The Senate delayed consideration of a sweeping US crypto bill again as lawmakers prioritized housing legislation tied to rising living costs. A major US crypto The Senate delayed consideration of a sweeping US crypto bill again as lawmakers prioritized housing legislation tied to rising living costs. A major US crypto

U.S. lawmakers push back crypto bill markup amid housing focus

The Senate delayed consideration of a sweeping US crypto bill again as lawmakers prioritized housing legislation tied to rising living costs.

Summary
  • The Senate Banking Committee postponed the crypto bill markup to late as housing takes priority.
  • Lawmakers shifted focus to housing affordability amid Trump administration pressure.
  • Industry groups may gain more time to lobby as crypto legislation stalls.

A major US crypto market bill faced another setback this week, as Senate lawmakers shifted attention to housing legislation tied to rising living costs.

According to a Jan. 22 Bloomberg report, the Senate Banking Committee was expected to delay its markup of the long-awaited digital asset market structure bill by several weeks, pushing the timeline to late February or March.

Housing costs take priority in Senate agenda

The renewed delay followed pressure from the Trump administration to focus on affordability issues ahead of the 2026 congressional elections, with housing identified as a key driver of inflation for American households.

Lawmakers began drafting legislation aimed at limiting large institutional investors from buying single-family homes. Earlier this week, President Donald Trump signed an executive order instructing the Treasury Department to set thresholds for large institutional buyers and directing federal agencies to prohibit government-backed support for such purchases. 

Estimates indicate that institutional investors own less than 1% of U.S. single-family homes, although the effect of such measures on housing prices is still unknown. Still, political concerns around housing costs have taken precedence over crypto policy, despite digital assets being listed as a priority by the administration.

A spokesperson for the Senate Banking Committee declined to comment, while the White House did not immediately respond to media inquiries.

Crypto bill stalls amid industry and political friction

The crypto bill had already been postponed once on Jan. 15 after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong withdrew support, citing concerns over provisions affecting stablecoin rewards and tokenized equities.

The legislation seeks to establish a federal framework for digital assets by dividing oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The proposal calls for the CFTC to oversee digital commodities like Bitcoin (BTC), while the SEC would continue to oversee securities-linked tokens. 

According to industry associations, the bill would help maintain cryptocurrency innovation in the U.S. and offer much-needed regulatory clarity. The current drafts, according to critics like Coinbase, could limit yields, boost surveillance, and put pressure on decentralized finance protocols.

The delay may allow crypto firms and financial institutions more time to lobby lawmakers for changes that could attract broader support.

In parallel, the Senate Agriculture Committee released its own GOP-led draft on Jan. 21 and scheduled a markup for Jan. 27 at 3:00 p.m. ET. The proposal expanded the CFTC’s authority over digital commodities but lacked full Democratic backing, including support from Senator Cory Booker.

Any final legislation would need to merge the Agriculture and Banking Committee versions before reaching a full Senate vote. Industry estimates placed the bill’s chances of passage at 20% to 30% without major compromises, raising concerns that prolonged delays could leave U.S. crypto policy unresolved ahead of the 2026 mid-term elections.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.002466
$0.002466$0.002466
-0.08%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Superstate Raises Over $82 Million to Develop Onchain Capital Markets

Superstate Raises Over $82 Million to Develop Onchain Capital Markets

Superstate announced that it has raised $82.5 million in a Series B funding round. The capital will be used to develop infrastructure for issuing and trading shares
Share
Incrypted2026/01/23 00:13
Valicor Brings Financial Education to Second High School in Underserved Community

Valicor Brings Financial Education to Second High School in Underserved Community

Partnership with Ramsey Education expands from Cincinnati to Michigan, equipping students with essential money management skills. MONROE, Ohio., Jan. 22, 2026 /
Share
AI Journal2026/01/22 23:50