Serenity's vertically integrated ecosystem targeting governments, enterprises, banks, and Web3 companies positions $SERSH as infrastructure access rather than speculative asset.Serenity's vertically integrated ecosystem targeting governments, enterprises, banks, and Web3 companies positions $SERSH as infrastructure access rather than speculative asset.

Biometric Blockchain Platform Serenity Clears MiCA Registration as Europe's Regulatory Wall Locks Out Hundreds

2025/11/18 20:56

As dozens of firms secure coveted EU crypto registrations and hundreds remain locked out,Serenity biometric platform joins the regulatory winners' circle.

In the seven months since Europe's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation took full effect, the battlefield has become brutally clear: you're either registered, or you're out.

By July 2025, just 53 entities had secured full MiCA authorizations—14 e-money token (EMT) issuers and 39 crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) across the entire European Union. Over 120 enforcement actions had targeted non-compliant projects. More than 250 crypto startups postponed European launches due to regulatory delays. And Tether, the world's largest stablecoin, was delisted from major EU exchanges for failing to meet reserve requirements.​

Now, Serenity—a Dubai-based biometric authentication and tokenization infrastructure company—has secured white paper notification through the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) and publication in the ESMA Interim MiCA Register.​

The achievement positions Serenity's $SERSH token among the first wave of projects to complete MiCA's notification process.

White Paper Notification vs. Full Authorization: What Serenity Actually Achieved

Here's what matters: Serenity didn't need a license. And that's precisely the point.​

Under MiCA Title II, offerors of "Other Crypto-Assets" (OCAs)—tokens that aren't stablecoins or asset-referenced tokens—must notify their white paper to competent authorities at least 20 working days before publication. The authority has five working days to review for completeness. But crucially, no prior approval is required.​

Once notified, the white paper can be published on the issuer's website, and the token can be lawfully offered across all 27 EU member states. The notification is then recorded in ESMA's central register, creating a public record of compliance.​

This differs dramatically from the authorization required for CASPs (crypto-asset service providers), which face extensive capital requirements, ongoing supervision, and multi-month application processes. It also differs from Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs), which require prior approval of their white papers before publication.​

Serenity's pathway—notification without prior approval—represents the most accessible MiCA compliance route for token issuers. Yet even this lighter-touch process has proven a bottleneck, with most projects failing to achieve even basic notification status.​

The Strategic Value of Being First: Registration as Competitive Moat

"MiCA establishes the first truly harmonized crypto regulation globally," said Venket Naga, Serenity's CEO. "For Serenity, MiCA compliance is more than a legal requirement—it's a competitive advantage".​

The numbers support his thesis. While Silicon Valley startups obsess over growth hacks and viral adoption, Europe's crypto market has transformed into a regulatory fortress where compliance timelines determine winners and losers before products even launch.​

European crypto exchanges reported a 22% increase in compliance costs in 2025. Stablecoin issuers saw regulatory expenses surge 35%. Over 65% of exchanges adjusted compliance strategies, while 70% of crypto custodians expanded legal teams.​

For startups without venture capital war chests or institutional backing, these numbers are fatal. The white paper alone must contain comprehensive information about the crypto-asset, including characteristics, risks, intended use, associated rights, and detailed disclosures ensuring investor transparency.​

Serenity cleared these hurdles through its affiliated issuer Quant ID Systems Inc., supervised by MFSA—demonstrating the organizational sophistication and legal firepower required even for MiCA's simplest compliance pathway.​

The $SERSH Utility Play: Why Token Classification Matters Under MiCA

Serenity positions $SERSH as a utility token—the access key to its vertically integrated ecosystem comprising sAxess biometric hardware, S-Box secure modules, the patent-pending DeDaSP survivability protocol, RWS tokenization engine, and DePIN-based private-cloud infrastructure.​

This classification is crucial because MiCA creates three distinct token categories, each with radically different compliance burdens:​

E-Money Tokens (EMTs): Stablecoins pegged 1:1 to fiat currencies, requiring notification but facing strict reserve requirements and supervision​

Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs): "Flatcoins" pegged to baskets of assets or commodities, requiring prior approval of white papers and €350,000+ capital reserves​

Other Crypto-Assets (OCAs): Everything else, including utility tokens, governance tokens, and non-stablecoin cryptocurrencies—requiring only notification, not approval​

By structuring $SERSH as a utility token under OCA classification, Serenity avoids prior approval requirements and capital reserve mandates that sink most stablecoin projects—while still gaining lawful offering rights across all 27 EU member states.​

Malta's Strategic Position: First In, Still Registering

Serenity's choice of Malta as its regulatory jurisdiction reflects strategic calculation. Despite recent ESMA scrutiny over pre-MiCA crypto licensing practices, Malta continues processing new notifications and maintains its reputation as Europe's crypto pioneer.​

The country holds 5 of the EU's 53 fully authorized entities—a disproportionate share for a nation of 500,000 people. More importantly, Malta's Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) has institutional knowledge dating to 2018, when it became the first EU jurisdiction to comprehensively regulate crypto-assets under its Virtual Financial Assets Act.​

This regulatory head start translates to faster processing times and clearer guidance for token issuers navigating MiCA's notification requirements.​

The ESMA Register: Public Record as Market Signal

Once notified and published, Serenity's $SERSH white paper appears in ESMA's central register of crypto-asset white papers. This public listing serves multiple functions beyond legal compliance.​

First, it signals institutional legitimacy to potential enterprise clients—governments, banks, and Web3 companies seeking secure digital asset infrastructure. Second, it enables pan-European marketing without country-by-country regulatory approval. Third, it creates a compliance moat against competitors who lack the legal sophistication or capital to navigate even basic notification requirements.​

ESMA's register also includes machine-readable white paper formats and standardized data fields enabling classification by token type. This transparency requirement disadvantages projects that thrived in regulatory ambiguity while benefiting well-capitalized issuers like Serenity with legitimate business models.​

The Notification Process: Simple in Theory, Complex in Practice

MiCA's notification process appears straightforward on paper: submit white paper 20 working days before publication, wait five working days for completeness review, then publish. In reality, the documentation burden creates significant barriers.​

Issuers must submit the white paper itself plus a justification explaining why the crypto-asset is not an asset-referenced token, e-money token, or excluded financial instrument. They must provide a list of all EU member states where the token will be offered or listed. Marketing communications must comply with Article 7 requirements and be available for regulatory review.​

The white paper must follow standardized templates specified in ESMA regulatory technical standards, include comprehensive risk disclosures, and remain accessible on the issuer's website for as long as tokens are held by the public.​

For projects accustomed to issuing tokens via Medium posts and Twitter threads, these requirements represent an insurmountable compliance barrier. For institutionally-backed infrastructure companies like Serenity, they represent defensible market positioning.​

First-Wave Advantage: The 12-Month Window

With MiCA white paper notification secured, Serenity can now lawfully offer and market $SERSH across all EU member states under a single harmonized framework while competitors navigate regulatory uncertainty.​

The strategic value is measurable. Crypto.com, upon receiving in-principle MiCA authorization as a CASP, immediately highlighted its ability to "provide its full range of services throughout the EU under streamlined regulations" and called the approval "a testament to our commitment to responsible growth".​

Regulatory compliance has become the primary market differentiator in European crypto markets, more valuable than technology innovation, user experience, or network effects.​

The Ecosystem Bet: When Tokens Unlock Infrastructure Access

$SERSH's utility model—token-gated access to biometric hardware, DePIN infrastructure, and tokenization engines—mirrors the emerging playbook of MiCA-era crypto projects: build compliance first, then monetize infrastructure access through tokens rather than pure speculation.​

This aligns with MiCA's core philosophy. The regulation aims to eliminate regulatory fragmentation, establish consumer protections, prevent market manipulation, and create clear rules for issuers and service providers.​

Serenity's vertically integrated ecosystem targeting governments, enterprises, banks, and Web3 companies positions $SERSH as infrastructure access rather than speculative asset.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

How decentralization technologies are advancing in the Old Continent.
Share
The Cryptonomist2025/12/06 15:00
Wang Yongli, former vice president of the Bank of China: Why did China resolutely halt stablecoins?

