The post Dusan Vlahovic Scored Against Parma, But Where Does His Future Lie? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ALLIANZ STADIUM, TORINO, ITALY – 2025/08/24: Dusan Vlahovic of Juventus Fc gestures during the Serie A football match between Juventus Fc and Parma Calcio. Juventus Fc wins 2-0 over Parma Calcio. (Photo by Marco Canoniero/LightRocket via Getty Images) LightRocket via Getty Images What kind of future does Dusan Vlahovic have at Juventus? The Serb came off the bench against Parma on the opening weekend of the season to score a goal, only his second goal in the last six months, and secured all three points for The Old Lady. Juve laboured for parts of the match, but did just about enough to bring home a victory. Vlahovic came on as a substitute for Jonathan David, who scored on his debut, with 10 minutes remaining. If Vlahovic is to stay in Turin this season, this is likely to be a snapshot of his campaign: a reserve, receiving fleeting moments of playing time. The 25-year-old’s time at Juve has been rocky, to say the least. Arriving with massive expectations, the former Fiorentina man hasn’t come close to showing the kind of form he did in Florence. Three-and-a-half years and 59 goals later, Vlahovic may well have just netted his last in Bianconero colours. The issue isn’t perhaps his output in itself, 59 goals from 146 games isn’t the worst record in the world, but it’s the price tag and his salary which is held against him. Juve paid Fiorentina some $90m for Vlahovic in the winter of 2022, and handed him a hefty $14m-per-season contract to fend off interest from Arsenal. And this is where the mistake was made. For a start, Vlahovic was never worth that kind of money, neither in transfer fee nor salary. Yet Juve paid it, and in this sense it’s hardly the Serb’s fault. On the other… The post Dusan Vlahovic Scored Against Parma, But Where Does His Future Lie? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ALLIANZ STADIUM, TORINO, ITALY – 2025/08/24: Dusan Vlahovic of Juventus Fc gestures during the Serie A football match between Juventus Fc and Parma Calcio. Juventus Fc wins 2-0 over Parma Calcio. (Photo by Marco Canoniero/LightRocket via Getty Images) LightRocket via Getty Images What kind of future does Dusan Vlahovic have at Juventus? The Serb came off the bench against Parma on the opening weekend of the season to score a goal, only his second goal in the last six months, and secured all three points for The Old Lady. Juve laboured for parts of the match, but did just about enough to bring home a victory. Vlahovic came on as a substitute for Jonathan David, who scored on his debut, with 10 minutes remaining. If Vlahovic is to stay in Turin this season, this is likely to be a snapshot of his campaign: a reserve, receiving fleeting moments of playing time. The 25-year-old’s time at Juve has been rocky, to say the least. Arriving with massive expectations, the former Fiorentina man hasn’t come close to showing the kind of form he did in Florence. Three-and-a-half years and 59 goals later, Vlahovic may well have just netted his last in Bianconero colours. The issue isn’t perhaps his output in itself, 59 goals from 146 games isn’t the worst record in the world, but it’s the price tag and his salary which is held against him. Juve paid Fiorentina some $90m for Vlahovic in the winter of 2022, and handed him a hefty $14m-per-season contract to fend off interest from Arsenal. And this is where the mistake was made. For a start, Vlahovic was never worth that kind of money, neither in transfer fee nor salary. Yet Juve paid it, and in this sense it’s hardly the Serb’s fault. On the other…

Dusan Vlahovic Scored Against Parma, But Where Does His Future Lie?

2025/08/29 05:14

ALLIANZ STADIUM, TORINO, ITALY – 2025/08/24: Dusan Vlahovic of Juventus Fc gestures during the Serie A football match between Juventus Fc and Parma Calcio. Juventus Fc wins 2-0 over Parma Calcio. (Photo by Marco Canoniero/LightRocket via Getty Images)

LightRocket via Getty Images

What kind of future does Dusan Vlahovic have at Juventus?

The Serb came off the bench against Parma on the opening weekend of the season to score a goal, only his second goal in the last six months, and secured all three points for The Old Lady.

