The post This Robotic Surgery Legend Is Pouring $100 Million Into Next-Gen Medical Startups appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Fred Moll, the cofounder of $200 billion Intuitive Surgical, has invested in some 15 companies building robots that could help make both complex and common surgeries more accessible to everyone. Dr. Fred Moll left the practice of medicine more than four decades ago. But he’s responsible for some 3 million surgeries a year, done by robots that he helped invent as the cofounder of Intuitive Surgical, the leader in robotic surgeries with more than 10,000 machines deployed and $8.4 billion in 2024 revenue. Now, three decades after its founding and nearly 25 years since he departed Intuitive to start more companies, Moll has plowed around $100 million of his own funds into the next generation of surgical robotics startups. Colonoscopies. Cataract surgeries. Heart-valve replacements. One day, he’s betting these and a slew of other medical procedures will be performed by robots, improved over time by AI that analyzes what’s worked and what hasn’t in similar situations in the past. The goal is to bring the best medical care to everyone, whether they’re in New York or Nagpur. “I’ve spent my career watching other people do surgery. The difference between a good surgeon and an average surgeon is massive,” Moll, 73, told Forbes. “My ambition is that the robot can do procedures that people struggle with. Its impact is to raise the level of capability of average surgeons to very good surgeons in procedures that not everyone is good at.” One such operation is brain surgery, which requires extraordinary precision. Moll is both chairman and an investor in Houston-based XCath (valued at $62 million, per PitchBook), which performed the first robotic brain aneurysm procedure in a human in Panama this November. XCath CEO Eduardo Fonseca said Moll has been helpful in making sure its robot didn’t become overly complex for doctors… The post This Robotic Surgery Legend Is Pouring $100 Million Into Next-Gen Medical Startups appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Fred Moll, the cofounder of $200 billion Intuitive Surgical, has invested in some 15 companies building robots that could help make both complex and common surgeries more accessible to everyone. Dr. Fred Moll left the practice of medicine more than four decades ago. But he’s responsible for some 3 million surgeries a year, done by robots that he helped invent as the cofounder of Intuitive Surgical, the leader in robotic surgeries with more than 10,000 machines deployed and $8.4 billion in 2024 revenue. Now, three decades after its founding and nearly 25 years since he departed Intuitive to start more companies, Moll has plowed around $100 million of his own funds into the next generation of surgical robotics startups. Colonoscopies. Cataract surgeries. Heart-valve replacements. One day, he’s betting these and a slew of other medical procedures will be performed by robots, improved over time by AI that analyzes what’s worked and what hasn’t in similar situations in the past. The goal is to bring the best medical care to everyone, whether they’re in New York or Nagpur. “I’ve spent my career watching other people do surgery. The difference between a good surgeon and an average surgeon is massive,” Moll, 73, told Forbes. “My ambition is that the robot can do procedures that people struggle with. Its impact is to raise the level of capability of average surgeons to very good surgeons in procedures that not everyone is good at.” One such operation is brain surgery, which requires extraordinary precision. Moll is both chairman and an investor in Houston-based XCath (valued at $62 million, per PitchBook), which performed the first robotic brain aneurysm procedure in a human in Panama this November. XCath CEO Eduardo Fonseca said Moll has been helpful in making sure its robot didn’t become overly complex for doctors…

This Robotic Surgery Legend Is Pouring $100 Million Into Next-Gen Medical Startups

2025/12/05 20:07

Fred Moll, the cofounder of $200 billion Intuitive Surgical, has invested in some 15 companies building robots that could help make both complex and common surgeries more accessible to everyone.


Dr. Fred Moll left the practice of medicine more than four decades ago. But he’s responsible for some 3 million surgeries a year, done by robots that he helped invent as the cofounder of Intuitive Surgical, the leader in robotic surgeries with more than 10,000 machines deployed and $8.4 billion in 2024 revenue.

Now, three decades after its founding and nearly 25 years since he departed Intuitive to start more companies, Moll has plowed around $100 million of his own funds into the next generation of surgical robotics startups. Colonoscopies. Cataract surgeries. Heart-valve replacements. One day, he’s betting these and a slew of other medical procedures will be performed by robots, improved over time by AI that analyzes what’s worked and what hasn’t in similar situations in the past. The goal is to bring the best medical care to everyone, whether they’re in New York or Nagpur.

