Dockerized Android is a Docker-based virtualization platform that lets cyber-range designers simulate mobile attack and defense scenarios efficiently. Its modular design allows features like Bluetooth and GPS emulation to be toggled via Docker Compose, enhancing automation and realism. While best run on Linux, the system promises future cloud support and stronger security integrations, paving the way for more dynamic and realistic cybersecurity training environments.Dockerized Android is a Docker-based virtualization platform that lets cyber-range designers simulate mobile attack and defense scenarios efficiently. Its modular design allows features like Bluetooth and GPS emulation to be toggled via Docker Compose, enhancing automation and realism. While best run on Linux, the system promises future cloud support and stronger security integrations, paving the way for more dynamic and realistic cybersecurity training environments.

Building Smarter Cyber Ranges with Dockerized Android

2025/10/17 05:15

:::info Authors:

(1) Daniele Capone, SecSI srl, Napoli, Italy (daniele.capone@secsi.io);

(2) Francesco Caturano, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Information, Technology University of Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy (francesco.caturano@unina.i)

(3) Angelo Delicato, SecSI srl, Napoli, Italy (angelo.delicato@secsi.io);

(4) Gaetano Perrone, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy (gaetano.perrone@unina.it)

(5) Simon Pietro Romano, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy (spromano@unina.it).

:::

Abstract and I. Introduction

II. Related Work

III. Dockerized Android: Design

IV. Dockerized Android Architecture

V. Evaluation

VI. Conclusion and Future Developments, and References

VI. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

In this work, we have described Dockerized Android, a platform that supports cyber-range designers in realizing mobile virtual scenarios. The application is based on Docker, i.e., a container-based virtualization framework extensively adopted in the cyber-range field for several benefits already mentioned. We described the main components and showed how it is possible to realize a complex cyber kill-chain scenario that involves the utilization of Bluetooth components. The architecture has been conceived at the outset as an extensible one. Its feature set can be dynamically enabled or disabled through the docker-compose creator, and some fine-grained options can be configured to customize the scenarios. The strength of this system is its ability to quickly run a mobile component through Docker, with many interesting features out of the box. Furthermore, the centralization of several components increases the overall usability level. The cons are all related to compatibility issues with Windows and OS X when running the Core for Emulator. While the former will probably be solved with the next updates, the latter is not solvable without significant changes to the OS X implementation. Another limitation is the lack of support for emulating some hardware components, e.g., Bluetooth. For these reasons, the Linux environment as a host machine is strongly recommended. We will also assess the potential benefits of using Dockerized Android in cloud-based environments in future works. Other improvements include the full integration of security-based features in the Android Emulator. For example, the GPS location could be useful to simulate a realistic route traveled by a simulated user. In recent works, cyber ranges are configured by using the high-level SDL (Specification and Description Language) representation [8]. Integrating this language in Dockerized Android is relatively easy, as every feature is set through Docker environment variables. Additional efforts will be focused on improving automation features, such as the design of an event-based architecture to simulate complex sequential actions involving human interaction.

REFERENCES

[1] Jan Vykopal et al. “Lessons learned from complex hands-on defence exercises in a cyber range”. In: 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 2017, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2017.8190713.

\ [2] Adam McNeil and W. Stuart Jones. Mobile Malware is Surging in Europe: A Look at the Biggest Threats. https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/email-and-cloudthreats/mobile-malware- surging-europe-look- biggestthreats. Online; 14-May-2022. 2022.

\ [3] René Mayrhofer et al. “The Android Platform Security Model”. In: ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security 24.3 (Aug. 2021), pp. 1–35. DOI: 10 . 1145/ 3448609. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3448609.

\ [4] Ryotaro Nakata and Akira Otsuka. “CyExec*: A HighPerformance Container-Based Cyber Range With Scenario Randomization”. In: IEEE Access 9 (2021), pp. 109095–109114. DOI: 10 . 1109 / ACCESS . 2021 . 3101245.

\ [5] Ryotaro Nakata and Akira Otsuka. Evaluation of vulnerability reproducibility in container-based Cyber Range. 2020. DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.2010.16024. URL: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2010.16024.

\ [6] Francesco Caturano, Gaetano Perrone, and Simon Pietro Romano. “Capturing flags in a dynamically deployed microservices-based heterogeneous environment”. In: 2020 Principles, Systems and Applications of IP Telecommunications (IPTComm). 2020, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1109/IPTComm50535.2020.9261519.

