Author: Zhixiong Pan, ChainFeeds At the Ethereum Devconnect ARG, Fede, the founder of LambdaClass, delivered a passionate and thought-provoking speech. He abandoned the traditional "world computer" narrative, redefining Ethereum as the first "verifiable computer" in human history. Fede believes that this "antifragility," which does not rely on trust but is based solely on mathematical and economic incentives, is the fundamental cornerstone for Ethereum to establish internet ownership and support a multi-trillion-dollar "global economy." However, this was not a simple celebration, but a jarring wake-up call. Faced with the rise of high-performance public chains like Solana, Fede bluntly stated that the Ethereum community is facing the risk of "death by complacency." From denouncing the false prosperity of "most L2 implementations simply not working" to criticizing Solidity's self-defeating development experience, he called on the community to break free from its information cocoon and rediscover the ambition and fighting spirit of the "Bronze Age." He quoted the former CEO of Intel as warning the audience: in the brutal competition of technology, "only the paranoid survive." From pushing the performance limits of 1 Gigagas to building the architectural vision of Lean Ethereum, Fede uses the most hardcore technical details and the most sincere emotions to demonstrate how Ethereum can maintain its dominance over the next decade. This is not just a technology roadmap, but also a declaration of war against mediocrity. The following is a transcript of the highlights of this speech. Speaker: Fede (LambdaClass) Today I'm going to talk about Ethereum's next decade: from "verifiable computer" to "global economy". Core definition: Ethereum is the first "verifiable computer". To me, Ethereum is a verifiable computer. I've never really liked the "world computer" meme. I think AWS or Google are the real "world computers." They have countless funds and servers, but you have to trust them. Ethereum's biggest difference from them is its verifiability. Ethereum is the world's first verifiable computer that doesn't require trust in the computation itself, but only in economic incentives and mathematics. This gives it a significant advantage over AWS or Google Cloud. In traditional cloud services, everything is based on trust, and trust can be broken. A few days ago, I saw on Twitter that someone hacked into Bing and modified the movie list. If you searched for "top 10 movies," the results were tampered with. In this case, you are actually trusting the hacker. This kind of thing is impossible on Ethereum unless the entire network is compromised, but that's extremely difficult because you would have to compromise multiple teams and multiple client implementations simultaneously, and everyone would be able to see the attack. This makes Ethereum anti-fragile. Every attack attempt, whether by North Korea, other national actors, or private hackers, actually makes Ethereum stronger because it continues to operate and handles huge sums of money. Verifiable changes brought about by computers It can be verified that the computer has realized genuine Internet Property Rights. True ownership: You no longer need to click "agree to the terms" to hand over your data to tech giants; instead, you control everything through your private key. The private key is more reliable than any terms of service. Global neutrality: Chinese developers, Russian traders, US funds, and Argentinian users all compete on the same level playing field. The cornerstone of artificial intelligence: In the next decade, we will tokenize everything, from art and land to AI. This is crucial. If the future is driven by AI, hackers will have a huge incentive to tamper with its parameters. We need Ethereum to verify whether AI is functioning as expected. Current Status and Product-Market Fit (PMF) Ethereum has created a complete economy. This is not just a $300 billion scale, but rather the processing of $3 trillion in transactions monthly through stablecoins—three times the size of Visa. Our biggest advantage over Visa or the NYSE is composability. All funds, assets, and artworks are in one place and can be exchanged at any time. This creates a flywheel effect. In this sense, Ethereum is less fragmented than global capital markets because it operates 24/7. Ethereum's current Product-Market Fit (PMF) can be summarized as follows: Decentralized/permissionless verifiability. Privacy (a feature we need to build at the core layer). Stablecoins (programmable, private, borderless US dollars). Technical challenges: the tough nuts to crack. To continue winning over the next decade, I must "grumble" from a technical perspective. Here are the challenges I see: 1. Performance We (LambdaClass) are building an Ethrex client. A team just told me we're only 10% behind Reth in performance. Most clients, besides Nethermind, Reth, Geth, and us, struggle with performance. Without raising the hardware requirements for validators, we will find it difficult to achieve the performance needed to compete with technologies like Solana. This touches on a sensitive topic: Gas Limit. For the past three years, our decision not to increase the Gas Limit has slowed us down. I believe we can increase speed while maintaining verifiability. This used to be a taboo subject, but now, for the sake of competition, we need to accelerate. We cannot wait if other execution layers fall behind. Ethereum is more important than any single team. I'm also reflecting on this: Is Ethereum's goal really to allow everyone to run nodes at home with a $50 Raspberry Pi? I'm not sure. Maybe as long as the verification cost is low enough (a few thousand dollars or even a few dollars), it doesn't necessarily have to be an extremely low barrier to entry. 2. Scalability I think we should increase the gas limit by 100 times. The cheaper it is, the more people will use it. YouTube was born only after the internet became faster. Furthermore, I'm a big fan of RISC-V and not a big fan of Solidity. Solidity doesn't represent Ethereum. While it has made significant contributions, it has many problems. I believe RISC-V should be the default standard. Regarding Layer 2: Frankly, most L2 technology stacks simply don't work. You clone the codebase and run it, and it's broken. The current incentive is "issue a token and then ignore it, let it die." If you believe in a Rollup-centric roadmap, we must make running Rollups extremely simple. We are working to make Ethrex run L2 with a single command. 3. Interoperability and Decentralization The AWS outage a few days ago caused some rollups to crash, which was terrible. The Solana community mocked us, and I think they have a point. We need to move to "Stage 2," which requires a decentralized sequencer, based rollups (reusing L1 pipelines to build L2), and technologies like CommitBoost for pre-confirmations. 