According to David Sacks, the appointed crypto and AI Czar at the White House, there are expected to be no distinctions between the banking industry and the cryptoAccording to David Sacks, the appointed crypto and AI Czar at the White House, there are expected to be no distinctions between the banking industry and the crypto

David Sacks Says Banks and Crypto Will Merge Into One Digital Asset Industry

  • David Sacks states that the banking industry and crypto industry are going to have to merge to create one digital assets industry.
  • Noting that a cryptocurrency market structure legislation may facilitate the trend, especially regarding stablecoins.

According to David Sacks, the appointed crypto and AI Czar at the White House, there are expected to be no distinctions between the banking industry and the crypto market in the soon to be developed regulatory structures. These were the remarks made during a CNBC interview at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, according to which he stated that the banks and crypto companies are heading to a combined digital industry.

Sacks also pointed to the ongoing debates regarding the US crypto market structure bill. He noted that one of the points of contention in the discussion is whether issuers of stablecoins are allowed to yield. However, Sacks made it clear that a compromise between the crypto community and the banking community may be achieved in order to allow banks to fully participate in the market once the bill becomes a law.

The impending consolidation involving banks and crypto companies is a larger shift in the way in which digital assets are perceived by policymakers and financial leaders. According to Sacks, with the entrance of banks into the stablecoin and digital assets market, there is expected to be a shift to some of the traditional attributes of the crypto market, such as the yield strategy linked to the creation of stablecoin.

Regulatory and Industry Context

Sacks stressed the need for people in the cryptocurrency and banking communities to “see the bigger picture” in coming to a consensus on outstanding issues in legislation, such as those regarding the yield for stablecoins, which Sacks described as important to the philosophy underlying cryptocurrencies but necessary to resolve to move forward with broader legislation.

The general regulatory landscape is characterized by intense debate in the US regarding the regulation of digital assets. The much-disputed “CLARITY Act” and market structure debates center on the scope of regulatory power of Federal agencies and the regulatory standards of digital asset instruments and services. Key stakeholders in the industry differ on their take regarding the perfect regulatory handling of innovation and protection of the investment.

The banks have also been showing interest in digital assets, which can be reflected in the kind of vision laid out in Sacks’ comments, anticipating a formal structure that will be implemented in legislation. The supporters of integrating the sectors believe that the alignment of banking infrastructure with the technology of the blockchain and the stablecoin will bring about financial inclusion.

The projection made by David Sacks that the banking and cryptocurrency sectors will combine and form a new digital asset industry shows the dramatic shift that exists in the financial environment and the fact that the two industries are becoming codependent. With the U.S. Congress still struggling with legislation for the crypto markets, the relationship between the financial and crypto markets could be the future of financial services and regulation.

Highlighted Crypto News:

X Introduces Starterpacks to Help New Users Find Top Crypto Accounts

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record

‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record

The post ‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline “Sinners” shattered a 75-year-old record
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:34
‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years

‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years

The post ‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Return to Silent Hil Return to Silent Hil
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:19