Dockerized Azure Functions often fail with 401 errors because the container cannot access file-based secret storage. The fix is to switch to blob-based secret storage, keep the container stateless, and let Azure handle key decryption. This restores authentication without breaking your build.Dockerized Azure Functions often fail with 401 errors because the container cannot access file-based secret storage. The fix is to switch to blob-based secret storage, keep the container stateless, and let Azure handle key decryption. This restores authentication without breaking your build.

How to Fix 401 Unauthorized Errors in Dockerized Azure Functions

2025/12/08 21:45
5 min read

The Problem

You’ve deployed an Azure Function using Docker to production, everything looks good, but when you try to call your function endpoint, you get a frustrating 401 Unauthorized error:

curl -X POST \ "https://my-prod-functions.azurewebsites.net/api/MyFunction?code=my-function-key" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" # Response: 401 Unauthorized

Meanwhile, your non-dockerized development environment works perfectly with the exact same code and keys. What’s going on?

The Investigation

Step 1: Rule Out the Obvious

First, I checked all the usual suspects:

  • Function keys were correct (copied from Portal → Functions → Function Keys)
  • No App Service Authentication enabled
  • No IP restrictions
  • CORS configured properly
  • Authorization level set to AuthorizationLevel.Function in my code.

Step 2: Check the Logs

Application Insights revealed something interesting:

Request successfully matched the route with name 'MyFunction' and template 'api/MyFunction' Executing StatusCodeResult, setting HTTP status code 401

The request was reaching the function and matching the route, but Azure was returning 401 before the code even executed. This meant the issue was at the Azure Functions runtime authentication layer, not in my code.

Step 3: The Critical Discovery

I inspected the environment variables via Kudu console (https://my-functions.scm.azurewebsites.net) and found:

AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType = files WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE = false # I THOUGHT THIS IS THE PROBLEM!

The Root Cause

Here’s what was happening:

How Azure Functions Stores Keys

Azure Functions can store authentication keys in two ways:

  1. File-based storage (AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType = files)
  • Keys stored as JSON files in /home/data/Functions/secrets/
  • Requires persistent file system access
  • Default for non-containerized apps
  1. Blob-based storage (AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType = blob)
  • Keys stored in Azure Blob Storage
  • No file system dependency
  • Recommended for Docker containers

The Docker Conflict

When you set WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE = false (common for stateless Docker containers), Azure does not mount persistent storage to your container.

This means:

  • Your function keys exist in Azure’s storage
  • But your container cannot access them
  • Authentication always fails with 401

Let me verify this in the container:

# SSH into container or via Kudu ls -la /home/data/ # Result: No such file or directory ls -la /azure-functions-host/Secrets/ #Result: No such file or directory

The secrets directory didn’t exist because storage wasn’t mounted!

The Secondary Issue

When I initially tried to fix this by setting WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE = true, authentication worked but I got 404 Not Found instead!

\ Why? Because mounting Azure’s persistent storage at /home/site/wwwroot/ overwrote my Docker container’s application files. The mounted directory only had host.json but no compiled DLLs (in the docker container, not the host container it is very important to keep that in mind there are two containers here the host container and the app docker container) so Azure Functions runtime finds 0 functions to load so When a request comes in Authentication works (keys in blob) but Function not found so we get 404.In short, this option makes the host find the function key files (so authentication works) but loses the functions themselves. We cant use it and WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE needs to be false.

The Solution

The correct fix for Dockerized Azure Functions is to use blob-based secret storage:

Step 1: Change Secret Storage Type

In Azure Portal:

  1. Go to your Function App
  2. Navigate to ConfigurationApplication Settings
  3. Find or add: AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType
  4. Set value to: blob
  5. Ensure: WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE is false

Step 2: Save and Restart

Click Save, then restart the function app. Azure will automatically:

  • Create a azure-webjobs-secrets container in your storage account
  • Migrate existing keys to blob storage
  • Configure the runtime to read from blobs

Step 3: Get Your Keys

Go to Portal → Function App → Functions → [Your Function] → Function Keys

Copy the key from the Portal (this is the decrypted version).

Step 4: Test

curl -X POST \ "https://my-prod-functions.azurewebsites.net/api/MyFunction?code=<KEY_FROM_PORTAL>" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"test": "data"}' # Response: 200 OK

Understanding Key Encryption

When you check blob storage, you’ll see keys stored like this:

{ "keys": [ { "name": "default", "value": "CfDJ8AAAAAAA...encrypted-value...", "encrypted": true } ] }

Important: You cannot use this encrypted value directly! Azure automatically:

  1. Stores keys encrypted in blob storage (for security)
  2. Decrypts them at runtime using machine keys
  3. Validates incoming requests against decrypted values

Always get your keys from the Azure Portal UI, which shows the decrypted version.

