Protocol suffered a massive exploit that drained $26 million. 

This event caused the native TRU token to lose all its value almost instantly. Security experts from SlowMist analysed the situation and found that a small mistake in the code led to this financial disaster.

How a Simple Code Error Led to the Truebit hack

Every smart contract relies on precise math to work properly. 

In the case of Truebit, the contract used to buy tokens contained a small mistake. The developers wrote the contract using an older version of the Solidity programming language. 

Specifically, they used version 0.6.10, and this version does not automatically check for a problem called “integer overflow.”

How the attacker stole the funds How the attacker stole the funds | source: Slowmist

The attacker figured out a way to craft a specific minting amount. When the contract tried to add numbers together to calculate the price, the total became too large for the system to handle. 

Instead of stopping the transaction, the number wrapped around back to zero. This “silent overflow” meant that the price of millions of tokens suddenly became zero. The hacker exploited this loophole to mint 8,535 ETH worth of tokens at almost no cost. 

The Immediate Result of the Truebit Protocol Hack on the Market

Once the tokens were minted for free, the attacker quickly began draining the protocol’s reserves. 

The TRU token price fell by 99% within minutes of the discovery, and currently, the token shows a 100% loss on major tracking sites like CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko. Trading volume has vanished as investors lost all faith in the project.

The Truebit team acknowledged the incident through their official channels. 

They identified the affected contract and told users to stop interacting with it. They are now working with law enforcement to trace the stolen funds. However, many community members feel that a full recovery is unlikely. 

Unexpected Gains for Other Platforms

While Truebit suffered, other parts of the ecosystem saw even worse activity. Uniswap recorded a massive jump in its daily trading fee revenue on January 8. 

The platform captured over $1.4 million in fees in a single day, and this was the highest amount the platform had ever seen.

Analysts discovered that nearly $1.3 million of those fees came from trades related to the TRU token. The high volume was a direct result of the arbitrage and selling happening during the hack. 

An analyst named Marcov eventually removed these values from the live Dune dashboard. Since the token value hit zero, those fees will not be used to burn UNI as originally expected. 

The Move Toward Social Engineering and Phishing

While protocol hacks still happen, many criminals now seem to be changing their approach. They are moving away from complex code exploits to target human behaviour. 

Crypto phishing scams cost investors $722 million across 248 incidents last year. 

Fortunately, people are becoming more aware of these dangers. The total amount lost to phishing so far in 2025 was 38% lower than the $1 billion lost in 2024. 

This shows that education and better wallet security are starting to work. Even so, the Truebit Protocol hack proves that technical bugs are still a massive danger.

The post This Is What Really Happened In The $26M Truebit Hack appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
MATH Logo
MATH Price(MATH)
$0.03613
$0.03613$0.03613
-4.03%
USD
MATH (MATH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record

‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record

The post ‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline “Sinners” shattered a 75-year-old record
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:34
‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years

‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years

The post ‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Return to Silent Hil Return to Silent Hil
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:19