SMS is still a bit old school on the surface, but in real business numbers it is very hard to replace. People may skip inboxes and mute apps for days, yet a short text on the phone screen still pulls attention within seconds. For verification codes, payment alerts, order updates, flash sales, even last-minute seat […] The post How to Do Bulk SMS Marketing the SKY Way: A Deep Dive Into Skyline Hardware SMS Gateways appeared first on TechBullion.SMS is still a bit old school on the surface, but in real business numbers it is very hard to replace. People may skip inboxes and mute apps for days, yet a short text on the phone screen still pulls attention within seconds. For verification codes, payment alerts, order updates, flash sales, even last-minute seat […] The post How to Do Bulk SMS Marketing the SKY Way: A Deep Dive Into Skyline Hardware SMS Gateways appeared first on TechBullion.

How to Do Bulk SMS Marketing the SKY Way: A Deep Dive Into Skyline Hardware SMS Gateways

2025/12/05 20:15

SMS is still a bit old school on the surface, but in real business numbers it is very hard to replace. People may skip inboxes and mute apps for days, yet a short text on the phone screen still pulls attention within seconds. For verification codes, payment alerts, order updates, flash sales, even last-minute seat drops, SMS is often the quiet backbone.

Behind that little message there has to be something solid. Not a random USB stick modem cluster on a desk. A proper hardware SMS gateway that can run day and night, talk to local operators, and still be simple enough for a normal tech team to handle.

This is exactly the corner where Skyline sits. Skyline Telecom has been in global telecom value-added services for more than 18 years, working with hundreds of operators around the world and building its own gateway lines around real traffic, not just lab tests.

For teams that need stable, high-volume SMS, the Skyline SK-SMS Gateway series, including SK-SMS Gateway 16-64, 16-128 and 16-256, gives a hardware base that can grow with the traffic instead of breaking every time a campaign does well.

What Is A Hardware SMS Gateway And Why It Matters

A hardware SMS gateway is a small telecom node in a box. On one side, it speaks IP: HTTP, SMPP, web panels, APIs. On the other side, it speaks mobile network: SIM cards, radio modules, 2G or 4G bands that match the country.

Skyline’s own definition is straightforward:

“SMS Gateway is a multi-functional and high performance product, which supports SMS sending and receiving, it’s based on IP network, with the SMPP HTTP API.” 

In simple terms, business systems  send SMS tasks to the gateway through an IP network. The gateway passes them to the mobile communication network, and the messages land on users’ phones. At the same time, replies from users are received back into the platform.

Why is this so critical:

lLocal SIM cards keep SMS charges and routing closer to local market reality.

lOne box can manage automatic or manual SIM rotation. That matters when traffic spikes and operators start watching.

lReal-time receive and send handling lets SMS work not just for blasts but for two-way flows like surveys and feedback.

Skyline’s SMS Gateway solution description talks about up to 512 SIM cards, automatic or manual rotation and a maximum throughput of 5 440 SMS per minute. For most Global markets, this already covers a mix of verification codes, notifications, and daily marketing campaigns.

A Quick Look At Skyline: Company And Product Line

Skyline Telecom is described in its own materials as a diversified technology company focused on R&D and sales of telecom value-added services, with deep engagement in the global telecom business for over 18 years and long-term cooperation with hundreds of telecom operators.

On top of the SMS gateways, there are voice gateways, proxy gateways and SMS modem solutions, all around similar ideas: IP on one side, SIM and network on the other.

For SMS specifically, Skyline offers:

lDedicated SK-SMS Gateway hardware

lSMS Gateway solution for bulk sending and receiving

lA platform side that speaks SMPP and HTTP and uses Skyline’s own ETMS / EIMS / ESPS management interfaces for remote access and control.

There is also a long list of real business cases in the internal materials: people going from one device to ten devices in a few months, clearing debts within half a year, opening retail shops or telecom outlets and even reaching stable financial independence after running Skyline devices for several years. The numbers look almost like marketing slogans, yet they come from actual customer journeys collected over time.

