The post Ripple CTO Lists Six Pain Points in Buying Private Stocks as IPO Talk Heats Up appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple’s latest streak of big deals has pushed IPO talk back into the market, and as more investors try to grab pre-IPO exposure through secondary brokers, Ripple CTO David Schwartz stepped in with a reality check, laying out six pain points that shape private-stock buying today — not because they are tied to Ripple but because these issues show up every time enthusiasm runs ahead of how the secondary market actually works. First, there is the issue of pricing, where secondary brokers often give solid-looking quotes based on partial or unreliable data. This means buyers walk into negotiations without knowing if the “market price” they are shown has any real basis. You Might Also Like Since brokers make more when the price is higher, and sellers want the same, the buyer ends up as the only one keeping the numbers in check. This makes a simple deal into a slow and lopsided process. (None of this is Ripple specific at all and I definitely don’t want to either encourage or discourage anyone to or from buying or selling Ripple stock on secondary markets.) There are a few serious issues with buying stock in privately held companies through secondary market… — David ‘JoelKatz’ Schwartz (@JoelKatz) December 10, 2025 Schwartz also mentioned the information gap, since private companies do not publish anything like public market disclosures, leaving buyers with hardly any visibility.  Meanwhile, insiders — who usually know a lot more and are often the ones selling — sit on the other side of the trade. This creates a setup where the buyer is always playing catch-up. Execution matters too The tricky part is that deals can drag on for weeks because of ROFR steps, company approvals or administrative delays. This leaves buyers waiting while market conditions change around them. And once you add in… The post Ripple CTO Lists Six Pain Points in Buying Private Stocks as IPO Talk Heats Up appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple’s latest streak of big deals has pushed IPO talk back into the market, and as more investors try to grab pre-IPO exposure through secondary brokers, Ripple CTO David Schwartz stepped in with a reality check, laying out six pain points that shape private-stock buying today — not because they are tied to Ripple but because these issues show up every time enthusiasm runs ahead of how the secondary market actually works. First, there is the issue of pricing, where secondary brokers often give solid-looking quotes based on partial or unreliable data. This means buyers walk into negotiations without knowing if the “market price” they are shown has any real basis. You Might Also Like Since brokers make more when the price is higher, and sellers want the same, the buyer ends up as the only one keeping the numbers in check. This makes a simple deal into a slow and lopsided process. (None of this is Ripple specific at all and I definitely don’t want to either encourage or discourage anyone to or from buying or selling Ripple stock on secondary markets.) There are a few serious issues with buying stock in privately held companies through secondary market… — David ‘JoelKatz’ Schwartz (@JoelKatz) December 10, 2025 Schwartz also mentioned the information gap, since private companies do not publish anything like public market disclosures, leaving buyers with hardly any visibility.  Meanwhile, insiders — who usually know a lot more and are often the ones selling — sit on the other side of the trade. This creates a setup where the buyer is always playing catch-up. Execution matters too The tricky part is that deals can drag on for weeks because of ROFR steps, company approvals or administrative delays. This leaves buyers waiting while market conditions change around them. And once you add in…

Ripple CTO Lists Six Pain Points in Buying Private Stocks as IPO Talk Heats Up

2025/12/10 18:54

Ripple’s latest streak of big deals has pushed IPO talk back into the market, and as more investors try to grab pre-IPO exposure through secondary brokers, Ripple CTO David Schwartz stepped in with a reality check, laying out six pain points that shape private-stock buying today — not because they are tied to Ripple but because these issues show up every time enthusiasm runs ahead of how the secondary market actually works.

First, there is the issue of pricing, where secondary brokers often give solid-looking quotes based on partial or unreliable data. This means buyers walk into negotiations without knowing if the “market price” they are shown has any real basis.

You Might Also Like

Since brokers make more when the price is higher, and sellers want the same, the buyer ends up as the only one keeping the numbers in check. This makes a simple deal into a slow and lopsided process.

Schwartz also mentioned the information gap, since private companies do not publish anything like public market disclosures, leaving buyers with hardly any visibility. 

Meanwhile, insiders — who usually know a lot more and are often the ones selling — sit on the other side of the trade. This creates a setup where the buyer is always playing catch-up.

Execution matters too

The tricky part is that deals can drag on for weeks because of ROFR steps, company approvals or administrative delays. This leaves buyers waiting while market conditions change around them. And once you add in the fees — 5% for the buyer and 5% for the seller, included in the buyer’s final cost — it is no longer a shortcut to an IPO.

It becomes a long, expensive detour, where excitement does not make things any easier.

Source: https://u.today/ripple-cto-lists-six-pain-points-in-buying-private-stocks-as-ipo-talk-heats-up

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28