This paper introduces a flexible Transformer-based model for detecting anomalies in system logs. By embedding log templates with a pre-trained BERT model and incorporating positional and temporal encoding, it captures both semantic and sequential context within log sequences. The approach supports variable sequence lengths and configurable input features, enabling extensive experimentation across datasets. The model performs supervised binary classification to distinguish normal from anomalous patterns, using a [CLS]-like token for sequence-level representation. Overall, it pushes the boundaries of log-based anomaly detection by integrating modern NLP and deep learning techniques into system monitoring.This paper introduces a flexible Transformer-based model for detecting anomalies in system logs. By embedding log templates with a pre-trained BERT model and incorporating positional and temporal encoding, it captures both semantic and sequential context within log sequences. The approach supports variable sequence lengths and configurable input features, enabling extensive experimentation across datasets. The model performs supervised binary classification to distinguish normal from anomalous patterns, using a [CLS]-like token for sequence-level representation. Overall, it pushes the boundaries of log-based anomaly detection by integrating modern NLP and deep learning techniques into system monitoring.

Transformer-Based Anomaly Detection Using Log Sequence Embeddings

2025/11/04 01:52

Abstract

1 Introduction

2 Background and Related Work

2.1 Different Formulations of the Log-based Anomaly Detection Task

2.2 Supervised v.s. Unsupervised

2.3 Information within Log Data

2.4 Fix-Window Grouping

2.5 Related Works

3 A Configurable Transformer-based Anomaly Detection Approach

3.1 Problem Formulation

3.2 Log Parsing and Log Embedding

3.3 Positional & Temporal Encoding

3.4 Model Structure

3.5 Supervised Binary Classification

4 Experimental Setup

4.1 Datasets

4.2 Evaluation Metrics

4.3 Generating Log Sequences of Varying Lengths

4.4 Implementation Details and Experimental Environment

5 Experimental Results

5.1 RQ1: How does our proposed anomaly detection model perform compared to the baselines?

5.2 RQ2: How much does the sequential and temporal information within log sequences affect anomaly detection?

5.3 RQ3: How much do the different types of information individually contribute to anomaly detection?

6 Discussion

7 Threats to validity

8 Conclusions and References

\

3 A Configurable Transformer-based Anomaly Detection Approach

In this study, we introduce a novel transformer-based method for anomaly detection. The model takes log sequences as inputs to detect anomalies. The model employs a pretrained BERT model to embed log templates, enabling the representation of semantic information within log messages. These embeddings, combined with positional or temporal encoding, are subsequently inputted into the transformer model. The combined information is utilized in the subsequent generation of log sequence-level representations, facilitating the anomaly detection process. We design our model to be flexible: The input features are configurable so that we can use or conduct experiments with different feature combinations of the log data. Additionally, the model is designed and trained to handle input log sequences of varying lengths. In this section, we introduce our problem formulation and the detailed design of our method.

\ 3.1 Problem Formulation

We follow the previous works [1] to formulate the task as a binary classification task, in which we train our proposed model to classify log sequences into anomalies and normal ones in a supervised way. For the samples used in the training and evaluation of the model, we utilize a flexible grouping approach to generate log sequences of varying lengths. The details are introduced in Section 4

\ 3.2 Log Parsing and Log Embedding

In our work, we transform log events into numerical vectors by encoding log templates with a pre-trained language model. To obtain the log templates, we adopt the Drain parser [24], which is widely used and has good parsing performance on most of the public datasets [4]. We use a pre-trained sentence-bert model [25] (i.e., all-MiniLML6-v2 [26]) to embed the log templates generated by the log parsing process. The pre-trained model is trained with a contrastive learning objective and achieves state-ofthe-art performance on various NLP tasks. We utilize this pre-trained model to create a representation that captures semantic information of log messages and illustrates the similarity between log templates for the downstream anomaly detection model. The output dimension of the model is 384.

\ 3.3 Positional & Temporal Encoding

The original transformer model [27] adopts a positional encoding to enable the model to make use of the order of the input sequence. As the model contains no recurrence and no convolution, the models will be agnostic to the log sequence without the positional encoding. While some studies suggest that transformer models without explicit positional encoding remain competitive with standard models when dealing with sequential data [28, 29], it is important to note that any permutation of the input sequence will produce the same internal state of the model. As sequential information or temporal information may be important indicators for anomalies within log sequences, previous works that are based on transformer models utilize the standard positional encoding to inject the order of log events or templates in the sequence [11, 12, 21], aiming to detect anomalies associated with the wrong execution order. However, we noticed that in a common-used replication implementation of a transformer-based method [5], the positional encoding was, in fact, omitted. To the best of our knowledge, no existing work has encoded the temporal information based on the timestamps of logs for their anomaly detection method. The effectiveness of utilizing sequential or temporal information in the anomaly detection task is unclear.

\ In our proposed method, we attempt to incorporate sequential and temporal encoding into the transformer model and explore the importance of sequential and temporal information for anomaly detection. Specifically, our proposed method has different variants utilizing the following sequential or temporal encoding techniques. The encoding is then added to the log representation, which serves as the input to the transformer structure.

\

3.3.1 Relative Time Elapse Encoding (RTEE)

We propose this temporal encoding method, RTEE, which simply substitutes the position index in positional encoding with the timing of each log event. We first calculate the time elapse according to the timestamps of log events in the log sequence. Instead of using the log event sequence index as the position to sinusoidal and cosinusoidal equations, we use the relative time elapse to the first log event in the log sequence to substitute the position index. Table 1 shows an example of time intervals in a log sequence. In the example, we have a log sequence containing 7 events with a time span of 7 seconds. The elapsed time from the first event to each event in the sequence is utilized to calculate the time encoding for the corresponding events. Similar to positional encoding, the encoding is calculated with the above-mentioned equations 1, and the encoding will not update during the training process.

