USO, USL and BNO are all exchange-traded oil products managed by United States Commodity Funds, but they use different futures strategies.
The key distinction is:
USO
= short-dated WTI-focused exposure
USL
= diversified exposure across 12 consecutive WTI futures months
BNO
= short-dated Brent-focused exposure
That means investors can hold three products that all appear to be “oil funds” and still receive meaningfully different results.
| Feature | USO | USL | BNO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full name | United States Oil Fund | United States 12 Month Oil Fund | United States Brent Oil Fund |
| Benchmark | WTI | WTI | Brent |
| Futures structure | Short-dated | 12 consecutive months | Short-dated |
| Exchange | NYSE Arca | NYSE Arca | NYSE Arca |
| Main curve sensitivity | Front of WTI curve | Spread across curve | Front of Brent curve |
| Commodity pool | Yes | Yes | Yes |
USO primarily references the near-month WTI contract and changes into the next-month contract during its five-day roll process.
That provides relatively concentrated exposure to the front of the WTI futures curve.
The United States 12 Month Oil Fund (USL) uses a substantially different benchmark.
USCF says its benchmark consists of:
That produces 12 consecutive futures contracts, with each contract equally weighted when calculating the benchmark's daily movement.
Because USL spreads its exposure across the curve.
If severe contango exists mainly at the very front of the curve, USL's broader structure can reduce concentration in that particular roll relationship.
But that does not mean USL is immune to futures-curve risk.
All 12 contracts still move based on oil expectations.
USCF says USL's benchmark changes by rolling the relevant contract composition on one day each month.
This is another operational difference from USO's new five-day 2026 roll process.
The United States Brent Oil Fund (BNO) seeks daily exposure related to Brent crude.
USCF states that BNO's Benchmark Futures Contract is the near-month Brent crude contract traded on ICE Futures, moving to the next-month contract when the near month is within two weeks of expiration.
This is fundamentally a benchmark choice.
USO
focuses on WTI-related futures.
BNO
focuses on Brent-related futures.
WTI and Brent are both major light-sweet crude benchmarks, but supply, transportation and regional market conditions can cause their prices to diverge.
Suppose the WTI curve is:
| Month | Price |
|---|---|
| 1 | $70 |
| 2 | $74 |
| 3 | $76 |
| 4–12 | Gradually higher |
USO is concentrated closer to the first part of the curve.
USL spreads benchmark exposure across 12 months.
Their returns therefore can differ substantially even though both are broadly “WTI oil funds.”
USO's short-dated structure generally makes it more directly exposed to movements at the front of the WTI curve.
USL distributes exposure across a broader set of expectations.
BNO provides a similar short-dated concept but for Brent.
This is a structural comparison, not a prediction that one product will always be more volatile.
There is no guaranteed winner.
A 12-month structure may reduce concentration in an unusually steep front-month roll, but the entire futures curve can also be in contango.
Investors should compare the actual shape of the curve rather than assume:
“USL automatically fixes contango.”
It does not.
A short-dated fund such as USO can potentially benefit more directly from strong front-end backwardation.
But actual performance depends on how the curve evolves after purchase.
A favorable curve today can disappear tomorrow.
USO.
OIL(USOON) is linked to the United States Oil Fund rather than USL or BNO.
Therefore:
USL performance
and
BNO performance
do not directly determine OIL(USOON).
MEXC also offers RealStocks, which provides eligible users with access to real U.S.-listed securities through regulated brokerage infrastructure. MEXC states that RealStocks positions represent real shares held in the user's name and can carry associated shareholder entitlements.
Availability of USO, USL or BNO through RealStocks should be checked in the live interface rather than assumed.
There is no universally best oil ETP.
The choice depends on the exposure being sought.
May be more relevant when the goal is short-dated WTI futures exposure.
May be more relevant when the goal is WTI exposure distributed across a broader 12-month curve.
May be more relevant when the focus is Brent rather than WTI.
No. USO is more concentrated in short-dated WTI futures, while USL benchmarks 12 consecutive WTI contracts.
No. It references Brent futures.
No.
USO.
No. They primarily use futures and related financial instruments.
USO, USL and BNO use different futures strategies and can generate materially different results. Historical behavior should not be used as a guarantee of future tracking or returns.

For traders outside the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and the EEA, MEXC is our pick in this MEXC vs Coinbase comparison on one published number: 0.0000% maker and 0.0500% taker on major

A meme coin can have 20,000 holders and still be controlled economically by a handful of wallets. That is why holder count and holder distribution should never be treated as the same metric. For

For years, crypto companies have tried to make blockchains behave more like banks. OpenReserve is attempting the opposite: build a regulated U.S. bank that behaves more like an always-on blockchain

4th Week of August 2026 Period: Aug 26, 2026 – Sep 1, 2026 Data Cutoff: Sep 1, 2026 Core Narrative Over the past week, the crypto market experienced a sharp reversal, shifting rapidly from frenzy to

For years, the biggest names in banking treated stablecoins the way a cat treats a bathtub, with deep suspicion and a healthy distance. That era just ended. On September 1, 2026, a coalition of 21

Overview Driven by synchronized buying across digital asset markets and retail financial technology platforms, Robinhood (NASDAQ: HOOD) shares staged a dramatic breakout in secondary markets, surging

I. Macro & Market Sentiment Market Data: BTC $77,373 (+0.62%) | ETH $2,388 (-0.30%) | SOL $100.28 (+1.26%) Market Sentiment: Funding Rate +0.0076% | Fear & Greed Index 65 (Greed) Global bond selloff

On September 1st, the US stock market closed with all three major indexes falling: the Nasdaq fell 1.03%, the S & P 500 fell 0.70%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.79%. Pressure came from

Franklin Templeton is taking tokenization beyond the idea of simply putting traditional funds on a blockchain. The asset manager is exploring how Franklin Templeton tokenized assets could be used insi

The RLUSD market cap has surpassed $2 billion, marking another major milestone for Ripple’s dollar-backed stablecoin less than two years after its December 2024 launch. The growth is notable because R

SummaryMSTRON combines several layers of risk that investors should evaluate separately.First, it is linked to MSTR, the common stock of Strategy Inc. MSTR itself is highly sensitive to Bitcoin prices

SummaryYes—but "backed by MSTR" needs to be understood correctly.Ondo states that its tokenized stocks are fully backed and collateralized by the corresponding stocks or ETFs, together with cash in tr

SummaryMSTRON can experience significant volatility because its reference asset, MSTR, is influenced by both Bitcoin and Strategy Inc.'s complex capital structure.Instead of attempting to identify one