European Commission Proposes Expanded Powers for ESMA, Sparking Industry Concerns The European Commission has unveiled a proposal to broaden the authority of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), aiming to integrate oversight of key market infrastructure. While intended to enhance regulatory cohesion, industry stakeholders express apprehensions about potential centralization and its implications for blockchain [...]European Commission Proposes Expanded Powers for ESMA, Sparking Industry Concerns The European Commission has unveiled a proposal to broaden the authority of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), aiming to integrate oversight of key market infrastructure. While intended to enhance regulatory cohesion, industry stakeholders express apprehensions about potential centralization and its implications for blockchain [...]

European SEC Proposal Sparks Licensing Worries & Institutional Goals

European Sec Proposal Sparks Licensing Worries & Institutional Goals

European Commission Proposes Expanded Powers for ESMA, Sparking Industry Concerns

The European Commission has unveiled a proposal to broaden the authority of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), aiming to integrate oversight of key market infrastructure. While intended to enhance regulatory cohesion, industry stakeholders express apprehensions about potential centralization and its implications for blockchain and fintech firms across the continent.

On Thursday, the Commission published a legislative package that proposes to grant ESMA “direct supervisory competences” over significant entities, including crypto-asset service providers, trading venues, and central counterparty firms. This move would extend ESMA’s jurisdiction to both licensing and supervising crypto and financial technology firms within the European Union, marking a significant shift in decentralized markets’ regulatory landscape.

Critics warn that such a centralized approach could slow down licensing processes and stifle innovation among startups. Faustine Fleuret, Head of Public Affairs at decentralized lending protocol Morpho, expressed concern that ESMA’s expanded role would encompass both the authorization and supervision—a potential bottleneck for emerging firms.

The proposal remains subject to approval by the European Parliament and the Council, which are currently engaged in negotiations. If enacted, the regulatory model would resemble the centralized oversight framework seen in the United States, as suggested by European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde earlier this year.

Addressing these concerns, industry experts emphasize that the success of the reform hinges more on practical implementation than on legal structure. Elisenda Fabrega, General Counsel at Brickken, a tokenization platform, remarked that resource allocation, operational capacity, independence, and cooperation channels with member states will determine the reform’s effectiveness. She cautioned that without adequate resources, the new mandate could become unmanageable, potentially causing delays or overly cautious assessments especially impacting smaller or innovative firms.

The broader aim of the initiative is to bolster Europe’s financial markets by making them more competitive globally. Currently, the US stock market exceeds $62 trillion in value, representing nearly half of the global equity market, while the EU’s stock market stands at around $11 trillion, constituting approximately 9% of the total, according to data from Visual Capitalist.

This article was originally published as European SEC Proposal Sparks Licensing Worries & Institutional Goals on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Stellar’s Origin Story Matters Again As Tokenized XLM Dollars Move Mainstream

Stellar’s Origin Story Matters Again As Tokenized XLM Dollars Move Mainstream

Stellar Lumens is easy to misread because its “introduction” was never a pitch for a general-purpose crypto computer. From the very start, it framed itself as
Share
Coinstats2026/02/19 06:21
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Tutor Perini Announces Conference Call to Discuss Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results

Tutor Perini Announces Conference Call to Discuss Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Tutor Perini Corporation (NYSE: TPC) (the “Company”), a leading civil, building and specialty construction company, announced today
Share
AI Journal2026/02/19 07:15