BlackBerry, Nokia, and IBM have all surged back into the investor conversation, but three decades of fallen-titan history reveals a brutal filter that only oneBlackBerry, Nokia, and IBM have all surged back into the investor conversation, but three decades of fallen-titan history reveals a brutal filter that only one

BlackBerry, IBM, and Nokia Are All Trying to Come Back. History Says Only One Survives

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The post BlackBerry, IBM, and Nokia Are All Trying to Come Back. History Says Only One Survives appeared first on 24/7 Wall St..

Although Wall Street typically buries its dethroned category kings without ceremony, three former tech titans have spent the past year clawing their way back into the investor conversation. BlackBerry (NYSE: BB) has vaulted 172.8% year to date, Nokia (NYSE: NOK) has piled on 114.8%, and International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM) still commands a $242.7 billion market capitalization after divesting Kyndryl and rebuilding around hybrid cloud. But the long memory of public markets says only one type of comeback actually endures. The historical pattern is unforgiving: fallen tech leaders survive when they abandon the consumer battlefield and rebuild around an enterprise moat, and they fail when they chase the next consumer hype cycle.

The textbook precedent is IBM itself. When Lou Gerstner arrived in 1993, the company was hemorrhaging cash as the PC era eroded the mainframe’s pricing power. His pivot away from boxes and toward services, software, and consulting became the template every fallen tech name has tried to copy. Satya Nadella ran a similar playbook at Microsoft a generation later by stepping away from the Windows-phone war and rebuilding around Azure. Apple’s 1997 reinvention stands as the rare consumer-side exception, and exceptions do not make policy. The verdict that the record delivers is consistent: picks-and-shovels enterprise suppliers tend to survive, while consumer-comeback bets usually do not.

IBM: The Original Blueprint, Running It Again

IBM is now attempting Gerstner 2.0. Arvind Krishna shed Kyndryl, paid $34 billion for Red Hat in 2019, and re-anchored the company on hybrid cloud, mainframes, and generative AI. Q1 2026 revenue rose 9.5% year over year, and the IBM Z mainframe line grew 51% as enterprises retooled for AI workloads. The stock trades at 23 times trailing earnings with a 2.6% dividend yield, and the company has raised its payout for 31 consecutive years. Over the past five years, IBM shares have returned 84.0%, a measured rerating rather than a euphoric one. Analysts carry an average price target of $293.89.

BlackBerry: The Cleanest Break From the Old Battlefield

BlackBerry sold its handset business long ago and re-emerged as an embedded-software and secure-communications pure play. Q1 FY27 revenue jumped 25.6% to $152.9 million, with the QNX segment delivering $72.3 million at an 86% adjusted gross margin. QNX now sits inside more than 275 million vehicles with a royalty backlog near $950 million, and the company has partnered with Nvidia on QNX OS for Safety 8.0 integrated with Nvidia IGX Thor. CEO John Giamatteo told investors, “We are no longer a company in transition. We are a growth company.” The catch lives in the multiple. BlackBerry trades at 96 times trailing earnings and 53 times forward earnings, against an analyst consensus price target of $6.43 while the stock changes hands above $10. The business is improving, but the valuation has run ahead of it.

Nokia: True Reinvention or Cyclical Telecom Rebound?

Nokia sold its handset arm to Microsoft in 2014, divested HERE maps, and now positions itself as a telecom and AI-infrastructure supplier. Q4 2025 revenue of $7.12 billion beat consensus by 17.0%, with Optical Networks revenue of $2.8 billion, soaring on AI and cloud demand following the Infinera acquisition. Nvidia took a $1 billion equity stake as part of an AI-RAN partnership. The reinvention case, however, is only partial. FY25 net income still fell 49% to $737 million, and the stock trades at 87 times trailing earnings against an analyst price target of $14.89. The optical and IP-routing lines look structural; the mobile-networks legacy still moves with carrier capex cycles.

The Ranked Verdict

Score each name against the Gerstner survivor profile, the test of whether a company has abandoned the old consumer field and rebuilt around a durable enterprise moat—and a ranking emerges:

  1. IBM. Closest match. It wrote the playbook, scaled it, and is running it for a second cycle with mainframes and generative AI as the wedge. A 35.8% return on equity and three decades of dividend hikes are the receipts.
  2. BlackBerry. The cleanest narrative break from its old consumer identity, but the smallest scale and the richest multiple. The QNX thesis has substance; the price now demands flawless execution. Recent filings show a genuine business inflection.
  3. Nokia. Mid-pivot. Optical and AI-RAN are the right adjacencies, yet the mobile-networks legacy still trades on telco capex. Treat part of the rerating as cyclical until the structural mix proves otherwise.

Long term, Wall Street still rewards companies that pick a durable enterprise lane and stay in it. The historical record says investors who confuse a cyclical bounce with a structural reinvention tend to learn the difference the expensive way. The past three decades of fallen-titan comebacks suggest the survivor profile is built quarter by quarter, not bought in a single rerating.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and IBM didn’t make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

The post BlackBerry, IBM, and Nokia Are All Trying to Come Back. History Says Only One Survives appeared first on 24/7 Wall St..

Market Opportunity
three.ws Logo
three.ws Price(THREE)
$0.00164
$0.00164$0.00164
-6.12%
USD
three.ws (THREE) Live Price Chart

Get Covered, Share 1M USDT

Get Covered, Share 1M USDTGet Covered, Share 1M USDT

Higher VVIP tiers, higher compensation odds.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Not a loophole: Singapore AI export controls let China tap US AI legally

Not a loophole: Singapore AI export controls let China tap US AI legally

American AI technology is reaching Chinese tech giants through a route that US export controls were never designed to close: Singapore. The city-state sits outside
Share
The Cryptonomist2026/07/10 14:46
Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35
Q2 Market Insights: Bitcoin regains dominance in risk-averse environment, ETFs remain critical to market structure

Q2 Market Insights: Bitcoin regains dominance in risk-averse environment, ETFs remain critical to market structure

The market will show a downward trend in the short term, and then rebound and set new highs in the second half of the year.
Share
PANews2025/04/28 19:40

Record Ads, Stock Down 7%

Record Ads, Stock Down 7%Record Ads, Stock Down 7%

Jul 29: Meta earnings face the market's question.