Wang Yongli, former vice president of the Bank of China: Why did China resolutely halt stablecoins?

Written by: Wang Yongli , former Vice President of Bank of China China's policy orientation of accelerating the development of the digital yuan and resolutely curbing virtual currencies, including stablecoins, is now fully clear. This is based on a comprehensive consideration of factors such as China's leading global advantages in mobile payments and the digital yuan, the sovereignty and security of the yuan, and the stability of the monetary and financial system. Since May 2025, the United States and Hong Kong have been racing to advance stablecoin legislation, which has led to a surge in global legislation on stablecoins and crypto assets (also known as "cryptocurrencies" or "virtual currencies"). A large number of institutions and capital are flocking to issue stablecoins and invest in crypto assets, which has also sparked heated debate on whether China should fully promote stablecoin legislation and the development of RMB stablecoins (including offshore ones). Furthermore, after the United States legislated to prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing digital dollars, whether China should continue to promote digital RMB has also become a hot topic of debate. For China, this involves the direction and path of national currency development. With the global spread of stablecoins and the increasingly acute and complex international relations and fiercer international currency competition, this has a huge and far-reaching impact on how the RMB innovates and develops, safeguards national security, and achieves the strategic goals of a strong currency and a financial power. We must calmly analyze, accurately grasp, and make decisions early. We cannot be indifferent or hesitant, nor can we blindly follow the trend and make directional and subversive mistakes. Subsequently, the People's Bank of China announced that it would optimize the positioning of the digital yuan within the monetary hierarchy (adjusting the previously determined M0 positioning. This is a point I have repeatedly advocated from the beginning; see Wang Yongli's WeChat public account article "Digital Yuan Should Not Be Positioned as M0" dated January 6, 2021), further optimize the digital yuan management system (establishing an international digital yuan operations center in Shanghai, responsible for cross-border cooperation and use of the digital yuan; and establishing a digital yuan operations management center in Beijing, responsible for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the digital yuan system), and promote and accelerate the development of the digital yuan . On November 28, the People's Bank of China and 13 other departments jointly convened a meeting of the coordination mechanism for combating virtual currency trading and speculation. The meeting pointed out that due to various factors, virtual currency speculation has recently resurfaced, and related illegal and criminal activities have occurred frequently, posing new challenges to risk prevention and control. It emphasized that all units should deepen coordination and cooperation, continue to adhere to the prohibitive policy on virtual currencies, and persistently crack down on illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies. It clarified that stablecoins are a form of virtual currency , and their issuance and trading activities are also illegal and subject to crackdown. This has greatly disappointed those who believed that China would promote the development of RMB stablecoins and correspondingly relax the ban on virtual currency (crypto asset) trading. Therefore, China's policy orientation of accelerating the development of the digital yuan and resolutely curbing virtual currencies, including stablecoins, is now fully clear . Of course, this policy orientation remains highly debated both domestically and internationally, and there is no consensus among the public. So, how should we view this major policy direction of China? This article will first answer why China resolutely halted stablecoins; how to accelerate the innovative development of the digital yuan will be discussed in another article . There is little room or opportunity for the development of non-USD stablecoins. Since Tether launched USDT, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, in 2014 , USD stablecoins have been operating for over a decade and have formed a complete international operating system. They have basically dominated the entire crypto asset trading market, accounting for over 99% of the global fiat stablecoin market capitalization and trading volume . This situation arises from two main factors. First, the US dollar is the most liquid and has the most comprehensive supporting system of international central currencies, making stablecoins pegged to the dollar the easiest to accept globally. Second, it is also a result of the US's long-standing tolerant policy towards crypto assets like Bitcoin and dollar-denominated stablecoins, rather than leading the international community to strengthen necessary regulation and safeguard the fundamental interests of all humanity. Even this year, when the US pushed for legislation on stablecoins and crypto assets, it was largely driven by the belief that dollar-denominated stablecoins would increase global demand for the dollar and dollar-denominated assets such as US Treasury bonds, reduce the financing costs for the US government and society, and strengthen the dollar's international dominance. This was a choice made to enhance US support for dollar-denominated stablecoins and control their potential impact on the US, prioritizing the maximization of national interests while giving little consideration to mitigating the international risks of stablecoins. With the US strongly promoting dollar-denominated stablecoins, other countries or regions launching non-dollar fiat currency stablecoins will find it difficult to compete with dollar-denominated stablecoins on an international level, except perhaps within their own sovereign territory or on the issuing institution's own e-commerce platform. Their development potential and practical significance are limited . Lacking a strong ecosystem and application scenarios, and lacking distinct characteristics compared to dollar-denominated stablecoins, as well as the