Complete Configuration Reference

Dockerfile (Example)

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/azure-functions/dotnet:4 AS base WORKDIR /home/site/wwwroot EXPOSE 80 FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:6.0 AS build WORKDIR /src COPY ["MyFunction/MyFunction.csproj", "MyFunction/"] RUN dotnet restore "MyFunction/MyFunction.csproj" COPY . . WORKDIR "/src/MyFunction" RUN dotnet build "MyFunction.csproj" -c Release -o /app/build FROM build AS publish RUN dotnet publish "MyFunction.csproj" -c Release -o /app/publish FROM base AS final WORKDIR /home/site/wwwroot COPY --from=publish /app/publish . ENV AzureWebJobsScriptRoot=/home/site/wwwroot \ AzureFunctionsJobHost__Logging__Console__IsEnabled=true

\

Required App Settings

# Secret storage configuration AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType = blob AzureWebJobsStorage = <your-storage-connection-string> # Docker configuration WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE = false WEBSITE_RUN_FROM_PACKAGE = 0 # Functions runtime FUNCTIONS_WORKER_RUNTIME = dotnet FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION = ~4

Why This Happens

This issue is specific to Docker + Azure Functions because:

  1. Docker containers should be stateless and immutable
  2. File-based secrets require mounted persistent storage
  3. Mounting storage can overwrite containerized application files
  4. The solution is using blob storage, which is stateless-friendly

Non-dockerized function apps don’t have this problem because they naturally have access to the App Service file system.

Summary

Problem: Dockerized Azure Functions return 401 when using file-based secret storage without mounted volumes.

Solution: Use blob-based secret storage, which is stateless and Docker-friendly.

Key Settings:

AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType = blob WEBSITESENABLEAPPSERVICESTORAGE = false

This configuration allows your Docker container to remain stateless while still securely accessing authentication keys from Azure Blob Storage.


Troubleshooting a similar issue? Feel free to reach out in the comments below!

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

The post CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. An announcement was made by CME Group, the largest derivatives exchanger worldwide, revealed that it would introduce options for Solana and XRP futures. It is the latest addition to CME crypto derivatives as institutions and retail investors increase their demand for Solana and XRP. CME Expands Crypto Offerings With Solana and XRP Options Launch According to a press release, the launch is scheduled for October 13, 2025, pending regulatory approval. The new products will allow traders to access options on Solana, Micro Solana, XRP, and Micro XRP futures. Expiries will be offered on business days on a monthly, and quarterly basis to provide more flexibility to market players. CME Group said the contracts are designed to meet demand from institutions, hedge funds, and active retail traders. According to Giovanni Vicioso, the launch reflects high liquidity in Solana and XRP futures. Vicioso is the Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products for the CME Group. He noted that the new contracts will provide additional tools for risk management and exposure strategies. Recently, CME XRP futures registered record open interest amid ETF approval optimism, reinforcing confidence in contract demand. Cumberland, one of the leading liquidity providers, welcomed the development and said it highlights the shift beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. FalconX, another trading firm, added that rising digital asset treasuries are increasing the need for hedging tools on alternative tokens like Solana and XRP. High Record Trading Volumes Demand Solana and XRP Futures Solana futures and XRP continue to gain popularity since their launch earlier this year. According to CME official records, many have bought and sold more than 540,000 Solana futures contracts since March. A value that amounts to over $22 billion dollars. Solana contracts hit a record 9,000 contracts in August, worth $437 million. Open interest also set a record at 12,500 contracts.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:39
Microsoft Corp. $MSFT blue box area offers a buying opportunity

Microsoft Corp. $MSFT blue box area offers a buying opportunity

The post Microsoft Corp. $MSFT blue box area offers a buying opportunity appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In today’s article, we’ll examine the recent performance of Microsoft Corp. ($MSFT) through the lens of Elliott Wave Theory. We’ll review how the rally from the April 07, 2025 low unfolded as a 5-wave impulse followed by a 3-swing correction (ABC) and discuss our forecast for the next move. Let’s dive into the structure and expectations for this stock. Five wave impulse structure + ABC + WXY correction $MSFT 8H Elliott Wave chart 9.04.2025 In the 8-hour Elliott Wave count from Sep 04, 2025, we saw that $MSFT completed a 5-wave impulsive cycle at red III. As expected, this initial wave prompted a pullback. We anticipated this pullback to unfold in 3 swings and find buyers in the equal legs area between $497.02 and $471.06 This setup aligns with a typical Elliott Wave correction pattern (ABC), in which the market pauses briefly before resuming its primary trend. $MSFT 8H Elliott Wave chart 7.14.2025 The update, 10 days later, shows the stock finding support from the equal legs area as predicted allowing traders to get risk free. The stock is expected to bounce towards 525 – 532 before deciding if the bounce is a connector or the next leg higher. A break into new ATHs will confirm the latter and can see it trade higher towards 570 – 593 area. Until then, traders should get risk free and protect their capital in case of a WXY double correction. Conclusion In conclusion, our Elliott Wave analysis of Microsoft Corp. ($MSFT) suggested that it remains supported against April 07, 2025 lows and bounce from the blue box area. In the meantime, keep an eye out for any corrective pullbacks that may offer entry opportunities. By applying Elliott Wave Theory, traders can better anticipate the structure of upcoming moves and enhance risk management in volatile markets. Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/microsoft-corp-msft-blue-box-area-offers-a-buying-opportunity-202509171323
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:50
SHIB Price Analysis for February 8

SHIB Price Analysis for February 8

The post SHIB Price Analysis for February 8 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Original U.Today article Can traders expect SHIB to test the $0.0000070 range soon
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/09 00:26