Why Skyline Hardware SMS Gateways Work Well For Global Marketers

Skyline’s SMS Gateway is not just a dumb pipe. The “Human behaviour” and “Special features” sections in the spec sheet read like a wish list of every SMS operator who ever got tired of blocked SIM cards and frozen modems.

Key behaviour features include:

lInter-sending SMS and calls, not only one-direction traffic

lAutomatic SIM card rotation and SIM data usage tracking

lSMS send limit control

lSurfing the Internet functions for some modes, when needed for app behaviour simulation

Special features go deeper:

lIMEI modification

lHTTP API and SMPP support at the same time

lFirmware update from a central panel

lFine control of SMS sending intervals

lAT and USSD command access

lAuto-forward SMS, auto get SIM number

lAutomatically lock or switch SIM card

lLive SIM status monitoring

lWeb remote access through Skyline management platforms

One line in the spec stands out: high-speed sending at “1 SMS/2s”. That is per SIM. When 16 or more SIMs work in parallel, the total moves into serious volume.

Application scenarios listed by Skyline cover almost every common SMS use :

lVerification codes and one-time passwords

lSystem notifications and automatic alarms

lMarketing promotion and user reachout

lTicketing and passage codes

lMobile top-up messages

lSurveys and feedback requests

lCross-border communication with local access points

SK-SMS Gateway 16-64, 16-128, 16-256: Three Practical Choices For Global

Inside the Skyline SMS Gateway solution there are several models with different SIM capacities. The SK-SMS Gateway 16-64, 16-128 and 16-256 versions are particularly useful for SMS marketing tasks in one Global or a small cluster of Globals.

They share the same basic nature:

lMulti-functional high-performance SMS gateways

lSupport SMS sending and receiving

lBased on IP network

lExpose SMPP and HTTP API for connection to SMS platforms or in-house tools

SK-SMS Gateway 16-64

The SK-SMS Gateway 16-64 is typically used as a starter device for serious business rather than for lab experiments. Sixteen channels with several SIM cards each already give real flexibility.

In combination with Skyline’s SMS Gateway solution, it can:

lJoin bulk SMS sending and receiving tasks

lRotate SIM cards automatically or manually, which lowers the chance of sudden blocking

lDeliver marketing campaigns, notifications and verification codes with the same hardware box

For Global this fits:

lLocal brands testing direct-to-consumer SMS

lAgencies running a few medium clients with separate SIM pools

lEarly stages of SMS traffic business where volumes are growing but not yet in the millions per day

SK-SMS Gateway 16-128

The SK-SMS Gateway 16-128 follows the same logic and adds more SIM card capacity. More SIMs in the same physical footprint means more routing choices and more ways to spread risk.

With 16 channels and a much higher SIM ceiling, it is suited for:

lProjects using multiple mobile operators  at the same time

lSegmentation by traffic type: one group of SIMs for verification codes, another group for marketing, another group for cross-border routes

lService providers that sell SMS to downstream users and need clean separation in their routing rules

The same feature set applies: SIM rotation, SMS send limits, live SIM monitoring, web remote management. The hardware does not change the way developers integrate. SMPP and HTTP APIs stay the same, which makes later upgrades less painful.

SK-SMS Gateway 16-256

For dense SIM scenarios, the SK-SMS Gateway 16-256 is the practical high-end point before moving into multi-box clusters. The Skyline solution document mentions devices that support up to 512 SIM cards. The 16-256 sits close to this upper area and plays well in high-volume bulk SMS operations.

Typical uses include:

lSMS traffic businesses that relay traffic for many resellers

lMedia and entertainment projects with campaigns in several countries but one control centre

lOperators or service providers that want their own SMS relay nodes with dynamic SIM switching, to avoid heavy seals and to keep transmission efficient

From a day-to-day point of view, the biggest change compared with smaller models is not the user interface. It is the way SIM management is handled. With 256 positions available, SIM life cycle planning becomes a practical discipline. Some teams literally use spreadsheets here; others rely on Skyline’s remote platforms to watch live SIM status.

How Skyline’s SMS Gateway Solution Runs In Real Traffic

“Bulk SMS sending and receiving device, allowing for either automatic or manual rotation, providing flexible operation with up to 512 SIM cards. With a max throughput of 5,440 SMS/min and real-time SMS receive, it is the ideal choice for SMS marketing, notifications, ticketing, verification codes, mobile top-ups, corporate communication, and more.”