4. Privacy I've received a call from a lawyer warning me I was in big trouble, so I deeply empathize with this. We need to support all developers dedicated to privacy (like Roman, Alexei, and the developers of Samurai Wallet). If I wanted my mother to use Ethereum, she certainly wouldn't want all her transactions to be visible to the entire world. Currently, the rules regarding privacy development are very vague, and we need to work together to address them. 5. Security There are too few maintainers for the Solidity compiler; only one or two people on GitHub. This is Ethereum's most important programming language, yet it faces a huge risk of insufficient manpower. Solidity's syntax is simple, but it's easy to write security vulnerabilities. As a developer who has used over 20 languages, writing Solidity felt like shooting myself in the foot. We need a better compiler, or a long-term solution like RISC-V ZKVM. 6. The Post-Quantum Era We are working with Justin Drake to develop Lean Ethereum. Compared to Bitcoin, Ethereum has a huge advantage in deploying post-quantum cryptography because we allow for multi-client implementations and have a more open community, even if it means we are making some radical changes. Social and Cultural Challenges: Rejecting Mediocrity I'm a die-hard Ethereum fan, and my company relies on Ethereum, but I must be frank: We need to adopt a "Bronze Age" mentality: don't think, "We've either won or we're winning." Complacency leads to stagnation. Look at Intel; once a giant, it's now been left behind by NVIDIA and AMD. We need to maintain our hunger and ambition. Break free from closed-door processes: Science and engineering require open debate. Important decisions like EOF (Ethereum Object Format) should not be made in closed-door meetings. Closed-door decision-making makes it easy for state actors to control the network by infiltrating key decision-makers (see the OpenBSD case). Learn from competitors: I've attended every Solana Breakpoint conference, not because I support Solana, but because I want to learn from the competition. Linux succeeded by replicating the strengths of Solaris and open-sourcing it. We need this attitude. Refuse echo chambers: We need to pay those who offer dissenting opinions (contrarians). In my company, some partners frequently criticize me, which hurts me, but it creates a positive feedback loop. Without a good culture, there will be no good technology in the long run. What is LambdaClass doing? We're not just complaining, we're also taking action: Partnerships with governments in Latin America: In Argentina (Project Sobra), Mexico, and Colombia, we are conducting identity verification, KYC, and lending operations via on-chain IDs. Global infrastructure: Establishing passport and property rights infrastructure in Africa and Central Asia (such as Uzbekistan). Technology stack: Building Ethrex (L1 client), L2 stack based on SP1 and Zisk, ZKVM in collaboration with TMI Labs, and privacy and decentralized AI projects. Partner: We are working with IRSA (Argentine real estate giant) to streamline payment channels. Q&A Session Q: How do you feel about Devconnect being held in Argentina right now? I'm happy. Very happy. I'm so glad my mother was there; she finally understands what I'm doing. I'm also happy to show the world what we're doing. Q: What do you think is the most important measure at present? Lean Ethereum. I wasn't a big fan of the "Ultrasound Money" meme before. But Lean Ethereum is like a cathedral. When Justin Drake and I were walking through a cathedral in Cambridge, he asked me, "Do you think people will look at Ethereum's design like this cathedral 500 years from now?" I said, "Yes, and you'll be one of the architects." Q: How much do you think the Gas Limit can be improved in the near future? Thanks to Nethermind's amazing engineering capabilities (though I don't like the C# language), and our efforts with Reth, I believe we can achieve 300-400 Megagas on good servers. In the coming years, as technology improves, our goal is to reach 1 Gigagas. Q: You've interacted with all sorts of people, from government officials to developers. What do they have in common? Even those bigwigs who don't fully understand Ethereum (royalties, billionaires) know this is "for real." They trust "nerds" because nerds aren't just driven by money. They see Ethereum as the winner of the future. Q: What advice do you have for young builders? Don't raise funds until you've found product-market fit (PMF). Money is just fuel; connections and vision are more important. Work with ethical, passionate people who want to do things that benefit society. Do things you'll be proud of ten years from now.Author: Zhixiong Pan, ChainFeeds At the Ethereum Devconnect ARG, Fede, the founder of LambdaClass, delivered a passionate and thought-provoking speech. He abandoned the traditional "world computer" narrative, redefining Ethereum as the first "verifiable computer" in human history. Fede believes that this "antifragility," which does not rely on trust but is based solely on mathematical and economic incentives, is the fundamental cornerstone for Ethereum to establish internet ownership and support a multi-trillion-dollar "global economy." However, this was not a simple celebration, but a jarring wake-up call. Faced with the rise of high-performance public chains like Solana, Fede bluntly stated that the Ethereum community is facing the risk of "death by complacency." From denouncing the false prosperity of "most L2 implementations simply not working" to criticizing Solidity's self-defeating development experience, he called on the community to break free from its information cocoon and rediscover the ambition and fighting spirit of the "Bronze Age." He quoted the former CEO of Intel as warning the audience: in the brutal competition of technology, "only the paranoid survive." From pushing the performance limits of 1 Gigagas to building the architectural vision of Lean Ethereum, Fede uses the most hardcore technical details and the most sincere emotions to demonstrate how Ethereum can maintain its dominance over the next decade. This is not just a technology roadmap, but also a declaration of war against mediocrity. The following is a transcript of the highlights of this speech. Speaker: Fede (LambdaClass) Today I'm going to talk about Ethereum's next decade: from "verifiable computer" to "global economy". Core definition: Ethereum is the first "verifiable computer". To me, Ethereum is a verifiable computer. I've never really liked the "world computer" meme. I think AWS or Google are the real "world computers." They have countless funds and servers, but you have to trust them. Ethereum's biggest difference from them is its verifiability. Ethereum is the world's first verifiable computer that doesn't require trust in the computation itself, but only in economic incentives and mathematics. This gives it a significant advantage over AWS or Google Cloud. In traditional cloud services, everything is based on trust, and trust can be broken. A few days ago, I saw on Twitter that someone hacked into Bing and modified the movie list. If you searched for "top 10 movies," the results were tampered with. In this case, you are actually trusting the hacker. This kind of thing is impossible on Ethereum unless the entire network is compromised, but that's extremely difficult because you would have to compromise multiple teams and multiple client implementations simultaneously, and everyone would be able to see the attack. This makes Ethereum anti-fragile. Every attack attempt, whether by North Korea, other national actors, or private hackers, actually makes Ethereum stronger because it continues to operate and handles huge sums of money. Verifiable changes brought about by computers It can be verified that the computer has realized genuine Internet Property Rights. True ownership: You no longer need to click "agree to the terms" to hand over your data to tech giants; instead, you control everything through your private key. The private key is more reliable than any terms of service. Global neutrality: Chinese developers, Russian traders, US funds, and Argentinian users all compete on the same level playing field. The cornerstone of artificial intelligence: In the next decade, we will tokenize everything, from art and land to AI. This is crucial. If the future is driven by AI, hackers will have a huge incentive to tamper with its parameters. We need Ethereum to verify whether AI is functioning as expected. Current Status and Product-Market