Juve laboured for parts of the match, but did just about enough to bring home a victory.

Vlahovic came on as a substitute for Jonathan David, who scored on his debut, with 10 minutes remaining.

If Vlahovic is to stay in Turin this season, this is likely to be a snapshot of his campaign: a reserve, receiving fleeting moments of playing time.

The 25-year-old’s time at Juve has been rocky, to say the least. Arriving with massive expectations, the former Fiorentina man hasn’t come close to showing the kind of form he did in Florence.

Three-and-a-half years and 59 goals later, Vlahovic may well have just netted his last in Bianconero colours.

The issue isn’t perhaps his output in itself, 59 goals from 146 games isn’t the worst record in the world, but it’s the price tag and his salary which is held against him.

Juve paid Fiorentina some $90m for Vlahovic in the winter of 2022, and handed him a hefty $14m-per-season contract to fend off interest from Arsenal.

And this is where the mistake was made. For a start, Vlahovic was never worth that kind of money, neither in transfer fee nor salary. Yet Juve paid it, and in this sense it’s hardly the Serb’s fault.

On the other hand, that kind of transfer fee brings expectations, the sort that is often unrealistic and can never be reached.

Vlahovic has struggled for large parts of his time in Turin. Especially during Max Allegri’s second stint, where he was often isolated up front with little means of support from a team that did the bare minimum to win games.

Even Gabriel Batistuta in his prime would’ve struggled for goals.

On the other hand, Vlahovic struggled against teams who would set up a low block which, considering he now played for Juventus, worked against him.

At Fiorentina, teams would attack and thus leave space for him to score goals. At Juve, he lacked the technical brilliant to wriggle past opposing defenders to create space.

His confidence hit a nadir last season when Thiago Motta essentially washed his hands off him once Randal Kolo Muani was signed.

The Frenchman has more to his game and offered the kind of all-round attacking play Motta wanted from a striker. When he was sacked, many felt Vlahovic would be back in the team under new coach Igor Tudor.

He was, but the old familiar pattern reemerged: Vlahovic struggled, even when service was provided. Vlahovic featured in the top five for ‘big chances missed’ in Serie A games in two consecutive seasons, topping the charts in 2023/24.

Rumours of a move to Milan and a reunion with Allegri persisted all summer long, but with the club now set to sign Christopher Nkunku from Chelsea, Vlahovic may have no other choice but to remain in Turin for one more season, then leave as a free agent in the summer.

A fresh start is best for all concerned, but it may not happen as soon as Vlahovic would like it to.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmetgates/2025/08/28/dusan-vlahovic-scored-against-parma-but-where-does-his-future-lie/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

The post Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is making another attempt to break the downtrend that has kept the crypto king capped since late October. Price is hovering near $91,000 as investors watch a rare shift in market structure unfold.  For the first time in more than two and a half years, short-term holders have surpassed long-term holders in realized profits, creating both opportunities and risks for BTC. Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin Sees Some Shift The MVRV Long/Short Difference highlights a notable change in Bitcoin’s profit distribution. A positive reading usually signals long-term holders hold more unrealized gains, while a negative value indicates short-term holders are ahead. In Bitcoin’s case, the difference has dipped into negative territory for the first time since March 2023. This marks 30 months since short-term holders last led in profits. Such dominance raises concerns because short-term holders tend to sell aggressively when volatility increases. Their profit-taking behavior could add pressure on BTC’s price if the broader market weakens, especially during attempts to break the downtrend. Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. Bitcoin MVRV Long/Short Difference. Source: Santiment Sponsored Sponsored Despite this shift, Bitcoin’s broader momentum shows encouraging signs. Exchange net position change data confirms rising outflows across major platforms, signaling a shift in investor accumulation. BTC leaving exchanges is often treated as a bullish indicator, reflecting confidence in long-term appreciation. This trend suggests that many traders view the $90,000 range as a reasonable bottom zone and are preparing for a potential recovery. Sustained outflows support price stability and strengthen the probability of BTC breaking above immediate resistance levels. Bitcoin Exchange Net Position Change. Source: Glassnode BTC Price Is Trying Its Best Bitcoin is trading at $91,330 at the time of writing, positioned just below the $91,521 resistance. Reclaiming this level and flipping it into support…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 05:57
OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