“I’ve spent my career watching other people do surgery. The difference between a good surgeon and an average surgeon is massive,” Moll, 73, told Forbes. “My ambition is that the robot can do procedures that people struggle with. Its impact is to raise the level of capability of average surgeons to very good surgeons in procedures that not everyone is good at.”

One such operation is brain surgery, which requires extraordinary precision. Moll is both chairman and an investor in Houston-based XCath (valued at $62 million, per PitchBook), which performed the first robotic brain aneurysm procedure in a human in Panama this November. XCath CEO Eduardo Fonseca said Moll has been helpful in making sure its robot didn’t become overly complex for doctors to use. “If you want your technology to succeed, you listen to what Dr. Fred says very seriously, and time will prove that he’s right,” he said.

Moll has also invested Neptune Medical (worth $387 million, according to PitchBook), which makes robots for gastrointestinal procedures, and its spinout company, Jupiter Endovascular; ForSight Robotics (worth an estimated $500 million), an Israeli firm that’s developing robots for cataract surgery; and Vitestro, which is based in the Netherlands and does autonomous blood collection. He sees potential too in Santa Cruz, California-based Capstan Medical (worth $367 million, according to VC database Pitchbook), which is developing a robot-assisted method for performing mitral valve replacement, an extremely tricky procedure. They’re all at early stages, in development or, in some cases, available for sale outside the U.S.

“He has been a forward thinker on where [robotics] can go,” said Maggie Nixon, Capstan’s CEO who worked at Intuitive early in her career. “I think his sweet spot is in that early space.”

The largest company he’s backed is Gurugram, India-based SS Innovations International, a publicly traded firm with a market cap of $1.2 billion that builds robots for a variety of different types of surgery, including cardiac, urologic and gynecologic. The company’s tech also allows surgeons to operate remotely. In November, SS Innovations’ founder Dr. Sudhir Srivastava performed a robotic assisted coronary bypass from his New Delhi home on a patient 185 miles away in the northwest Indian city of Jaipur—one of numerous recent cases of telesurgery abroad that could help people in remote areas get access to care. While “some people might wring their hands about this,” Moll said, “I’ve gone from a skeptic to a believer.”

For founders, Moll’s involvement in a company, as an investor, advisor or board member, is something of a Good Housekeeping seal of approval. He invests personally and through a small venture firm, Sonder Capital, where he is a cofounder and partner, that focuses on early-stage medtech startups. Forbes estimates that Moll is worth more than $500 million, and calculates that if he’d never sold any of his shares of Intuitive Surgical they’d be worth $3.3 billion.

Intuitive’s success—it’s publicly traded with a market cap of $200 billion—is due to its first-mover advantage. It launched its da Vinci robots in 2000, well before any other company. To operate one, a surgeon sits at a console and views the surgical site on a high-definition 3D screen. The robot, equipped with surgical tools that can fit through small incisions in the human body, mimics that doctor’s hand movements with precision.

Moll has seen enough in three decades in the industry that there’s one thing he won’t invest in: Companies that are building “me too” robots too similar to Intuitive’s.

“Robotics is littered with companies that don’t work,” he said. “Their characteristic is they thought, ‘I can build a robotic surgical device, and maybe it doesn’t get the valuation of Intuitive, but we’d be happy with something smaller in the same ballpark.’ What they don’t understand is that it’s all about clinical capability. Surgeons live with the da Vinci robots—if they are going to use something else, they want to know why.”


Moll’s obsession with robots didn’t begin with robots at all. In the 1980s, when Moll was a young doctor fresh from medical school at the University of Washington, laparoscopic surgery was in its infancy. During his surgical residency at Virginia Mason Medical Center, he wondered why the new technique, in which surgeons make small incisions with the aid of a camera, wasn’t being used more broadly. “I got very excited at an early age not by robotics, but by minimally invasive surgery,” he said.

Rather than continue on in his practice as a doctor, Moll left his surgical residency to develop a device called a safety trocar, which covers the sharp tips of a laparoscope so that it does as little damage as possible to a patient. He then founded two companies in laparoscopic surgery, one of which was acquired by United States Surgical, the other by Eli Lilly. “I had enough success that I got hooked on entrepreneurship and invention,” said Moll, who then picked up a master’s degree in business management from Stanford.