Fit (PMF) Ethereum has created a complete economy. This is not just a $300 billion scale, but rather the processing of $3 trillion in transactions monthly through stablecoins—three times the size of Visa. Our biggest advantage over Visa or the NYSE is composability. All funds, assets, and artworks are in one place and can be exchanged at any time. This creates a flywheel effect. In this sense, Ethereum is less fragmented than global capital markets because it operates 24/7. Ethereum's current Product-Market Fit (PMF) can be summarized as follows: Decentralized/permissionless verifiability. Privacy (a feature we need to build at the core layer). Stablecoins (programmable, private, borderless US dollars). Technical challenges: the tough nuts to crack. To continue winning over the next decade, I must "grumble" from a technical perspective. Here are the challenges I see: 1. Performance We (LambdaClass) are building an Ethrex client. A team just told me we're only 10% behind Reth in performance. Most clients, besides Nethermind, Reth, Geth, and us, struggle with performance. Without raising the hardware requirements for validators, we will find it difficult to achieve the performance needed to compete with technologies like Solana. This touches on a sensitive topic: Gas Limit. For the past three years, our decision not to increase the Gas Limit has slowed us down. I believe we can increase speed while maintaining verifiability. This used to be a taboo subject, but now, for the sake of competition, we need to accelerate. We cannot wait if other execution layers fall behind. Ethereum is more important than any single team. I'm also reflecting on this: Is Ethereum's goal really to allow everyone to run nodes at home with a $50 Raspberry Pi? I'm not sure. Maybe as long as the verification cost is low enough (a few thousand dollars or even a few dollars), it doesn't necessarily have to be an extremely low barrier to entry. 2. Scalability I think we should increase the gas limit by 100 times. The cheaper it is, the more people will use it. YouTube was born only after the internet became faster. Furthermore, I'm a big fan of RISC-V and not a big fan of Solidity. Solidity doesn't represent Ethereum. While it has made significant contributions, it has many problems. I believe RISC-V should be the default standard. Regarding Layer 2: Frankly, most L2 technology stacks simply don't work. You clone the codebase and run it, and it's broken. The current incentive is "issue a token and then ignore it, let it die." If you believe in a Rollup-centric roadmap, we must make running Rollups extremely simple. We are working to make Ethrex run L2 with a single command. 3. Interoperability and Decentralization The AWS outage a few days ago caused some rollups to crash, which was terrible. The Solana community mocked us, and I think they have a point. We need to move to "Stage 2," which requires a decentralized sequencer, based rollups (reusing L1 pipelines to build L2), and technologies like CommitBoost for pre-confirmations. 4. Privacy I've received a call from a lawyer warning me I was in big trouble, so I deeply empathize with this. We need to support all developers dedicated to privacy (like Roman, Alexei, and the developers of Samurai Wallet). If I wanted my mother to use Ethereum, she certainly wouldn't want all her transactions to be visible to the entire world. Currently, the rules regarding privacy development are very vague, and we need to work together to address them. 5. Security There are too few maintainers for the Solidity compiler; only one or two people on GitHub. This is Ethereum's most important programming language, yet it faces a huge risk of insufficient manpower. Solidity's syntax is simple, but it's easy to write security vulnerabilities. As a developer who has used over 20 languages, writing Solidity felt like shooting myself in the foot. We need a better compiler, or a long-term solution like RISC-V ZKVM. 6. The Post-Quantum Era We are working with Justin Drake to develop Lean Ethereum. Compared to Bitcoin, Ethereum has a huge advantage in deploying post-quantum cryptography because we allow for multi-client implementations and have a more open community, even if it means we are making some radical changes. Social and Cultural Challenges: Rejecting Mediocrity I'm a die-hard Ethereum fan, and my company relies on Ethereum, but I must be frank: We need to adopt a "Bronze Age" mentality: don't think, "We've either won or we're winning." Complacency leads to stagnation. Look at Intel; once a giant, it's now been left behind by NVIDIA and AMD. We need to maintain our hunger and ambition. Break free from closed-door processes: Science and engineering require open debate. Important decisions like EOF (Ethereum Object Format) should not be made in closed-door meetings. Closed-door decision-making makes it easy for state actors to control the network by infiltrating key decision-makers (see the OpenBSD case). Learn from competitors: I've attended every Solana Breakpoint conference, not because I support Solana, but because I want to learn from the competition. Linux succeeded by replicating the strengths of Solaris and open-sourcing it. We need this attitude. Refuse echo chambers: We need to pay those who offer dissenting opinions (contrarians). In my company, some partners frequently criticize me, which hurts me, but it creates a positive feedback loop. Without a good culture, there will be no good technology in the long run. What is LambdaClass doing? We're not just complaining, we're also taking action: Partnerships with governments in Latin America: In Argentina (Project Sobra), Mexico, and Colombia, we are conducting identity verification, KYC, and lending operations via on-chain IDs. Global infrastructure: Establishing passport and property rights infrastructure in Africa and Central Asia (such as Uzbekistan). Technology stack: Building Ethrex (L1 client), L2 stack based on SP1 and Zisk, ZKVM in collaboration with TMI Labs, and privacy and decentralized AI projects. Partner: We are working with IRSA (Argentine real estate giant) to streamline payment channels. Q&A Session Q: How do you feel about Devconnect being held in Argentina right now? I'm happy. Very happy. I'm so glad my mother was there; she finally understands what I'm doing. I'm also happy to show the world what we're doing. Q: What do you think is the most important measure at present? Lean Ethereum. I wasn't a big fan of the "Ultrasound Money" meme before. But Lean Ethereum is like a cathedral. When Justin Drake and I were walking through a cathedral in Cambridge, he asked me, "Do you think people will look at Ethereum's design like this cathedral 500 years from now?" I said, "Yes, and you'll be one of the architects." Q: How much do you think the Gas Limit can be improved in the near future? Thanks to Nethermind's amazing engineering capabilities (though I don't like the C# language), and our efforts with Reth, I believe we can achieve 300-400 Megagas on good servers. In the coming years, as technology improves, our goal is to reach 1 Gigagas. Q: You've interacted with all sorts of people, from government officials to developers. What do they have in common? Even those bigwigs who don't fully understand Ethereum (royalties, billionaires) know this is "for real." They trust "nerds" because nerds aren't just driven by money. They see Ethereum as the winner of the future. Q: What advice do you have for young builders? Don't raise funds until you've found product-market fit (PMF). Money is just fuel; connections and vision are more important. Work with ethical, passionate people who want to do things that benefit society. Do things you'll be proud of ten years from now.

