The term Sybil Attack originates from the book "Sybil," which tells the case study of a woman with dissociative identity disorder, reflecting the behavior of attackers creating multiple falseThe term Sybil Attack originates from the book "Sybil," which tells the case study of a woman with dissociative identity disorder, reflecting the behavior of attackers creating multiple false

Learn/Crypto Basics/Security & Scams/What is a Sybil Attack?

What is a Sybil Attack?

Author: MEXC

Sep 21, 2026MEXC

4 min

The term Sybil Attack originates from the book "Sybil," which tells the case study of a woman with dissociative identity disorder, reflecting the behavior of attackers creating multiple false identities. A Sybil Attack refers to malicious attackers creating multiple false identities or nodes in a blockchain network to gain undue influence and control. Attackers can use these numerous false identities to manipulate the network, disrupt its functionality, or engage in other malicious activities.

Sybil Attacks have existed since the birth of the internet, mainly because real identities cannot be directly mapped to online identities. The most common example of a Sybil Attack in daily life is vote manipulation. For instance, in a competition where votes determine prizes, you might seek out individuals who specialize in vote manipulation to cast votes for you, or you might create multiple fake accounts to vote for yourself. Although these votes may come from different devices and IPs, they are fundamentally fake identities created by you, making this the most common example of a Sybil Attack.

1. The Impact of Sybil Attacks

The primary goal of a Sybil Attack is not necessarily to directly damage the network but to expand one's influence thereupon, thereby causing further disruption. This can include spreading false information, denying services to legitimate nodes, or even influencing the consensus mechanism to validate only certain transactions. Just like in our previous example, the act of vote manipulation doesn't necessarily damage the voting system but rather leverages influence (more votes) to gain benefits (prizes).

1.1 For Ordinary Users

Sybil attacks can hinder regular users from using and accessing the network normally. Attackers create a sufficient number of fake identities to deceive honest nodes in voting, causing the blockchain network to stop transmitting or receiving blocks, thus preventing other users from participating in the network. For example, if a decision in a cryptocurrency project is made through node voting on the network, attackers can create thousands of fake accounts to influence the decision-making process.

1.2 For System Networks

Typically, the target of a Sybil attack is the entire network, with an aim to tamper with the credibility system of the network protocol. A successful Sybil attack can provide attackers with over half (i.e., ≥51%) of the total computing power, granting them access and control. When attackers control more than 51% of the network's computing power, they can reverse transactions or change the order of transactions, leading to the "double-spending" problem.

Double-spending refers to the same funds being spent multiple times. On networks like Bitcoin SV (BSV), Ethereum Classic (ETC), etc., there have been instances of double-spending issues due to attackers controlling over 51% of computing power.

2. Sybil Attack's New Form: Airdrop Hunter

Airdrop hunting has become a new form of Sybil attack. Airdrop hunters create numerous accounts and interact purposefully with smart contracts and protocols to obtain a large share of project tokens distributed through airdrops. You may see some users on the network achieving financial freedom after certain project airdrop releases. Essentially, they use the Sybil attack method to create a large number of accounts and participate in early-stage exchanges of projects to ultimately profit from airdrop distributions.

This form of Sybil attack disrupts the original intention of projects to distribute tokens equally, leading project teams to take anti-Sybil actions before airdrop distributions. These actions may include IP detection, account association analysis, mutual reporting, and other measures to prevent tokens from concentrating in the hands of a few airdrop hunters, thus avoiding situations where tokens are immediately sold off after listing, causing price drops.

3. How to Prevent Sybil Attacks

3.1 Use Consensus Mechanisms to Increase Attack Costs

Many blockchains use different consensus mechanisms to resist Sybil attacks, such as POW (proof of work) or POS (proof of stake), which increase the computational cost of creating blocks to prevent Sybil attacks in the case of POW, or asset risk, in the case of POS. Consensus mechanisms only increase the cost of a successful Sybil attack, making the attack impractical, but they do not eliminate Sybil attacks entirely.