In the early 1990s, Moll learned that the Stanford Research Institute (now SRI International) was working on ways for surgeons to remotely operate on soldiers on a battlefield. Through telesurgery, they were figuring out how a MASH unit surgeon could send detailed instructions to a trauma unit so that the far-away surgeon’s hand movements could be translated onto a patient. “My first thought was, ‘Why can’t you do this for laparoscopy?” he wondered. At the time, surgeons often struggled with long sticks that lacked dexterity for operating on a patient. He realized that a robot outfitted with mechanical wrists that held surgical tools could translate their hand movements.

In 1995, he cofounded Intuitive Surgical with former investment banker Dr. John Freund and electrical engineer Robert Younge to develop the concept. Five years later, Intuitive launched the da Vinci robotic system, which can be used for urologic, gynecologic, cardiothoracic and head and neck surgeries, as well as general surgery. Now the dominant maker of surgical robots, Intuitive announced in its Q3 earnings that as of September its installed base of da Vinci robots reached 10,763, up 13% from 9,539 the previous year. They have now performed more than 14 million surgeries. Its latest 12-month revenue (through September 30) hit $9.6 billion, a 22% increase from $7.9 billion year-over-year.

Moll, though, wasn’t there for most of that growth. He left Intuitive back in 2002 after a stint as its CEO and went back to starting companies. That year, he launched Hansen Medical, which developed robots for vascular procedures. Then, in 2007, he cofounded Auris Health, which developed a robotic-assisted system for diagnosing lung cancer. It subsequently bought Hansen for $80 million, before itself being acquired by J&J in 2019 for $3.4 billion upfront with another $2.35 billion due upon reaching certain commercial and regulatory milestones. (That deal resulted in finger-pointing and litigation over J&J’s efforts to reach those milestones. In 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery ordered J&J to pay more than $1 billion for violating its merger agreement.) Moll, who spent a few years at J&J as chief development officer following the acquisition, left in 2023—allowing him to again focus on early-stage inventions.

In 2023, SS Innovations’ Dr. Srivastava sought out Moll as an investor. As a top cardiac surgeon in Texas, Srivastava was an early customer of Intuitive—and figures he’s done a whopping 1,400 cardiac surgeries with the help of robots, mostly the da Vinci. But when he moved to India in 2011, Srivastava said, he “very quickly realized that the cost of the da Vinci was prohibitive.” He decided to build his own, more affordable surgical robot. “All Indian surgeons know about robotics, but they don’t do robotics because they can’t afford it,” said Moll, whose 11% stake in SS Innovations is now worth $120 million.

After a rocky early start, SS Innovations is now growing fast: Its revenue more than doubled in the first nine months of this year (thru September 30) to $28 million from $12.5 million in the same period last year. A big reason is price. Today, Srivastava said, SS Innovations’ robots sell for as little as $600,000 compared with $2 million or more for da Vinci’s newest model. “Some people buy a Cadillac or Rolls Royce and others buy a Ford,” Srivastava said. The company now plans to file with the FDA for clearance in the U.S. before year end.

Most of Moll’s other bets are focused on robots that can improve care for complex or repetitive procedures where specialists are scarce. One potential area for neurovascular surgery-focused XCath is responding to strokes. Moll sees the opportunity to use robots to cut the time between when someone has a stroke and when they can have the clot that caused it removed–a huge deal because each minute of delay results in the death of nearly 2 million brain cells. A big advantage of a robot for a brain surgeon is that the person can make very large movements with his or her hands and the machine can translate that motion to a cramped space where sub-millimeter movements make a difference. “It can translate gross movements to fine movements, and in aneurysm surgery that’s exactly what you need,” he said.

Robots are also very good at high-volume repetitive tasks. To that end, Moll invested in ForSight Robotics, an Israeli firm developing robots for cataract surgery, which is one of the world’s most common medical procedures with more than 4 million of them a year in the U.S. alone. With a shortage of doctors to meet that demand, ForSight raised a total of $195 million at an estimated $500 million valuation earlier this year. Moll joined as an investor and strategic advisory board member in June because, as he said, “it’s taking on a massive opportunity.” ForSight has been testing its robot on pig eyes.

