Only 10% of Tokenized Assets Reach DeFi as Institutions Capture Value, DWF Ventures Finds

The tokenization of real-world assets has crossed $31 billion, but the beneficiaries are not necessarily the protocols building the rails. A new analysis from DWF Ventures finds that only 10% of that total—roughly $3 billion—sits inside DeFi as active TVL. The rest moves slowly, parked in wallets with few transfers, and the value capture remains tilted toward institutional issuers rather than crypto-native infrastructure.

That pattern is visible across the tokenization stack. Institutions like BlackRock and Securitize originate and custody the assets, while lending protocols and exchanges represent the lower, more fragmented layers where value dissipates. The result is a market where trillions in traditional asset classes are being digitized, but the on-chain ecosystem hasn’t yet engineered a way to keep the flows downstream. As recent tokenization milestones have shown—from asset managers acquiring transfer agents to live settlement pilots—the movement is accelerating. The question is whether the infrastructure can catch up.

Why Most Tokenized Assets Sit Idle

The report highlights a simple bottleneck: secondary liquidity. Top US Treasury tokens like BUIDL, WTGXX, and BENJI average fewer than 30 transfers per month. Restrictions on issuance, redemption delays, and KYC requirements create interfaces incompatible with permissionless DeFi. While total value locked has grown 50% year-to-date, the lion’s share remains in holding patterns, not in composable collateral.

What little activity exists is dominated by a handful of protocols. Sky (formerly MakerDAO) holds over $1.5 billion across BlackRock’s BUIDL and similar funds. Ethena recently allocated $250 million to a AAA CLO fund via Securitize. Morpho, Aave, Maple Finance, and Pendle all generate revenue from these instruments. Yet DWF Ventures notes that much of this is crypto-native capital rotating to safer yields rather than net new money. Still, chain analysis indicates over 400,000 wallets received their first RWA token within a week of creation, suggesting fresh capital is entering, even if total DeFi utilization remains stuck at 10%.

The gap between value created and value captured is partly by design. Asset issuers built tokenized products for institutional distribution, not DeFi composability. As long as redemption windows are T+1 or T+2 and market makers cannot hedge intraday, spreads stay wide. A $1,000 swap in Ondo Finance’s USDY tokenized Treasury, for example, shows slippage of 0.2–0.3%, pushing traders back to slow OTC exits.

Infrastructure Fixes That Could Shift the Balance

The DWF Ventures analysis points to several infrastructure solutions that could re-route value toward crypto-native layers. Stablecoin wrappers, like Maple Finance’s syrupUSDC and syrupUSDT, have pushed private credit utilization to 64.3% on-chain, but they introduce concentration risk—users bear the first loss without direct control over asset allocation. Pricing infrastructure is another weak point. Private credit and real estate tokens rely on periodic NAV updates, widening spreads and limiting lending market efficiency. Oracle providers like Pyth Network and RedStone are building 24/7 price feeds for tokenized stocks and commodities, while Credora offers risk scores to improve trust and composability.

Redemption mechanisms are also evolving. Symbiotic’s Liquid Lane uses a shared vault infrastructure with market makers competing through a request-for-quote layer to price redemption discounts, squeezing spreads and speeding exit times. Meanwhile, Figure’s vertical integration—originating over $21 billion in HELOCs, running its own Provenance Blockchain, and launching an SEC-registered yield-bearing stablecoin—shows what happens when one entity controls issuance, pricing, and settlement. That stack gives Figure first-party credit data that external platforms cannot match, and it’s now extending the model through Forge to real estate equity, auto loans, and trade finance.

All of these solutions must operate within compliance frameworks that institutional asset managers require, and that tension will likely sharpen as US regulators weigh the architecture of tokenization. Recent pushes by banking interests to alter key crypto legislation underscore how the structure of on-chain asset markets is still being contested, not just in code but in policy. Whoever can thread the gap between regulatorily compliant asset origination and efficient DeFi execution stands to capture the value that currently sits on institutional balance sheets.

Where the Next Wave of Value Will Come From

The report identifies non-USD-denominated bonds and private credit as the biggest opportunity. Over 94% of tokenized assets are USD-denominated, while non-USD sovereign bonds represent 45% of the global traditional fixed-income market. Brazilian government bonds yield around 10%, Turkish lira bonds around 15%, yet almost none of this sits on-chain. Regional private credit in MENA and APAC is growing, but the infrastructure to tokenize it at scale doesn’t exist yet. Depreciation risk is real, but instruments like non-deliverable forwards can provide hedging, making the yield spread attractive for DeFi integration.

Tokenized commodities have already generated $4.8 billion on-chain in the first quarter of 2026, and tokenized equities surpassed $1 billion with 185,000 holders. Here too, the value gap is glaring: assets with strong demand but zero yield. Any protocol that can layer yield onto these through lending markets, stablecoin minting, or options will lock in sticky user bases. The reward, according to DWF Ventures, is distribution that is essentially pre-built because exchanges already list these tokens—the missing piece is yield that converts passive holders into active participants.

The market direction is clear. Crypto-native infrastructure that solves for pricing, settlement, and compliance will gradually absorb more value from the institutional layer. Much of that infrastructure is already under construction, and the next 12 to 18 months will test whether the tokenization stack can deliver on its original promise: not just digitizing assets, but making them productive on-chain.