For example, on the Bitcoin network, if an attacker wants to control over half of the network's computing power, they would need to purchase a large number of advanced mining equipment. Additionally, the costs of electricity, space, and ongoing maintenance are unimaginable. The Proof of Work (POW) consensus mechanism ensures the security of the Bitcoin network and increases the cost of attacks for attackers.

3.2 Third-Party Identity Verification

Sybil attacks occur because real-world identities cannot be directly matched to online identities. Using third-party identity verification verifies individual identities. If personal identities and their corresponding online identities are uniquely determined and cannot be forged, theoretically, Sybil attacks would not occur. In the blockchain industry, projects in the decentralized identity (DID) sector, such as on-chain identities and on-chain reputations, are attempts to solve the uniqueness of real-world and online identities.

Disclaimer: This information does not provide advice on investment, taxation, legal, financial, accounting, consultation, or any other related services, nor does it constitute advice to purchase, sell, or hold any assets. MEXC Learn provides information for reference purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved and exercise caution when investing. The platform is not responsible for users' investment decisions.

Market Opportunity

ELYSIA Price(EL)

$0.001384

$0.001384$0.001384

+0.80%

USD

ELYSIA (EL) Live Price Chart

Anthropic IPO Roadshow: When It Starts, Who Runs It and What Happens Next

The Anthropic IPO roadshow is the stretch where the bankers stop filing paperwork and start selling the deal. It has not started yet, but its earliest date is already fixed by an SEC rule, and its

Author: MEXC Editorial Team

2026-11-06

ANT Stock: Anthropic's Ticker, IPO Date and How to Buy It (Not Ant Group)

Type "ANT stock" into a search bar right now and two very different companies show up. ANT is the ticker Anthropic has applied to use on Nasdaq for its Class A shares, and it is not trading yet. Ant

Author: MEXC Editorial Team

2026-11-06

MEXC On-Chain Daily Report: Can NYSE’s Broadridge Partnership Preserve Traditional Shareholder Rights in Tokenized Stocks?

Updated: November 3, 2026, 09:30 (UTC+8) | Author: MEXC Headlines SBI plans to invest $100 million in U.S. digital bank Erebor Starknet community backs research into a potential independent L1 Aave

Author: MEXC

2026-11-03

MEXC On-Chain Daily Report: FBI Attributes Binance Theft of Over $6 Billion to North Korea

Updated: November 2, 2026, 09:30 (UTC+8) | Author: MEXC Headlines Stablecoin supply falls to $298.5 billion, the lowest since August tBTC pauses minting and redemptions while reserves remain fully

Author: MEXC

2026-11-02

Hot Crypto Updates

Red Sea Tensions Return as Houthi Threats Put Oil Shipping Costs at Risk

Overview Red Sea tensions have returned to the centre of global market attention because the risk is no longer confined to isolated attacks on individual vessels. Investors are now considering the

Author: James Mitchell

2026-07-22

US Stocks AI Daily on Nov 4, 2026: fal Announces Series E and F Together With $1.3B in the F Round

The AI supply chain filled all six layers on November 3, yet only one of seven items carried a price. Inference provider fal disclosed a Series E and a Series F at once, with the F round at $1.3B on

Author: MEXC Editorial Team

2026-11-04

Why the 2026 US Midterm Elections Triggered a 2.9 Trillion Dollar Rout in AI Stocks and Tesla

Overview The November 3, 2026 U.S. midterm elections—in which Democrats swept control of both chambers of Congress and flipped key governorships including Texas—triggered a two-stage market repricing

Author: MEXC Editorial Team

2026-11-06

Hong Kong Enables 24/7 Tokenized Settlements as HSBC RedCoin Reaches 50,000 Users in Just Over a Week

Hong Kong is accelerating the integration of traditional finance with blockchain technology as the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) advances its Project Ensemble pilot to support 24/7 settlement

Author: Nguyen Rin Hoang

2026-11-06