And now AI is here, which adds a whole new layer of opportunity to surgical robotics, particularly around using vast amounts of data to improve their capabilities. “I feel like there’s an opportunity to use what we started 30 years ago that really leapfrogs the capabilities that we have,” he said.

More from Forbes

ForbesThis Haiti-Born Doctor Built A $6 Billion Business Developing Drugs For Depression And Alzheimer’sForbesHow A High-Tech Chair Could Revolutionize Cancer Radiation TherapyForbes30 Under 30 Healthcare 2026: Using AI To Improve Care And Cut Administrative BurdensForbesHow A Turkish Immigrant Engineered A Successful Diagnostics Startup IPOForbesLonely Seniors Are Turning To AI Bots For Companionship

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/amyfeldman/2025/12/03/robotic-surgery-legend-fred-moll-is-pouring-100-million-into-next-gen-medical-startups/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

How decentralization technologies are advancing in the Old Continent.
Share
The Cryptonomist2025/12/06 15:00
Wang Yongli, former vice president of the Bank of China: Why did China resolutely halt stablecoins?

Wang Yongli, former vice president of the Bank of China: Why did China resolutely halt stablecoins?

Written by: Wang Yongli , former Vice President of Bank of China China's policy orientation of accelerating the development of the digital yuan and resolutely curbing virtual currencies, including stablecoins, is now fully clear. This is based on a comprehensive consideration of factors such as China's leading global advantages in mobile payments and the digital yuan, the sovereignty and security of the yuan, and the stability of the monetary and financial system. Since May 2025, the United States and Hong Kong have been racing to advance stablecoin legislation, which has led to a surge in global legislation on stablecoins and crypto assets (also known as "cryptocurrencies" or "virtual currencies"). A large number of institutions and capital are flocking to issue stablecoins and invest in crypto assets, which has also sparked heated debate on whether China should fully promote stablecoin legislation and the development of RMB stablecoins (including offshore ones). Furthermore, after the United States legislated to prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing digital dollars, whether China should continue to promote digital RMB has also become a hot topic of debate. For China, this involves the direction and path of national currency development. With the global spread of stablecoins and the increasingly acute and complex international relations and fiercer international currency competition, this has a huge and far-reaching impact on how the RMB innovates and develops, safeguards national security, and achieves the strategic goals of a strong currency and a financial power. We must calmly analyze, accurately grasp, and make decisions early. We cannot be indifferent or hesitant, nor can we blindly follow the trend and make directional and subversive mistakes. Subsequently, the People's Bank of China announced that it would optimize the positioning of the digital yuan within the monetary hierarchy (adjusting the previously determined M0 positioning. This is a point I have repeatedly advocated from the beginning; see Wang Yongli's WeChat public account article "Digital Yuan Should Not Be Positioned as M0" dated January 6, 2021), further optimize the digital yuan management system (establishing an international digital yuan operations center in Shanghai, responsible for cross-border cooperation and use of the digital yuan; and establishing a digital yuan operations management center in Beijing, responsible for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the digital yuan system), and promote and accelerate the development of the digital yuan . On November 28, the People's Bank of China and 13 other departments jointly convened a meeting of the coordination mechanism for combating virtual currency trading and speculation. The meeting pointed out that due to various factors, virtual currency speculation has recently resurfaced, and related illegal and criminal activities have occurred frequently, posing new challenges to risk prevention and control. It emphasized that all units should deepen coordination and cooperation, continue to adhere to the prohibitive policy on virtual currencies, and persistently crack down on illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies. It clarified that stablecoins are a form of virtual currency , and their issuance and trading activities are also illegal and subject to crackdown. This has greatly disappointed those who believed that China would promote the development of RMB stablecoins and correspondingly relax the ban on virtual currency (crypto asset) trading. Therefore, China's policy orientation of accelerating the development of the digital yuan and resolutely curbing virtual currencies, including stablecoins, is now fully clear . Of course, this policy orientation remains highly debated both domestically and internationally, and there is no consensus among the public. So, how should we view this major policy direction of China? This article will first answer why China resolutely halted stablecoins; how to accelerate the innovative development of the digital yuan will be discussed in another article . There is little room or opportunity for the development of non-USD stablecoins. Since Tether launched USDT, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, in 2014 , USD stablecoins have been operating for over a decade and have formed a complete international operating system. They have basically dominated the entire crypto asset trading market, accounting for over 99% of the global fiat stablecoin market capitalization and trading volume . This situation arises from two main factors. First, the US dollar is the most liquid and has the most comprehensive supporting system of international central currencies, making stablecoins pegged to the dollar the easiest to accept globally. Second, it is also a result of the US's long-standing tolerant policy towards crypto assets like Bitcoin and dollar-denominated stablecoins, rather than leading the international community to strengthen necessary regulation and safeguard the fundamental interests of all humanity. Even this year, when the US pushed for legislation on stablecoins and crypto assets, it was largely driven by the belief that dollar-denominated stablecoins would increase global demand for the dollar and dollar-denominated assets such as US Treasury bonds, reduce the financing costs for the US government and society, and strengthen the dollar's international dominance. This was a choice made to enhance US support for dollar-denominated