The post Hougan Explains Why Only the Best Will Survive appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan said that structural drag ensures most DATs will trade at a discount. Only a few exceptional DATs can sustainably increase crypto-per-share and earn a premium. DATs that scale and operate efficiently will evolve into fully operational companies, Hougan said. Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan believes that the next evolution of digital asset treasuries (DATs) is already taking shape and many of these firms will eventually transition into fully operational companies rather than passive crypto-holding entities.  Speaking in a series of posts on X on Sunday, Hougan argued that the structural forces shaping DAT valuations leave little room for long-term premiums. This will eventually push most firms toward building real business models to survive. Hougan said that most DATs currently rely on a narrow and uncertain set of tools to increase their “crypto-per-share,” while facing heavy and unavoidable downward pressures such as illiquidity, operating expenses, and execution risk.  “Most will trade at a discount, and only a few exceptional firms will trade at a premium,” he noted and added that the sector faces a “high hurdle” by design. 22/ For the past six months, DATs have risen and fallen together. Going forward, I think there will be more differentiation. A few will execute well and trade at a premium, and many will execute poorly and trade at a discount. This model is one way to think about which is which. — Matt Hougan (@Matt_Hougan) November 23, 2025 A Structural Discount That DATs Cannot Ignore Hougan’s model begins by treating a DAT as if it had a fixed lifespan, i.e., what would the company be worth if its assets were liquidated today, in a year, or over a longer horizon?  He pointed out that investors will not pay full market price today for crypto they would only… The post Hougan Explains Why Only the Best Will Survive appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan said that structural drag ensures most DATs will trade at a discount. Only a few exceptional DATs can sustainably increase crypto-per-share and earn a premium. DATs that scale and operate efficiently will evolve into fully operational companies, Hougan said. Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan believes that the next evolution of digital asset treasuries (DATs) is already taking shape and many of these firms will eventually transition into fully operational companies rather than passive crypto-holding entities.  Speaking in a series of posts on X on Sunday, Hougan argued that the structural forces shaping DAT valuations leave little room for long-term premiums. This will eventually push most firms toward building real business models to survive. Hougan said that most DATs currently rely on a narrow and uncertain set of tools to increase their “crypto-per-share,” while facing heavy and unavoidable downward pressures such as illiquidity, operating expenses, and execution risk.  “Most will trade at a discount, and only a few exceptional firms will trade at a premium,” he noted and added that the sector faces a “high hurdle” by design. 22/ For the past six months, DATs have risen and fallen together. Going forward, I think there will be more differentiation. A few will execute well and trade at a premium, and many will execute poorly and trade at a discount. This model is one way to think about which is which. — Matt Hougan (@Matt_Hougan) November 23, 2025 A Structural Discount That DATs Cannot Ignore Hougan’s model begins by treating a DAT as if it had a fixed lifespan, i.e., what would the company be worth if its assets were liquidated today, in a year, or over a longer horizon?  He pointed out that investors will not pay full market price today for crypto they would only…

Hougan Explains Why Only the Best Will Survive

  • Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan said that structural drag ensures most DATs will trade at a discount.
  • Only a few exceptional DATs can sustainably increase crypto-per-share and earn a premium.
  • DATs that scale and operate efficiently will evolve into fully operational companies, Hougan said.

Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan believes that the next evolution of digital asset treasuries (DATs) is already taking shape and many of these firms will eventually transition into fully operational companies rather than passive crypto-holding entities. 

Speaking in a series of posts on X on Sunday, Hougan argued that the structural forces shaping DAT valuations leave little room for long-term premiums. This will eventually push most firms toward building real business models to survive.

Hougan said that most DATs currently rely on a narrow and uncertain set of tools to increase their “crypto-per-share,” while facing heavy and unavoidable downward pressures such as illiquidity, operating expenses, and execution risk. 

“Most will trade at a discount, and only a few exceptional firms will trade at a premium,” he noted and added that the sector faces a “high hurdle” by design.

A Structural Discount That DATs Cannot Ignore

Hougan’s model begins by treating a DAT as if it had a fixed lifespan, i.e., what would the company be worth if its assets were liquidated today, in a year, or over a longer horizon? 

He pointed out that investors will not pay full market price today for crypto they would only receive much later. The gap between immediate ownership and delayed delivery, he said, creates an automatic discount, one that widens with time, friction, and uncertainty.

Hougan brought to light two additional drags on valuation, i.e., expenses and operational risk. Every dollar spent on salaries, fees, or overhead reduces the value available to shareholders, while even small operational missteps must be priced into the market’s expectations. These forces, he said, are both predictable and unavoidable.

Expenses and risk compound over time, Hougan stated, warning that the drag only grows the longer a DAT attempts to operate as a perpetual holding vehicle.

Related: Bitcoin to $250K? Hoskinson Highlights Regulation and Corporate Treasuries as Catalysts

Limited Paths to Premiums 

There are ways DATs can grow their crypto-per-share, thereby overcoming some of the drag, Hougan said. However, he claims that the available levers are few, uncertain, and dependent on strong execution.

The four paths Hougan discussed include: issuing debt to buy crypto, lending tokens for yield using derivatives such as covered calls, and acquiring assets at a discount, absorbing other DATs trading below book value, and acquiring businesses with cash flow.

Large DATs would have better access to credit markets, deeper liquidity for derivatives, and more opportunities for discounted strategic acquisitions, Hougan added. 

DATs Will Be Forced to Build Real Businesses

Because the sources of drag are foundational while the sources of upside are conditional, Hougan claims that DATs will inevitably need to become operational companies, not merely crypto-holding vehicles, if they want to survive and create long-term value.

“Going forward, I think there will be more differentiation,” he wrote. “A few will execute well and trade at a premium, and many will execute poorly and trade at a discount.”

Hougan concluded that the only sustainable way for DATs to outperform their underlying assets is to generate revenue, reduce execution risk, and build scalable operational strategies. They will have to evolve into real businesses, not permanently leveraged Bitcoin or crypto trackers.

Related: Corporate Bitcoin Treasuries Climb to $135 Billion with Strategy (MSTR) on Top

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/why-most-dats-will-trade-at-a-discount-according-to-bitwises-matt-hougan/

Market Opportunity
Polytrade Logo
Polytrade Price(TRADE)
$0.03547
$0.03547$0.03547
-1.41%
USD
Polytrade (TRADE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

The post XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple [XRP] remains one of the top five cryptocurrencies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:49
Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026?

Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026?

The post Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is trading around $68,700, down nearly 22% year to date
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:59