The work flow is simple enough to explain in one go:

1.The business system, CRM or platform raises a short message request on the SMS platform.

2.The platform passes message content and destination to the Skyline SMS Gateway over IP.

3.The gateway picks the right SIM and channel according to routing strategy and SIM status.

4.The message goes out through the mobile communication network to the end user’s phone.

5.Delivery reports and replies come back through the gateway to the platform and, when needed, back to the sender.

The same device can sit in many roles :

lA marketing node for seasonal promotions and new product launch campaigns

lA notification node for express status updates, bill reminders, appointment reminders, ticket QR codes

lA verification code node for login, registration, payment confirmation and password retrieval

Small detail, often ignored: SMS is still one of the few channels that works reliably when fancy apps fail during peaks.

Real Business Outcomes Seen With Skyline Hardware

The internal case collection around Skyline SMS and voice devices reads less like pure brochure text and more like a list of life changes. A few highlights:

lOne client started as a complete beginner in 2021, joined the SMS business, cleared all debts within six months, opened a retail shop and reached stable financial freedom in three years.

lAnother went from one device to ten devices in three months, then hired staff to manage daily operations while keeping income running from Skyline-powered SMS traffic.

lSome partners report buying cars and property from the profits of multi-year SMS and voice cooperation with Skyline hardware, mentioning over thirty gateways running continuously.

In many of these stories, the same pattern appears: start with one or two devices, learn the flows, then scale up as traffic and confidence grow. The hardware is not a magic ticket, but it becomes a very concrete tool in a wider business model.

There are also media and entertainment projects that deployed Skyline’s equipment and customised platforms in multiple countries within weeks, gaining a first-mover advantage in new markets and reporting 100 percent platform uptime since launch.

For Global readers, the exact country names matter less than the structure: repeatable hardware, stable software stack, clear support steps.

Simple Deployment Path For Global Teams

A workable path for rolling out Skyline hardware usually looks like this:

1.Define scenarios
Pick from Skyline’s own list: marketing promotion, new product launch, holiday reminders, birthday greetings, server and power alerts, logistics updates, verification codes, ticketing and cross-border local access.

2.Choose the gateway model
SK-SMS Gateway 16-64 for early growth, 16-128 for multi-operator and multi-segment use, 16-256 for dense SIM rotation and more aggressive routing strategies.

3.Plan SIM resources
Combine different operators, different bundles and different types of traffic, using the auto SIM rotation and SMS send limit features baked into Skyline gateways.

4.Connect via SMPP or HTTP
Skyline gateways speak standard SMPP and HTTP API, and support AT and USSD commands for deeper control, which makes them fit into existing SMS platforms without needing exotic adapters.

5.Use remote management
With ETMS, EIMS and ESPS based web remote access, teams  can monitor SIM status live, update firmware, lock or switch SIMs and adjust sending intervals from a central panel instead of logging into each box in person.

FAQ

Q1:How to choose between SK-SMS Gateway 16-64, 16-128 and 16-256 for a Global project?
A:Selection mainly depends on total volume and how many SIM cards are needed for rotation. Skyline’s SMS Gateway solution supports up to 512 SIM cards with automatic or manual rotation. For small to mid-size traffic and a few operators , SK-SMS Gateway 16-64 is often enough.

Q2:Can Skyline hardware handle both marketing SMS and sensitive flows like verification codes on the same device?
A:Yes. Notifications, marketing SMS, ticketing and mobile top-ups all under the same SMS Gateway solution. In practice, teams  usually separate these flows by SIM group inside a single SK-SMS gateway. Auto SIM rotation, SMS send limits and SIM status monitoring help keep sensitive traffic stable while more aggressive campaigns run on other SIM pools.