stablecoins and control their potential impact on the US, prioritizing the maximization of national interests while giving little consideration to mitigating the international risks of stablecoins. With the US strongly promoting dollar-denominated stablecoins, other countries or regions launching non-dollar fiat currency stablecoins will find it difficult to compete with dollar-denominated stablecoins on an international level, except perhaps within their own sovereign territory or on the issuing institution's own e-commerce platform. Their development potential and practical significance are limited . Lacking a strong ecosystem and application scenarios, and lacking distinct characteristics compared to dollar-denominated stablecoins, as well as the advantage of attracting traders and transaction volume, the return on investment for issuing non-dollar fiat currency stablecoins is unlikely to meet expectations, and they will struggle to survive in an environment of increasingly stringent legislation and regulation in various countries. The legislation on stablecoins in the United States still faces many problems and challenges. Following President Trump's second election victory, his strong advocacy for crypto assets such as Bitcoin fueled a new international frenzy in cryptocurrency trading, driving the rapid development of dollar-denominated stablecoin trading and a surge in stablecoin market capitalization. This not only increased demand for the US dollar and US Treasury bonds, strengthening the dollar's international status, but also brought huge profits to the Trump family and their cryptocurrency associates. However, this also posed new challenges to the global monitoring of the dollar's circulation and the stability of the traditional US financial system. Furthermore, the trading and transfer of crypto assets backed by dollar-denominated stablecoins has become a new and more difficult-to-prevent tool for the US to harvest global wealth, posing a serious threat to the monetary sovereignty and wealth security of other countries . This is why the United States has accelerated legislation on stablecoins, but its legislation is more about prioritizing America and maximizing American and even group interests, at the expense of the interests of other countries and the common interests of the world. After the legislation on US dollar stablecoins came into effect, institutions that have not obtained approval and operating licenses from US regulators will find it difficult to issue and operate US dollar stablecoins in the United States (for this reason, Tether has announced that it will apply for US-issued USDT). Stablecoin issuers subject to US regulation must meet regulatory requirements such as Know Your Customer (KYC), Anti-Money Laundering (AML), and Counter-Terrorist Financing (FTC). They must be able to screen customers against government watchlists and report suspicious activities to regulators. Their systems must have the ability to freeze or intercept specific stablecoins when ordered by law enforcement agencies. Stablecoin issuers must have reserves of no less than 100% US dollar assets (including currency assets, short-term Treasury bonds, and repurchase agreements backed by Treasury bonds) approved by regulators, and must keep US customer funds in US banks and not transfer them overseas. They are prohibited from paying interest or returns on stablecoins, and strict control must be exercised over-issuance and self-operation. Reserve assets must be held in custody by an independent institution approved by regulators and must be audited by an auditing firm at least monthly and an audit report must be issued. This will greatly enhance the value stability of stablecoins relative to the US dollar, strengthen their payment function and compliance, while weakening their investment attributes and illegal use; it will also significantly increase the regulatory costs of stablecoins, thereby reducing their potential for exorbitant profits in an unregulated environment. The US stablecoin legislation officially took effect on July 18, but it still faces numerous challenges : While it stipulates the scope of reserve assets for stablecoin issuance (bank deposits, short-term Treasury bonds, repurchase agreements backed by Treasury bonds, etc.), since it primarily includes Treasury bonds with fluctuating trading prices, even if reserve assets are sufficient at the time of issuance, a subsequent decline in Treasury bond prices could lead to insufficient reserves; if the reserve asset structures of different issuing institutions are not entirely consistent, and there is no central bank guarantee, it means that the issued dollar stablecoins will not be the same, creating arbitrage opportunities and posing challenges to relevant regulation and market stability; even if there is no over-issuance of stablecoins at the time of issuance, allowing decentralized finance (DeFi) to engage in stablecoin lending could still lead to stablecoin derivation and over-issuance, unless it is entirely a matchmaking between lenders and borrowers rather than proprietary trading; getting stablecoin issuers outside of financial institutions to meet regulatory requirements is not easy, and regulation also presents significant challenges. More importantly, the earliest and most fundamental requirement for stablecoins is the borderless, decentralized, 24/7 pricing and settlement of crypto assets on the blockchain. It is precisely because crypto assets like Bitcoin cannot fulfill the fundamental requirement of currency as a measure of value and a value token—that the total amount of currency must change in line with the total value of tradable wealth requiring monetary pricing and settlement—that their price relative to fiat currency fluctuates wildly (therefore, using crypto assets like Bitcoin as collateral or strategic reserves carries significant risks), making it difficult to become a true circulating currency. This has led to the development of fiat stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies. (Therefore, Bitcoin and similar crypto assets can only be considered crypto assets; calling them "cryptocurrency" or "virtual currency" is inaccurate; translating the English word "Token" as "币" or "币" is also inappropriate; it should be directly transliterated as "通证" and clearly defined as an asset, not currency.) The emergence and development of fiat-backed stablecoins have brought fiat currencies and more real-world assets (RWAs) onto the blockchain, strongly supporting on-chain cryptocurrency trading and development. They serve as a channel connecting the on-chain cryptocurrency world with the off-chain real-world, thereby strengthening the integration and influence of the cryptocurrency world