The post Solana (SOL) Ecosystem in Turmoil: Two Protocols Collide, Solana Foundation Issues Statement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Discussions on the Jupiter Lend vault design, one of the most talked-about topics in the Solana ecosystem, escalated further over the weekend. Kash Dhanda, Jupiter Exchange’s chief operating officer, released a video statement addressing community concerns regarding the protocol’s lending product, acknowledging that claims of “zero risk of contagion” circulating on social media are “not 100% accurate.” Dhanda noted that some previous posts had portrayed Jupiter Lend’s vaults as “isolated risk,” with one post even stating that “cross-contamination is completely eliminated.” This post was subsequently deleted by the Jupiter team due to backlash. Dhanda said in his statement: “The post we described as having zero risk of infection was completely inaccurate. We wanted to delete it to prevent further spread, but in hindsight, we should have issued a correction at that time.” The controversy was sparked by Fluid co-founder Samyak Jain’s announcement that Jupiter Lend uses rehypothecation for capital efficiency. This means collateral users deposit into vaults can be reused elsewhere within the protocol, meaning the collateral isn’t completely isolated. According to Jain, Jupiter Lend vaults can still be considered “isolated” because each vault has its own configuration, limit, liquidation threshold, and penalty rate. However, this structure does not prevent collateral reuse due to the shared liquidity layer. Dhanda also confirmed the use of rehypothecation, saying, “This mechanism is why these collateral generates returns.” However, Dhanda argued that the vaults are still “internally isolated.” Marius Ciubotariu, co-founder of rival Solana lending protocol Kamino, publicly criticized Jupiter Lend’s design. Kamino recently blocked Jupiter’s financial instrument from accessing Kamino positions. Ciubotariu argued that funds from a user who had pledged SOL collateral were being sent to loop trades and other risky positions, writing: “There’s no isolation here, just complete cross-contamination. Contrary to what’s advertised.” As the debate escalated, Solana Foundation President Lily… The post Solana (SOL) Ecosystem in Turmoil: Two Protocols Collide, Solana Foundation Issues Statement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Discussions on the Jupiter Lend vault design, one of the most talked-about topics in the Solana ecosystem, escalated further over the weekend. Kash Dhanda, Jupiter Exchange’s chief operating officer, released a video statement addressing community concerns regarding the protocol’s lending product, acknowledging that claims of “zero risk of contagion” circulating on social media are “not 100% accurate.” Dhanda noted that some previous posts had portrayed Jupiter Lend’s vaults as “isolated risk,” with one post even stating that “cross-contamination is completely eliminated.” This post was subsequently deleted by the Jupiter team due to backlash. Dhanda said in his statement: “The post we described as having zero risk of infection was completely inaccurate. We wanted to delete it to prevent further spread, but in hindsight, we should have issued a correction at that time.” The controversy was sparked by Fluid co-founder Samyak Jain’s announcement that Jupiter Lend uses rehypothecation for capital efficiency. This means collateral users deposit into vaults can be reused elsewhere within the protocol, meaning the collateral isn’t completely isolated. According to Jain, Jupiter Lend vaults can still be considered “isolated” because each vault has its own configuration, limit, liquidation threshold, and penalty rate. However, this structure does not prevent collateral reuse due to the shared liquidity layer. Dhanda also confirmed the use of rehypothecation, saying, “This mechanism is why these collateral generates returns.” However, Dhanda argued that the vaults are still “internally isolated.” Marius Ciubotariu, co-founder of rival Solana lending protocol Kamino, publicly criticized Jupiter Lend’s design. Kamino recently blocked Jupiter’s financial instrument from accessing Kamino positions. Ciubotariu argued that funds from a user who had pledged SOL collateral were being sent to loop trades and other risky positions, writing: “There’s no isolation here, just complete cross-contamination. Contrary to what’s advertised.” As the debate escalated, Solana Foundation President Lily…

Solana (SOL) Ecosystem in Turmoil: Two Protocols Collide, Solana Foundation Issues Statement

Discussions on the Jupiter Lend vault design, one of the most talked-about topics in the Solana ecosystem, escalated further over the weekend.