From "Verifiable Computers" to "Internet Property Rights": Ethereum's Next Decade

2025/12/03 19:00

Author: Zhixiong Pan, ChainFeeds

At the Ethereum Devconnect ARG, Fede, the founder of LambdaClass, delivered a passionate and thought-provoking speech. He abandoned the traditional "world computer" narrative, redefining Ethereum as the first "verifiable computer" in human history. Fede believes that this "antifragility," which does not rely on trust but is based solely on mathematical and economic incentives, is the fundamental cornerstone for Ethereum to establish internet ownership and support a multi-trillion-dollar "global economy."

However, this was not a simple celebration, but a jarring wake-up call. Faced with the rise of high-performance public chains like Solana, Fede bluntly stated that the Ethereum community is facing the risk of "death by complacency." From denouncing the false prosperity of "most L2 implementations simply not working" to criticizing Solidity's self-defeating development experience, he called on the community to break free from its information cocoon and rediscover the ambition and fighting spirit of the "Bronze Age." He quoted the former CEO of Intel as warning the audience: in the brutal competition of technology, "only the paranoid survive."

From pushing the performance limits of 1 Gigagas to building the architectural vision of Lean Ethereum, Fede uses the most hardcore technical details and the most sincere emotions to demonstrate how Ethereum can maintain its dominance over the next decade. This is not just a technology roadmap, but also a declaration of war against mediocrity.

The following is a transcript of the highlights of this speech.

Speaker: Fede (LambdaClass)

Today I'm going to talk about Ethereum's next decade: from "verifiable computer" to "global economy".

Core definition: Ethereum is the first "verifiable computer".

To me, Ethereum is a verifiable computer.

I've never really liked the "world computer" meme. I think AWS or Google are the real "world computers." They have countless funds and servers, but you have to trust them. Ethereum's biggest difference from them is its verifiability.

Ethereum is the world's first verifiable computer that doesn't require trust in the computation itself, but only in economic incentives and mathematics. This gives it a significant advantage over AWS or Google Cloud. In traditional cloud services, everything is based on trust, and trust can be broken.

A few days ago, I saw on Twitter that someone hacked into Bing and modified the movie list. If you searched for "top 10 movies," the results were tampered with. In this case, you are actually trusting the hacker. This kind of thing is impossible on Ethereum unless the entire network is compromised, but that's extremely difficult because you would have to compromise multiple teams and multiple client implementations simultaneously, and everyone would be able to see the attack.

This makes Ethereum anti-fragile. Every attack attempt, whether by North Korea, other national actors, or private hackers, actually makes Ethereum stronger because it continues to operate and handles huge sums of money.

