The post Solana advocates dismiss Base’s ‘disingenuous’ bridge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The rivalry between Base and Solana has taken on a new dimension with the introduction of the Base-Solana bridge. The latest episode goes back to September 2025, when Aerodrome’s co-founder Alex Cutler boasted at Basecamp that Base would “flip Solana,” attracting the attention of Solana’s famous defender, Mert Mumtaz, the CEO of Helius Labs.  The tension has since escalated after Base launched the bridge to Solana on December 4, with Solana’s most vocal builders accusing Jesse Pollak of disguising a vampire attack as interoperability. The rivalry of ‘healthy competition’ The bridge, which uses Chainlink CCIP and Coinbase infrastructure to let users move assets between Base and Solana, was launched with early integrations in Zora, Aerodrome, Virtuals, Flaunch, and Relay.  They are all applications native to Base, and while Pollak framed the move as bidirectional pragmatism, Vibhu Norby, founder of Solana creator platform DRiP, called it out for being anything but.  He took to X with footage of Aerodrome’s Alexander Cutler at Basecamp, claiming that Base would “flip Solana” and become the largest chain in the world. Norby’s response was pointed: “These are not partners; if they had it their way, Solana would not exist.” The post apparently rubbed Jesse Pollak the wrong way. His response post started the discourse on what the bridge really means for both chains. In his reply, Pollak claimed that Base built a bridge to Solana because “Solana assets deserve to have access to the Base economy and Base assets should have access to Solana.” However, Norby replied with allegations that Base deliberately passed on Solana-based applications for launch, nor did they liaise with the Solana Foundation marketing or operations team. Akshay BD, a popular voice linked to Solana’s Superteam, chimed in, “Calling it bidirectional doesn’t make it so. It’s a bridge between two economies that… The post Solana advocates dismiss Base’s ‘disingenuous’ bridge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The rivalry between Base and Solana has taken on a new dimension with the introduction of the Base-Solana bridge. The latest episode goes back to September 2025, when Aerodrome’s co-founder Alex Cutler boasted at Basecamp that Base would “flip Solana,” attracting the attention of Solana’s famous defender, Mert Mumtaz, the CEO of Helius Labs.  The tension has since escalated after Base launched the bridge to Solana on December 4, with Solana’s most vocal builders accusing Jesse Pollak of disguising a vampire attack as interoperability. The rivalry of ‘healthy competition’ The bridge, which uses Chainlink CCIP and Coinbase infrastructure to let users move assets between Base and Solana, was launched with early integrations in Zora, Aerodrome, Virtuals, Flaunch, and Relay.  They are all applications native to Base, and while Pollak framed the move as bidirectional pragmatism, Vibhu Norby, founder of Solana creator platform DRiP, called it out for being anything but.  He took to X with footage of Aerodrome’s Alexander Cutler at Basecamp, claiming that Base would “flip Solana” and become the largest chain in the world. Norby’s response was pointed: “These are not partners; if they had it their way, Solana would not exist.” The post apparently rubbed Jesse Pollak the wrong way. His response post started the discourse on what the bridge really means for both chains. In his reply, Pollak claimed that Base built a bridge to Solana because “Solana assets deserve to have access to the Base economy and Base assets should have access to Solana.” However, Norby replied with allegations that Base deliberately passed on Solana-based applications for launch, nor did they liaise with the Solana Foundation marketing or operations team. Akshay BD, a popular voice linked to Solana’s Superteam, chimed in, “Calling it bidirectional doesn’t make it so. It’s a bridge between two economies that…

Solana advocates dismiss Base’s ‘disingenuous’ bridge

2025/12/07 01:30

The rivalry between Base and Solana has taken on a new dimension with the introduction of the Base-Solana bridge. The latest episode goes back to September 2025, when Aerodrome’s co-founder Alex Cutler boasted at Basecamp that Base would “flip Solana,” attracting the attention of Solana’s famous defender, Mert Mumtaz, the CEO of Helius Labs. 

The tension has since escalated after Base launched the bridge to Solana on December 4, with Solana’s most vocal builders accusing Jesse Pollak of disguising a vampire attack as interoperability.

The rivalry of ‘healthy competition’

The bridge, which uses Chainlink CCIP and Coinbase infrastructure to let users move assets between Base and Solana, was launched with early integrations in Zora, Aerodrome, Virtuals, Flaunch, and Relay. 

They are all applications native to Base, and while Pollak framed the move as bidirectional pragmatism, Vibhu Norby, founder of Solana creator platform DRiP, called it out for being anything but. 