Kash Dhanda, Jupiter Exchange’s chief operating officer, released a video statement addressing community concerns regarding the protocol’s lending product, acknowledging that claims of “zero risk of contagion” circulating on social media are “not 100% accurate.”

Dhanda noted that some previous posts had portrayed Jupiter Lend’s vaults as “isolated risk,” with one post even stating that “cross-contamination is completely eliminated.” This post was subsequently deleted by the Jupiter team due to backlash.

Dhanda said in his statement:

The controversy was sparked by Fluid co-founder Samyak Jain’s announcement that Jupiter Lend uses rehypothecation for capital efficiency. This means collateral users deposit into vaults can be reused elsewhere within the protocol, meaning the collateral isn’t completely isolated.

According to Jain, Jupiter Lend vaults can still be considered “isolated” because each vault has its own configuration, limit, liquidation threshold, and penalty rate. However, this structure does not prevent collateral reuse due to the shared liquidity layer.

Dhanda also confirmed the use of rehypothecation, saying, “This mechanism is why these collateral generates returns.” However, Dhanda argued that the vaults are still “internally isolated.”

Marius Ciubotariu, co-founder of rival Solana lending protocol Kamino, publicly criticized Jupiter Lend’s design. Kamino recently blocked Jupiter’s financial instrument from accessing Kamino positions.

Ciubotariu argued that funds from a user who had pledged SOL collateral were being sent to loop trades and other risky positions, writing:

As the debate escalated, Solana Foundation President Lily Liu called on both sides on social media. Liu demanded that Kamino and Jupiter Lend stop targeting each other. Liu noted that the Solana lending market is approximately $5 billion, while Ethereum has a volume 10 times that, and the traditional financial collateral market is much larger.

Liu used the following expressions in his message:

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/solana-sol-ecosystem-in-turmoil-two-protocols-collide-solana-foundation-issues-statement/

Market Opportunity
Solana Logo
Solana Price(SOL)
$81.75
$81.75$81.75
-1.52%
USD
Solana (SOL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Revolutionary Growth In Construction, Capex And Healthcare – ING Report

Revolutionary Growth In Construction, Capex And Healthcare – ING Report

The post Revolutionary Growth In Construction, Capex And Healthcare – ING Report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. AI Sector Analysis: Revolutionary Growth In
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/19 08:29
‘Bad news for bulls’ – Is Bitcoin’s bear market far from over?

‘Bad news for bulls’ – Is Bitcoin’s bear market far from over?

The post ‘Bad news for bulls’ – Is Bitcoin’s bear market far from over? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Journalist Posted: February 19, 2026 Bitcoin has been
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/19 07:49
Best Sit and Go Poker Sites

Best Sit and Go Poker Sites

The post Best Sit and Go Poker Sites appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Like its name implies, Sit and Go tournaments, widely popular as SNG poker events, allow players to jump into the action immediately, appealing to players who prefer not to wait for scheduled games.  These events start as soon as the seats are filled rather than at a set time, ensuring a more spontaneous and fast-paced tournament experience than traditional events with specific start times.  That alone explains why the format has grown increasingly popular among tournament crushers, particularly those with busy schedules. Thankfully, some poker sites offer SNG poker format, delivering the flexibility and convenience that many players crave. But the real question is: which among these platforms offer the most rewarding SNG poker experience? Our team of experts provides answers to that question in this article by recommending one of the best Sit and Go poker sites suitable for both newbies and professionals alike. What is SNG Poker? SNG poker is a tournament format defined by its instant start once the required number of players registers. Unlike scheduled multi-table tournaments, there is no waiting for a specific time. The game kicks off as soon as all seats are taken, typically accommodating six, nine, or ten players. Each entrant pays a fixed buy-in that forms the prize pool. Blinds increase at set intervals, creating pressure and pushing players to adjust strategies as the game progresses. This structure makes the format appealing to those seeking a balance between cash games and longer multi-table events. However, prize distribution depends on the format. In a nine-player setup, for instance, the top three positions typically share the pool, with the largest portion awarded to first place. Heads-up versions pay the entire prize pool to the winner, while other variations distribute rewards across multiple seats. This predictability in payouts adds clarity to bankroll management. The…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:34