The post OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The successful stock market debut of Moore Threads, a company that’s being touted as China’s answer to Nvidia, has been overshadowed by resurfaced allegations that link one of its co-founders to an unpaid cryptocurrency debt that has been lingering for roughly a decade. Shares in the GPU maker skyrocketed to as much as 470% on Thursday following its initial public offering (IPO) on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, valuing the company at around RMB 282 billion ($39.9 billion). However, as the success was being celebrated online, a social media post revived claims that Moore Threads’ co-founder Li Feng borrowed 1,500 Bitcoins from Mingxing “Star” Xu, founder and CEO of cryptocurrency exchange OKX, and never repaid the loan. Crypto past with OKX founder resurfaces In an X post, AB Kuai.Dong referenced Feng’s involvement in a 2017 initial coin offering that raised 5,000 ETH alongside controversial angel investor Xue Manzi. Feng allegedly dismissed the Bitcoin loan, stating, “It was just that Xu Mingxing’s investment in me had failed.” Xu responded to the post with a conciliatory message, writing, “People cannot always remain in the shadow of negative history. Face the future and contribute more positive energy.” He added, “Let the legal system handle the debt issue,” and offered blessings to every entrepreneur. Feng reportedly partnered with Xue Manzi and Li Xiaolai in 2017 to launch Malego Coin, which was later renamed Alpaca Coin MGD. The project reportedly raised approximately 5,000 ETH, but it was around this period that China banned ICOs, allowing regulators to crack down on what they viewed as speculative excess and potential fraud in the cryptocurrency sector. The Bitcoin loan dispute appears separate from the ICO controversy. According to sources familiar with the matter, the original loan agreement was dated December 17, 2014, with an expiry of December 16, 2016.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 06:13
Solana Foundation calls out Kamino and Jupiter rivalry, directs focus on growth

Solana Foundation calls out Kamino and Jupiter rivalry, directs focus on growth

The post Solana Foundation calls out Kamino and Jupiter rivalry, directs focus on growth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Lily Liu, the president of the Solana Foundation, has entered the growing feud between Kamino Finance, an established player in Solana’s lending market, and Jupiter Lend, a more recent entrant into the lending space.  Jupiter launched Jupiter Lend in August, and it has already grown to $1 billion in TVL. The Solana lending market is currently valued at around $5 billion, a number that is significantly dwarfed by Ethereum’s $50 billion and the trillions in TradFi collateral markets. Solana Foundation’s president does not mind the competition Lily Liu, president of the Solana Foundation, referenced the current valuation of Solana’s lending market in her post. That gap is what is fueling the competitive landscape in Solana’s lending sector. While it has led to rapid innovation, tensions have been rising between protocols vying for dominance. “Hey @kamino @jup_lend, Love you both,” she wrote. “…We can snipe at one another (one click lending position conversion; dunking on sloppy remarks; etc) or we can focus on capturing market share from all of crypto and then Tradfi beyond that.” As the Solana Foundation executive is concerned, competition has always been healthy for the space, but it is crucial not to lose sight of the main goal, which is capturing more market share from Ethereum and TradFi. Why are Kamino Finance and Jupiter Lend feuding? Jupiter Lend had had to contend with accusations that the protocol misled users about the platform’s risk isolation and rehypothecation practices, with critics (mostly founders from rival protocols like Kamino and Fluid) claiming that Jupiter Lend falsely advertised its vaults as completely isolated, an act that could potentially expose the broader DeFi space to contagion during market stress. While Kash Dhanda, Jupiter Lend’s co-founder, admitted that the initial “zero contagion” assertion was not 100% accurate, the executive insisted that rehypothecation occurs…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 06:40