🚨 A New York court suspended a lawsuit over 1.09 million BTC thought to belong to Satoshi Nakamoto. 💼 Plaintiffs wanted dormant $BTC wallets declared lost so they🚨 A New York court suspended a lawsuit over 1.09 million BTC thought to belong to Satoshi Nakamoto. 💼 Plaintiffs wanted dormant $BTC wallets declared lost so they

New York court suspended lawsuit over 1.09 million BTC allegedly linked to Satoshi Nakamoto

2026/06/20 21:09
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

A high-profile lawsuit in New York targeting the ownership rights over Bitcoin wallets allegedly belonging to the pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto has been put on hold. Galaxy Research Head of Research, Alex Thorn, reported this latest development on social media, highlighting that the case continues to draw significant attention within the cryptocurrency industry.

Scope of the lawsuit and assets in question

The lawsuit, filed in March at the New York Supreme Court, centers around claims over approximately 3.799 million BTC. The plaintiffs are registered as “Noah Doe” and two anonymous Wyoming-based limited liability companies. The suit called for certain Bitcoin addresses, dormant for many years, and their assets to be recognized as the property of the plaintiffs under New York’s lost property regulations.

The primary focus of the case is a set of addresses believed to be associated with Satoshi Nakamoto. According to the court file, this segment covers 21,744 addresses holding around 1.09 million BTC. Should the claim be recognized, it could set a contentious precedent, not only for these specific assets but also for how inactivity on the blockchain relates to ownership rights more broadly.

Challenges and technical debate

Ian R. Cohen, an external party to the proceedings, submitted an opinion to the court on May 29 contending that the case is built on a weak legal foundation. Cohen asserted that New York’s lost property laws do not extend to Bitcoin funds secured through users’ private keys. He also emphasized that prolonged inactivity on a Bitcoin address does not necessarily mean its assets have been abandoned.

Cohen’s central objection is that in the world of Bitcoin, ownership hinges on control of the private key. Without the private key, a wallet cannot truly be considered “found.” A dormant address, he argued, reflects untransferred holdings—not lost property.

Mini glossary: A private key is a unique cryptographic element that allows users to conduct transactions with assets in a Bitcoin wallet. Control and authority over assets on the Bitcoin network depend on access to this key, making it central to debates about ownership.

Court’s latest decision

On June 4, Judge Kathy King granted Cohen the right to a hearing and temporarily halted the entire proceeding. As a result, any potential in absentia judgments in favor of the plaintiffs or further steps in the case have been suspended. The plaintiffs’ attorneys challenged this court order, but Cohen has since provided a detailed rebuttal to their objection.

Another notable aspect of the case concerns on-chain activity. Public records indicate that some of the allegedly “lost” assets have, in fact, been moved by their rightful owners. This finding suggests potential flaws in the plaintiffs’ method for identifying addresses and further weakens their claim that the assets should be legally considered “found property.”

The post New York court suspended lawsuit over 1.09 million BTC allegedly linked to Satoshi Nakamoto appeared first on COINTURK NEWS.

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$63,953.45
$63,953.45$63,953.45
-0.30%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200xWorld Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

Combine up to 20 World Cup matches in one order