on the real world. This will significantly enhance the scope, speed, scale, and volatility of global wealth financialization and financial transactions, accelerating the transfer and concentration of global wealth in a few countries or groups. In this context, failing to strengthen global joint regulation of stablecoins and cryptocurrency issuance and trading poses extremely high risks and dangers . Therefore, the surge in stablecoin and cryptocurrency development driven by the Trump administration in the United States has already revealed a huge bubble and potential risks, making it unsustainable. The international community must be highly vigilant about this! Stablecoin legislation could severely backfire on stablecoins. One unexpected outcome of stablecoin legislation is that the inclusion of fiat-backed stablecoins in legislative regulation will inevitably lead to legislative regulation of crypto asset transactions denominated and settled using fiat-backed stablecoins, including blockchain-generated assets such as Bitcoin and on-chain real-world assets (RWA). This will have a profound impact on stablecoins. Before crypto assets receive legislative regulation and compliance protection, licensed financial institutions such as banks find it difficult to directly participate in crypto asset trading, clearing, custody, and other related activities, thus ceding opportunities to private organizations outside of financial institutions. Due to the lack of regulation and the absence of regulatory costs, existing stablecoin issuers and crypto asset trading platforms have become highly profitable and attractive entities, exerting an increasing impact on banks and the financial system, forcing governments and monetary authorities in countries like the United States to accelerate legislative regulation of stablecoins. However, once crypto assets receive legislative regulation and compliance protection, banks and other financial institutions will undoubtedly participate fully. Payment institutions such as banks can directly promote the on-chain operation of fiat currency deposits (deposit tokenization), completely replacing stablecoins as a new channel and hub connecting the crypto world and the real world . Similarly, existing stock, bond, money market fund, and ETF exchanges can promote the on-chain trading of these relatively standardized financial products through RWA (Real-Time Asset Exchange). Having adequately regulated financial institutions such as banks act as the main entities connecting the crypto world and the real world on the blockchain is more conducive to implementing current legislative requirements for stablecoins, upholding the principle of "equal regulation for the same business" for all institutions, and reducing the impact and risks of crypto asset development on the existing monetary and financial system. This trend has already emerged in the United States and is rapidly intensifying, proving difficult to stop . Therefore, stablecoin legislation may seriously backfire on or subvert stablecoins ( see Wang Yongli's WeChat public account article "Stablecoin Legislation May Seriously Backfire on Stablecoins" on September 3, 2025 ). In this situation, it is not a reasonable choice for other countries to follow the US lead and vigorously promote stablecoin legislation and development. China should not follow the path of stablecoins taken by the United States. China already has a leading global advantage in mobile payments and the digital yuan. Promoting a stablecoin for the yuan has no advantage domestically, and it will have little room for development and influence internationally. It should not follow the path of the US dollar stablecoin, but should instead focus on promoting the development of stablecoins for the yuan, both domestically and offshore. More importantly, crypto assets and stablecoins like Bitcoin can achieve 24/7 global trading and clearing through borderless blockchains and crypto asset trading platforms. While this significantly improves efficiency, the highly anonymous and high-frequency global flow, lacking coordinated international oversight, makes it difficult to meet regulatory requirements such as KYC, AML, and FTC. This poses a clear risk and has been demonstrated in real-world cases of being used for money laundering, fundraising fraud, and illegal cross-border fund transfers. Given that US dollar stablecoins already dominate the crypto asset trading market, and the US has greater control or influence over major global blockchain operating systems, crypto asset trading platforms, and the exchange rate between crypto assets and the US dollar (as evidenced by the US's ability to trace, identify, freeze, and confiscate the crypto asset accounts of some institutions and individuals, and to punish or even arrest some crypto asset trading platforms and their leaders), China's development of a RMB stablecoin following the path of US dollar stablecoins not only fails to challenge the international status of US dollar stablecoins but may even turn the RMB stablecoin into a vassal of US dollar stablecoins. This could impact national tax collection, foreign exchange management, and cross-border capital flows, posing a serious threat to the sovereignty and security of the RMB and the stability of the monetary and financial system. Faced with a more acute and complex international situation, China should prioritize national security and exercise high vigilance and strict control over the trading and speculation of crypto assets, including stablecoins, rather than simply pursuing increased efficiency and reduced costs . It is necessary to accelerate the improvement of relevant regulatory policies and legal frameworks, focus on key links such as information flow and capital flow, strengthen information sharing among relevant departments, further enhance monitoring and tracking capabilities, and severely crack down on illegal and criminal activities involving crypto assets. Of course, while resolutely halting stablecoins and cracking down on virtual currency trading and speculation, we must also accelerate the innovative development and widespread application of the digital yuan at home and abroad, establish the international leading advantage of the digital yuan, forge a Chinese path for the development of digital currency, and actively explore the establishment of a fair, reasonable and secure new international monetary and financial system . Taking into account the above factors, it is not difficult to understand why China has chosen to resolutely curb virtual currencies, including stablecoins, while firmly promoting and accelerating the development of the digital yuan.
Share
PANews2025/12/06 15:08
Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