Q3:What makes Skyline different from using a simple USB modem pool for SMS ?
A:A basic SMS modem pool can send texts, but it typically lacks Skyline’s “human behaviour” features such as auto SIM rotation, IMEI modification, control of sending intervals, live SIM status monitoring, web remote access and high-speed sending at roughly one message every two seconds per SIM. Skyline’s SMS Gateway solution also scales up to 512 SIM cards and 5 440 SMS per minute on properly configured setups, and is designed for long-term bulk SMS business, verification codes, notifications and cross-border communication. For teams  that want a stable SMS business rather than a weekend test, that difference becomes very visible after a few months of real traffic.

Comments
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

How decentralization technologies are advancing in the Old Continent.
Share
The Cryptonomist2025/12/06 15:00
Wang Yongli, former vice president of the Bank of China: Why did China resolutely halt stablecoins?

Wang Yongli, former vice president of the Bank of China: Why did China resolutely halt stablecoins?

Written by: Wang Yongli , former Vice President of Bank of China China's policy orientation of accelerating the development of the digital yuan and resolutely curbing virtual currencies, including stablecoins, is now fully clear. This is based on a comprehensive consideration of factors such as China's leading global advantages in mobile payments and the digital yuan, the sovereignty and security of the yuan, and the stability of the monetary and financial system. Since May 2025, the United States and Hong Kong have been racing to advance stablecoin legislation, which has led to a surge in global legislation on stablecoins and crypto assets (also known as "cryptocurrencies" or "virtual currencies"). A large number of institutions and capital are flocking to issue stablecoins and invest in crypto assets, which has also sparked heated debate on whether China should fully promote stablecoin legislation and the development of RMB stablecoins (including offshore ones). Furthermore, after the United States legislated to prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing digital dollars, whether China should continue to promote digital RMB has also become a hot topic of debate. For China, this involves the direction and path of national currency development. With the global spread of stablecoins and the increasingly acute and complex international relations and fiercer international currency competition, this has a huge and far-reaching impact on how the RMB innovates and develops, safeguards national security, and achieves the strategic goals of a strong currency and a financial power. We must calmly analyze, accurately grasp, and make decisions early. We cannot be indifferent or hesitant, nor can we blindly follow the trend and make directional and subversive mistakes. Subsequently, the People's Bank of China announced that it would optimize the positioning of the digital yuan within the monetary hierarchy (adjusting the previously determined M0 positioning. This is a point I have repeatedly advocated from the beginning; see Wang Yongli's WeChat public account article "Digital Yuan Should Not Be Positioned as M0" dated January 6, 2021), further optimize the digital yuan management system (establishing an international digital yuan operations center in Shanghai, responsible for cross-border cooperation and use of the digital yuan; and establishing a digital yuan operations management center in Beijing, responsible for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the digital yuan system), and promote and accelerate the development of the digital yuan . On November 28, the People's Bank of China and 13 other departments jointly convened a meeting of the coordination mechanism for combating virtual currency trading and speculation. The meeting pointed out that due to various factors, virtual currency speculation has recently resurfaced, and related illegal and criminal activities have occurred frequently, posing new challenges to risk prevention and control. It emphasized that all units should deepen coordination and cooperation, continue to adhere to the prohibitive policy on virtual currencies, and persistently crack down on illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies. It clarified that stablecoins are a form of virtual currency , and their issuance and trading activities are also illegal and subject to crackdown. This has greatly disappointed those who believed that China would promote the development of RMB stablecoins and correspondingly relax the ban on virtual currency (crypto asset) trading. Therefore, China's policy orientation of accelerating the development of the digital yuan and resolutely curbing virtual currencies, including stablecoins, is now fully clear . Of course, this policy orientation remains highly debated both domestically and internationally, and there is no consensus among the public. So, how should we view this major policy direction of China? This article will first answer why China resolutely halted stablecoins; how to accelerate the innovative development of the digital yuan will be discussed in another article . There is little room or opportunity for the development of non-USD stablecoins. Since Tether launched USDT, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, in 2014 , USD stablecoins have been operating for over a decade and have formed a complete international operating system. They have basically dominated the entire crypto asset trading market, accounting for over 99% of the global fiat stablecoin market capitalization and trading volume . This situation arises from two main factors. First, the US dollar is the most liquid and has the most comprehensive supporting system of international central currencies, making stablecoins pegged to the dollar the easiest to accept globally. Second, it is also a result of the US's long-standing tolerant policy towards crypto assets like Bitcoin and dollar-denominated stablecoins, rather than leading the international community to strengthen necessary regulation and safeguard the fundamental interests of all humanity. Even this year, when the US pushed for legislation on stablecoins and crypto assets, it was largely driven by the belief that dollar-denominated stablecoins would increase global demand for the dollar and dollar-denominated assets such as US Treasury bonds, reduce the financing costs for the US government and society, and strengthen the dollar's international dominance. This was a choice made to enhance US support for dollar-denominated stablecoins and control their potential impact on the US, prioritizing the