Verifiable changes brought about by computers

It can be verified that the computer has realized genuine Internet Property Rights.

True ownership: You no longer need to click "agree to the terms" to hand over your data to tech giants; instead, you control everything through your private key. The private key is more reliable than any terms of service.

Global neutrality: Chinese developers, Russian traders, US funds, and Argentinian users all compete on the same level playing field.

The cornerstone of artificial intelligence: In the next decade, we will tokenize everything, from art and land to AI. This is crucial. If the future is driven by AI, hackers will have a huge incentive to tamper with its parameters. We need Ethereum to verify whether AI is functioning as expected.

Current Status and Product-Market Fit (PMF)

Ethereum has created a complete economy. This is not just a $300 billion scale, but rather the processing of $3 trillion in transactions monthly through stablecoins—three times the size of Visa.

Our biggest advantage over Visa or the NYSE is composability. All funds, assets, and artworks are in one place and can be exchanged at any time. This creates a flywheel effect. In this sense, Ethereum is less fragmented than global capital markets because it operates 24/7.

Ethereum's current Product-Market Fit (PMF) can be summarized as follows:

  1. Decentralized/permissionless verifiability.
  2. Privacy (a feature we need to build at the core layer).
  3. Stablecoins (programmable, private, borderless US dollars).

Technical challenges: the tough nuts to crack.

To continue winning over the next decade, I must "grumble" from a technical perspective. Here are the challenges I see:

1. Performance

We (LambdaClass) are building an Ethrex client. A team just told me we're only 10% behind Reth in performance. Most clients, besides Nethermind, Reth, Geth, and us, struggle with performance.

Without raising the hardware requirements for validators, we will find it difficult to achieve the performance needed to compete with technologies like Solana.

This touches on a sensitive topic: Gas Limit. For the past three years, our decision not to increase the Gas Limit has slowed us down. I believe we can increase speed while maintaining verifiability. This used to be a taboo subject, but now, for the sake of competition, we need to accelerate. We cannot wait if other execution layers fall behind. Ethereum is more important than any single team.

I'm also reflecting on this: Is Ethereum's goal really to allow everyone to run nodes at home with a $50 Raspberry Pi? I'm not sure. Maybe as long as the verification cost is low enough (a few thousand dollars or even a few dollars), it doesn't necessarily have to be an extremely low barrier to entry.

2. Scalability

I think we should increase the gas limit by 100 times. The cheaper it is, the more people will use it. YouTube was born only after the internet became faster.

Furthermore, I'm a big fan of RISC-V and not a big fan of Solidity. Solidity doesn't represent Ethereum. While it has made significant contributions, it has many problems. I believe RISC-V should be the default standard.

Regarding Layer 2: Frankly, most L2 technology stacks simply don't work. You clone the codebase and run it, and it's broken. The current incentive is "issue a token and then ignore it, let it die." If you believe in a Rollup-centric roadmap, we must make running Rollups extremely simple. We are working to make Ethrex run L2 with a single command.

3. Interoperability and Decentralization

The AWS outage a few days ago caused some rollups to crash, which was terrible. The Solana community mocked us, and I think they have a point. We need to move to "Stage 2," which requires a decentralized sequencer, based rollups (reusing L1 pipelines to build L2), and technologies like CommitBoost for pre-confirmations.

4. Privacy

I've received a call from a lawyer warning me I was in big trouble, so I deeply empathize with this. We need to support all developers dedicated to privacy (like Roman, Alexei, and the developers of Samurai Wallet). If I wanted my mother to use Ethereum, she certainly wouldn't want all her transactions to be visible to the entire world. Currently, the rules regarding privacy development are very vague, and we need to work together to address them.

5. Security

There are too few maintainers for the Solidity compiler; only one or two people on GitHub. This is Ethereum's most important programming language, yet it faces a huge risk of insufficient manpower. Solidity's syntax is simple, but it's easy to write security vulnerabilities. As a developer who has used over 20 languages, writing Solidity felt like shooting myself in the foot. We need a better compiler, or a long-term solution like RISC-V ZKVM.

6. The Post-Quantum Era

We are working with Justin Drake to develop Lean Ethereum. Compared to Bitcoin, Ethereum has a huge advantage in deploying post-quantum cryptography because we allow for multi-client implementations and have a more open community, even if it means we are making some radical changes.

Social and Cultural Challenges: Rejecting Mediocrity

I'm a die-hard Ethereum fan, and my company relies on Ethereum, but I must be frank:

We need to adopt a "Bronze Age" mentality: don't think, "We've either won or we're winning." Complacency leads to stagnation. Look at Intel; once a giant, it's now been left behind by NVIDIA and AMD. We need to maintain our hunger and ambition.

Break free from closed-door processes: Science and engineering require open debate. Important decisions like EOF (Ethereum Object Format) should not be made in closed-door meetings. Closed-door decision-making makes it easy for state actors to control the network by infiltrating key decision-makers (see the OpenBSD case).

Learn from competitors: I've attended every Solana Breakpoint conference, not because I support Solana, but because I want to learn from the competition. Linux succeeded by replicating the strengths of Solaris and open-sourcing it. We need this attitude.

Refuse echo chambers: We need to pay those who offer dissenting opinions (contrarians). In my company, some partners frequently criticize me, which hurts me, but it creates a positive feedback loop. Without a good culture, there will be no good technology in the long run.

What is LambdaClass doing?

