The Flow protocol can’t seem to catch a break, as Huobi HTX, an exchange linked to Justin Sun, publicly condemned the project’s recovery plans after it sufferedThe Flow protocol can’t seem to catch a break, as Huobi HTX, an exchange linked to Justin Sun, publicly condemned the project’s recovery plans after it suffered

Huobi HTX has called out the Flow network for creating an isolated recovery plan

The Flow protocol can’t seem to catch a break, as Huobi HTX, an exchange linked to Justin Sun, publicly condemned the project’s recovery plans after it suffered close to a $4 million exploit. 

An update shared via the Huobi official site detailed the major security incident that occurred on the Flow network in December last year, and claimed that after the incident, Huobi HTX immediately attempted to verify the situation by reaching out to the team and providing abnormal price monitoring and on-chain data.

Huobi criticizes Flow’s recovery plans

The report claims that after the project team confirmed the security incident, Huobi HTX continued to provide assistance to the project team in risk management and on-chain tracking, including providing relevant address information and related recharge information.

Through this process, Huobi HTX’s risk control and monitoring system continuously tracked abnormal capital flows and took restrictive measures on identifiable hacker-related assets to prevent further inflows into the market as much as possible while protecting the overall interests of currency holders.

However, the report claims that without fully communicating with the exchange and the community, the Flow project party decided to unilaterally promote its so-called “Isolated Recovery” plan through protocol layer authority.

Without mastering the private key, the team directly forcibly transferred its identified FLOW assets from centralized exchange addresses, including Huobi HTX. These assets included a large number of normal user positions obtained via real market transactions, and they were going to be unilaterally destroyed on January 30, 2026, according to plans announced by the team.

Huobi claims the approach not only seriously deviates from the decentralization principle that the blockchain should have, but it also fails to fully consider the legitimate rights and interests of the platform and its regular users.

Huobi HTX claims it was acting in the best interest of users and its community and continued to invest resources in monitoring, tracking, and coordination, striving to minimize the potential impact on users in a highly uncertain environment.

It has said it will continue to urge the Flow project team to handle this incident more transparently and responsibly, while fully respecting the legitimate rights and interests of users, exchange custody assets, and publish a complete and auditable post-analysis report.

The exchange has also said it will continue to synchronize the progress of the incident with users, and will provide explanations and follow-up as soon as possible in any situation that may affect users’ asset rights.

The collateral damage from the Flow exploit 

The hack that disrupted the Flow ecosystem went down on December 27, 2025.

The hacker minted counterfeit or duplicate tokens, which led to about $3.9 million in assets being drained and bridged out to other chains. To be clear, the exploit did not affect legitimate user deposits and balances; it only created fake assets.

In the days that followed, the Flow team claimed there was no other logical way forward than to initiate a rollback that would restore the network to a pre-hack state while removing unauthorized transactions from the ledger.

The rollback raised eyebrows and critics like Alex Smirnov, whose company, deBridge, is integrated with Flow, alleged the team had reached the decision to effect a rollback without communicating or coordinating with his platform, even though it had claimed they were synchronizing with critical partners.

After consulting, the foundation altered course, switching to a targeted recovery approach that saw it maintain most valid transactions on-chain and only process transactions that failed to act correctly. The plan saw affected accounts temporarily frozen as forensic analysis was carried out to identify and fully remediate the illicitly minted tokens.

The foundation called it the “scalpel” approach and claimed it would enable them to resolve the issue while staying true to their principles of decentralization.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Market Opportunity
HTX DAO Logo
HTX DAO Price(HTX)
$0,00000175
$0,00000175$0,00000175
-0,28%
USD
HTX DAO (HTX) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

The post QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. QNT’s MACD histogram showing a positive trend and RSI stabilizing in the neutral zone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 23:54
SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

The post SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu is forming a death cross
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 00:26