maximization of national interests while giving little consideration to mitigating the international risks of stablecoins. With the US strongly promoting dollar-denominated stablecoins, other countries or regions launching non-dollar fiat currency stablecoins will find it difficult to compete with dollar-denominated stablecoins on an international level, except perhaps within their own sovereign territory or on the issuing institution's own e-commerce platform. Their development potential and practical significance are limited . Lacking a strong ecosystem and application scenarios, and lacking distinct characteristics compared to dollar-denominated stablecoins, as well as the advantage of attracting traders and transaction volume, the return on investment for issuing non-dollar fiat currency stablecoins is unlikely to meet expectations, and they will struggle to survive in an environment of increasingly stringent legislation and regulation in various countries. The legislation on stablecoins in the United States still faces many problems and challenges. Following President Trump's second election victory, his strong advocacy for crypto assets such as Bitcoin fueled a new international frenzy in cryptocurrency trading, driving the rapid development of dollar-denominated stablecoin trading and a surge in stablecoin market capitalization. This not only increased demand for the US dollar and US Treasury bonds, strengthening the dollar's international status, but also brought huge profits to the Trump family and their cryptocurrency associates. However, this also posed new challenges to the global monitoring of the dollar's circulation and the stability of the traditional US financial system. Furthermore, the trading and transfer of crypto assets backed by dollar-denominated stablecoins has become a new and more difficult-to-prevent tool for the US to harvest global wealth, posing a serious threat to the monetary sovereignty and wealth security of other countries . This is why the United States has accelerated legislation on stablecoins, but its legislation is more about prioritizing America and maximizing American and even group interests, at the expense of the interests of other countries and the common interests of the world. After the legislation on US dollar stablecoins came into effect, institutions that have not obtained approval and operating licenses from US regulators will find it difficult to issue and operate US dollar stablecoins in the United States (for this reason, Tether has announced that it will apply for US-issued USDT). Stablecoin issuers subject to US regulation must meet regulatory requirements such as Know Your Customer (KYC), Anti-Money Laundering (AML), and Counter-Terrorist Financing (FTC). They must be able to screen customers against government watchlists and report suspicious activities to regulators. Their systems must have the ability to freeze or intercept specific stablecoins when ordered by law enforcement agencies. Stablecoin issuers must have reserves of no less than 100% US dollar assets (including currency assets, short-term Treasury bonds, and repurchase agreements backed by Treasury bonds) approved by regulators, and must keep US customer funds in US banks and not transfer them overseas. They are prohibited from paying interest or returns on stablecoins, and strict control must be exercised over-issuance and self-operation. Reserve assets must be held in custody by an independent institution approved by regulators and must be audited by an auditing firm at least monthly and an audit report must be issued. This will greatly enhance the value stability of stablecoins relative to the US dollar, strengthen their payment function and compliance, while weakening their investment attributes and illegal use; it will also significantly increase the regulatory costs of stablecoins, thereby reducing their potential for exorbitant profits in an unregulated environment. The US stablecoin legislation officially took effect on July 18, but it still faces numerous challenges : While it stipulates the scope of reserve assets for stablecoin issuance (bank deposits, short-term Treasury bonds, repurchase agreements backed by Treasury bonds, etc.), since it primarily includes Treasury bonds with fluctuating trading prices, even if reserve assets are sufficient at the time of issuance, a subsequent decline in Treasury bond prices could lead to insufficient reserves; if the reserve asset structures of different issuing institutions are not entirely consistent, and there is no central bank guarantee, it means that the issued dollar stablecoins will not be the same, creating arbitrage opportunities and posing challenges to relevant regulation and market stability; even if there is no over-issuance of stablecoins at the time of issuance, allowing decentralized finance (DeFi) to engage in stablecoin lending could still lead to stablecoin derivation and over-issuance, unless it is entirely a matchmaking between lenders and borrowers rather than proprietary trading; getting stablecoin issuers outside of financial institutions to meet regulatory requirements is not easy, and regulation also presents significant challenges. More importantly, the earliest and most fundamental requirement for stablecoins is the borderless, decentralized, 24/7 pricing and settlement of crypto assets on the blockchain. It is precisely because crypto assets like Bitcoin cannot fulfill the fundamental requirement of currency as a measure of value and a value token—that the total amount of currency must change in line with the total value of tradable wealth requiring monetary pricing and settlement—that their price relative to fiat currency fluctuates wildly (therefore, using crypto assets like Bitcoin as collateral or strategic reserves carries significant risks), making it difficult to become a true circulating currency. This has led to the development of fiat stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies. (Therefore, Bitcoin and similar crypto assets can only be considered crypto assets; calling them "cryptocurrency" or "virtual currency" is inaccurate; translating the English word "Token" as "币" or "币" is also inappropriate; it should be directly transliterated as "通证" and clearly defined as an asset, not currency.) The emergence and development of fiat-backed stablecoins have brought fiat currencies and more real-world assets (RWAs) onto the blockchain, strongly supporting on-chain cryptocurrency trading and development. They serve as a channel connecting the on-chain cryptocurrency world with the off-chain real-world, thereby strengthening the integration and influence of the cryptocurrency world on the real world. This will significantly