The post Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In recent years, even Europe, traditionally cautious towards new technologies, seems to be experiencing a phase of progressive adoption of Web3. The Old Continent is tackling the challenges of decentralization technologies, amidst innovative momentum, strict regulations, and new opportunities for businesses and creatives.  Web3: The Technologies of Decentralization Web3 refers to the evolution of the Internet towards a decentralized model, based on blockchain, smart contracts, tokens, crypto, and distributed digital identities.  According to what is described by Amazon Web Services, other key technologies of Web3 include artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, WebAssembly, semantic technologies and interfaces such as decentralized wallets and augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR).  All these technologies aim to give users greater control over their own data and ownership of digital assets, eliminating reliance on centralized intermediaries. Moreover, Web3 projects are mostly driven directly by the community.  Thus, the first challenge of Web3 is to evolve Web2, dominated by centralized platforms. With decentralization technologies, Web3 aims to  return control and ownership of data to users; eliminate intermediaries thanks to smart contracts; create digital economies based on tokens and NFTs; promote greater transparency and security. Today, Web3 is capable of influencing sectors such as finance, art, video games, music, real estate, and digital governance.  The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: A Conscious Growth The adoption of Web3 in Europe is not predominant compared to other continents like North America and Asia. However, it can be stated that in the Old Continent, the adoption of Web3 is in a hybrid phase: it is not a matter of mass usage, but rather a growing number of businesses, professionals, and informed users.  For example, in the blockchain and crypto sector, the report by Chainalysis confirmed that between July 2023 and June 2024, the European region experienced significant growth and resilience. …
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 15:24