advantage of attracting traders and transaction volume, the return on investment for issuing non-dollar fiat currency stablecoins is unlikely to meet expectations, and they will struggle to survive in an environment of increasingly stringent legislation and regulation in various countries. The legislation on stablecoins in the United States still faces many problems and challenges. Following President Trump's second election victory, his strong advocacy for crypto assets such as Bitcoin fueled a new international frenzy in cryptocurrency trading, driving the rapid development of dollar-denominated stablecoin trading and a surge in stablecoin market capitalization. This not only increased demand for the US dollar and US Treasury bonds, strengthening the dollar's international status, but also brought huge profits to the Trump family and their cryptocurrency associates. However, this also posed new challenges to the global monitoring of the dollar's circulation and the stability of the traditional US financial system. Furthermore, the trading and transfer of crypto assets backed by dollar-denominated stablecoins has become a new and more difficult-to-prevent tool for the US to harvest global wealth, posing a serious threat to the monetary sovereignty and wealth security of other countries . This is why the United States has accelerated legislation on stablecoins, but its legislation is more about prioritizing America and maximizing American and even group interests, at the expense of the interests of other countries and the common interests of the world. After the legislation on US dollar stablecoins came into effect, institutions that have not obtained approval and operating licenses from US regulators will find it difficult to issue and operate US dollar stablecoins in the United States (for this reason, Tether has announced that it will apply for US-issued USDT). Stablecoin issuers subject to US regulation must meet regulatory requirements such as Know Your Customer (KYC), Anti-Money Laundering (AML), and Counter-Terrorist Financing (FTC). They must be able to screen customers against government watchlists and report suspicious activities to regulators. Their systems must have the ability to freeze or intercept specific stablecoins when ordered by law enforcement agencies. Stablecoin issuers must have reserves of no less than 100% US dollar assets (including currency assets, short-term Treasury bonds, and repurchase agreements backed by Treasury bonds) approved by regulators, and must keep US customer funds in US banks and not transfer them overseas. They are prohibited from paying interest or returns on stablecoins, and strict control must be exercised over-issuance and self-operation. Reserve assets must be held in custody by an independent institution approved by regulators and must be audited by an auditing firm at least monthly and an audit report must be issued. This will greatly enhance the value stability of stablecoins relative to the US dollar, strengthen their payment function and compliance, while weakening their investment attributes and illegal use; it will also significantly increase the regulatory costs of stablecoins, thereby reducing their potential for exorbitant profits in an unregulated environment. The US stablecoin legislation officially took effect on July 18, but it still faces numerous challenges : While it stipulates the scope of reserve assets for stablecoin issuance (bank deposits, short-term Treasury bonds, repurchase agreements backed by Treasury bonds, etc.), since it primarily includes Treasury bonds with fluctuating trading prices, even if reserve assets are sufficient at the time of issuance, a subsequent decline in Treasury bond prices could lead to insufficient reserves; if the reserve asset structures of different issuing institutions are not entirely consistent, and there is no central bank guarantee, it means that the issued dollar stablecoins will not be the same, creating arbitrage opportunities and posing challenges to relevant regulation and market stability; even if there is no over-issuance of stablecoins at the time of issuance, allowing decentralized finance (DeFi) to engage in stablecoin lending could still lead to stablecoin derivation and over-issuance, unless it is entirely a matchmaking between lenders and borrowers rather than proprietary trading; getting stablecoin issuers outside of financial institutions to meet regulatory requirements is not easy, and regulation also presents significant challenges. More importantly, the earliest and most fundamental requirement for stablecoins is the borderless, decentralized, 24/7 pricing and settlement of crypto assets on the blockchain. It is precisely because crypto assets like Bitcoin cannot fulfill the fundamental requirement of currency as a measure of value and a value token—that the total amount of currency must change in line with the total value of tradable wealth requiring monetary pricing and settlement—that their price relative to fiat currency fluctuates wildly (therefore, using crypto assets like Bitcoin as collateral or strategic reserves carries significant risks), making it difficult to become a true circulating currency. This has led to the development of fiat stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies. (Therefore, Bitcoin and similar crypto assets can only be considered crypto assets; calling them "cryptocurrency" or "virtual currency" is inaccurate; translating the English word "Token" as "币" or "币" is also inappropriate; it should be directly transliterated as "通证" and clearly defined as an asset, not currency.) The emergence and development of fiat-backed stablecoins have brought fiat currencies and more real-world assets (RWAs) onto the blockchain, strongly supporting on-chain cryptocurrency trading and development. They serve as a channel connecting the on-chain cryptocurrency world with the off-chain real-world, thereby strengthening the integration and influence of the cryptocurrency world on the real world. This will significantly enhance the scope, speed, scale, and volatility of global wealth financialization and financial transactions, accelerating the transfer and concentration of global wealth in a few countries or groups. In this context, failing to strengthen global joint regulation of stablecoins and cryptocurrency issuance and trading poses extremely high