enhance the scope, speed, scale, and volatility of global wealth financialization and financial transactions, accelerating the transfer and concentration of global wealth in a few countries or groups. In this context, failing to strengthen global joint regulation of stablecoins and cryptocurrency issuance and trading poses extremely high risks and dangers . Therefore, the surge in stablecoin and cryptocurrency development driven by the Trump administration in the United States has already revealed a huge bubble and potential risks, making it unsustainable. The international community must be highly vigilant about this! Stablecoin legislation could severely backfire on stablecoins. One unexpected outcome of stablecoin legislation is that the inclusion of fiat-backed stablecoins in legislative regulation will inevitably lead to legislative regulation of crypto asset transactions denominated and settled using fiat-backed stablecoins, including blockchain-generated assets such as Bitcoin and on-chain real-world assets (RWA). This will have a profound impact on stablecoins. Before crypto assets receive legislative regulation and compliance protection, licensed financial institutions such as banks find it difficult to directly participate in crypto asset trading, clearing, custody, and other related activities, thus ceding opportunities to private organizations outside of financial institutions. Due to the lack of regulation and the absence of regulatory costs, existing stablecoin issuers and crypto asset trading platforms have become highly profitable and attractive entities, exerting an increasing impact on banks and the financial system, forcing governments and monetary authorities in countries like the United States to accelerate legislative regulation of stablecoins. However, once crypto assets receive legislative regulation and compliance protection, banks and other financial institutions will undoubtedly participate fully. Payment institutions such as banks can directly promote the on-chain operation of fiat currency deposits (deposit tokenization), completely replacing stablecoins as a new channel and hub connecting the crypto world and the real world . Similarly, existing stock, bond, money market fund, and ETF exchanges can promote the on-chain trading of these relatively standardized financial products through RWA (Real-Time Asset Exchange). Having adequately regulated financial institutions such as banks act as the main entities connecting the crypto world and the real world on the blockchain is more conducive to implementing current legislative requirements for stablecoins, upholding the principle of "equal regulation for the same business" for all institutions, and reducing the impact and risks of crypto asset development on the existing monetary and financial system. This trend has already emerged in the United States and is rapidly intensifying, proving difficult to stop . Therefore, stablecoin legislation may seriously backfire on or subvert stablecoins ( see Wang Yongli's WeChat public account article "Stablecoin Legislation May Seriously Backfire on Stablecoins" on September 3, 2025 ). In this situation, it is not a reasonable choice for other countries to follow the US lead and vigorously promote stablecoin legislation and development. China should not follow the path of stablecoins taken by the United States. China already has a leading global advantage in mobile payments and the digital yuan. Promoting a stablecoin for the yuan has no advantage domestically, and it will have little room for development and influence internationally. It should not follow the path of the US dollar stablecoin, but should instead focus on promoting the development of stablecoins for the yuan, both domestically and offshore. More importantly, crypto assets and stablecoins like Bitcoin can achieve 24/7 global trading and clearing through borderless blockchains and crypto asset trading platforms. While this significantly improves efficiency, the highly anonymous and high-frequency global flow, lacking coordinated international oversight, makes it difficult to meet regulatory requirements such as KYC, AML, and FTC. This poses a clear risk and has been demonstrated in real-world cases of being used for money laundering, fundraising fraud, and illegal cross-border fund transfers. Given that US dollar stablecoins already dominate the crypto asset trading market, and the US has greater control or influence over major global blockchain operating systems, crypto asset trading platforms, and the exchange rate between crypto assets and the US dollar (as evidenced by the US's ability to trace, identify, freeze, and confiscate the crypto asset accounts of some institutions and individuals, and to punish or even arrest some crypto asset trading platforms and their leaders), China's development of a RMB stablecoin following the path of US dollar stablecoins not only fails to challenge the international status of US dollar stablecoins but may even turn the RMB stablecoin into a vassal of US dollar stablecoins. This could impact national tax collection, foreign exchange management, and cross-border capital flows, posing a serious threat to the sovereignty and security of the RMB and the stability of the monetary and financial system. Faced with a more acute and complex international situation, China should prioritize national security and exercise high vigilance and strict control over the trading and speculation of crypto assets, including stablecoins, rather than simply pursuing increased efficiency and reduced costs . It is necessary to accelerate the improvement of relevant regulatory policies and legal frameworks, focus on key links such as information flow and capital flow, strengthen information sharing among relevant departments, further enhance monitoring and tracking capabilities, and severely crack down on illegal and criminal activities involving crypto assets. Of course, while resolutely halting stablecoins and cracking down on virtual currency trading and speculation, we must also accelerate the innovative development and widespread application of the digital yuan at home and abroad, establish the international leading advantage of the digital yuan, forge a Chinese path for the development of digital currency, and actively explore the establishment of a fair, reasonable and secure new international monetary and financial system . Taking into account the above factors, it is not difficult to understand why China has chosen to resolutely curb virtual currencies, including stablecoins, while firmly promoting and accelerating the development of the digital yuan.
Share
PANews2025/12/06 15:08
Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