\ [7] Muhammad Mudassar Yamin, Basel Katt, and Vasileios Gkioulos. “Cyber ranges and security testbeds: Scenarios, functions, tools and architecture”. In: Computers & Security 88 (Jan. 2020), p. 101636. DOI: 10. 1016/ J. COSE.2019.101636.

\ [8] Enrico Russo, Luca Verderame, and Alessio Merlo. “Enabling Next-Generation Cyber Ranges with Mobile Security Components”. In: IFIP International Conference on Testing Software and Systems. Springer, 2020, pp. 150–165.

\ [9] Giuseppe Trotta Andrea Pierini. From APK to Golden Ticket. https://www.exploit-db.com/docs/english/44032- from- apk-to- golden-ticket.pdf. [Online; accessed 01- March-2021]. 2017.

\ [10] Genymotion. Android as a Service. https : / / www . genymotion.com/. [Online; accessed 1-March-2021].

\ [11] Corellium. ARM Device Virtualization. https : / / corellium.com/. [Online; accessed 10-March-2021].

\ [12] Android Emulator. https : / / developer . android . com / studio/run/emulator. Accessed: 11-01-2021.

\ [13] thyrlian. AndroidSDK. https : / / github . com / thyrlian / AndroidSDK. [Online; accessed 10-March-2021].

\ [14] budtmo. docker-android. https:// github. com/ budtmo/ docker-android. [Online; accessed 10-March-2021].

\ [15] bitrise-io. android. https://github.com/bitrise-io/android. [Online; accessed 10-March-2021].

\ [16] MobSF. Mobile Security Framework. https : / / www . github . com / MobSF / Mobile - Security - Framework - MobSF. [Online; accessed 1-March-2021].

\ [17] Dockerfile best practices. https : / / docs . docker. com / develop / develop - images / dockerfile _ best - practices/. Accessed: 13-02-2021.

\ [18] Flaticon. Free vector icons. https://www.flaticon.com/. [Online; accessed 17-April-2021].

\ [19] Frida. Frida. https://frida.re/. Online; 13-May-2022.

\ [20] Anonymized authors. Dockerized Android github repo. . In order to adhere to the double-blind review principle, the github repo information has been obfuscated and will be made available if and when the paper is accepted.

\ [21] Android-Exploits. https : / / github . com / sundaysec / Android - Exploits / blob / master / remote / 44242 . md. [Online; accessed 19-April-2021].

\ [22] Ben Seri and Gregory Vishnepolsky. BlueBorne - The dangers of Bluetooth implementations: Unveiling zero day vulnerabilities and security flaws in modern Bluetooth stacks. Tech. rep. Armis, 2017.

\ [23] Armis Security. BlueBorne. https://www.armis.com/ research/blueborne/. Online; 13-May-2022. 2017.

\

:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC by-SA 4.0 Deed (Attribution-Sahrealike 4.0 International license.

:::

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK FCA Plans to Waive Some Rules for Crypto Companies: FT

UK FCA Plans to Waive Some Rules for Crypto Companies: FT

The post UK FCA Plans to Waive Some Rules for Crypto Companies: FT appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has plans to waive some of its rules for cryptocurrency companies, according to a Financial Times (FT) report on Wednesday. However, in another areas the FCA intends to tighten the rules where they pertain to industry-specific risks, such as cyber attacks. The financial watchdog wishes to adapt its existing rules for financial service companies to the unique nature of cryptoassets, the FT reported, citing a consultation paper published Wednesday. “You have to recognize that some of these things are very different,” David Geale, the FCA’s executive director for payments and digital finance, said in an interview, according to the report, adding that a “lift and drop” of existing traditional finance rules would not be effective with crypto. One such area that may be handled differently is the stipulation that a firm “must conduct its business with integrity” and “pay due regard to the interest of its customers and treat them fairly.” Crypto companies would be given less strict requirements than banks or investment platforms on rules concerning senior managers, systems and controls, as cryptocurrency firms “do not typically pose the same level of systemic risk,” the FCA said. Firms would also not have to offer customers a cooling off period due to the voltatile nature of crypto prices, nor would technology be classed as an outsourcing arrangement requiring extra risk management. This is because blockchain technology is often permissionless, meaning anyone can participate without the input of an intermediary. Other areas of crypto regulation remain undecided. The FCA has plans to fully integrate cryptocurrency into its regulatory framework from 2026. Source: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2025/09/17/uk-fca-plans-to-waive-some-rules-for-crypto-companies-ft
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:15