OKX CEO Star Xu has advice for decentralized exchange (DEX) products after a weekend of security risks being exposed in exploits. The exchange executive highlightedOKX CEO Star Xu has advice for decentralized exchange (DEX) products after a weekend of security risks being exposed in exploits. The exchange executive highlighted

OKX’s Star Xu fires a shot at DEX products, calls for CEX-standard security

2025/12/28 23:10
3 min read

OKX CEO Star Xu has advice for decentralized exchange (DEX) products after a weekend of security risks being exposed in exploits. The exchange executive highlighted the need for them to meet the same rigorous standards that centralized exchanges (CEXs) are subjected to. 

According to Xu, a lot of existing DEX bot products require that users upload their private keys to centralized servers, where they are stored in plaintext or decryptable form.

In Xu’s estimation, he believes that it creates a centralized private key risk that elevates their vulnerability to the level of CEXs in the case of a compromise. Because of this, Xu says there is a need for such products to be able to meet exchange-level security standards to protect their users.

As far as he is concerned, products like DEXs and DEX bots are not truly self-custodial in the way they’re touted to be and, as a result, can potentially trigger regulatory obligations like KYC/AML in many jurisdictions as crypto continues to signal adoption.

OKX’s Star Xu fires a shot at DEX products

In Xu’s post, he outlines wallet compromise risks, including code vulnerabilities, data leakages, and device malware, while highlighting some solutions the team at OKX is working on to address these issues, like the concept of smart accounts.

According to documentation, smart accounts are a feature the team plans to introduce on the OKX wallet and will utilize TEE technology to automate trading custody keys, proving that security and usability don’t have to be mutually exclusive.

For now, Xu says OKX Pay is still a conceptual product. However, over the next year, he says the team will continue to introduce more powerful capabilities to better safeguard asset security for ordinary users.

Xu’s comment comes after hacking incidents reported by Cryptopolitan over the weekend that targeted DeBot, a DEX trading bot, and Flow, an L1 built for consumer apps, resulting in the loss of millions.

How much was lost in the Flow exploit?

According to a recent update from the Flow team, an attacker targeted a vulnerability in its execution layer and moved approximately $3.9M in assets off-network before validators caught it and executed a coordinated halt.

The Foundation’s security team confirmed $3.9 million got drained, primarily routed through bridges Celer, Debridge, Relay, and Stargate.

The attacker’s wallet has been identified and flagged, and active laundering via Thorchain/Chainflip is reportedly being tracked in real-time with freeze requests submitted to Circle, Tether, and major exchanges. Forensic analysis is also ongoing.

The team claims containment is now complete as well, with the network halt validators implemented, severing exit paths while remediation is in progress. No further unauthorized activity is allegedly possible.

According to the post, the confirmed funds exited represent a manageable amount and do not threaten network solvency or user funds. As such, the immediate priority is remediation and a safe restart.

As for when a restart can be expected, the team claims there is already a protocol fix in place that is about to enter final validation. The restart is scheduled to happen within hours pending a successful testnet validation. However, it will not happen until the fix has been fully validated.

Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today

Market Opportunity
Starpower Logo
Starpower Price(STAR)
$0.0774
$0.0774$0.0774
+0.06%
USD
Starpower (STAR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00