TLDR Amazon filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI on Tuesday to stop its Comet shopping agent from making purchases on Amazon’s platform Amazon claims Perplexity’s agent accessed customer accounts without proper disclosure and disguised automated activity as human browsing Perplexity called Amazon a bully and said the company is trying to stifle competition and limit [...] The post Amazon (AMZN) Stock: Company Takes Legal Action Against Perplexity Over AI Shopping Agent appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Amazon filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI on Tuesday to stop its Comet shopping agent from making purchases on Amazon’s platform Amazon claims Perplexity’s agent accessed customer accounts without proper disclosure and disguised automated activity as human browsing Perplexity called Amazon a bully and said the company is trying to stifle competition and limit [...] The post Amazon (AMZN) Stock: Company Takes Legal Action Against Perplexity Over AI Shopping Agent appeared first on CoinCentral.

Amazon (AMZN) Stock: Company Takes Legal Action Against Perplexity Over AI Shopping Agent

2025/11/05 17:52

TLDR

  • Amazon filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI on Tuesday to stop its Comet shopping agent from making purchases on Amazon’s platform
  • Amazon claims Perplexity’s agent accessed customer accounts without proper disclosure and disguised automated activity as human browsing
  • Perplexity called Amazon a bully and said the company is trying to stifle competition and limit user choice in AI assistants
  • Amazon accused Perplexity of ignoring repeated requests to stop using the agent and creating security risks for customer data
  • The case could set important precedents for how AI agents interact with websites and perform tasks on behalf of users

Amazon filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI in San Francisco federal court on Tuesday. The complaint demands the startup stop its Comet browser agent from making purchases on Amazon’s platform.

The lawsuit marks the latest battle between traditional tech companies and AI startups. It comes after Amazon sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity last Friday.

Amazon claims Perplexity’s Comet agent secretly accessed customer accounts. The company says the startup disguised automated activity as regular human browsing.


AMZN Stock Card
Amazon.com, Inc., AMZN

The retailer argues this creates security risks for customer data. Amazon also says Perplexity ignored multiple requests to stop the practice.

According to court documents, Perplexity configured its system to hide the agent’s activities. Amazon stated the startup was not transparent about when Comet was shopping on behalf of real people.

Perplexity pushed back hard against the allegations. The startup’s spokesperson called Amazon a bully following the lawsuit filing.

The company wrote in a blog post that Amazon was using legal threats to block innovation. Perplexity said users should be able to choose their preferred AI assistant for shopping.

The Technical Details Behind the Dispute

Amazon’s terms of service prohibit data mining, robots, and similar automated tools. The company first asked Perplexity to stop using shopping agents in November 2024.

Perplexity initially complied with that request. However, by August 2025, the startup deployed its new Comet browser agent.

This time, Comet identified itself as a Google Chrome browser user. When Amazon tried to block the bots, Perplexity released a new version to bypass the security measures.

Amazon accused Perplexity of violating its terms by failing to disclose when Comet shops for users. The retailer argues third-party apps should operate openly and respect business decisions.

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas defended the company’s approach. He said agents should have the same rights as human users.

Srinivas argued it’s not Amazon’s job to determine the difference. He claimed Comet doesn’t train or scrape information from Amazon.

The startup says user credentials stay stored locally and never reach Perplexity’s servers. Perplexity also accused Amazon of trying to protect its advertising business.

AI Agents and the Future of Shopping

The dispute highlights questions about how AI agents will interact with websites. Both companies are developing their own AI shopping tools.

Amazon offers Buy For Me, which lets shoppers purchase from brand sites within its app. The company also has Rufus, an AI assistant that recommends products and manages carts.

CEO Andy Jassy discussed AI shopping agents on a recent earnings call. He said the customer experience wasn’t good yet due to lack of personalization.

Jassy mentioned Amazon was having conversations with third-party agent builders. He suggested the company would find ways to partner with some services.

The lawsuit could establish legal boundaries for AI agents. It may determine how far these tools can go in performing real-world tasks.

Perplexity has faced similar controversies before. Publishers accused the company of using their content without permission.