We're not just complaining, we're also taking action:

  • Partnerships with governments in Latin America: In Argentina (Project Sobra), Mexico, and Colombia, we are conducting identity verification, KYC, and lending operations via on-chain IDs.
  • Global infrastructure: Establishing passport and property rights infrastructure in Africa and Central Asia (such as Uzbekistan).
  • Technology stack: Building Ethrex (L1 client), L2 stack based on SP1 and Zisk, ZKVM in collaboration with TMI Labs, and privacy and decentralized AI projects.
  • Partner: We are working with IRSA (Argentine real estate giant) to streamline payment channels.

Q&A Session

Q: How do you feel about Devconnect being held in Argentina right now?

I'm happy. Very happy. I'm so glad my mother was there; she finally understands what I'm doing. I'm also happy to show the world what we're doing.

Q: What do you think is the most important measure at present?

Lean Ethereum. I wasn't a big fan of the "Ultrasound Money" meme before. But Lean Ethereum is like a cathedral. When Justin Drake and I were walking through a cathedral in Cambridge, he asked me, "Do you think people will look at Ethereum's design like this cathedral 500 years from now?" I said, "Yes, and you'll be one of the architects."

Q: How much do you think the Gas Limit can be improved in the near future?

Thanks to Nethermind's amazing engineering capabilities (though I don't like the C# language), and our efforts with Reth, I believe we can achieve 300-400 Megagas on good servers. In the coming years, as technology improves, our goal is to reach 1 Gigagas.

Q: You've interacted with all sorts of people, from government officials to developers. What do they have in common?

Even those bigwigs who don't fully understand Ethereum (royalties, billionaires) know this is "for real." They trust "nerds" because nerds aren't just driven by money. They see Ethereum as the winner of the future.

Q: What advice do you have for young builders?

Don't raise funds until you've found product-market fit (PMF). Money is just fuel; connections and vision are more important. Work with ethical, passionate people who want to do things that benefit society. Do things you'll be proud of ten years from now.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

How decentralization technologies are advancing in the Old Continent.
Share
The Cryptonomist2025/12/06 15:00
Wang Yongli, former vice president of the Bank of China: Why did China resolutely halt stablecoins?

Wang Yongli, former vice president of the Bank of China: Why did China resolutely halt stablecoins?