risks and dangers . Therefore, the surge in stablecoin and cryptocurrency development driven by the Trump administration in the United States has already revealed a huge bubble and potential risks, making it unsustainable. The international community must be highly vigilant about this! Stablecoin legislation could severely backfire on stablecoins. One unexpected outcome of stablecoin legislation is that the inclusion of fiat-backed stablecoins in legislative regulation will inevitably lead to legislative regulation of crypto asset transactions denominated and settled using fiat-backed stablecoins, including blockchain-generated assets such as Bitcoin and on-chain real-world assets (RWA). This will have a profound impact on stablecoins. Before crypto assets receive legislative regulation and compliance protection, licensed financial institutions such as banks find it difficult to directly participate in crypto asset trading, clearing, custody, and other related activities, thus ceding opportunities to private organizations outside of financial institutions. Due to the lack of regulation and the absence of regulatory costs, existing stablecoin issuers and crypto asset trading platforms have become highly profitable and attractive entities, exerting an increasing impact on banks and the financial system, forcing governments and monetary authorities in countries like the United States to accelerate legislative regulation of stablecoins. However, once crypto assets receive legislative regulation and compliance protection, banks and other financial institutions will undoubtedly participate fully. Payment institutions such as banks can directly promote the on-chain operation of fiat currency deposits (deposit tokenization), completely replacing stablecoins as a new channel and hub connecting the crypto world and the real world . Similarly, existing stock, bond, money market fund, and ETF exchanges can promote the on-chain trading of these relatively standardized financial products through RWA (Real-Time Asset Exchange). Having adequately regulated financial institutions such as banks act as the main entities connecting the crypto world and the real world on the blockchain is more conducive to implementing current legislative requirements for stablecoins, upholding the principle of "equal regulation for the same business" for all institutions, and reducing the impact and risks of crypto asset development on the existing monetary and financial system. This trend has already emerged in the United States and is rapidly intensifying, proving difficult to stop . Therefore, stablecoin legislation may seriously backfire on or subvert stablecoins ( see Wang Yongli's WeChat public account article "Stablecoin Legislation May Seriously Backfire on Stablecoins" on September 3, 2025 ). In this situation, it is not a reasonable choice for other countries to follow the US lead and vigorously promote stablecoin legislation and development. China should not follow the path of stablecoins taken by the United States. China already has a leading global advantage in mobile payments and the digital yuan. Promoting a stablecoin for the yuan has no advantage domestically, and it will have little room for development and influence internationally. It should not follow the path of the US dollar stablecoin, but should instead focus on promoting the development of stablecoins for the yuan, both domestically and offshore. More importantly, crypto assets and stablecoins like Bitcoin can achieve 24/7 global trading and clearing through borderless blockchains and crypto asset trading platforms. While this significantly improves efficiency, the highly anonymous and high-frequency global flow, lacking coordinated international oversight, makes it difficult to meet regulatory requirements such as KYC, AML, and FTC. This poses a clear risk and has been demonstrated in real-world cases of being used for money laundering, fundraising fraud, and illegal cross-border fund transfers. Given that US dollar stablecoins already dominate the crypto asset trading market, and the US has greater control or influence over major global blockchain operating systems, crypto asset trading platforms, and the exchange rate between crypto assets and the US dollar (as evidenced by the US's ability to trace, identify, freeze, and confiscate the crypto asset accounts of some institutions and individuals, and to punish or even arrest some crypto asset trading platforms and their leaders), China's development of a RMB stablecoin following the path of US dollar stablecoins not only fails to challenge the international status of US dollar stablecoins but may even turn the RMB stablecoin into a vassal of US dollar stablecoins. This could impact national tax collection, foreign exchange management, and cross-border capital flows, posing a serious threat to the sovereignty and security of the RMB and the stability of the monetary and financial system. Faced with a more acute and complex international situation, China should prioritize national security and exercise high vigilance and strict control over the trading and speculation of crypto assets, including stablecoins, rather than simply pursuing increased efficiency and reduced costs . It is necessary to accelerate the improvement of relevant regulatory policies and legal frameworks, focus on key links such as information flow and capital flow, strengthen information sharing among relevant departments, further enhance monitoring and tracking capabilities, and severely crack down on illegal and criminal activities involving crypto assets. Of course, while resolutely halting stablecoins and cracking down on virtual currency trading and speculation, we must also accelerate the innovative development and widespread application of the digital yuan at home and abroad, establish the international leading advantage of the digital yuan, forge a Chinese path for the development of digital currency, and actively explore the establishment of a fair, reasonable and secure new international monetary and financial system . Taking into account the above factors, it is not difficult to understand why China has chosen to resolutely curb virtual currencies, including stablecoins, while firmly promoting and accelerating the development of the digital yuan.
Share
PANews2025/12/06 15:08
Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