He took to X with footage of Aerodrome’s Alexander Cutler at Basecamp, claiming that Base would “flip Solana” and become the largest chain in the world. Norby’s response was pointed: “These are not partners; if they had it their way, Solana would not exist.”

The post apparently rubbed Jesse Pollak the wrong way. His response post started the discourse on what the bridge really means for both chains. In his reply, Pollak claimed that Base built a bridge to Solana because “Solana assets deserve to have access to the Base economy and Base assets should have access to Solana.”

However, Norby replied with allegations that Base deliberately passed on Solana-based applications for launch, nor did they liaise with the Solana Foundation marketing or operations team.

Akshay BD, a popular voice linked to Solana’s Superteam, chimed in, “Calling it bidirectional doesn’t make it so. It’s a bridge between two economies that has net import/export result based on how you roll it out. I don’t mind that you’re competitive… I mind that you’re being dishonest.”

In response to that, Pollak acknowledged that the team could have “improved the way we communicated to the Solana Foundation, but the idea that there’s some conspiracy here is just ungrounded in reality.” 

Solana’s Toly was also skeptical of the Base bridge

By then, the thread had already garnered an audience and caught the attention of Anatoly Yakovenko, Solana’s co-founder. 

“Migrate Base apps to Solana so they execute on Solana and the transactions are linearized by Solana staked block producers,” he wrote. “That would be good for Solana developers. Otherwise, it’s alignment bullshit.”

Throughout the debate, Pollak repeatedly pointed out that Base announced the bridge in September and began discussing it with Yakovenko and others in May, and that it is bidirectional, which means Base and Solana developers will benefit from access to both economies.

However, reputable voices on Solana argue that the method Base used to launch the bridge is proof that its main function is to siphon Solana capital into Base’s ecosystem while marketing it as reciprocal infrastructure.

However, if the bridge only lets Base apps import Solana assets while keeping all execution and fee revenue on Base, it ultimately extracts value from the SOL ecosystem without giving anything back, which is the vampire attack thesis people like Toly are going with. 

Pollak is convinced this is not the case and argues in the thread that both chains can compete and collaborate simultaneously, and that the bridge was a response to developers on both sides wanting access to each other’s economies.

He also claimed that Base attempted to engage Solana ecosystem participants during the nine months it took to build the bridge, but apparently, “folks weren’t really interested” with the exception of some meme projects like Trencher and Chillhouse, who chose to collaborate.

Norby and Akshay countered that talk by arguing that dropping a repo without coordinating launch partners or working with the Solana Foundation reeks of tactical extraction dressed up as open-source infrastructure.

What doesSolana gain from the Base bridge?

Reputable voices on Solana claim that with the bridge, Base gains immediate access to Solana’s cultural and financial momentum, which is a lot considering how Solana has been the center of meme coin trading, NFT speculation, and retail onboarding for the past year.

By integrating SOL and SPL tokens into Base apps, Base gets access to all that energy and also benefits from being the “neutral” interoperability layer that connects all ecosystems. 

Solana advocates insist that the network only gains optionality, not guaranteed value capture. For the relationship to be truly reciprocal, the bridge will need to push Base developers to experiment with Solana execution or encourage Solana apps to start using Base liquidity pools for bridged assets. 

In the event that the bridge only serves as a one-way funnel that pulls Solana assets into Base’s economy, Solana risks becoming a feeder chain for Base DeFi rather than a destination, which makes it the losing party. 

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/solana-dismiss-base-bridge/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer

XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer

The post XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple’s transfer of 250 million XRP to an unknown wallet has immediately altered the short-term liquidity for XRP price, reducing available tokens in sell zones and potentially supporting a bullish reversal. This move coincides with shrinking exchange reserves, signaling tighter supply amid growing buyer interest. Ripple transferred 250 million XRP, impacting circulating supply and exchange liquidity. XRP price shows a potential double-bottom pattern at $1.99, with a key neckline at $2.2443. Exchange reserves dropped 2.51%, while taker buy CVD rose, indicating stronger buyer aggression per CryptoQuant data. Ripple’s 250M XRP transfer tightens liquidity, boosting XRP price potential amid double-bottom signals. Explore how shrinking reserves and rising CVD support bullish trends—stay informed on crypto shifts today. What does Ripple’s 250 million XRP transfer mean for XRP price? Ripple’s transfer of 250 million XRP to an unknown wallet has reshaped the short-term liquidity environment for XRP price by reducing the number of tokens readily available in sell zones. This large movement, often seen as a strategic repositioning, highlights implications for circulating supply and forces traders to reassess market dynamics. As fewer XRP tokens sit in immediate exchange reserves, the transfer could amplify price reactions to buying pressure, especially with supporting on-chain indicators. How is the double-bottom pattern influencing XRP price action? XRP price has formed a potential double-bottom structure around the $1.99 level, where both touches demonstrated strong rejection from buyers, establishing this zone as a critical support. This pattern suggests a possible brief test near $1.90 before advancing, with the neckline at $2.2443 serving as the pivotal breakout point; surpassing it could target $2.5021. On-chain data from TradingView reinforces this setup, as volume profiles align with historical resistance breaks, and expert analysis from market observers notes that such formations often precede 10-15% rallies in similar conditions. Short sentences here emphasize: the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 10:28
Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ

Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ

The post Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Peter Schiff has challenged President Trump to a public debate on the U.S. economy following Trump’s criticism of his comments on the ongoing affordability crisis. This exchange highlights tensions over inflation, economic policies, and their impacts on everyday Americans amid claims of falling prices and recovery. Schiff’s Challenge: Gold advocate Peter Schiff proposes a debate to discuss Trump’s economic strategies and their role in rising costs. Trump’s Response: The president labels Schiff a detractor and insists prices are dropping, attributing issues to prior administration policies. Broader Context: Searches for affordability have surged 110% year-over-year, reflecting public concerns despite official dismissals, per Google data. Peter Schiff challenges Trump to debate U.S. economy amid affordability crisis and inflation debates. Explore Schiff’s views on Bitcoin vs. gold and policy impacts—stay informed on crypto’s role in financial stability today. What is Peter Schiff’s Challenge to President Trump About? Peter Schiff’s challenge to President Trump stems from a heated exchange over the U.S. economy’s health, particularly the affordability crisis affecting Americans. On December 6, 2025, during an appearance on Fox & Friends Weekend, Schiff highlighted how inflation is accelerating under current policies, exacerbating everyday cost pressures. Trump responded sharply on Truth Social, calling Schiff a “Trump hating loser” and claiming prices are falling dramatically, including gasoline at $1.99 per gallon in some states. Schiff then invited Trump or a representative to debate these economic realities publicly, emphasizing the need for truthful discourse on policy effectiveness. How Does Peter Schiff’s Debate with CZ Relate to Economic Concerns? Peter Schiff’s recent debate with Changpeng Zhao (CZ), founder of Binance, at Binance Blockchain Week in Dubai underscores his longstanding skepticism toward cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, tying directly into broader economic discussions on inflation and asset value. Schiff argued that Bitcoin lacks inherent value, serving only as a speculative tool…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 10:01
Texas Monet Bank Plans Crypto Services as Bitcoin Hits $126K High

Texas Monet Bank Plans Crypto Services as Bitcoin Hits $126K High

The post Texas Monet Bank Plans Crypto Services as Bitcoin Hits $126K High appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Monet Bank, a Texas-based institution owned by billionaire Andy Beal, has rebranded to prioritize cryptocurrency services, offering secure digital asset banking solutions amid regulatory shifts. This move positions it as a premier provider for crypto custody, lending, and blockchain-integrated transactions, capitalizing on Bitcoin’s 2025 all-time high of $126,000. Rebranding Focus: Monet Bank’s transition from Beal Savings Bank to XD Bank and now Monet Bank emphasizes digital asset innovation for the modern economy. Regulatory Changes: Recent federal adjustments under the Trump administration have eased restrictions, enabling banks like Monet to engage with cryptocurrencies without prior cautions. Growth in Sector: With Bitcoin hitting $126,000 in 2025, institutions such as Monet are expanding services, including blockchain for faster payments, supported by FDIC regulation and over $1 billion in capital. Discover how Monet Bank’s pivot to cryptocurrency services is reshaping banking. Explore secure digital asset solutions and regulatory insights for crypto investors today. (148 characters) What is Monet Bank’s Strategy for Cryptocurrency Services? Monet Bank’s cryptocurrency services represent a strategic pivot to integrate digital assets into traditional banking, providing clients with custody, lending, and blockchain-based transactions. Founded in 1988 as Beal Savings Bank, the Texas institution has undergone two rebrands in 2025—first to XD Bank and now to Monet Bank—to align with the digital economy. This evolution allows FDIC-insured operations while offering innovative tools for cryptocurrency users, backed by less than $6 billion in assets and strong capital reserves. How Does Monet Bank’s Rebranding Impact Crypto Banking? Monet Bank’s rebranding to focus on cryptocurrency services stems from a clear vision to become a leading digital asset financial institution. According to the bank’s official statement, it aims to deliver “innovative and forward-facing solutions for the digital economy,” operating through six Texas offices under strict FDIC oversight. This small community bank, with assets under $6 billion…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 09:52