Written by: Wang Yongli , former Vice President of Bank of China China's policy orientation of accelerating the development of the digital yuan and resolutely curbing virtual currencies, including stablecoins, is now fully clear. This is based on a comprehensive consideration of factors such as China's leading global advantages in mobile payments and the digital yuan, the sovereignty and security of the yuan, and the stability of the monetary and financial system. Since May 2025, the United States and Hong Kong have been racing to advance stablecoin legislation, which has led to a surge in global legislation on stablecoins and crypto assets (also known as "cryptocurrencies" or "virtual currencies"). A large number of institutions and capital are flocking to issue stablecoins and invest in crypto assets, which has also sparked heated debate on whether China should fully promote stablecoin legislation and the development of RMB stablecoins (including offshore ones). Furthermore, after the United States legislated to prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing digital dollars, whether China should continue to promote digital RMB has also become a hot topic of debate. For China, this involves the direction and path of national currency development. With the global spread of stablecoins and the increasingly acute and complex international relations and fiercer international currency competition, this has a huge and far-reaching impact on how the RMB innovates and develops, safeguards national security, and achieves the strategic goals of a strong currency and a financial power. We must calmly analyze, accurately grasp, and make decisions early. We cannot be indifferent or hesitant, nor can we blindly follow the trend and make directional and subversive mistakes. Subsequently, the People's Bank of China announced that it would optimize the positioning of the digital yuan within the monetary hierarchy (adjusting the previously determined M0 positioning. This is a point I have repeatedly advocated from the beginning; see Wang Yongli's WeChat public account article "Digital Yuan Should Not Be Positioned as M0" dated January 6, 2021), further optimize the digital yuan management system (establishing an international digital yuan operations center in Shanghai, responsible for cross-border cooperation and use of the digital yuan; and establishing a digital yuan operations management center in Beijing, responsible for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the digital yuan system), and promote and accelerate the development of the digital yuan . On November 28, the People's Bank of China and 13 other departments jointly convened a meeting of the coordination mechanism for combating virtual currency trading and speculation. The meeting pointed out that due to various factors, virtual currency speculation has recently resurfaced, and related illegal and criminal activities have occurred frequently, posing new challenges to risk prevention and control. It emphasized that all units should deepen coordination and cooperation, continue to adhere to the prohibitive policy on virtual currencies, and persistently crack down on illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies. It clarified that stablecoins are a form of virtual currency , and their issuance and trading activities are also illegal and subject to crackdown. This has greatly disappointed those who believed that China would promote the development of RMB stablecoins and correspondingly relax the ban on virtual currency (crypto asset) trading. Therefore, China's policy orientation of accelerating the development of the digital yuan and resolutely curbing virtual currencies, including stablecoins, is now fully clear . Of course, this policy orientation remains highly debated both domestically and internationally, and there is no consensus among the public. So, how should we view this major policy direction of China? This article will first answer why China resolutely halted stablecoins; how to accelerate the innovative development of the digital yuan will be discussed in another article . There is little room or opportunity for the development of non-USD stablecoins. Since Tether launched USDT, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, in 2014 , USD stablecoins have been operating for over a decade and have formed a complete international operating system. They have basically dominated the entire crypto asset trading market, accounting for over 99% of the global fiat stablecoin market capitalization and trading volume . This situation arises from two main factors. First, the US dollar is the most liquid and has the most comprehensive supporting system of international central currencies, making stablecoins pegged to the dollar the easiest to accept globally. Second, it is also a result of the US's long-standing tolerant policy towards crypto assets like Bitcoin and dollar-denominated stablecoins, rather than leading the international community to strengthen necessary regulation and safeguard the fundamental interests of all humanity. Even this year, when the US pushed for legislation on stablecoins and crypto assets, it was largely driven by the belief that dollar-denominated stablecoins would increase global demand for the dollar and dollar-denominated assets such as US Treasury bonds, reduce the financing costs for the US government and society, and strengthen the dollar's international dominance. This was a choice made to enhance US support for dollar-denominated stablecoins and control their potential impact on the US, prioritizing the maximization of national interests while giving little consideration to mitigating the international risks of stablecoins. With the US strongly promoting dollar-denominated stablecoins, other countries or regions launching non-dollar fiat currency stablecoins will find it difficult to compete with dollar-denominated stablecoins on an international level, except perhaps within their own sovereign territory or on the issuing institution's own e-commerce platform. Their development potential and practical significance are limited . Lacking a strong ecosystem and application scenarios, and lacking distinct characteristics compared to dollar-denominated stablecoins, as well as the advantage of attracting traders and transaction volume, the return on investment for issuing non-dollar fiat currency stablecoins is unlikely to meet expectations, and they will struggle to survive in an environment of increasingly stringent legislation and regulation in various countries. The legislation on stablecoins in the United States still faces many problems and challenges. Following President Trump's second election victory, his strong advocacy for crypto assets such as Bitcoin fueled a new international frenzy in cryptocurrency trading, driving the rapid development of dollar-denominated stablecoin trading and a surge in stablecoin market capitalization. This not only increased demand for the US dollar and US Treasury bonds, strengthening the dollar's international status, but also brought huge profits to the Trump family and their cryptocurrency associates. However, this also posed new challenges to the global monitoring of the dollar's circulation and the stability of the traditional US financial system. Furthermore, the trading and transfer of crypto assets backed by dollar-denominated stablecoins has become a new and more difficult-to-prevent tool for the US to harvest global wealth, posing a serious threat to the monetary sovereignty and wealth security of other countries . This is why the United States has accelerated legislation on stablecoins, but its legislation is more about prioritizing America and maximizing American and even group interests, at the expense of the interests of other countries and the common interests of the world. After the legislation on US dollar stablecoins came into effect, institutions that have not obtained approval and operating licenses from US regulators will find it difficult to issue and operate US dollar stablecoins in the United States (for this reason, Tether has announced that it will apply for US-issued USDT). Stablecoin issuers subject to US regulation must meet regulatory requirements such as Know Your Customer (KYC), Anti-Money Laundering (AML), and Counter-Terrorist Financing (FTC). They must be able to screen customers against government watchlists and report suspicious activities to regulators. Their systems must have the ability to freeze or intercept specific stablecoins when ordered by law enforcement agencies. Stablecoin issuers must have reserves of no less than 100% US dollar assets (including currency assets, short-term Treasury bonds, and repurchase agreements backed by Treasury bonds) approved by regulators, and must keep US customer funds in US banks and not transfer them overseas. They are prohibited from paying interest or returns on stablecoins, and strict control must be exercised over-issuance and self-operation. Reserve assets must be held in custody by an independent institution approved by regulators and must be audited by an auditing firm at least monthly and an audit report must be issued. This will greatly enhance the value stability of stablecoins relative to the US dollar, strengthen their payment function and compliance, while weakening their investment attributes and illegal use; it will also significantly increase the regulatory costs of stablecoins, thereby reducing their potential for