\

3.4 Model Structure

The transformer is a neural network architecture that relies on the self-attention mechanism to capture the relationship between input elements in a sequence. The transformer-based models and frameworks have been used in the anomaly detection task by many previous works [6, 11, 12, 21]. Inspired by the previous works, we use a transformer encoder-based model for anomaly detection. We design our approach to accept log sequences of varying lengths and generate sequence-level representations. To achieve this, we have employed some specific tokens in the input log sequence for the model to generate sequence representation and identify the padded tokens and the end of the log sequence, drawing inspiration from the design of the BERT model [31]. In the input log sequence, we used the following tokens: is placed at the start of each sequence to allow the model to generate aggregated information for the entire sequence, is added at the end of the sequence to signify its completion, is used to mark the masked tokens under the self-supervised training paradigm, and is used for padded tokens. The embeddings for these special tokens are generated randomly based on the dimension of the log representation used. An example is shown in Figure 1, the time elapsed for , and are set to -1. The log event-level representation and positional or temporal embedding are summed as the input feature of the transformer structure.

\ 3.5 Supervised Binary Classification Under this training objective, we utilize the output of the first token of the transformer model while ignoring the outputs of the other tokens. This output of the first token is designed to aggregate the information of the whole input log sequence, similar to the token of the BERT model, which provides an aggregated representation of the token sequence. Therefore, we consider the output of this token as a sequence-level representation. We train the model with a binary classification objective (i.e., Binary Cross Entropy Loss) with this representation.

\

:::info Authors:

  1. Xingfang Wu
  2. Heng Li
  3. Foutse Khomh

:::

:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

:::

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

This Exclusive Cayman Getaway Tastes As Good As It Feels

This Exclusive Cayman Getaway Tastes As Good As It Feels

The post This Exclusive Cayman Getaway Tastes As Good As It Feels appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. 1OAK’s Sand Soleil sits on Grand Cayman’s iconic Seven Mile Beach 1OAK Exhausted and professionally burnt out, I arrived at 1OAK’s Sand Soleil in search of the type of restoration that could still my mind and get me writing again. The seven-day culinary experience was a no-brainer for me as a food writer. The integration of an epicurean getaway with pure Cayman luxury seemed to be the perfect spark for my creativity—private chef dinners, deep dives into Caribbean flavors, and hands-on masterclasses, all located within a serene, oceanfront villa. I had finally arrived. With the last rays of the sun setting behind Grand Cayman’s famous Seven Mile Beach, casting a warm golden glow across the water, I tasted Chef Joe Hughes’ ceviche for the first time—cubes of wahoo cured in lime, with charred pineapple and a subtle, nutty crunch. Chef Joe Hughes’ love for bright, Asian-inspired flavours came through in this wahoo tataki layered with Vietnamese herbs, ripe papaya and mango, cashew and cilantro, all brought together with a nuoc cham. Jamie Fortune Something softened. For the first time in months, I began to feel present. Sophia List, the brainchild of the 1OAK experience, heard me well. With an intuition honed by years of curating luxury, she matched me with what she called “a vision realized.” List told me Sand Soleil—like the other 1OAK homes on Seven Mile Beach and in West Bay—was created to feel like a real sanctuary. For her, it’s the laid-back alternative to a busy hotel, a place where you get privacy and elegance without any fuss. “We wanted to introduce the Cayman Islands to something truly special—an ultra-luxury experience that combines exquisite design, maximum privacy, and a sense of calm,” she shared as she guided me through the four-bedroom villa. “We are so excited to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 14:01
How Pros Buy Bitcoin Dips With DCA Like Institutions

How Pros Buy Bitcoin Dips With DCA Like Institutions

The post How Pros Buy Bitcoin Dips With DCA Like Institutions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “Buy every dip.” That’s the advice from Strike CEO Jack Mallers. According to Mallers, with quantitative tightening over and rate cuts and stimulus on the horizon, the great print is coming. The US can’t afford falling asset prices, he argues, which translates into a giant wall of liquidity ready to muscle in and prop prices up. While retail has latched onto terms like “buy the dip” and “dollar-cost averaging” (DCA) for buying at market lows or making regular purchases, these are really concepts borrowed from the pros like Samar Sen, the senior vice president and head of APAC at Talos, an institutional digital asset trading platform. He says that institutional traders have used these terms for decades to manage their entry points into the market and build exposure gradually, while avoiding emotional decision-making in volatile markets. Source: Jack Mallers Related: Cryptocurrency investment: The ultimate indicators for crypto trading How institutions buy the dip Treasury companies like Strategy and BitMine have become poster children for institutions buying the dip and dollar-cost averaging (DCA) at scale, steadfastly vacuuming up coins every chance they get. Strategy stacked another 130 Bitcoin (BTC) on Monday, while the insatiable Tom Lee scooped up $150 million of Ether (ETH) on Thursday, prompting Arkham to post, “Tom Lee is DCAing ETH.” But while it may look like the smart money is glued to the screen reacting to every market downturn, the reality is quite different. Institutions don’t use the retail vocabulary, Samar explains, but the underlying ideas of disciplined accumulation, opportunistic rebalancing and staying insulated from short-term noise are very much present in how they engage with assets like Bitcoin. The core difference, he points out, is in how they execute those ideas. While retail investors are prone to react to headlines and price charts, institutional desks rely…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 13:53