The post Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In recent years, even Europe, traditionally cautious towards new technologies, seems to be experiencing a phase of progressive adoption of Web3. The Old Continent is tackling the challenges of decentralization technologies, amidst innovative momentum, strict regulations, and new opportunities for businesses and creatives.  Web3: The Technologies of Decentralization Web3 refers to the evolution of the Internet towards a decentralized model, based on blockchain, smart contracts, tokens, crypto, and distributed digital identities.  According to what is described by Amazon Web Services, other key technologies of Web3 include artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, WebAssembly, semantic technologies and interfaces such as decentralized wallets and augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR).  All these technologies aim to give users greater control over their own data and ownership of digital assets, eliminating reliance on centralized intermediaries. Moreover, Web3 projects are mostly driven directly by the community.  Thus, the first challenge of Web3 is to evolve Web2, dominated by centralized platforms. With decentralization technologies, Web3 aims to  return control and ownership of data to users; eliminate intermediaries thanks to smart contracts; create digital economies based on tokens and NFTs; promote greater transparency and security. Today, Web3 is capable of influencing sectors such as finance, art, video games, music, real estate, and digital governance.  The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: A Conscious Growth The adoption of Web3 in Europe is not predominant compared to other continents like North America and Asia. However, it can be stated that in the Old Continent, the adoption of Web3 is in a hybrid phase: it is not a matter of mass usage, but rather a growing number of businesses, professionals, and informed users.  For example, in the blockchain and crypto sector, the report by Chainalysis confirmed that between July 2023 and June 2024, the European region experienced significant growth and resilience. …
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 15:24