exorbitant profits in an unregulated environment. The US stablecoin legislation officially took effect on July 18, but it still faces numerous challenges : While it stipulates the scope of reserve assets for stablecoin issuance (bank deposits, short-term Treasury bonds, repurchase agreements backed by Treasury bonds, etc.), since it primarily includes Treasury bonds with fluctuating trading prices, even if reserve assets are sufficient at the time of issuance, a subsequent decline in Treasury bond prices could lead to insufficient reserves; if the reserve asset structures of different issuing institutions are not entirely consistent, and there is no central bank guarantee, it means that the issued dollar stablecoins will not be the same, creating arbitrage opportunities and posing challenges to relevant regulation and market stability; even if there is no over-issuance of stablecoins at the time of issuance, allowing decentralized finance (DeFi) to engage in stablecoin lending could still lead to stablecoin derivation and over-issuance, unless it is entirely a matchmaking between lenders and borrowers rather than proprietary trading; getting stablecoin issuers outside of financial institutions to meet regulatory requirements is not easy, and regulation also presents significant challenges. More importantly, the earliest and most fundamental requirement for stablecoins is the borderless, decentralized, 24/7 pricing and settlement of crypto assets on the blockchain. It is precisely because crypto assets like Bitcoin cannot fulfill the fundamental requirement of currency as a measure of value and a value token—that the total amount of currency must change in line with the total value of tradable wealth requiring monetary pricing and settlement—that their price relative to fiat currency fluctuates wildly (therefore, using crypto assets like Bitcoin as collateral or strategic reserves carries significant risks), making it difficult to become a true circulating currency. This has led to the development of fiat stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies. (Therefore, Bitcoin and similar crypto assets can only be considered crypto assets; calling them "cryptocurrency" or "virtual currency" is inaccurate; translating the English word "Token" as "币" or "币" is also inappropriate; it should be directly transliterated as "通证" and clearly defined as an asset, not currency.) The emergence and development of fiat-backed stablecoins have brought fiat currencies and more real-world assets (RWAs) onto the blockchain, strongly supporting on-chain cryptocurrency trading and development. They serve as a channel connecting the on-chain cryptocurrency world with the off-chain real-world, thereby strengthening the integration and influence of the cryptocurrency world on the real world. This will significantly enhance the scope, speed, scale, and volatility of global wealth financialization and financial transactions, accelerating the transfer and concentration of global wealth in a few countries or groups. In this context, failing to strengthen global joint regulation of stablecoins and cryptocurrency issuance and trading poses extremely high risks and dangers . Therefore, the surge in stablecoin and cryptocurrency development driven by the Trump administration in the United States has already revealed a huge bubble and potential risks, making it unsustainable. The international community must be highly vigilant about this! Stablecoin legislation could severely backfire on stablecoins. One unexpected outcome of stablecoin legislation is that the inclusion of fiat-backed stablecoins in legislative regulation will inevitably lead to legislative regulation of crypto asset transactions denominated and settled using fiat-backed stablecoins, including blockchain-generated assets such as Bitcoin and on-chain real-world assets (RWA). This will have a profound impact on stablecoins. Before crypto assets receive legislative regulation and compliance protection, licensed financial institutions such as banks find it difficult to directly participate in crypto asset trading, clearing, custody, and other related activities, thus ceding opportunities to private organizations outside of financial institutions. Due to the lack of regulation and the absence of regulatory costs, existing stablecoin issuers and crypto asset trading platforms have become highly profitable and attractive entities, exerting an increasing impact on banks and the financial system, forcing governments and monetary authorities in countries like the United States to accelerate legislative regulation of stablecoins. However, once crypto assets receive legislative regulation and compliance protection, banks and other financial institutions will undoubtedly participate fully. Payment institutions such as banks can directly promote the on-chain operation of fiat currency deposits (deposit tokenization), completely replacing stablecoins as a new channel and hub connecting the crypto world and the real world . Similarly, existing stock, bond, money market fund, and ETF exchanges can promote the on-chain trading of these relatively standardized financial products through RWA (Real-Time Asset Exchange). Having adequately regulated financial institutions such as banks act as the main entities connecting the crypto world and the real world on the blockchain is more conducive to implementing current legislative requirements for stablecoins, upholding the principle of "equal regulation for the same business" for all institutions, and reducing the impact and risks of crypto asset development on the existing monetary and financial system. This trend has already emerged in the United States and is rapidly intensifying, proving difficult to stop . Therefore, stablecoin legislation may seriously backfire on or subvert stablecoins ( see Wang Yongli's WeChat public account article "Stablecoin Legislation May Seriously Backfire on Stablecoins" on September 3, 2025 ). In this situation, it is not a reasonable choice for other countries to follow the US lead and vigorously promote stablecoin legislation and development. China should not follow the path of stablecoins taken by the United States. China already has a leading global advantage in mobile payments and the digital yuan. Promoting a stablecoin for the yuan has no advantage domestically, and it will have little room for development and influence internationally. It should not follow the path of the US dollar stablecoin, but should instead focus on promoting the development of stablecoins for the yuan, both domestically and offshore. More importantly, crypto assets and stablecoins like Bitcoin can achieve 24/7 global trading and clearing through borderless blockchains and crypto asset trading platforms. While this significantly improves efficiency, the highly anonymous and high-frequency global flow, lacking coordinated international oversight, makes it difficult to meet regulatory requirements such as KYC, AML, and FTC. This poses a clear risk and has been demonstrated in real-world cases of being used for money laundering, fundraising fraud, and illegal cross-border fund transfers. Given that US dollar stablecoins already dominate the crypto asset trading market, and the US has greater control or influence over major global blockchain operating systems, crypto asset trading platforms, and the exchange rate between crypto assets and the US dollar (as evidenced by the US's ability to trace, identify, freeze, and confiscate the crypto asset accounts of some institutions and individuals, and to punish or even arrest some crypto asset trading platforms and their leaders), China's development of a RMB stablecoin following the path of US dollar stablecoins not only fails to challenge the international status of US dollar stablecoins but may even turn the RMB stablecoin into a vassal of US dollar stablecoins. This could impact national tax collection, foreign exchange management, and cross-border capital flows, posing a serious threat to the sovereignty and security of the RMB and the stability of the monetary and financial system. Faced with a more acute and complex international situation, China should prioritize national security and exercise high vigilance and strict control over the trading and speculation of crypto assets, including stablecoins, rather than simply pursuing increased efficiency and reduced costs . It is necessary to accelerate the improvement of relevant regulatory policies and legal frameworks, focus on key links such as information flow and capital flow, strengthen information sharing among relevant departments, further enhance monitoring and tracking capabilities, and severely crack down on illegal and criminal activities involving crypto assets. Of course, while resolutely halting stablecoins and cracking down on virtual currency trading and speculation, we must also accelerate the innovative development and widespread application of the digital yuan at home and abroad, establish the international leading advantage of the digital yuan, forge a Chinese path for the development of digital currency, and actively explore the establishment of a fair, reasonable and secure new international monetary and financial system . Taking into account the above factors, it is not difficult to understand why China has chosen to resolutely curb virtual currencies, including stablecoins, while firmly promoting and accelerating the development of the digital yuan.
Share
PANews2025/12/06 15:08