The post Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In recent years, even Europe, traditionally cautious towards new technologies, seems to be experiencing a phase of progressive adoption of Web3. The Old Continent is tackling the challenges of decentralization technologies, amidst innovative momentum, strict regulations, and new opportunities for businesses and creatives.  Web3: The Technologies of Decentralization Web3 refers to the evolution of the Internet towards a decentralized model, based on blockchain, smart contracts, tokens, crypto, and distributed digital identities.  According to what is described by Amazon Web Services, other key technologies of Web3 include artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, WebAssembly, semantic technologies and interfaces such as decentralized wallets and augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR).  All these technologies aim to give users greater control over their own data and ownership of digital assets, eliminating reliance on centralized intermediaries. Moreover, Web3 projects are mostly driven directly by the community.  Thus, the first challenge of Web3 is to evolve Web2, dominated by centralized platforms. With decentralization technologies, Web3 aims to  return control and ownership of data to users; eliminate intermediaries thanks to smart contracts; create digital economies based on tokens and NFTs; promote greater transparency and security. Today, Web3 is capable of influencing sectors such as finance, art, video games, music, real estate, and digital governance.  The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: A Conscious Growth The adoption of Web3 in Europe is not predominant compared to other continents like North America and Asia. However, it can be stated that in the Old Continent, the adoption of Web3 is in a hybrid phase: it is not a matter of mass usage, but rather a growing number of businesses, professionals, and informed users.  For example, in the blockchain and crypto sector, the report by Chainalysis confirmed that between July 2023 and June 2024, the European region experienced significant growth and resilience. …
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 15:24