The startup was also accused of buying illegally scraped data from Reddit. Perplexity previously said it fights for users’ rights to access public knowledge.

The company is valued at $20 billion. It counts Amazon Web Services as a major customer with hundreds of millions in commitments.

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has invested in Perplexity. The startup uses Amazon’s cloud infrastructure for its AI operations.

The post Amazon (AMZN) Stock: Company Takes Legal Action Against Perplexity Over AI Shopping Agent appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

This Exclusive Cayman Getaway Tastes As Good As It Feels

This Exclusive Cayman Getaway Tastes As Good As It Feels

The post This Exclusive Cayman Getaway Tastes As Good As It Feels appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. 1OAK’s Sand Soleil sits on Grand Cayman’s iconic Seven Mile Beach 1OAK Exhausted and professionally burnt out, I arrived at 1OAK’s Sand Soleil in search of the type of restoration that could still my mind and get me writing again. The seven-day culinary experience was a no-brainer for me as a food writer. The integration of an epicurean getaway with pure Cayman luxury seemed to be the perfect spark for my creativity—private chef dinners, deep dives into Caribbean flavors, and hands-on masterclasses, all located within a serene, oceanfront villa. I had finally arrived. With the last rays of the sun setting behind Grand Cayman’s famous Seven Mile Beach, casting a warm golden glow across the water, I tasted Chef Joe Hughes’ ceviche for the first time—cubes of wahoo cured in lime, with charred pineapple and a subtle, nutty crunch. Chef Joe Hughes’ love for bright, Asian-inspired flavours came through in this wahoo tataki layered with Vietnamese herbs, ripe papaya and mango, cashew and cilantro, all brought together with a nuoc cham. Jamie Fortune Something softened. For the first time in months, I began to feel present. Sophia List, the brainchild of the 1OAK experience, heard me well. With an intuition honed by years of curating luxury, she matched me with what she called “a vision realized.” List told me Sand Soleil—like the other 1OAK homes on Seven Mile Beach and in West Bay—was created to feel like a real sanctuary. For her, it’s the laid-back alternative to a busy hotel, a place where you get privacy and elegance without any fuss. “We wanted to introduce the Cayman Islands to something truly special—an ultra-luxury experience that combines exquisite design, maximum privacy, and a sense of calm,” she shared as she guided me through the four-bedroom villa. “We are so excited to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 14:01
How Pros Buy Bitcoin Dips With DCA Like Institutions

How Pros Buy Bitcoin Dips With DCA Like Institutions

The post How Pros Buy Bitcoin Dips With DCA Like Institutions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “Buy every dip.” That’s the advice from Strike CEO Jack Mallers. According to Mallers, with quantitative tightening over and rate cuts and stimulus on the horizon, the great print is coming. The US can’t afford falling asset prices, he argues, which translates into a giant wall of liquidity ready to muscle in and prop prices up. While retail has latched onto terms like “buy the dip” and “dollar-cost averaging” (DCA) for buying at market lows or making regular purchases, these are really concepts borrowed from the pros like Samar Sen, the senior vice president and head of APAC at Talos, an institutional digital asset trading platform. He says that institutional traders have used these terms for decades to manage their entry points into the market and build exposure gradually, while avoiding emotional decision-making in volatile markets. Source: Jack Mallers Related: Cryptocurrency investment: The ultimate indicators for crypto trading How institutions buy the dip Treasury companies like Strategy and BitMine have become poster children for institutions buying the dip and dollar-cost averaging (DCA) at scale, steadfastly vacuuming up coins every chance they get. Strategy stacked another 130 Bitcoin (BTC) on Monday, while the insatiable Tom Lee scooped up $150 million of Ether (ETH) on Thursday, prompting Arkham to post, “Tom Lee is DCAing ETH.” But while it may look like the smart money is glued to the screen reacting to every market downturn, the reality is quite different. Institutions don’t use the retail vocabulary, Samar explains, but the underlying ideas of disciplined accumulation, opportunistic rebalancing and staying insulated from short-term noise are very much present in how they engage with assets like Bitcoin. The core difference, he points out, is in how they execute those ideas. While retail investors are prone to react to headlines and price charts, institutional desks rely…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 13:53